Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-088-8 | CAS number: 91-66-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation
The dermal irritation potential of test chemical was assessed in various experimental studies conducted on rabbits. Based on the available data for the key and supporting studies, it can be concluded that the test chemical is able to cause skin irritation and thus considered as irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Category 2”.
Eye irritation
An ocular irritation potential of target chemical was assessed in various experimental studies conducted on rabbits for test and its structurally similar read across chemical. Based on the available data for the key and supporting study, it can be concluded that the test chemical is unable to cause eye damage and thus can be considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from experimental report
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The objective of the study was to assess the irritant and/or corrosive effects of test chemical after dermal application on the intact skin in rabbits.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:Procured from LIVEON BIOLABS PVT. LTD
- Age at study initiation:3.0 to 4.0 Months (Approximately)
- Weight (Prior to Treatment):Minimum: Minimum: 2.082 kg and Maximum: 2.250 kg
- Health Status : Healthy young adults rabbits were used for the study.
- Housing:The animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages.
- Room Sanitation:The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
- Cages and water bottle:All the cages and water bottles were changed minimum twice a week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):All animals were provided conventional laboratory rabbit diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum.
- Acclimation period:Rabbits were acclimatised to the test conditions for a period of 6 days (Animal No.-1) and 8 days (Animal No.-2 and 3) prior to the application of the test item.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):Minimum: 20.30 °C and Maximum: 22.70 °C
- Humidity (%):Minimum: 48.30 % and Maximum: 68.30 %
- Air changes (per hr):More than 12 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12:12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Controls:
- yes
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):0.5 ml
- Concentration (if solution):N/A
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):N/A
- Concentration (if solution):N/A
- Lot/batch no. (if required):N/A
- Purity:N/A - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- rabbits were observed for 1, 24, 48, 72 hr and 7th day after patch removal
- Number of animals:
- 3 male rabbits
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure:The dorsal lumbar region at contralateral sites.
- % coverage:Approximately 6 X 6 cm.
- Type of wrap if used:A porous gauze dressing and non-irritating tape (Micropore 3”).
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):The residual test item was removed by using cotton soaked in distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure:4 hour
SCORING SYSTEM:Draize Method - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1 and #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The following were observed in treated rabbits.
Initially, the test item was applied to the clipped area of skin of one rabbit. The test site was covered with gauze patch. At 1 hour observation animal no. 1 revealed very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible). At 24 hour observation well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising) was observed. After 24 hours no severe skin lesions were observed hence a confirmatory test was conducted on additional two rabbits (No. 2 and 3) to confirm the irritant nature of the test item. At 48 hour observation, well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising) was observed. At 72 hour observation, very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible) was observed. Animal no.1 was recovered to normal on day 7.
Animal no. 2 and 3 revealed very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible) at 1 hour observation. At 24 and 48 hour observation animal no. 2 and 3 revealed well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising). At 72 hour observation, animal no. 2 revealed well defined erythema and very slight oedema (barely perceptible). At 24, 48 and 72 hour observation, animal no. 3 revealed well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising). Animal no.2 and 3 recovered to normal on day 7.
The patch was removed after 4 hours and rabbits were observed for erythema and oedema at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on day 7 post patch removal, evaluated and graded as per draize method. - Other effects:
- Clinical Observation
No systemic toxicity was observed at treated rabbits during the experimental period.
Mortality
No mortality was observed during the observation period. - Interpretation of results:
- Category 2 (irritant) based on GHS criteria
- Conclusions:
- The individual mean score at 24, 48 and 72 hours for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 were 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 and 1.67, 1.67, 2.00, for erythema and oedema formation, respectively. Hence, it was concluded that the test chemical was Mild Skin Irritation to the skin of Male New Zealand White rabbits under the experimental conditions tested and classified as “Category 2 (irritant)” as per CLP regulation.
- Executive summary:
Acute Dermal Irritation/corrosion Study of test chemical was performed as per OECD guideline No. 404 using three healthy young adult male.
Rabbits with good intact skin were selected for the study. The hairs of all the rabbits were clipped at contralateral sites, approximately 24 hours prior to treatment. A dose of 0.5 ml of test item (as such) was applied to the skin, over an area of approximately 6 x 6 cm clipped of hair on one side of rabbits. The other untreated side was kept as control area and 0.5 ml of distilled water was applied at this site. At the end of 4 hours, the gauze patch was removed and test item application site was wiped with water without altering the integrity of the epidermis.
Initially, the test item was applied to the clipped area of skin of one rabbit. The test site was covered with gauze patch. At 1 hour observation animal no. 1 revealed very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible). At 24 hour observation well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising) was observed. After 24 hours no severe skin lesions were observed hence a confirmatory test was conducted on additional two rabbits (No. 2 and 3) to confirm the irritant nature of the test item. At 48 hour observation, well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising) was observed. At 72 hour observation, very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible) was observed. Animal no.1 was recovered to normal on day 7.
Animal no. 2 and 3 revealed very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible) at 1 hour observation. At 24 and 48 hour observation animal no. 2 and 3 revealed well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising). At 72 hour observation, animal no. 2 revealed well defined erythema and very slight oedema (barely perceptible). At 24, 48 and 72 hour observation, animal no. 3 revealed well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising). Animal no.2 and 3 recovered to normal on day 7.
The patch was removed after 4 hours and rabbits were observed for erythema and oedema at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on day 7 post patch removal, evaluated and graded as per draize method.
The individual mean score at24, 48 and 72 hours for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 were 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 and The individual mean score at 24, 48 and 72 hours for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 were 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 and 1.67, 1.67, 2.00, for erythema and oedema formation, respectively.
Hence, it was concluded that the test chemical was Mild Skin Irritation to the skin of Male New Zealand White rabbits under the experimental conditions tested and classified as “Category 2 (irritant)” as per CLP regulation.
Reference
Table 1
Skin Reaction
In Treated area Dose:0.5 ml of test item Sex:Male
Animal No. |
Test |
Treated area* |
Erythema score |
Oedema score |
||||||||
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
Day 7 |
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
Day 7 |
|||
1 |
Initial |
Left |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
Confirmatory |
Right |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
Right |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
In Control area Dose:0.5 ml of distilled water Sex:Male
Animal No. |
Test |
Treated area* |
Erythema score |
Oedema score |
||||||||
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
Day 7 |
1h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
Day 7 |
|||
1 |
Initial |
Right |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
Confirmatory |
Left |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Left |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Key: h = Hour.
Erythema Oedema
0 =No erythema 0 =No oedema
1 =Very slight erythema (barely perceptible) 1 =Very slight oedema (barely perceptible)
2 =Well defined erythema 2 = Slight oedema (edges of defined by definite raising
Table 1 Continued…
Mean Individual Animal Score at 24, 48 and 72 hours
Animal Number Observations |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Erythema |
2.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
Oedema |
1.67 |
1.67 |
2.00 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- data from authoritative databases
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- To assess the ocular irritation potential of the test chemical
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 100%
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- no data
- Observation period (in vivo):
- no data
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- no data
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- no data
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: not specified
- Reversibility:
- not specified
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No irritation was observed
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating
- Conclusions:
- The test material did not induce any ocular effects. Hence the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to the eyes of treated rabbits.
- Executive summary:
The ocular irritation potential of the test chemical was in rabbits according to OECD Guide–line 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion"
When the undiluted test chemical was instilled into the eyes of each rabbit, no adverse effects were observed in treated eyes.
Since the test material did not induce any ocular effects, the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to the eyes of treated rabbits.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation:
Various studies has been investigated for the test chemical to observe the potential for dermal irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments in rabbits for target chemical that have been summarized as below;
Acute Dermal Irritation/corrosion Study of test chemical was performed as per OECD guideline No. 404 using three healthy young adult male. Rabbits with good intact skin were selected for the study. The hairs of all the rabbits were clipped at contralateral sites, approximately 24 hours prior to treatment. A dose of 0.5 ml of test item (as such) was applied to the skin, over an area of approximately 6 x 6 cm clipped of hair on one side of rabbits. The other untreated side was kept as control area and 0.5 ml of distilled water was applied at this site. At the end of 4 hours, the gauze patch was removed and test item application site was wiped with water without altering the integrity of the epidermis. Initially, the test item was applied to the clipped area of skin of one rabbit. The test site was covered with gauze patch. At 1 hour observation animal no. 1 revealed very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible). At 24 hour observation well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising) was observed. After 24 hours no severe skin lesions were observed hence a confirmatory test was conducted on additional two rabbits (No. 2 and 3) to confirm the irritant nature of the test item. At 48 hour observation, well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising) was observed. At 72 hour observation, very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible) was observed. Animal no.1 was recovered to normal on day 7. Animal no. 2 and 3 revealed very slight erythema (barely perceptible) and very slight oedema (barely perceptible) at 1 hour observation. At 24 and 48 hour observation animal no. 2 and 3 revealed well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising). At 72 hour observation, animal no. 2 revealed well defined erythema and very slight oedema (barely perceptible). At 24, 48 and 72 hour observation, animal no. 3 revealed well defined erythema and slight oedema (edges of area well defined by definite raising). Animal no.2 and 3 recovered to normal on day 7. The patch was removed after 4 hours and rabbits were observed for erythema and oedema at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours and on day 7 post patch removal, evaluated and graded as per draize method. The individual mean score at24, 48 and 72 hours for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 were 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 and The individual mean score at 24, 48 and 72 hours for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 were 2.00, 2.00, 2.00 and 1.67, 1.67, 2.00, for erythema and oedema formation, respectively. Hence, it was concluded that the test chemical was Mild Skin Irritation to the skin of Male New Zealand White rabbits under the experimental conditions tested and classified as “Category 2 (irritant)” as per CLP regulation.
Another skin irritation study of test chemical was assessed in rabbits to determine its skin irritation potential.The undiluted test chemical was applied on back or ear of each rabbit for exposure period of 1 min., 5 min., 15 min. (back) and 20 hours (back or ear). The skin reactions were observed for 8 days.Since the test chemical caused moderate skin irritating effects, the test chemical can be considered as irritating to the rabbits’ skin.
The next dermal irritation study was examined on rabbit’s ear under semi-occlusive.About 500 µl of test chemical was applied on the ear of each rabbit for the exposure period of 24 hours and skin reactions were observed for 7 days.As the test chemical caused severe skin irritation and corrosive effects on treated rabbits’, it was considered as irritating to the skin of rabbits.
The overall results were further supported by the skin irritation study conducted on rabbits according to OECD Guide–line 404 "Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion.When the undiluted test chemical was applied onto each rabbit, slightly skin irritating effects were observed in treated eyes. Since the test material induced skin reactions, the test chemical was considered to be slightly irritating to the skin of treated rabbits.
Based on the available data for key and supporting studies, it can be concluded that test chemical is able to cause skin irritation and considered as irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Category 2”.
Eye irritation:
In different studies, the test chemical has been investigated for potential for ocular irritation to a greater or lesser extent. The studies are based on in vivo experiments in rabbits for target chemical and its structurally similar read across chemical that have been summarized as below;
The ocular irritation potential of the test chemical was conducted in rabbits according to OECD Guide–line 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion". When the undiluted test chemical was instilled into the eyes of each rabbit, no adverse effects were observed in treated eyes. Since the test material did not induce any ocular effects, the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to the eyes of treated rabbits.
Another eye irritation study was conducted to assess the adverse ocular effects caused by the test chemical on treated rabbits. The chemical did not induce any ocular lesions when 50 mg of undiluted test chemical was instilled into the eye of treated rabbits.Therefore the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to the rabbit’s eye.
In next ocular study, when the undiluted test chemical was applied on rabbit’s eye, little irritative effects (maximal effects 1 hour after application) were observed. These effects were completely reversible after 48–96 hours.As the observed effects were not persisted with the observation period the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to the rabbit’s eye.
An eye irritation study was performed on rabbits to determine the eye irritation potential of test chemical. The installation of test chemical into the rabbits’ eye caused slight irritation. Hence the test chemical was considered to be slightly irritating to the eye of treated rabbits’.
The overall negative results were further supported by the ocular irritation study conducted on rabbits to assess its irritation potential of test chemical. When the test chemical was applied into the eyes of each rabbit, no irritation was observed in treated rabbits. Hence the test chemical was considered to be not irritating to the eyes of treated rabbits.
Even though one study for the test chemical claims that there is a possibility of test chemical to cause slight eye irritation, but it is strongly negated by the results of the other studies. Also the potential of causing eye irritation was not sufficient to classify the test chemical as eye irritatnt. Henceon the basis of available data for the target as well as supporting study, it can be concluded that test chemical is unable to cause eye irritation and considered not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified”.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The skin and eye irritation potential of test chemical were observed in various studies. The results obtained from these studies indicates that the chemical is able to cause skin irritation but unlikely to cause eye damage. Hence the test chemical can be classified under the category “Category 2” for skin and “Not Classified” eye as per CLP.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.