Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-580-1 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Actual guideline method. GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 008
- Report date:
- 2008
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]propane-1-sulfonic acid
- Cas Number:
- 14235-54-2
- Molecular formula:
- C5H14N2O3S
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]propane-1-sulfonic acid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
- Composition of test material, percentage of components:
48.5 % (w/w) 3-[(2-aminoethyl)ammonio]propane-1-sulfonate
51.5 % water
- Lot/batch No.: 06060423/101
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: 79 % RPMI 1640 with L-glutamine, 20 % Fetal Bovine Serum (heat inactivated), 1 % Penicillin-Streptomycin (10000 µg/mL Penicillin, 10000 µg/mL Streptomycin)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.067, 0.202, 0.607, 1.822 mg/mL
1.822 mg/mL as the highest test substance concentration is 0.01M and was chosen in accordance with the EC directive and the OECD guideline. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: RPMI1640 for 3 hours treatment, medium for 20 hours treatment
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RPMI1640 for 3 hours treatment, medium for 20 hours treatment
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RPMI1640 for 3 hours treatment, medium for 20 hours treatment
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- controls-treatment without metabolic activation system
Migrated to IUCLID6: treatment without metabolic activation system
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RPMI1640 for 3 hours treatment
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RPMI1640 for 3 hours treatment
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- controls-treatment with metabolic activation system
Migrated to IUCLID6: treatment with metabolic activation system
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 h
- Exposure duration: with and without metabolism: 3 h, without metabolism: 20 h
- Further culture period: 15 h
- Colcemid treatment: 2 h
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa solution (10 % v/v in a buffer of 0.067 M KH2PO4 and 0.067 M Na2HPO4 x 2 H2O in deionised water)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: In general, apart from cultures with very few metaphases or with obviously high numbers of metaphases with aberrations, 100 metaphases per culture were analysed for structural and numerical chromosomal aberrations.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index: The mitotic indices were determined by counting a total of 2000 lymphocytes per cell culture and by recording the number of lymphocytes in any stage of mitosis. This number was then expressed as percentage of mitotic lymphocytes. In cultures where no mitoses were noted at all, the number of lymphocytes was not evaluated. - Evaluation criteria:
- • the number of metaphases with numerical aberrations (< 46 chromosomes, > 46 chromosomes, tetraploidy, endoreduplication)
• the number of metaphases with structural aberrations, excluding gaps
• the number of chromatid-type aberrations, excluding gaps
• the number of chromosome-type aberrations, excluding gaps
• the number of gaps (chromatid- and isochromatid-type). - Statistics:
- Chi2-Test or Fisher’s Exact Test
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- 20 h treatment, in the highest and second highest concentration (1,822 and 0,607 mg/mL)
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
-
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
All relevant figures were within the range of historical negative controls.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No marked cytotoxicity (reduction of mitotic indices by more than 50 %, compared to concurrent negative controls) was noted at any of the concentrations tested. The highest tested concentration was 0.01M and thus in accordance with the EC directive and the OECD guideline.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Cytotoxicity
No marked cytotoxicity was noted in any experiment.
Experiment without a metabolic activation system, 3 hours of incubation:
test substance concentration in mg/mL |
0,067 | 0,202 | 0,607 | 1,822 |
mitotic index (% of respective negative control) |
100,0 | 93,8 | 106,8 | 80,2 |
Experiment without a metabolic activation system, 20 hours of incubation:
test substance concentration in mg/mL |
0,067 | 0,202 | 0,607 | 1,822 |
mitotic index (% of respective negative control) |
138,8 | 136,0 | 125,9 | 178,4 |
Experiments with a metabolic activation system, 3 hours of incubation:
test substance concentration in mg/mL |
0,067 | 0,202 | 0,607 | 0,607 | 1,822 | 1,822 |
mitotic index (% of respective negative control) |
79,2 | 73,9 | 71,4 | 136,9 | 71,1 | 116,2 |
Numerical aberrations
In experiment B without a metabolic activation system and a treatment length of 20 hours the number of metaphases with less than 46 chromosomes was statistically significantly lower at the low test substance concentration of 0.202 mg/mL compared to the concurrent negative controls.
No statistically significant differences in the number of metaphases with numerical aberrations were noted in any other experiment performed at any concentration analysed compared to the concurrent negative controls, regardless whether a metabolic activation system was used or not.
Structural aberrations
In experiment B without a metabolic activation system and a treatment length of 20 hours the number of metaphases with structural aberrations was statistically significantly higher at test substance concentrations of 0.607 and 1.822 mg/mL than in the corresponding negative controls (12/200 and 11/200 versus 2/200). The figures were also clearly beyond the data of historical negative controls. No such increase was noted at the lowest test concentration analysed (0.202 mg/mL, 4/200) and there was no clear concentration-response relationship.
In the same experiment uncommon types of aberrations were seen: two pulverisations of chromosomes at 1.822 mg/mL and one centric ring at the low concentration of 0.202 mg/mL.
No marked or statistically significant increases in the number of metaphases with structural aberrations were noted in any other experiment performed at any concentration analysed compared to the concurrent negative controls, regardless whether a metabolic activation system was used or not. All figures were within the range of historical negative controls.
Gaps
In experiment B without a metabolic activation system and a treatment length of 20 hours the number of gaps was statistically significantly higher at test substance concentrations of 0.607 and 1.822 mg/mL than in the corresponding negative controls (11/200 and 9/200 versus 0/200). The figures were also clearly beyond the data of historical negative controls. No such increase was noted at the lowest test concentration analysed (0.202 mg/mL, 2/200) and there was no clear concentration-response relationship.
No other statistically significant increases in the number of gaps were noted in any experiment performed at any concentration analysed compared to the concurrent negative controls, regardless whether a metabolic activation system was used or not.
Positive controls
The positive control substances caused clearly higher numbers of metaphases with structural aberrations (statistically significant) than found in the negative controls, without as well as with the use of a metabolic activation system, thus demonstrating that the test systems were adequate and that the metabolic activation system functioned properly.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
positive without metabolic activation 20 h treatment, in the highest and second highest concentration
The overall results of the study indicate clastogenic properties of the test substance at the extended treatment length of 20 hours and without the use of a metabolic activation system. - Executive summary:
"3-[(2-aminoethyl)ammonio]propane-1-sulfonate"did not cause marked cytotoxic effects (reduction of mitotic indices by more than 50 %, compared to concurrent negative controls) at any of the concentrations tested. The highest tested concentration was 0.01M and thus in accordance with the EC directive and the OECD guideline.
Statistically significantly higher numbers of metaphases with less than 46 chromosomes at the low test substance concentration of 0.202 mg/mL in one experiment are regarded as a random event without biological relevance.
There was, under the conditions of this study, relevant evidence that"3-[(2-aminoethyl)ammonio]propane-1-sulfonate"did induce structural chromosomal aberrations in cultured human lymphocytes after a treatment length of 20 hours and in the absence of a metabolic activation system, although there was no clear concentration-response relationship. The conclusion is mainly based on a statistically significant increase of metaphases with structural aberrations at the highest and the second highest test substance concentration (1.822 and 0.607 mg/mL) and on the fact that these figures were far beyond the range of historical negative controls. An additional indication for clastogenic effects in this single experiment is the scattered occurence of rare types of structural aberrations (pulverisations and a centric ring), also at the low test substance concentration (0.202 mg/mL). Gaps are not necessarily an indicator for clastogenic effects, but at the highest and the second highest test substance concentration the number of gaps was also increased.
No marked or statistically significant increase in the number of metaphases with aberrations was noted in any other experiment, neither with nor without a metabolic activation system. All relevant figures were within the range of historical negative controls.
The overall results of the study indicate clastogenic properties of the test substance at the extended treatment length of 20 hours and without the use of a metabolic activation system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.