Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 274-572-7 | CAS number: 70331-94-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20 May 2015 to 18 June 2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study performed in accordance with OECD & EU test guidelines in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method C.4-C (Determination of the "Ready" Biodegradability - Carbon Dioxide Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
None specified - Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- Source: The source of test organisms was activated sludge freshly obtained from a municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap Aa en Maas', 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.
Treatment: The freshly obtained sludge was kept under continuous aeration until further treatment. The concentration of suspended solids was determined to be 4.1 g/l in the concentrated sludge. Before use, the sludge was allowed to settle (31 minutes) and the supernatant liquid was used as inoculum at the amount of 10 ml/l of mineral medium.
Reason for selection: The test has been accepted internationally for determining the 'ready' biodegradability of test substances under aerobic conditions. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 17.4 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 12 mg/L
- Based on:
- ThOD/L
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- Test concentration and preparation of test solutions
1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] was a white powder with a purity of 99.0%. The test substance was tested in duplicate at a target concentration of 17.4 mg/l, corresponding to 12 mg TOC/l. The organic carbon content was based on the molecular formula.
Since the test substance was not sufficiently soluble to allow preparation of an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 g/l, weighed amounts were added to the 2-litres test bottles containing medium with microbial organisms and mineral components (test substance bottle A: 34.6 mg; test substance bottle B: 35.1 mg and toxicity control bottle: 35.0 mg). To this end, 10 ml of Milli-RO water was added to each weighing bottle containing the test substance. After vigorous mixing (vortex) the resulting suspension was added quantitatively to the test medium. The test solutions were continuously stirred during the test. Furthermore, the test medium was daily swirled around to ensure optimal contact between the test substance and test medium, since the test substance tended to float on the water surface.
Reference substance concentration and preparation of test solutions
A solution of sodium acetate was prepared by dissolving 400.9 mg in Milli-RO water and making this up to a total volume of 100 ml. Volumes of 20 ml from this stock solution were added to 2 litres of the test medium of the positive control bottle and the toxicity control bottle, resulting in a final concentration of 40 mg sodium acetate per litre (12 mg TOC/l).
Test procedure and conditions
Test duration: 28 days (last CO2 measurement on day 29). During the test period, the test media were aerated and stirred continuously.
Test vessels: 2 litre glass brown coloured bottles.
Milli-RO water: Tap-water purified by reverse osmosis (Milli-RO) and subsequently passed over activated carbon.
Stock solutions of mineral components:
A) 8.50 g KH2PO4 ; 21.75 g K2HPO4 ; 67.20 g Na2HPO4.12H2O; 0.50 g NH4Cl - dissolved in Milli-RO water and made up to 1 litre, pH 7.4 ± 0.2
B) 22.50 g MgSO4.7H2O dissolved in Milli-RO water and made up to 1 litre.
C) 36.40 g CaCl2.2H2O dissolved in Milli-RO water and made up to 1 litre.
D) 0.25 g FeCl3.6H2O dissolved in Milli-RO water and made up to 1 litre.
Mineral medium: 1 litre mineral medium contains: 10 ml of solution (A), 1 ml of solutions (B) to (D) and Milli-RO water.
Barium hydroxide: 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2 (Boom, Meppel, The Netherlands), stored in a sealed vessel to prevent absorption of CO2 from the air.
Synthetic air (CO2 < 1 ppm): A mixture of oxygen (ca. 20%) and nitrogen (ca. 80%) was passed through a bottle, containing 0.5 - 1 litre 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2 solution to trap CO2 which might be present in small amounts. The synthetic air was sparged through the scrubbing solutions at a rate of approximately 1-2 bubbles per second (ca. 30-100 ml/min).
Illumination: The test media were excluded from light.
Preparation of bottles
Pre-incubation medium: The day before the start of the test (day -1) mineral components, Milli-RO water (ca. 80% of final volume) and inoculum (1% of final volume) were added to each bottle. This mixture was aerated with synthetic air overnight to purge the system of CO2.
Type and number of bottles:
Test suspension: containing test substance and inoculum (2 bottles).
Inoculum blank: containing only inoculum (2 bottles)
Positive control: containing reference substance and inoculum (1 bottle).
Toxicity control: containing test substance, reference substance and inoculum (1 bottle).
Preparation: At the start of the test (day 0), test and reference substance were added to the bottles containing the microbial organisms and mineral components.
The volumes of suspensions were made up to 2 litres with Milli-RO water, resulting in the mineral medium described before.
Three CO2-absorbers (bottles filled with 100 ml 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2) were connected in series to the exit air line of each test bottle.
Determination of CO2
Experimental CO2 production: The CO2 produced in each test bottle reacted with the barium hydroxide in the gas scrubbing bottle and precipitated out as barium carbonate. The amount of CO2 produced was determined by titrating the remaining Ba(OH)2 with 0.05 M standardized HCl (1:20 dilution from 1 M HCl (Titrisol® ampoule), Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
Measurements: Titrations were made every second or third day during the first 10 days, and thereafter at least every fifth day until day 28, for the inoculum blank and test suspension. Titrations for the positive and toxicity control were made over a period of at least 14 days.
Each time the CO2-absorber nearest to the test bottle was removed for titration; each of the remaining two absorbers was moved one position in the direction of the test bottle. A new CO2-absorber was placed at the far end of the series. Phenolphthalein (1% solution in ethanol, Merck) was used as pH-indicator.
On day 28, the pH of all test suspensions was measured and 1 ml of concentrated HCl (37%, Merck) was added to the bottles of the inoculum blank and test suspension. The bottles were aerated overnight to drive off CO2 present in the test suspension. The final titration was made on day 29.
Theoretical CO2 production: The theoretical CO2 production was calculated from the molecular formula.
Measurements and recording
pH: At the start of the test (day 0) and on day 28, before addition of concentrated HCl. The pH of the toxicity control was not measured on day 28.
Temperature of medium: Continuously in a vessel with Milli-RO water in the same room.
Electronic data capture
Observations/measurements in the study were recorded electronically using the following programme "Rees Centron Environmental Monitoring system version SQL 2.0 (REES Scientific, Trenton, NJ, USA): Temperature." - Reference substance:
- acetic acid, sodium salt
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- > 0 - < 2
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- Theoretical CO2 production
The ThCO2 of 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] was calculated to be 2.53 mg CO2/mg.
The ThCO2 of sodium acetate was calculated to be 1.07 mg CO2/mg.
Biodegradation
The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed no significant biodegradation of 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] (0% and 2%, based on ThCO2).
In the toxicity control, more than 25% biodegradation occurred within 14 days (38%, based on ThCO2 of the test and positive control substances combined). Therefore, the test substance was assumed not to inhibit microbial activity.
Functioning of the test system was checked by testing the reference substance sodium acetate, which showed a normal biodegradation curve. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
- Conclusions:
- 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] was designated as not readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
Determination of ‘ready’ biodegradability: carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution test (modified Sturm test) of 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat].
The study procedures described in this report were based on the OECD guideline No. 301 B, 1992. In addition, the procedures were designed to meet the test methods of the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 of 30 May 2008, Publication No. L142, Part C.4-C, ISO 9439, 1999 and ISO 10634, 1995.
The test substance was a white powder with a purity of 99.0%. The test substance was tested in duplicate at a target concentration of 17.4 mg/l, corresponding to 12 mg TOC/l. The organic carbon content was based on the molecular formula. The Theoretical CO2production (ThCO2) of the test substance was calculated to be 2.53 mg CO2/mg.
The study consisted of six bottles:
- 2 inoculum blanks (no test substance),
- 2 test bottles (test substance),
- 1 positive control (sodium acetate) and
- 1 toxicity control (test substance plus sodium acetate).
Since the test substance was not sufficiently soluble to allow preparation of an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 g/l, weighed amounts were added to the 2-litres test bottles containing medium with microbial organisms and mineral components. To this end, 10 ml of Milli-RO water was added to each weighing bottle containing the test substance. After vigorous mixing (vortex) the resulting suspension was added quantitatively to the test medium. The test solutions were continuously stirred during the test, to ensure optimal contact between the test substance and the test organisms. Test duration was 28 days (last CO2-measurement on day 29).
The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed no significant biodegradation of 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] (0% and 2%, based on ThCO2).
In the toxicity control, the test substance was found not to inhibit microbial activity.
Since all criteria for acceptability of the test were met, this study was considered to be valid.
In conclusion, 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] was designated as not readily biodegradable.
Reference
pH values of different test media
Test medium: |
At the start of the test: |
On day 28: |
Blank control (A) |
7.8 →17.6 |
7.7 |
Blank control (B) |
7.8 →17.6 |
7.7 |
Positive control |
7.8 →17.6 |
8.0 |
Test substance (A) |
7.8 →17.6 |
7.7 |
Test substance (B) |
7.8 →17.6 |
7.7 |
Toxicity control |
7.8 →17.6 |
N.D. |
1 Adjusted using 1 M HCI (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany)
N.D. Not determined.
NOTES: Except for the percentages biodegradation, all calculations are performed without rounding off. Produced CO2: negative values are expressed as 0.00 ml HCI.
HCI titrated in duplicate blank bottles
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
||
Blank A |
Blank B |
Mean Value |
|
2 5 7 9 14 19 23 27 29 29 29 |
45.27 43.50 44.61 41.39 44.42 42.91 41.33 42.36 44.01 47.56 48.76 |
45.72 44.73 45.38 45.67 43.85 43.70 42.94 42.80 45.30 48.99 49.32 |
45.50 44.12 45.00 43.53 44.14 43.31 42.14 42.58 44.66 48.28 49.04 |
HCI titrated in Ba(OH)2solution (background bottles)
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
||
Bottle A |
Bottle B |
Mean Value |
|
2 5 7 9 14 19 23 27 29 29 29 |
47.51 47.75 47.36 46.41 47.99 48.08 48.63 49.55 50.55 51.81 49.80 |
47.91 48.28 46.71 48.41 48.01 46.78 49.05 50.24 51.43 51.29 50.33 |
47.71 48.02 47.04 47.41 48.00 47.43 48.84 49.90 50.99 51.55 50.07 |
CO2production in the blank
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCI) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
|
Ba(OH)21) |
Blank (mean) |
||||
2 5 7 9 14 19 23 27 29 29 29 |
47.71 48.02 47.04 47.41 48.00 47.43 48.84 49.90 50.99 51.55 50.07 |
45.50 44.12 45.00 43.53 44.14 43.31 42.14 43.58 44.66 48.28 49.04 |
2.21 3.90 2.04 3.88 3.86 4.13 6.71 7.32 6.33 3.27 1.03 |
2.4 4.3 2.2 4.3 4.3 4.5 7.4 8.0 7.0 3.6 1.1 |
2.4 6.7 9.0 13.2 17.5 22.0 29.4 37.5 44.4 48.0 49.1 |
1)“Strength” of untreated 0.0125 M Ba(OH)2solution
CO2production and percentage biodegradation of the positive control substance
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCI) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1)(%) |
|
Blank (mean) |
Positive control |
|||||
2 5 7 9 14 |
45.50 44.12 45.00 43.53 44.14 |
35.31 23.06 36.30 41.42 36.62 |
10.19 21.06 8.70 2.11 7.52 |
11.2 23.2 9.6 2.3 8.3 |
11.2 34.4 43.9 46.2 54.5 |
13 40 51 54 64 |
1)Calculated as the ratio between CO2produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2of sodium acetate: 85.8 mg CO2/2l
CO2production and percentage biodegradation of the test substance (bottle A)
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCI) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1)(%) |
|
Blank (mean) |
Bottle A |
|||||
2 5 7 9 14 19 23 27 29 29 29 |
45.50 44.12 45.00 43.53 44.14 43.31 42.14 42.58 44.66 48.28 49.04 |
46.17 45.45 46.13 46.25 43.27 44.11 45.41 43.65 46.94 47.30 49.98 |
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.00 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 |
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 |
1)Calculated as the ratio between CO2produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2of the test substance: 87.5 mg CO2/2l
CO2production and percentage biodegradation of the test substance (bottle B)
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCI) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1)(%) |
|
Blank (mean) |
Bottle B |
|||||
2 5 7 9 14 19 23 27 29 29 29 |
45.50 44.12 45.00 43.53 44.14 43.31 42.14 42.58 44.66 48.28 49.04 |
46.19 45.46 46.10 44.69 44.29 44.90 43.76 43.87 46.18 48.36 48.66 |
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.38 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 |
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
1)Calculated as the ratio between CO2produced (cumulative) and the ThCO2of the test substance: 88.8 mg CO2/2l
CO2production and percentage biodegradation of the toxicity control
Day |
HCI (0.05 N) titrated (ml) |
Produced CO2 (ml HCI) |
Produced CO2 (mg) |
Cumulative CO2 (mg) |
Biodegradation1)(%) |
|
Blank (mean) |
Toxicity control |
|||||
2 5 7 9 14 |
45.50 44.12 45.00 43.53 44.14 |
35.31 18.06 32.15 39.00 37.38 |
10.19 26.06 12.85 4.53 6.76 |
11.2 28.7 14.1 5.0 7.4 |
11.2 39.9 54.0 59.0 66.4 |
6 23 31 34 38 |
1)Calculated as the ratio between CO2produced (cumulative) and the sum of the ThCO2of the test substance and positive control: 174.3 mg CO2/2l (ThCO2test substance: 88.6 mg CO2/2l + ThCO2sodium acetate: 85.8 mg CO2/2l)
Comparison of biodegradation of the test substance in bottles A and B
Day |
Biodegradation (%) |
|||
Bottle A |
Bottle B |
Mean A and B |
∆ A-B1) |
|
2 5 7 9 14 19 23 27 29 29 29 |
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 |
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 |
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 |
0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 |
1)Absolute difference in biodegradation between bottles A and B
Description of key information
Key value determined in GLP laboratory study in accordance with OECD Guideline 301 B and EU Method C.4-C.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Additional information
Determination of ‘ready’ biodegradability: carbon dioxide (CO2) evolution test (modified Sturm test) of 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat].
The test substance was tested in duplicate at a target concentration of 17.4 mg/l, corresponding to 12 mg TOC/l. The organic carbon content was based on the molecular formula. The Theoretical CO2production (ThCO2) of the test substance was calculated to be 2.53 mg CO2/mg.
The study consisted of six bottles:
- 2 inoculum blanks (no test substance),
- 2 test bottles (test substance),
- 1 positive control (sodium acetate) and
- 1 toxicity control (test substance plus sodium acetate).
Since the test substance was not sufficiently soluble to allow preparation of an aqueous solution at a concentration of 1 g/l, weighed amounts were added to the 2-litres test bottles containing medium with microbial organisms and mineral components. To this end, 10 ml of Milli-RO water was added to each weighing bottle containing the test substance. After vigorous mixing (vortex) the resulting suspension was added quantitatively to the test medium. The test solutions were continuously stirred during the test, to ensure optimal contact between the test substance and the test organisms. Test duration was 28 days (last CO2-measurement on day 29).
The relative biodegradation values calculated from the measurements performed during the test period revealed no significant biodegradation of 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] (0% and 2%, based on ThCO2).
In the toxicity control, the test substance was found not to inhibit microbial activity.
In conclusion, 1,2-Dioxoethylen)bis(iminoethylen)bis[3-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propionat] was designated as not readily biodegradable.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.