Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From April 16th to May 16, 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
1981
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
An in vivo non-LLNA study was already available, therefore data was used for assessment

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reference Substance 02
IUPAC Name:
Reference Substance 02
Test material form:
solid
Remarks:
blue powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Himalayan
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL Ltd, Basel
- Age at study initiation: Approx. 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 346-445 grams
- Housing: Group housing of 2 animals per labelled metal cage with wire-mesh floors.
- Diet: Free acces to standard guinea pig diet (pellet diameter 4mm), including ascorbic acid (1600 mg/kg). Hay once a week
- Water: Free access to tap-water, diluted with decalcified water.
- Acclimation period: At least five days before start of treatment under test conditions after physical examination.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21°C
- Humidity (%): 55%
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Lighting was 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark per day.

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
5% (w/w)
Day(s)/duration:
day 1
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: vaseline
Concentration / amount:
50% (w/w)
Day(s)/duration:
Day 8 / 24 hour
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: vaseline
Concentration / amount:
25% 10% 5%
Day(s)/duration:
Day 22 / 24 hour
No. of animals per dose:
20 test group
10 control group
5 primary irritation experiment
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:

MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Site: area of the dorsal skin from the scapular region, clipped free of hair
- Duration: 48 hours
- Concentrations: 50% (w/w) in vaseline

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Site: left flank
- Concentrations: 25%, 10%, 5% in vaseline
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours after challenge

OTHER:
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
Formaldehyde

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
8
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
3
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
red spots and/or scaliness
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
10% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
16
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
red spots and/or scaliness
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
5% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
13
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
red spots and/or scaliness
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
25% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
25% (w/w)
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
10%
No. with + reactions:
2
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0 % in distilled water
No. with + reactions:
0
Remarks on result:
other: n. of hours after challenge and number of animals in the group not indicated
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1 % in distilled water
No. with + reactions:
8
Remarks on result:
other: n. of hours after challenge and number of animals in the group not indicated
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.25 % in distilled water
No. with + reactions:
12
Remarks on result:
other: n. of hours after challenge and number of animals in the group not indicated
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.5 % in distilled water
No. with + reactions:
20
Remarks on result:
other: n. of hours after challenge and number of animals in the group not indicated

Any other information on results incl. tables

Animal number

Induction day 10
Readings 50a
ER

Induction day 10
Readings 50a
0E

Challenge day 24
Readings 25a

Challenge day 24
Readings 10

Challenge day 24
Readings 5

Challenge day 24
Readings 0

Challenge day 25
Readings 25a

Challenge day 25
Readings 10

Challenge day 25
Readings 5

Challenge day 25
Readings 0

Comments

Experimental group

36

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

sensitized

37

1

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

sensitized

38

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

not sensitized

39

0

0

1s

1

0

0

1s

1

1

0

sensitized

40

1

0

0

0

1s

0

0

1

1s

0

sensitized

41

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

not sensitized

42

0

0

0

0

0

0

0s

1

1

0

sensitized

43

1

0

1b

0

1b

0

1bs

1

1bs

0

sensitized

44

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

sensitized

45

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

sensitized

46

1

0

1b

0b

0

0

1bs

1bs

0

0

not sensitized

47

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

not sensitized

48

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

sensitized

49

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

sensitized

50

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

sensitized

51

1

0

1b

0

0

0

1bs

1

1

0

sensitized

52

0

0

1bs

1bs

1bs

0

1bs

1s

1s

0

sensitized

53

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

not sensitized

54

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

not sensitized

55

1

0

0

1bs

0

0

0

1s

0

0

not sensitized

Control group

56

0

0

0b

0

0

0

0b

0

0

0

57

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

58

0

0

1bs

0

0

0

0s

0

0

0

59

0

0

0

0b

0

0

0

0bs

0

0

60

0

0

0b

0

0

0

0b

0

0

0

61

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

62

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

63

0

0

1bs

0b

0

0

1s

1s

0

0

64

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

65

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

ER = Erythema

OE = Oedema

a = Concentrations (%) in vaseline

b = Particles of test substance were noted pressed into the skin

s = Scaliness

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: According to CLP (CE) n. 1272/2008 criteria the test substance is classified in category 1b
Conclusions:
Under the conditions used in this study, test substance resulted in a sensitisation rate of 65 per cent.
According to CLP (CE) n. 1272/2008 criteria the test substance is classified in category 1b.
Executive summary:

The purpose of the study was to obtain information on the potential of the test substance to induce delayed contact hypersensitivity (skin sensitisation) in the guinea pig after intradermal and epidermal exposure.

After identification of the slightly irritating and the non-irritating test substance concentrations in the primary irritation experiments, a main study was performed with selected test substance concentrations. The experimental animals were intradermally injected with a 5% concentration in physiological saline and epidermally exposed with a 50% concentration in vaseline, while the control animal were similarly treated, but with the vehicles only.

Immediately after the epidermal exposure, the skin irritation was scored. Two weeks after the epidermal application all animals were challenged with test substance concentrations of 25%, 10%, 5% and the vehicle. The challenge reactions were assessed 24 and 48 hours after bandage removal.

The epidermal exposure of test substance in the induction phase resulted in slight erythema in fifteen of the twenty animals. The epidermal exposure of test substance in the challenge phase resulted in thirteen positive sensitisation reactions in response to the 5% test substance concentrations.

No simptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals duringn the study. No mortality occurred during the study.

Under the conditions used in this study, test substance resulted in a sensitisation rate of 65 per cent.