Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Some information in this page has been claimed confidential.

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1992
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This study was according to the OECD 406 Buehler protocol
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Predates OECD 429, LLNA

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Yellowish Brown Liquid

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
28 young adult Hartley Guinea Pigs were used in the study. 14 males and 14 females were used.
Animals were purchased from a registered commercial breeding laboratory (Elm Hill Breeding Labs, Chelmsford, MA)
All animals weighed between 250-400 grams before the test study
All animals were between 21-43 days old
Animals were housed in stainless steel cages
Test rooms were held at 68±F with an average humidity of 30-70%
A 12 hour light/dark cycle was used within the lab room, and 10-13 air changes per hour occured

All test animals received food and water ad libitum
Animals were supplied with a diet of guinea pig ration and municiple tap water

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
10%, 25%, 50%, and 100% at 0.4 mL
Day(s)/duration:
6 hours
Adequacy of induction:
highest concentration used causing mild-to-moderate skin irritation and well-tolerated systemically
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Concentration / amount:
50% concentration, 0.4 mL
Day(s)/duration:
24 hours
Adequacy of challenge:
highest non-irritant concentration
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
The Buehler closed patch technique was used to test guinea pigs for signs of skin sensitisation.
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
DNCB

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
DNCB

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Key result
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
100%
No. with + reactions:
4
Total no. in group:
4
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation

Any other information on results incl. tables

In a preliminary irritation screening study and during the induction phase of main study, signs of erythema or edema were observed in animals at concentrations of 100%. The irritation was transient and disappeared within 48 h. No erythema or edema were observed when animals were challenged with 50% concentrations. The test substance was not considered a skin sensitizer.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
4-Phenylpropylpyridine was not considered a skin sensitizer in guinea pigs in a Buehler procedure for dermal sensitisation.