Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 209-513-6 | CAS number: 583-60-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Three different in vitro studies were performed for the following endpoints: in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria (OECD 471), in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study (OECD 487), and in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells (OECD 490). The substance was found being negative for mutagenicity. Therefore, currently there is no concern on mutagenic effects caused by the substance.
Three main conclusions for the mentioned above endpoints:
1. OECD471 - In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, 2-MCH did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used. Therefore, 2-MCH is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay.
2. OECD478 - In addition, it can be stated that during the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, 2-MCH did not induce structural and/or numerical chromosomal damage in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Therefore, 2-MCH is considered to be non-mutagenic with respect to clastogenicity and/or aneugenicity in this in vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test.
3. OECD490 - Finally, in the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item 2-MCH is considered to be non-mutagenic in this in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- March 2019-March 2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- Version / remarks:
- Final
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Concerning: Experimental Performance Report: In the experiment with metabolic activation (for selection and plating efficiency) the cell culture medium was prepared without A. This deviation did not influence the quality or integrity of the present study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Characterisation of the Test Item
The identity of the test item was inspected upon delivery at the test facility (e.g. test item name,
batch no. and additional data were compared with the label) based on the following specifications
provided by the sponsor. The following listed information applies to the sample as received. - Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- (clone TK+/- 3.7.2C)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- These cells are characterised by their high proliferation rate (10 - 12 h
doubling time of the Eurofins Munich stock cultures) and their cloning efficiency, usually more than
50%. The cells obtain a near diploid karyotype (40 ± 2 chromosomes). They are heterozygous at the
Thymidine Kinase (TK) locus in order to detect mutation events at the TK-locus.
To prevent high backgrounds arising from spontaneous mutation, cells lacking TK can be eliminated
by culturing cells in RPMI 1640 supplemented with:
9.0 µg/mL hypoxanthine
15.0 µg/mL thymidine
22.5 µg/mL glycine
0.1 µg/mL methotrexate
The cells are resuspended in medium without methotrexate but with thymidine, hypoxanthine and
glycine for 1 - 3 days.
Large stock cultures of the cleansed L5178Y cell line are stored over liquid nitrogen (vapour phase) in the cell bank of Eurofins Munich. This allows the repeated use of the same cell batch in
experiments. Each cell batch is routinely checked for mycoplasma infection.
Thawed stock cultures are maintained in plastic culture flasks in RPMI 1640 complete medium and subcultured three times per week. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian Microsomal Fraction S9 Homogenate
An advantage of using in vitro cell cultures is the accurate control of concentration and exposure
time of cells to the test item under study. However, due to the limited capacity of cells growing in
vitro for metabolic activation of potential mutagens, an exogenous metabolic activation system is
necessary [8]. Many substances only develop mutagenic potential when they are metabolized by the mammalian organism. Metabolic activation of substances can be achieved by supplementing the cell cultures with liver microsome preparations (S9 mix). Since the L5178Y cells used in this assay do not have the cytochrome-based P450 metabolic oxidation system, an exogenous metabolic activation system, the S9 microsomal fraction was added. The cells were exposed to the test substance both, in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation.
The S9 liver microsomal fraction was obtained from Trinova Biochem GmbH, Giessen, Germany.
Male Sprague Dawley rats were induced with phenobarbital / β-naphthoflavone.
The following quality control determinations were performed by Trinova Biochem GmbH:
a) Alkoxyresorufin-O-dealkylase activities
b) Test for the presence of adventitious agents
c) Promutagen activation (including biological activity in the Salmonella typhimurium assay using 2-aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene)
A stock of the supernatant containing the microsomes is frozen in aliquots of 5 mL and stored at
≤ -75 °C.
The protein concentration in the S9 preparation (Lot: 4146) was 38.5 mg/mL.
S9 Mix
An appropriate quantity of the S9 supernatant was thawed and mixed with S9 cofactor solution to
result in a final protein concentration of 0.75 mg/mL in the cultures. Cofactors were added to the S9 mix to reach the concentrations below:
8 mM MgCl2
33 mM KCl
5 mM Glucose-6-phosphate
5 mM NADP
in 100 mM sodium-phosphate-buffer pH 7.4. During the experiment the S9 mix was stored on ice.
The final concentration of S9 mix in the cultures was 5%. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The test item was investigated at the following concentrations: without and with metabolic activation:
0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5 % HS 100 U/100 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin 1 mM sodium pyruvate 2 mM L-glutamine 25 mM HEPES 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- no
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Experimental Design
Pre-Experiment for Toxicity
The toxicity of the test item was determined in a pre-experiment up to a maximum concentration of 10 mM. Eight concentrations [0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM] were tested without and
with metabolic activation. The experimental conditions in these pre-experiments were the same as described below in the paragraph experimental performance. After a 2-day growth period the relative suspension growth (RSG) of the treated cell cultures was calculated according to the method of Clive and Spector. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is considered mutagenic if the following criteria are met:
- The induced mutant frequency meets or exceeds the Global Evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 mutants per 106 cells and
- a concentration-dependent increase in mutant frequency is detected.
Besides, combined with a positive effect in the mutant frequency, an increased occurrence of small colonies (≥40% of total colonies) is an indication for potential clastogenic effects and/or
chromosomal aberrations.
Statistical methods might be used as an aid in evaluation of the test result.
A test item is considered to be negative if the induced mutant frequency is below the GEF or the
trend of the test is negative. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, in the described mutagenicity test under the experimental conditions reported, the test item 2-MCH is considered to be non-mutagenic in this in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay (thymidine kinase locus) in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.
- Executive summary:
Summary Results
The test item 2-MCH was assessed for its potential to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y.
The experiment without and with metabolic activation was performed as a 4 h short-term exposure assay.
The selection of the concentrations used in the main experiment was based on data from the pre-experiment. The test item was investigated at the following concentrations:
without and with metabolic activation:
0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM
No precipitation of the test item was noted in the experiment.
No growth inhibition was observed with metabolic activation. Growth inhibition was observed in the experiment without metabolic activation: The relative total
growth (RTG) was 46.3% for the highest concentration evaluated.
No biologically relevant increase of mutants was found after treatment with the test item (without and with metabolic activation). The Global Evaluation Factor (GEF; defined as the mean of thenegative/vehicle mutant frequency plus one standard deviation; data gathered from ten laboratories) was not exceeded by the induced mutant frequency at any concentration.
No concentration-related increase was observed.
EMS, MMS and B[a]P were used as positive controls and showed distinct and biologically relevant effects in mutation frequency. Additionally, MMS and B[a]P significantly increased the number of
small colonies, thus proving the efficiency of the test system to indicate potential clastogenic effects.Summary: Main Experiment, without and with metabolic activation
Test Group
Conc. [mM]
RCEa [%]
RTGb [%]
MFc [mutants/ 106 cells]
IMFd [mutants/ 106 cells]
GEFe exceeded
Statistical Significant Increasef
Precipitate
Exp without S9
C1
0
100.0
100.0
64.1
/
/
/
-
C2
/
/
/
-
2
0.2
97.2
74.2
56.1
-7.9
-
-
3
0.5
84.1
64.8
63.2
-0.9
-
-
-
4
1.0
70.4
50.2
79.3
15.3
-
-
-
5
2.5
84.1
57.7
61.5
-2.5
-
-
-
6
5.0
85.4
53.5
71.5
7.5
-
-
-
7
7.5
92.5
53.4
69.7
5.6
-
-
-
8
10
82.8
46.3
57.5
-6.6
-
-
-
EMS
300 µg/mL
56.0
38.5
842.6
778.6
+
+
-
MMS
10 µg/mL
49.3
32.7
455.8
391.7
+
+
-
Exp with S9
C1
0
100.0
100.0
66.5
/
/
/
-
C2
/
/
/
-
2
0.2
103.8
108.7
74.6
8.1
-
-
-
3
0.5
103.8
107.4
57.7
-8.9
-
-
-
4
1.0
112.3
126.0
63.6
-2.9
-
-
-
5
2.5
117.8
112.7
66.6
0.1
-
-
-
6
5.0
121.8
119.8
64.2
-2.3
-
-
-
7
7.5
117.8
115.5
59.3
-7.2
-
-
-
8
10
123.9
119.1
78.6
12.1
-
-
-
B[a]P
2.5 µg/mL
86.9
58.8
864.1
797.5
+
+
-
C: Negative Controls
a: Relative Cloning Efficiency, RCE = [(CE test group / CE of corresponding controls) x 100]
Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-ln (((96 - (mean Plate 1, Plate 2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)
b: Relative Total Growth, RTG = (RSG x RCE) / 100
c: Mutant Frequency,
MF = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selective medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}x800
d: Induced Mutant Frequency, IMF = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls
e: Global Evaluation Factor, GEF (126 mutants/106 cells); +: GEF exceeded, -: GEF not exceeded
f: statistical significant increase in mutant frequency compared to negative controls (Mann Whitney test, p<0.05).
+: significant; -: not significant
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate
MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate
B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- March-November 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Final
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 4.4. Schedule, study plan, p. 6 Study Plan: Arrival of the Test Item: 06 March 2019 Report: Arrival of the Test Item: 06 March 2019, 05 April 2019 Reason: Delivery of a new test material, due to precipitation in the bottle delivered on 06 March 2019.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Negative controls (cell culture medium) were treated in the same way as all concentration groups.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- An advantage of using cell cultures is the accurate control of the concentration and exposure time of cells to the test item under study. However, due to the limited capacity of cells growing in vitro for metabolic activation of potential mutagens, an exogenous metabolic activation system is necessary.
Many substances only develop mutagenic potential when they are metabolized by the mammalian
organism. Metabolic activation of substances can be achieved by supplementing the cell cultures
with liver microsome preparations (S9 mix).
The S9 liver microsomal fraction was prepared at Eurofins Munich. Male Wistar rats were induced
with phenobarbital (80 mg/kg bw) and ß-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw) for three consecutive days by oral route. The preparation was performed according to Ames et al. The following quality control determinations are performed:
a) Biological activity in the Salmonella typhimurium assay using 2-aminoanthracene and
benzo[a]pyrene
b) Sterility Test
A stock of the supernatant containing the microsomes was frozen in aliquots of 2 and 4 mL and stored at ≤ -75°C.
The protein concentration in the S9 preparation (Lot: 220219) was 43 mg/mL.
S9 Mix
An appropriate quantity of the S9 supernatant was thawed and mixed with S9 cofactor solution to
result in a final protein concentration of 0.75 mg/mL in the cultures. Cofactors were added to the S9 mix to reach the concentrations below:
8 mM MgCl2
33 mM KCl
5 mM Glucose-6-phosphate
5 mM NADP
in 100 mM sodium-phosphate-buffer pH 7.4. During the experiment the S9 mix was stored on ice.
The final concentration of S9 mix in the cultures is 5%. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- All concentrations were determined in the pre-experiment. The following concentrations were tested with and without S9 mix:
0.039, 0.078, 0.156, 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 7.5 and 10 mM
The concentration of 10 mM was considered to be the highest test concentration used in this test
system following the recommendation of the corresponding OECD testing guideline 487 - Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent Control: DMSO 1% v/v or ethanol 0.5% v/v in cell culture medium
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- Complete Culture Medium
10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS)
100 U/100 µg/mL penicillin/streptomycin solution
2 mM L-glutamine
2.5 µg/mL amphotericin
25 mM HEPES
Treatment Medium (short-term exposure)
Complete culture medium without FBS. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- colchicine
- cyclophosphamide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Pre-Experiment for Toxicity
A pre-experiment was conducted under identical conditions as described for the main experiment I.
The following concentrations were tested with and without S9 mix:
0.039, 0.078, 0.156, 0.313, 0.625, 1.25, 2.5, 7.5 and 10 mM
The concentration of 10 mM was considered to be the highest test concentration used in this test system following the recommendation of the corresponding OECD testing guideline 487.
Exposure Concentrations
Duplicate cultures were treated at each concentration. The following concentrations were used in the
main experiments:
Experiment I:
without metabolic activation: 0.25, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80, 0.90, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50 and 2.0 mM
with metabolic activation: 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10 mM
Experiment II:
without metabolic activation: 0.05, 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80 and 1.0 mM
The following concentrations were selected for the microscopic analyses of micronuclei frequencies:
Experiment I (short-term exposure 4 h):
without and with metabolic activation: 0.7, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.5 mM
with metabolic activation: 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mM
Experiment II (long-term exposure 24 h):
without metabolic activation: 0.10, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.60 mM
Experimental Performance
Seeding of the Cultures
Three or four day-old stock cultures (in exponential growth), more than 50% confluent, were rinsed
with Ca-Mg-free PBS solution prior to the trypsin treatment. Cells subsequently were trypsinised with a solution of 0.05% trypsin in Ca-Mg-free PBS at 37°C for 5 min. By adding complete culture
medium the detachment was stopped and a single cell suspension was prepared.
Experiment I
Exponentially growing V79 cells were seeded into 25 cm2 cell culture flasks (two flasks per test
group). Approx. 50 000 cells were seeded per cell culture flask, containing 5 mL complete culture
medium (minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% FBS). After an attachment period of approx. 48 h, the complete culture medium was removed and subsequently the test item was added to the treatment medium in appropriate concentrations. The cells were incubated with the test item for 4 h in presence or absence of metabolic activation. At the end of the incubation, the treatment medium was removed and the cells were washed twice with PBS. Subsequently, the cells were incubated in complete culture medium + 1.5 µg/mL cytochalasin B for 20 h at 37 °C.
Experiment II
If negative or equivocal results are obtained, they should be confirmed using continuous treatment (long-term treatment) without metabolic activation. Approx. 50 000 exponentially growing V79 cells were seeded in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks in absence of metabolic activation. After an attachment period of approx. 48 h the test item was added in complete culture medium. 1 h later 1.5 µg/mL cytochalasin B were added and the cells were incubated for 23 h at 37 °C. At the end of the treatment the cell culture medium was removed and the cells were prepared for microscopic analysis.
Number of Cultures
Duplicate cultures were performed at each concentration level except for the pre-experiment.
Preparation of the Cultures
At the end of the cultivation, the complete culture medium was removed. Subsequently, cells were
trypsinated and resuspended in about 9 ml complete culture medium. The cultures were transferred into tubes and incubated with hypotonic solution (0.4% KCl) for some minutes at room temperature.
After the treatment with the hypotonic solution the cells were fixed with methanol + glacial acetic acid (3+1). The cells were resuspended gently and the suspension was dropped onto clean glass slides. Consecutively, the cells were dried on a heating plate. Finally, the cells were stained with acridine orange solution.
Analysis of Micronuclei
All slides, including those of positive and negative controls were independently coded before
microscopic analysis. For each experimental point, at least 2000 binucleated cells per concentration (1000 binucleated cells per slide) were analysed for micronuclei according to the criteria of Fenech, i.e. clearly surrounded by a nuclear membrane, having an area of less than one-third of that of the main nucleus, being located within the cytoplasm of the cell and not linked to the main nucleus via nucleoplasmic bridges. Mononucleated and multinucleated cells and cells with more than six micronuclei were not considered.
Cytokinesis Block Proliferation Index
As an assessment of the cytotoxicity, a cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI) was determined from 500 cells according to the following formula:
CBPI=((c1 x 1) + (c2 x 2) + (cx x 3))/n
c1: mononucleate cells
c2: binucleate cells
cx: multinucleate cells
n: total number of cells
The CBPI can be used to calculate the % cytostasis, which indicates the inhibition of cell growth of treated cultures in comparison to control cultures:
% Cytostasis= 100 – 100 x ((CBPIT – 1) / (CBPIC – 1))
CBPIT: Cytokinesis Block proliferation index of treated cultures
CBPIC: Cytokinesis Block proliferation index of control cultures - Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Remarks:
- Experiment II
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- At 0.25 mM a cytostasis of 35% and at 0.60 mM a cytostasis of 61% was noted.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Remarks:
- Experiment I
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Remarks:
- Experiment I
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 1.5 mM a cytostasis of 55% was noted
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the study described and under the experimental conditions reported, 2-MCH did not induce structural and/or numerical chromosomal damage in Chinese hamster V79 cells.
Therefore, 2-MCH is considered to be non-mutagenic with respect to clastogenicity and/or aneugenicity in this in vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test. - Executive summary:
In order to investigate 2-MCH for a possible potential to induce micronuclei in Chinese hamster V79 cells an in vitro micronucleus assay was carried out. The following study design was performed:
Without S9
With S9
Exp. I
Exp. II
Exp. I
Exposure period
4 h
24 h
4 h
Cytochalasin B exposure
20 h
23 h
20 h
Preparation interval
24 h
24 h
24 h
Total culture period*
72 h
72 h
72 h
*Exposure started 48 h after culture initiation
The selection of the concentrations was based on data from the pre-experiment. In the first main experiment without and with metabolic activation 1.5 mM and 10 mM test item, respectively, and in experiment II 0.60 mM test item was selected as the highest concentration for microscopic
evaluation.
The following concentrations were evaluated for micronuclei frequencies:
Experiment I (short-term exposure 4 h):
without and with metabolic activation: 0.7, 0.9, 1.0 and 1.5 mM
with metabolic activation: 2.5, 5.0 and 10 mM
Experiment II (long-term exposure 24 h):
without metabolic activation: 0.10, 0.25, 0.50 and 0.60 mM.No precipitate of the test item in the cultures at the end of treatment was noted in any concentration group evaluated in experiment I and II.
In experiment I without metabolic activation the micronucleated cell frequency of the negative control (0.65%) was within the historical control limits of the negative control (0.37% – 1.37%). The mean values of micronucleated cells found after treatment with the test item were 1.00% (0.7 mM), 0.90% (0.9 mM), 1.25% (1.0 mM) and 1.20% (1.5 mM). The numbers of micronucleated cells were within the historical control limits of the negative control and did not show a biologically relevant increase compared to the concurrent negative control.
In experiment I with metabolic activation the micronucleated cell frequency of the negative control (0.78%) was within the historical control limits of the negative control (0.42% – 1.64%).
The mean values of micronucleated cells found after treatment with the test item were 1.15% (2.5 mM), 1.23% (5.0 mM) and 1.23% (10 mM). The numbers of micronucleated cells were within the historical control limits of the negative control and did not show a biologically relevant increase compared to the concurrent negative control.
In experiment II without metabolic activation the micronucleated cell frequency of the negative control (0.80%) was within the historical control limits of the negative control (0.37% – 1.37%). The mean values of micronucleated cells found after treatment with the test item were 0.95% (0.10 mM), 1.00% (0.25 mM), 0.75% (0.50 mM) and 1.20% (0.60 mM). The numbers of micronucleated cells were within the historical control limits of the negative control and did not show a biologically relevant increase compared to the concurrent negative control.
No statistically significant enhancement (p<0.05) of cells with micronuclei was noted in the concentration groups of the test item evaluated in experiment I and II without metabolic activation.
In experiment I with metabolic activation a statistically significant increase (p = 0.0431) of cells with micronuclei was noted at 5.0 and 10 mM. However, since the corresponding numbers of micronucleated cells were within the historical control limits of the negative control and no concentration-related increase was observed, this effect was considered as not biologically relevant.
The χ² Test for trend was performed to test whether there is a concentration-related increase in the micronucleated cells frequency in the experimental conditions. No statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells under the experimental conditions of the study was observed in experiment I and II.
MMS (25 µg/mL) and CPA (2.5 µg/mL) were used as clastogenic controls and colchicine as aneugenic controls (0.08 and 2.0 µg/mL). They induced distinct and statistically significant increases of the micronucleus frequency. This demonstrates the validity of the assay.- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April - July 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, No. 471 – Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test - recommends using a combination of S. typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- July 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Chemical Name: 2-Methylcyclohexanone (2-MCH), CAS No.: 583-60-8
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The bacteria most commonly used in these reverse mutation assays do not possess the enzyme system which, in mammals, is known to convert pro-mutagens into active DNA damaging metabolites. In order to overcome this major drawback an exogenous metabolic system was added in the form of mammalian microsome enzyme activation mixture.
S9 Homogenate: The S9 liver microsomal fraction was prepared at Eurofins Munich. Male Wistar rats were induced with phenobarbital (80 mg/kg bw) and β-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw) for three consecutive days by oral route. The following quality control determinations are performed:
a) Biological activity in the Salmonella typhimurium assay using 2-aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene
b) Sterility Test
A stock of the supernatant containing the microsomes was frozen in aliquots of 2 and 4 mL and stored at ≤ -75 °C. The protein concentration in the S9 preparation (Lot: 220219 and Lot: 210918) was 43 mg/mL and 35.7 mg/mL, respectively and was adjusted to 30 mg/mL.
Preparation of S9 Mix: The S9 mix preparation was performed according to Ames et al.
100 mM of sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4, was ice-cold added to the following pre-weighed sterilised reagents to give final concentrations in the S9 mix of: 8 mM MgCl2, 33 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, and 4 mM NADP. This solution was mixed with the liver 9000 x g supernatant fluid in the following proportion: co-factor solution 9.5 parts and liver preparation 0.5 parts. During the experiment the S9 mix was stored on ice.
S9 Mix Substitution Buffer: The S9 mix substitution buffer was used in the study as a replacement for S9 mix, without metabolic activation (-S9).
Phosphate-buffer (0.2 M) contains per litre of purified water: 0.2 M NaH2PO4 x H2O 120 mL and 0.2 M Na2HPO4 880 mL.
The two solutions were mixed and the pH was adjusted to 7.4. Sterilisation was performed for 20 min at 121 °C in an autoclave. This 0.2 M phosphate-buffer was mixed with 0.15 M KCl solution (sterile) in the following proportion: 0.2 M phosphate-buffer 9.5 parts, 0.15 M KCl solution 0.5 parts. This S9 mix substitution buffer was stored at 4 °C or use. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- In the pre-experiment with TA98 and TA100 eight doses were tested from 3.16 µg/plate up to 5000 µg/plate.
Based on the results from the pre-experiment, 5 doses were selected for the main experiment I and II as follows: 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 µL/plate. 5.0 µL/plate was selected as the maximum concentration according to the results of the pre-experiment and as is the maximum concentration recommended by the guideline. - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- 10 µg/plate, Tester Strains: S. typhimurium: TA100, TA1535 without S9)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine (99-56-9)
- Remarks:
- 10 µg/plate for TA98, 40 µg/plate for TA1537, Tester Strains: S. typhimurium: TA98, TA1537 (without S9)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- 1 µL/plate, Tester Strain: S. typhimurium: TA102 (without S9)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene (613-13-8)
- Remarks:
- 2.5 µg/plate; 10 µg/plate for TA102, Tester Strains: S. typhimurium: TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102 (with S9)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- A. dest., Eurofins Munich, Lot No. 190412, 190423, 190517
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- DMSO, AppliChem Lot No. 0001446873, Honeywell Lot No. G2170
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Bacteria
Five strains of S. typhimurium with the following characteristics were used:
TA98: his D 3052; rfa-; uvrB-; R-factor: frame shift mutations
TA100: his G 46; rfa-; uvrB-; R-factor: base-pair substitutions
TA1535: his G 46; rfa-; uvrB-: base-pair substitutions
TA1537: his C 3076; rfa-; uvrB-: frame shift mutations
TA102: his G 428 (pAQ1); rfa-; R-factor: base-pair substitutions
Tester strains TA98, TA1535 and TA102 were obtained from MOLTOX, INC., NC 28607, USA. Tester strains TA100 and TA1537 were obtained from Xenometrix AG, Switzerland. They were stored as stock cultures in ampoules with nutrient broth (OXOID) supplemented with DMSO (approx. 8% v/v) over liquid nitrogen.
All Salmonella strains contain mutations in the histidine operon, thereby imposing a requirement for histidine in the growth medium. They contain the deep rough (rfa) mutation, which deletes the polysaccharide side chain of the lipopolysaccharides of the bacterial cell surface. This increases cell permeability of larger substances. The other mutation is a deletion of the uvrB gene coding for a protein of the DNA nucleotide excision repair system resulting in an increased sensitivity in detecting many mutagens. This deletion also includes the nitrate reductase (chl) and biotin (bio) genes (bacteria require biotin for growth).
The tester strains TA98, TA100 and TA102 contain the R-factor plasmid, pkM101. These strains are reverted by a number of mutagens that are detected weakly or not at all with the non R-factor parent strains. pkM101 increases chemical and spontaneous mutagenesis by enhancing an error-prone DNA repair system which is normally present in these organisms.
The properties of the S. typhimurium strains with regard to membrane permeability, ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistance as well as normal spontaneous mutation rates are checked regularly according to Ames et al.. In this way it is ensured that the experimental conditions set up by Ames are fulfilled.
Preparation of Bacteria: Samples of each tester strain were grown by culturing for 12 h at 37 °C in Nutrient Broth to the late exponential or early stationary phase of growth (approx. 109 cells/mL). The nutrient medium consists per litre of purified water: 8 g Nutrient Broth and 5 g NaCl.
A solution of 125 µL ampicillin (10 mg/mL) (TA98, TA100, TA102) was added in order to retain the phenotypic characteristics of the strain.
Agar Plates: The Vogel-Bonner Medium E agar plates with 2% glucose used in the Ames Test were prepared by Eurofins Munich. Quality controls were performed. Vogel-Bonner-salts contain per litre of purified water: 10 g MgSO4 x 7 H2O, 100 g citric acid, 175 g NaNH4HPO4 x 4 H2O, and 500 g K2HPO4. Sterilisation was performed for 20 min at 121 °C in an autoclave. Vogel-Bonner Medium E agar plates contain per litre of purified water: 15 g Agar Agar, 20 mL Vogel-Bonner salts, and 50 mL glucose-solution (40%). Sterilisation was performed for 20 min at 121 °C in an autoclave.
Overlay Agar: The overlay agar contains per litre of purified water: 7.0 g Agar Agar, 6.0 g NaCl, 10.5 mg L-histidine x HCl x H2O, and 12.2 mg biotin. Sterilisation was performed for 20 min at 121 °C in an autoclave.
Mammalian Microsomal Fraction S9 Mix: The bacteria most commonly used in these reverse mutation assays do not possess the enzyme system which, in mammals, is known to convert promutagens into active DNA damaging metabolites. In order to overcome this major drawback an exogenous metabolic system was added in the form of mammalian microsome enzyme activation mixture.
S9 Homogenate: The S9 liver microsomal fraction was prepared at Eurofins Munich. Male Wistar rats were induced with phenobarbital (80 mg/kg bw) and β-naphthoflavone (100 mg/kg bw) for three consecutive days by oral route. The following quality control determinations are performed: a) Biological activity in the Salmonella typhimurium assay using 2-aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene, b) Sterility Test.
A stock of the supernatant containing the microsomes was frozen in aliquots of 2 and 4 mL and stored at ≤-75 °C.
The protein concentration in the S9 preparation (Lot: 220219 and Lot: 210918) was 43 mg/mL and 35.7 mg/mL, respectively and was adjusted to 30 mg/mL.
Preparation of S9 Mix: The S9 mix preparation was performed according to Ames et al..
100 mM of sodium-ortho-phosphate-buffer, pH 7.4, was ice-cold added to the following pre-weighed sterilised reagents to give final concentrations in the S9 mix of: 8 mM MgCl2, 33 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose-6-phosphate, and 4 mM NADP.
This solution was mixed with the liver 9000 x g supernatant fluid in the following proportion: co-factor solution 9.5 parts, liver preparation 0.5 parts. During the experiment the S9 mix was stored on ice.
S9 Mix Substitution Buffer: The S9 mix substitution buffer was used in the study as a replacement for S9 mix, without metabolic activation (-S9). Phosphate-buffer (0.2 M) contains per litre of purified water: 0.2 M NaH2PO4 x H2O - 120 mL, 0.2 M Na2HPO4 - 880 mL. The two solutions were mixed and the pH was adjusted to 7.4. Sterilisation was performed for 20 min at 121 °C in an autoclave. This 0.2 M phosphate-buffer was mixed with 0.15 M KCl solution (sterile) in the following proportion: 0.2 M phosphate-buffer - 9.5 parts, 0.15 M KCl solution - 0.5 parts. This S9 mix substitution buffer was stored at 4 °C. - Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluation of Cytotoxicity: Cytotoxicity can be detected by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn (indicated as "N" or "B", respectively in the result tables) or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately ≤ 0.5 in relation to the solvent control.
Evaluation of Mutagenicity: The Mutation Factor is calculated by dividing the mean value of the revertant counts by the mean values of the solvent control (the exact and not the rounded values are used for calculation). A test item is considered as mutagenic if:
- a clear and dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs and/or
- a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the dose groups occurs in at least one tester strain with or without metabolic activation.
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
- if in tester strains TA98, TA100 and TA102 the number of reversions is at least twice as high
- if in tester strains TA1535 and TA1537 the number of reversions is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the solvent control.
According to OECD guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of results, a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary. A test item producing neither a dose related increase in the number of revertants nor a reproducible biologically relevant positive response at any of the dose groups is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- starting at 1.0 µL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- starting at 5.0 µL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, 2-MCH did not cause gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the tester strains used.
Therefore, 2-MCH is considered to be non-mutagenic in this bacterial reverse mutation assay. - Executive summary:
In order to investigate the potential of 2-MCH for its ability to induce gene mutations the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) were performed with the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA102. In two independent experiments several concentrations of the test item were used. Each assay was conducted with and without metabolic activation. The concentrations, including the controls, were tested in triplicate. The following concentrations of the test item were prepared and used in the experiments: 0.0316, 0.100, 0.316, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 µL/plate.
No precipitation of the test item was observed in any tester strain used in experiment I and II (with and without metabolic activation).
No toxic effects of the test item were noted in any of the five tester strains used up to the highest dose group evaluated (with and without metabolic activation) in experiment I
In experiment II toxic effects of the test item were noted at concentrations of 1.0 µL/plate and higher (without metabolic activation) and at a concentration of 5.0 µL/plate (with metabolic activation), depending on the particular tester strain.
No biologically relevant increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains were observed following treatment with 2-MCH at any concentration level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation in experiment I and II.
All criteria of validity were met.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1: Pre-Experiment for Toxicity, without metabolic activation.
Test Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment | SGa | RSGb [%] |
C1 | 0 | 384000 | 1010000 | 1300000 | 13.1 | 100.0 |
C2 | 405000 | 1040000 | 1320000 | 13.7 | ||
1 | 0.1 | 406000 | 1020000 | 1520000 | 15.5 | 115.5 |
2 | 0.2 | 445000 | 1150000 | 1270000 | 14.6 | 108.8 |
3 | 0.5 | 445000 | 1000000 | 1440000 | 14.4 | 107.2 |
4 | 1.0 | 386000 | 1030000 | 1410000 | 14.5 | 108.1 |
5 | 2.5 | 350000 | 906000 | 1510000 | 13.7 | 101.9 |
6 | 5.0 | 405000 | 980000 | 1390000 | 13.6 | 101.4 |
7 | 7.5 | 345000 | 897000 | 1500000 | 13.5 | 100.2 |
8 | 10 | 349000 | 933000 | 1490000 | 13.9 | 103.5 |
C: Negative control
a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24 h x 30) / 1x107) x ((value 48 h x 20) / (value 24 h* x 20))];
* : for value 24 h > 3x105 then value 24 h = 3x105
b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]
Table 2. Pre-Experiment for Toxicity, with metabolic activation
Test Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment | SGa | RSGb [%] |
C1 | 0 | 337000 | 914000 | 1420000 | 13.0 | 100.0 |
C2 | 359000 | 978000 | 1230000 | 12.0 | ||
1 | 0.1 | 332000 | 867000 | 1370000 | 11.9 | 95.0 |
2 | 0.2 | 361000 | 961000 | 1400000 | 13.5 | 107.6 |
3 | 0.5 | 338000 | 908000 | 1210000 | 11.0 | 87.9 |
4 | 1.0 | 362000 | 959000 | 1260000 | 12.1 | 96.6 |
5 | 2.5 | 332000 | 959000 | 1420000 | 12.3 | 98.6 |
6 | 5.0 | 331000 | 937000 | 1490000 | 14.0 | 111.7 |
7# | 7.5 | 138000 | 358000 | 1410000 | 5.0 | 40.4 |
8# | 10 | 152000 | 382000 | 1480000 | 5.7 | 45.2 |
C: Negative control
a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24 h x 30) / 1x107) x ((value 48 h x 20) / (value 24 h* x 20))];
* : for value 24 h > 3x105 then value 24 h = 3x105
b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100] #
: for these concentrations only half of the cell number was used for treatment, but since this test was only used for toxicity determination, this was concluded as acceptable.
Table 3. Main Experiment - Toxicity Data, without metabolic activation
Test Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment | SGa | RSGb [%] | RCEc [%] | RTGd [%] |
C1 | 0 | 392000 | 1150000 | 1060000 | 12.2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
C2 | 407000 | 1110000 | 1110000 | 12.3 | ||||
2 | 0.2 | 406000 | 851000 | 1100000 | 9.4 | 76.4 | 97.2 | 74.2 |
3 | 0.5 | 389000 | 787000 | 1200000 | 9.4 | 77.1 | 84.1 | 64.8 |
4 | 1.0 | 413000 | 802000 | 1090000 | 8.7 | 71.3 | 70.4 | 50.2 |
5 | 2.5 | 353000 | 750000 | 1120000 | 8.4 | 68.5 | 84.1 | 57.7 |
6 | 5.0 | 351000 | 692000 | 1110000 | 7.7 | 62.7 | 85.4 | 53.5 |
7 | 7.5 | 343000 | 610000 | 1160000 | 7.1 | 57.7 | 92.5 | 53.4 |
8 | 10 | 326000 | 601000 | 1140000 | 6.9 | 55.9 | 82.8 | 46.3 |
EMS | 300 µg/mL | 387000 | 803000 | 1050000 | 8.4 | 68.8 | 56.0 | 38.5 |
MMS | 10 µg/mL | 418000 | 896000 | 907000 | 8.1 | 66.3 | 49.3 | 32.7 |
C: Negative control
a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24 h x 30) / 1x107) x ((value 48 h x 20) / (value 24 h* x 20))];
* : for value 24 h > 3x105 then value 24 h = 3x105
b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]
c: Relative Cloning Efficiency, RCE = [(CE test group / CE of corresponding controls) x 100], Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-ln (((96 - (mean Plate 1, Plate 2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)
d: Relative Total Growth, RTG = (RSG x RCE) / 100
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate
MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate
Table 4. Main Experiment - Mutagenicity Data, without metabolic activation
Test Group | Concentration [mM] | Cloning Efficiency (CE) | Mutagenicity Data | ||||||||
Plate 1e | Plate 2e | CEf [%] | Number of cultures / 96 wells | MFg [mutants / 106 cells] | IMFh [mutants / 106 cells] | ||||||
Plate 1e | Plate 2e | Plate 3e | Plate 4e | Mean | |||||||
C1 | 0 | 79 | 76 | 102.9 | 14 | 15 | 12 | 16 | 14.3 | 78.1 | / |
C2 | 79 | 76 | 116.0 | 12 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 10.5 | 50.0 | / | |
2 | 0.2 | 79 | 78 | 106.4 | 11 | 11 | 6 | 15 | 10.8 | 56.1 | -7.9 |
3 | 0.5 | 73 | 75 | 92.1 | 11 | 6 | 14 | 11 | 10.5 | 63.2 | -0.9 |
4 | 1.0 | 67 | 69 | 77.0 | 14 | 7 | 13 | 10 | 11.0 | 79.3 | 15.3 |
5 | 2.5 | 74 | 74 | 92.1 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 10.3 | 61.5 | -2.5 |
6 | 5.0 | 71 | 78 | 93.5 | 13 | 9 | 14 | 12 | 12.0 | 71.5 | 7.5 |
7 | 7.5 | 81 | 73 | 101.2 | 12 | 7 | 11 | 20 | 12.5 | 69.7 | 5.6 |
8 | 10 | 69 | 78 | 90.7 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 9.5 | 57.5 | -6.6 |
EMS | 300 µg/mL | 56 | 64 | 61.3 | 63 | 60 | 65 | 59 | 61.8 | 842.6 | 778.6 |
MMS | 10 µg/mL | 59 | 52 | 53.9 | 34 | 40 | 38 | 37 | 37.3 | 455.8 | 391.7 |
C: Negative control
e: Number of cultures with cell growth.
f: Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-ln (((96 - (mean Plate 1, Plate 2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)
g: Mutant frequency,
MF = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selective medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}x800
h: Induced mutant frequency, IMF = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate
MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate
Table 5. Main Experiment - Colony Sizing, without metabolic activation
Test Group* | Concentration [mM] | Wells with at least 1 colony | Large colonies | Small colonies | % small colonies |
C1 | 0 | 57 | 38 | 19 | 33.3 |
C2 | 42 | 27 | 15 | 35.7 | |
EMS | 300 µg/mL | 247 | 208 | 39 | 15.8 |
MMS | 10 µg/mL | 149 | 59 | 90 | 60.4 |
C: Negative control
EMS: Ethylmethanesulfonate
MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate
*: Based on the non-mutagenic effects of the test item, an assessment of clastogenicity was not feasible.
Table 6. Main Experiment - Toxicity Data, with metabolic activation
Test Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of Cells 4 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 24 h after Treatment | Number of Cells 48 h after Treatment | SGa | RSGb [%] | RCEc [%] | RTGd [%] |
C1 | 0 | 301000 | 826000 | 1440000 | 11.9 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
C2 | 288000 | 826000 | 1420000 | 11.7 | ||||
2 | 0.2 | 325000 | 896000 | 1380000 | 12.4 | 104.7 | 103.8 | 108.7 |
3 | 0.5 | 288000 | 860000 | 1420000 | 12.2 | 103.4 | 103.8 | 107.4 |
4 | 1.0 | 305000 | 914000 | 1450000 | 13.3 | 112.2 | 112.3 | 126.0 |
5 | 2.5 | 310000 | 849000 | 1330000 | 11.3 | 95.6 | 117.8 | 112.7 |
6 | 5.0 | 290000 | 830000 | 1400000 | 11.6 | 98.4 | 121.8 | 119.8 |
7 | 7.5 | 269000 | 815000 | 1420000 | 11.6 | 98.0 | 117.8 | 115.5 |
8 | 10 | 286000 | 794000 | 1430000 | 11.4 | 96.1 | 123.9 | 119.1 |
B[a]P | 2.5 µg/mL | 266000 | 563000 | 1420000 | 8.0 | 67.7 | 86.9 | 58.8 |
a: Suspension Growth, SG = [((value 24 h x 30) / 1x107) x ((value 48 h x 20) / (value 24 h* x 20))];
* : for value 24 h > 3x105 then value 24 h = 3x105
b: Relative Suspension Growth, RSG = [(value SG / value SG of corresponding controls) x 100]
c: Relative Cloning Efficiency, RCE = [(CE test group / CE of corresponding controls) x 100]
Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-ln (((96 - (mean Plate 1, Plate 2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)
d: Relative Total Growth, RTG = (RSG x RCE) / 100
B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene
Table 7. Main Experiment - Mutagenicity Data, with metabolic activation
Test Group | Concentration [mM] | Cloning Efficiency (CE) | Mutagenicity Data | ||||||||
Plate 1e | Plate 2e | CEf [%] | Number of cultures / 96 wells | MFg [mutants / 106 cells] | IMFh [mutants / 106 cells] | ||||||
Plate 1e | Plate 2e | Plate 3e | Plate 4e | Mean | |||||||
C1 | 0 | 73 | 70 | 85.4 | 11 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 10.5 | 68.0 | / |
C2 | 73 | 73 | 89.3 | 11 | 8 | 14 | 9 | 10.5 | 65.1 | / | |
2 | 0.2 | 68 | 78 | 89.3 | 16 | 7 | 18 | 7 | 12.0 | 75.8 | 9.3 |
3 | 0.5 | 76 | 71 | 90.7 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 9.5 | 57.7 | -8.9 |
4 | 1.0 | 82 | 70 | 98.0 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 11.3 | 63.6 | -2.9 |
5 | 2.5 | 79 | 76 | 102.9 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 12 | 12.3 | 66.6 | 0.1 |
6 | 5.0 | 79 | 78 | 106.4 | 14 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 12.3 | 64.2 | -2.3 |
7 | 7.5 | 81 | 74 | 102.9 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 11.0 | 59.3 | -7.2 |
8 | 10 | 78 | 80 | 108.2 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 16 | 15.0 | 78.6 | 12.1 |
B[a]P | 2.5 µg/mL | 61 | 74 | 75.9 | 69 | 72 | 66 | 73 | 70.0 | 864.1 | 797.5 |
C: Negative control
e: Number of cultures with cell growth.
f: Cloning Efficiency, CE = ((-ln (((96 - (mean Plate 1, Plate 2)) / 96)) / 1.6) x 100)
g: Mutant frequency,
MF = {-ln [negative cultures/total wells (selective medium)] / -ln [negative cultures/total wells (non selective medium)]}x800
h: Induced mutant frequency, IMF = mutant frequency sample – mean value mutant frequency corresponding controls
B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene
Table 8. Main Experiment - Colony Sizing, with metabolic activation
Test Group* | Concentration [mM] | Wells with at least 1 colony | Large colonies | Small colonies | % small colonies |
C1 | 0 | 42 | 33 | 9 | 21.4 |
C2 | 42 | 31 | 11 | 26.2 | |
B[a]P | 2.5 µg/mL | 280 | 168 | 112 | 40.0 |
C: Negative control
B[a]P: Benzo[a]pyrene
*: Based on the non-mutagenic effects of the test item, an assessment of clastogenicity was not feasible.
Pre-Experiment for Toxicity
According to the used guideline the highest recommended concentration is 10 mM. The test item was dissolved in cell culture medium. No precipitate of the test item was noted. The highest dose group evaluated in the pre-experiment was 7.5 mM without and 10 mM with metabolic activation.
The cytokinesis block proliferation index (CBPI) was used to calculate the cytostasis (cytostasis [%] = 100 - CBPI relative [%]). Cytostasis was used to describe cytotoxicity. The concentrations evaluated in the main experiment were based on the results obtained in the pre-experiment.
Table 1. Summary: Experiment I and II, without metabolic activation
| Dose Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of cells evaluated | Cytostasis [%] | Relative Cell Growth [%] | Micronucleated Cells Frequency [%] | Historical Control Limits Negative Control | P | Statistically Significant Increasea |
Exp. I 4 h treatment, 24 h fixation interval | C | 0 | 2000 | 0 | 100 | 0.65 | 0.37% -1.37% | / | / |
4 | 0.7 | 2000 | 14 | 86 | 1.00 | - | - | ||
6 | 0.9 | 2000 | 42 | 58 | 0.90 | - | - | ||
7 | 1.0 | 2000 | 45 | 55 | 1.25 | - | - | ||
9 | 1.5 | 2000 | 55 | 45 | 1.20 | - | - | ||
MMS | 25 µg/mL | 3000 | 8 | 92 | 1.98 | - | + | ||
Colc | 2.0 µg/mL | 2000 | 8 | 92 | 3.25 | - | + |
| Dose Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of cells evaluated | Cytostasis [%] | Relative Cell Growth [%] | Micronucleated Cells Frequency [%] | Historical Control Limits Negative Control | P | Statistically Significant Increasea |
Exp. II 24 h treatment, 24 h fixation interval | C | 0 | 2000 | 0 | 100 | 0.80 | 0.37% -1.37% | / | / |
4 | 0.10 | 2000 | 14 | 86 | 0.95 | - | - | ||
6 | 0.25 | 2000 | 35 | 65 | 1.00 | - | - | ||
7 | 0.5 | 2000 | 27 | 73 | 0.75 | - | - | ||
9 | 0.6 | 2000 | 61 | 39 | 1.20 | - | - | ||
MMS | 25 µg/mL | 2000 | 32 | 68 | 8.10 | - | + | ||
Colc | 0.08 µg/mL | 2000 | 12 | 88 | 5.25 | - | + |
Table 2: Summary: Experiment I, with metabolic activation
| Dose Group | Concentration [mM] | Number of cells evaluated | Cytostasis [%] | Relative Cell Growth [%] | Micronucleated Cells Frequency [%] | Historical Control Limits Negative Control | P | Statistically Significant Increasea |
Exp. I 4 h treatment, 24 h fixation interval
| C | 0 | 4000 | 0 | 100 | 0.78 | 0.42% -1.64% | / | / |
3 | 2.5 | 2000 | 20 | 80 | 1.15 | - | - | ||
4 | 5.0 | 4000 | 30 | 70 | 1.23 | - | + | ||
6 | 10 | 4000 | 27 | 73 | 1.23 | - | + | ||
CPA | 2.5 µg/mL | 2000 | 48 | 52 | 5.65 | - | + |
C: Negative Control (Culture medium)
a: statistical significant increase compared to negative control (χ² test , p<0.05). +: significant; -: not significant
MMS: Methylmethanesulfonate, Positive Control (without metabolic activation)
Colc: Colchicine, Positive Control (without metabolic activation)
CPA: Cyclophosphamide, Positive Control (with metabolic activation)
CBPI: Cytokinesis Block Proliferation Index, CBPI = ((c1 x 1) + (c2 x 2) + (cx x 3))/n
Relative Cell Growth: 100 x ((CBPI Test conc – 1) / (CBPI control -1))
c1: mononucleate cells
c2: binucleate cells
cx: multinucleate cells
n: total number of cells
P: Precipitation
Cytostasis [%] = 100- Relative Cell Growth [%]
*: the cytostasis is defined 0, when the relative cell growth exceeds 100%.
If cytotoxicity is observed the highest concentration evaluated should not exceed the limit of 55% ± 5% cytotoxicity according to the OECD Guideline 487. Higher levels of cytotoxicity may induce chromosome damage as a secondary effect of cytotoxicity. The other concentrations evaluated should exhibit intermediate and little or no toxicity. However, OECD 487 does not define the limit for discriminating between cytotoxic and non-cytotoxic effects. According to laboratory experience this limit is a value of the relative cell growth of 70% compared to the negative/solvent control which corresponds to 30% of cytostasis.
In experiment I without metabolic activation no increase of the cytostasis above 30% was noted at 0.7 mM. At 0.9 mM a cytostasis of 42%, at 1.0 mM a cytostasis of 45% and at 1.5 mM a cytostasis of 55% was noted. In experiment I with metabolic activation no increase of the cytostasis above 30% was observed.
In experiment II without metabolic activation no increase of the cytostasis above 30% was noted at 0.10 mM and at 0.50 mM. At 0.25 mM a cytostasis of 35% and at 0.60 mM a cytostasis of 61% was noted.
In the main experiment I with and without metabolic activation no biologically relevant increase of the micronucleus frequency was noted after treatment with the test item. No statistically significant enhancement (p<0.05) of cells with micronuclei was noted in the concentration groups of the test item evaluated in experiment I and II without metabolic activation.
In experiment I with metabolic activation a statistically significant increase (p = 0.0431) of cells with micronuclei was noted at 5.0 and 10 mM. However, since the corresponding numbers of micronucleated cells were within the historical control limits of the negative control and no concentration-related increase was observed, this effect was considered as not biologically relevant.
The χ² Test for trend was performed to test whether there is a concentration-related increase in the micronucleated cells frequency in the experimental conditions. No statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated cells under the experimental conditions of the study was observed in experiment I and II. Methylmethanesulfonate (MMS, 25 µg/mL) and cyclophosphamide (CPA, 2.5 µg/mL) were used as clastogenic controls. Colchicine (0.08 and 2.0 µg/mL) was used as aneugenic control. All induced distinct and statistically significant increases of the micronucleus frequency. This demonstrates the validity of the assay.
Toxicity may be detected by a clearing or rather diminution of the background lawn or a reduction in the number of revertants down to a mutation factor of approximately ≤ 0.5 in relation to the solvent control.
Table 1: Results Pre-Experiment
Substance | Dose (µg/plate) | TA98 | TA100 | ||
Mutation Factor [toxicity]* | Mutation Factor [toxicity]* | ||||
without S9 | with S9 | without S9 | with S9 | ||
Solvent Control (DMSO) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
4-NOPD | 10.0 | 13.8 | - | - | - |
NaN3 | 10.0 | - | - | 6.8 | - |
2-AA | 2.50 | - | 56.9 | - | 17.2 |
Test Item | 3.16 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.9 |
10.0 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
31.6 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | |
100 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | |
316 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | |
1000 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.9 | |
2500 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.1 | |
5000 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
* [toxicity parameter]: B = Background lawn reduced; N = No background lawn
Experiment I (Plate-incorporation Test)
Table 2: Results Experiment I
Tester Strain: TA98 1 Experiment: 1
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 36 31 35 |
34 |
2.6 | 44 37 45 |
42 |
4.4 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
DMSO |
| 43 29 30 |
34 |
7.8 | 42 44 48 |
45 |
3.1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 42 33 35 |
37 |
4.7 | 38 32 52 |
41 |
10.3 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 34 51 36 |
40 |
9.3 | 34 47 44 |
42 |
6.8 |
1.2 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 31 49 37 |
39 |
9.2 | 43 43 32 |
39 |
6.4 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 27 25 27 |
26 |
1.2 | 45 45 35 |
42 |
5.8 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 68 29 31 |
43 |
22.0 | 55 41 46 |
47 |
7.1 |
1.3 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 49 34 53 |
45 |
10.0 | 33 45 47 |
42 |
7.6 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
4-NOPD | 10 µg | 454 480 475 |
470 |
13.8 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
13.8 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 2993 2086 2547 |
2542 |
453.5 |
/ |
56.9 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA100 Experiment: 1
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 112 125 100 |
112
|
12.5 | 108 123 120 |
117 |
7.9 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
DMSO |
| 98 102 100 |
100 |
2.0 | 116 111 116 |
114 |
2.9 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 79 99 80 |
86 |
11.3 | 111 100 98 |
103 |
7.0 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 101 94 74 |
90 |
14.0 | 83 111 137 |
110 |
27.0 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 78 90 83 |
84 |
6.0 | 96 112 112 |
107 |
9.2 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 107 93 114 |
105 |
10.7 | 96 105 93 |
98 |
6.2 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 110 111 102 |
108 |
4.9 | 135 110 130 |
125 |
13.2 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 83 82 101 |
89 |
10.7 | 110 130 120 |
123 |
6.1 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
NaN3 | 10 µg | 620 675 736 |
677 |
58.0 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
6.8 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 1632 2032 2235 |
1966 |
306.8 |
/ |
17.2 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA1535 Experiment: 1
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 14 13 16 |
14 |
1.5 | 11 12 14 |
12 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
DMSO |
| 19 17 11 |
16 |
4.2 | 9 14 11 |
11 |
2.5 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 16 10 11 |
12 |
3.2 | 11 12 8 |
10 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 14 9 10 |
11 |
2.6 | 10 17 20 |
16 |
5.1 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 13 13 7 |
11 |
3.5 | 18 13 16 |
16 |
2.5 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 12 26 14 |
17 |
7.6 | 14 16 12 |
14 |
2.0 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 13 17 14 |
15 |
2.1 | 22 14 13 |
16 |
4.9 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 11 13 11 |
12 |
1.2 | 9 17 23 |
16 |
7.0 |
0.7 |
1.4 |
NaN3 | 10 µg | 1026 1011 951 |
996 |
39.7 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
63.6 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 117 147 114 |
126 |
18.2 |
/ |
11.1 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA1537 Experiment: 1
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 16 13 20 |
16
|
3.5 | 22 23 20 |
22 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
DMSO |
| 10 16 14 |
13 |
3.1 | 18 23 22 |
21 |
2.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 16 20 10 |
15 |
5.0 | 25 22 16 |
21 |
4.6 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 16 24 13 |
18 |
5.7 | 21 16 18 |
18 |
2.5 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 12 16 20 |
16 |
4.0 | 17 13 15 |
15 |
2.0 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 24 29 29 |
27 |
2.9 | 19 16 15 |
17 |
2.1 |
2.1 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 22 20 17 |
20 |
2.5 | 29 14 15 |
19 |
8.4 |
1.5 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 17 12 28 |
19 |
8.2 | 24 25 27 |
25 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
1.2 |
4-NOPD | 10 µg | 33 34 42 |
36 |
4.9 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
2.7 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 94 77 81 |
84 |
8.9 |
/ |
4.0 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item) / mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA102 Experiment: 1
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 456 455 481 |
464 |
14.7 | 512 505 487 |
501 |
12.9 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
DMSO |
| 471 473 458 |
467 |
8.1 | 469 459 462 |
463 |
5.1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 60 103 252 |
138 |
100.8 | 482 436 487 |
468 |
28.1 |
0.3 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | / 258 358 |
308 |
70.7 | 498 507 485 |
497 |
11.1 |
0.7 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 411 411 487 |
436 |
43.9 | 525 538 501 |
521 |
18.8 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 502 475 467 |
481 |
18.3 | 526 548 494 |
523 |
27.2 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 539 466 469 |
491 |
41.3 | 481 511 517 |
503 |
19.3 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 460 461 447 |
456 |
7.8 | 580 538 542 |
553 |
23.2 |
1.0 |
1.2 |
MMS | 1 µg | 1168 1232 1231 |
1210 |
36.7 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
2.6 |
/ |
2-AA | 10 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 1002 1073 1182 |
1086 |
90.7 |
/ |
2.3 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Experiment II (Pre-incubation Test)
Table 3: Results Experiment II
Tester Strain: TA98 Experiment: 2
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 46 35 39 |
40 |
5.6 | 36 30 39 |
35 |
4.6 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
DMSO |
| 55 19 34 |
36 |
18.1 | 24 32 32 |
29 |
4.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 23 29 32 |
28 |
4.6 | 31 41 43 |
38 |
6.4 |
0.8 |
1.3 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 17 27 45 |
30 |
14.2 | 48 40 46 |
45 |
4.2 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 34 28 34 |
32 |
3.5 | 38 49 40 |
42 |
5.9 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 21 B 30 B 30 B |
27 |
5.2 | 57 52 49 |
53 |
4.0 |
0.8 |
1.8 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 7 B 26 B 14 B |
16 |
9.6 | 64 44 57 |
55 |
10.1 |
0.4 |
1.9 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 0 N 0 N 0 N |
0
|
0.0 | 0 B 8 B 2 B |
3 |
4.2 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
4-NOPD | 10 µg | 477 433 377 |
429 |
50.1 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
11.9 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 968 903 1466 |
1112 |
308.0 |
/ |
37.9 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA100 Experiment: 2
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 98 100 92 |
97 |
4.2 | 110 112 97 |
106 |
8.1 |
1.2 |
1.0 |
DMSO |
| 71 82 92 |
82 |
10.5 | 101 97 110 |
103 |
6.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 79 71 77 |
76 |
4.2 | 92 99 88 |
93 |
5.6 |
0.9 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 61 109 89 |
86 |
24.1 | 87 82 86 |
85 |
2.6 |
1.1 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 72 60 67 |
66 |
6.0 | 76 74 90 |
80 |
8.7 |
0.8 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 84 74 62 |
73 |
11.0 | 86 88 82 |
85 |
3.1 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 48 B 45 B 0 B |
31 |
26.9 | 92 97 99 |
96 |
3.6 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 10 B 21 B 0 B |
10 |
10.5 | 57 B 92 B 78 B |
76 |
17.6 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
NaN3 | 10 µg | 526 589 703 |
606 |
89.7 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
7.4 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 448 443 661 |
517 |
124.4 |
/ |
5.0 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA1535 Experiment: 2
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 15 16 6 |
12 |
5.5 | 14 5 8 |
9 |
4.6 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
DMSO |
| 13 16 20 |
16 |
3.5 | 10 17 15 |
14 |
3.6 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 12 10 9 |
10 |
1.5 | 15 7 12 |
11 |
4.0 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 11 10 11 |
11 |
0.6 | 8 12 12 |
11 |
2.3 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 6 8 10 |
8 |
2.0 | 8 8 9 |
8 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 14 8 7 |
10 |
3.8 | 12 17 12 |
14 |
2.9 |
0.6 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 6 B 4 B 9 B |
6 |
2.5 | 17 11 12 |
13 |
3.2 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 0 B 0 B 0 B |
0 |
0.0 | 5 B 4 B 7 B |
5 |
1.5 |
0.0 |
0.4 |
NaN3 | 10 µg | 1369 1344 1264 |
1326 |
54.8 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
81.2 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 61 83 97 |
80 |
18.1 |
/ |
5.7 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA1537 Experiment: 2
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 14 16 15 |
15 |
1.0 | 19 16 22 |
19 |
3.0 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
DMSO |
| 6 17 14 |
12 |
5.7 | 14 13 20 |
16 |
3.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 17 12 5 |
11 |
6.0 | 10 12 14 |
12 |
2.0 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 12 8 12 |
11 |
2.3 | 22 14 23 |
20 |
4.9 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 14 9 7 |
10 |
3.6 | 13 9 21 |
14 |
6.1 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 14 16 12 |
14 |
2.0 | 21 19 11 |
17 |
5.3 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 9 B 13 B 16 B |
13 |
3.5 | 19 10 22 |
17 |
6.2 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 13 B 7 B 15 B |
12 |
4.2 | 8 B 9 B 8 B |
8 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
4-NOPD | 40 µg | 110 134 134 |
126 |
13.9 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
10.2 |
/ |
2-AA | 2.5 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 85 85 82 |
84 |
1.7 |
/ |
5.4 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Tester Strain: TA102 Experiment: 2
Treatment | Dose/plate | REVERTANT COLONIES PER PLATE | MUTATION FACTOR | ||||||
Without activation (-S9) | With activation (+S9) | ||||||||
Counts | Mean | SD | Counts | Mean | SD | -S9 | +S9 | ||
A.dest. |
| 421 379 370 |
390 |
27.2 | 444 443 450 |
446 |
3.8 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
DMSO |
| 385 399 417 |
400 |
16.0 | 412 439 448 |
433 |
18.7 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.0316 µL | 340 306 303 |
316 |
20.6 | 389 384 406 |
393 |
11.5 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 0.100 µL | 417 351 368 |
379 |
34.3 | 443 419 458 |
440 |
19.7 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
Test Item | 0.316 µL | 420 447 456 |
441 |
18.7 | 411 359 394 |
388 |
26.5 |
1.1 |
0.9 |
Test Item | 1.0 µL | 361 363 410 |
378 |
27.7 | 343 333 356 |
344 |
11.5 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
Test Item | 2.5 µL | 315 277 296 |
296 |
19.0 | 317 329 312 |
319 |
8.7 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
Test Item | 5.0 µL | 288 B 333 B 265 B |
295 |
34.6 | 356 395 411 |
387 |
28.3 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
MMS | 1 µg | 1630 1522 1396 |
1516 |
117.1 | / / / |
/ |
/ |
3.8 |
/ |
2-AA | 10 µg | / / / |
/ |
/ | 598 1216 1204 |
1006 |
353.4 |
/ |
2.3 |
SD: Standard-deviation; P: Precipitation; B: Background lawn reduced; C: Contamination; N: No background lawn
Mutation factor =mean revertants (test item)/mean revertants (vehicle control)
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
As the substance was found being negative in three independent in vitro genotoxicity studies (OECD471, OECD478, OECD490), 2-methycyclohexanone is not subject to classification according to Regulation EC No. 1272/2008, Annex 1, section 3.5.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.