Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
72 hrs
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48, 72 hrs after the application
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal:
Remarks:
#1, 2, 3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal:
Remarks:
#1, 2, 3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal:
Remarks:
#1, 2, 3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal:
Remarks:
#1, 2, 3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Other effects:
No test item-related clinical signs, body weight changes, dead animals or abnormal eye reaction were observed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met