Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-088-8 | CAS number: 91-66-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The skin sensitization potential of target chemical was assessedin various experimental studies which were conducted on guinea pigs and humans.The studies are based on in vivo experiments in guinea pigs for target chemicaland its structurally similar read across substances. Based on the available studies,it can be concluded thatchemical is unable to cause skin sensitization and considered as not sensitizing. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin sensitisation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- secondary literature
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from authoritative database
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Skin sensitization test was conducted on guinea pigs to assess skin sensitization potential of test chemical.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of study:
- not specified
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- not specified
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Concentration / amount:
- 10%
- Day(s)/duration:
- not specified
- Adequacy of induction:
- not specified
- No.:
- #1
- Route:
- other: epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Concentration / amount:
- 1or 2%
- Day(s)/duration:
- not specified
- Adequacy of challenge:
- not specified
- No. of animals per dose:
- No data available.
- Details on study design:
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- Concentrations: 10%
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- Concentrations: 1or 2%
-
- Positive control substance(s):
- not specified
- Reading:
- rechallenge
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1or 2%
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Clinical observations:
- No sensitization observed
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of skin sensitisation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not sensitizing
- Conclusions:
- The test material was considered to be not sensitizing on guinea pig skin.
- Executive summary:
The skin sensitization study was conducted in guinea pigs to observe the skin sensitization effects of test chemical.
In this study, the test animals were treated dermally with 10% solution of test chemical during induction. After induction, treated animals were dermally exposed to challenge concentration of 1 or 2% solutions of test chemical .
Since the test animals failed to induce any cutaneous reaction at challenge concentrations, the test chemical was considered as not sensitizing to guinea pigs.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
- Additional information:
Various studieshas been investigated for the test chemical to observe the potential for skin sensitization to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments in guinea pigs for target chemicaland its structurally similar read across substancesthat have beensummarized as below;
The skin sensitization study of test chemical was conducted in guinea pigs to observe its skin sensitization effects. In this study, the test animals were treated dermally with 10% solution of test chemical during induction. After induction, treated animals were dermally exposed to challenge concentration of 1 or 2% solutions of test chemical. Since the test animals failed to induce any cutaneous reaction at challenge concentrations, the test chemical was considered as not sensitizing to guinea pigs.
The above result is supported by modified draize test conducted on guinea pigs to assess the skin sensitization potential of test chemical. In a this test, induction was carried out by means of four simultaneous intracutaneous injections of 2.5% test chemical solution above the axillary and inguinal lymph nodes. Intracutaneous challenge treatment was carried out on the opposite shaved flanks 14 days later using a 1% concentration. No known evidence of skin sensitization was observed in treated guinea pigs. Hence the test chemical was considered to be not sensitizing to the skin of treated guinea pigs.
The overall results were further supported by the another skin sensitization study of test chemical performed in 10 female guinea pigs by using modified FCA and guinea pig maximization test. In the induction phase, the test compound was dissolved in FCA, 15 mg in 4 ml. Then physiological saline was added and an emulsion was prepared by mixing the material by mean of a 5ml syringe, until emulsification was completed. The intradermal injections of 6 X 0.10-0.15 ml of this emulsion was applied in a semi-circle arc on clipped and shaved shoulder from left to right in such a way that whole quantity of emulsion was used up for 10 animals. This procedure was repeated on 5thand 9thday. , leaving a gap of 2-3 cm between the rows of injection. After induction phase of 11 days, animals were challenged by applying 0.05ml of test chemical in a sub irritant concentration, with further dilution to the clipped and shaved skin of the right flank of the treated animals, allowing 5 mins for drying. Control animals were also used. Mean Observations were made after 24, 48 and 72 hours. As no sensitization effects were observed, the test material can be considered as non -sensitizing to the female guinea pigs.
Based on the available data for the target chemical, supporting studies and read across substance,it can be concluded thatchemical is unable to cause skin sensitization and considered as not sensitizing. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Respiratory sensitisation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
The skin sensitization potential of test substance and its structurally similar read across substancewere observed in various studies. From the results obtained from these studies it is concluded that the chemical is not likely to cause skin sensitization and hence can be classified as non-skin sensitizer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.