Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Remarks:
Keratinosens
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
without impact on the study conclusion (experimentation was redone due to a technical error which made results uninterpretable).
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: ECVAM DB-ALM protocol 155: KeratinoSensTM
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
activation of keratinocytes
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Alternative methods are recommended first before performing the LLNA test.

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Caramel (color)
EC Number:
232-435-9
EC Name:
Caramel (color)
Cas Number:
8028-89-5
Molecular formula:
C6H12OH
IUPAC Name:
Caramel

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
Cells (KeratinoSens™) are cultured in maintenance medium at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells are exempt of mycoplasma. Cells were used at passage 17 in repetition 1 and passage 19 in repetition 2.

Test item
The test item was tested at 12 concentrations according to a geometric progression of ratio 2 from 0.2 μg/ml to 400 μg/ml.

Reference item
Negative control: 6 wells of solvent control (1% DMSO in treatment medium) with cells and 1 well of solvent control without cell by culture plate.
Positive control: 5 concentrations of cinnamaldehyde on each culture plate. The concentration varies from 4 to 64 μM according to a geometric progression of ratio 2.

The study was composed of two independent repetitions. For each repetition the test item and the reference items were replicated on three independent plates for the measurement of induction and two plates for the measurement of cytotoxicity. Each repetition was performed on a different day with fresh stock solution.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control (cinnamaldehyde) gave the following results:
-EC1.5 = 7.19 (geometric mean)
-Imax = 6.36

In vitro / in chemico

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: repetition 1
Parameter:
other: EC1.5 (ug/mL)
Value:
200
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Run / experiment:
other: repetition 2
Parameter:
other: EC1.5 (ug/mL)
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Remarks:
EC1.5 was not calculated since Imax was lower than 1.5
Other effects / acceptance of results:
The positive control (cinnamaldehyde) fulfilled the acceptability criteria of the study:
-the gene induction was statistically significant above the threshold of 1.5 in at least one dose
-the EC1.5 value was between historical data of the laboratory: mean EC1.5 value ± 2 SD
-the average induction, in each repetition, for cinnamaldehyde at 64 μM was between 2 and 8.

The negative control (control solvent) fulfilled the acceptability criteria of the study:
For each repetition, the coefficient of variation (CV) of the solvent controls (3 x 6 wells) was less than 20% (Repetition 1: CV of 16.1 and Repetition 2: CV of 17.3)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the retained experimental conditions, Caramel E150 C may be classified as not skin sensitizer.
The test method KeratinoSensTM is considered scientifically valid to be used as part of an integrated approaches to testing and assessment, to support the identification of the sensitization potential of test item for hazard classification and labeling purposes.