Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-317-4 | CAS number: 105-64-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 May 2022 - 19 July 2022
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 022
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 489 (In vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 2016
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian comet assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Bisisopropyl peroxydicarbonate
- EC Number:
- 203-317-4
- EC Name:
- Bisisopropyl peroxydicarbonate
- Cas Number:
- 105-64-6
- Molecular formula:
- C8H14O6
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-[({[(propan-2-yloxy)carbonyl]peroxy}carbonyl)oxy]propane
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on species / strain selection:
- The rat is the species recommended by OECD guidelline for this test.
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France origin, Saint-Germain-sur-l’Arbresle; FRANCE
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 201 g to 230 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: in polypropylene cages
- Diet : A04C-10 from SAFE (batch 19330), ad libitum
- Water : ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 8 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %,
- Air changes (per hr): not precised, but ventilated system
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- Corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- Dose volume : 10 mL/kg b.w.
emulsion
In the main genotoxicity assay, three preparations of the test item at the concentrations of 100 - 50 and 25 mg/mL were prepared, giving final doses of 1000 - 500 and 250 mg/kg b.w./day (x2), respectively when administered at 10 mL/kg b.w..
Preparations for treatment were performed on the day of the 1st treatment and the formulations were used within 24 hours for the 2nd treatment. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 daily treatments at 24-hour intervals
- Frequency of treatment:
- 2 daily treatments at 24-hour intervals
- Post exposure period:
- 2-6 hours after the second treatment
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males/group, except for the high dose group : 7
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- A total of 5 animals were treated orally twice with Methylmethane sulfonate (Aldrich, batch MKCL6261) in sterile water (Fresenius, Batch 13RPD081), 100 mg/kg b.w./day, gavage, 2 daily treatments at 24-hour intervals and sacrified 2 to 6 hours after the last treatment.
Interpretation of the results
For a test item to be considered positive in the comet assay, it must be observed:
- At least one of the treatment groups exhibits a statistically significant increase in the mean of medians of percentage of DNA in tail compared with the concurrent vehicle control,
- This increase is dose-related when evaluated with an appropriate trend test, and
- Any of these results are outside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data and/or the intervals of historical data for individual values.
When all of these criteria are met, the test chemical is then considered able to induce DNA strand breakage in the tissues studied in this test system.
A test item is considered clearly negative if:
- none of the test concentrations exhibits a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent vehicle control,
- there is no concentration-related increase when evaluated with an appropriate trend test
- all results are inside the distribution of the historical vehicle control data and/or the intervals of historical data for individual values
- direct or indirect evidence supportive of exposure of, or toxicity to, the target tissue(s) has been demonstrated.
The test chemical is then considered unable to induce DNA strand breakage in the tissues studied in this test system.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Two to six hours after the second treatment, the rats are killed and cells from the selected target organs (i.e. liver, glandular stomach and duodenum) are isolated for the comet assay.
Five males of each group were assigned for cell isolation and assessed for DNA fragmentation.
Individual animals were anaesthetized with isoflurane and exsanguined.
Single cell preparations were done within one hour after animal sacrifice.
A 'V' shaped incision was made from the centre of the lower abdomen to the rib cage. The skin and muscles were removed to reveal the abdominal cavity.
A portion of the liver, the glandular stomach and the duodenum was removed and washed in the cold mincing buffer until as much blood as possible has been removed. The portion was minced or scrapped with a pair of fine scissors to release the cells. The cell suspension was stored on ice for 15-30 seconds to allow large clumps to settle. The whole cell suspension was collected.
Cells were enumerated on a hemocytometer, and sufficient cells to obtain 25± 5 x 103 viable cells per slide were harvested from each cell suspension for proceeding to slides preparation.
Number of cells observed per animal: 150
Number of cells observed per dose: 750 - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- After isolation, single cells are embedded in agarose on microscope slides and the obtained microgels are successively submitted to lysis, unwinding and electrophoresis in alkaline conditions and under dimmed light to prevent any additional DNA damage. After neutralization, slides are dried and could then be stained with a fluorescent dye (e.g. propidium iodide) before analysis and scoring. The method used for quantifying DNA migration involves a computerized image analysis system in order to collect comet data; then, the dedicated software allows the calculation of metrics for DNA migration.
Determination of the cytotoxicity of the test item
Statistically significant increases in the percentage of hedgehogs were observed in the 1000 and 250 mg/kg b.w./day (x2) treated groups when compared to the vehicle group (See Table 12) with values of 22.68 and 16.21%, respectively, vs. 12.79% in the relative vehicle control. The values were however clearly below 50%. - Evaluation criteria:
- Expression of the results
- the median per slide of the percentage of DNA in tail for at least 50 cells
- the mean of medians of the percentage of DNA in tail per animal (i.e. 3 slides, 150 cells)
- the mean of medians per concentration (i.e. 5 animals, 750 cells)
In addition, each slide was also examined for presence of hedgehogs (possible indicator of toxicity and or apoptosis). Hedgehogs were excluded from image analysis data collection. However, determining their frequency might be useful for data interpretation. Therefore, the percentage of hedgehogs was recorded for each slide per animal and per organ. The hedgehogs, also known as clouds or ghost cells, are morphological indicative of highly damaged cells often associated with severe genotoxicity, necrosis and apoptosis. A hedgehog results from a total migration of the DNA from the nucleus into the comet tail, reducing the size of the head to a minimum.
A study is accepted if the following criteria are fulfilled:
- Concurrent vehicle controls should be within the control limits of the distribution of the laboratory’s historical vehicle control database and in the intervals of historical data for individual values.
- The concurrent positive controls should induce responses that are comparable to the historical positive control data and produce a statistically significant increase compared with the concurrent vehicle control.
- The appropriate number of doses and cells must be analysed.
Moreover, in the vehicle group, an eventual increase in the percentage of hedgehogs, must not be >50%. - Statistics:
- In order to quantify the test item effects on DNA, the following statistical analysis strategy was applied, using the statistical software GraphPad Version 3.10.
As the median of percentage of DNA in tail and other tail parameters do not follow a Gaussian distribution (E. Bauer et al., 1998), the non-parametric, one-way Kruskall-Wallis test was performed. This method is based on the analysis of variance by ranks for testing equality of population medians among groups.
The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test was applied to compare each of the doses tested with the vehicle control in order to determine statistical significance of differences in group median values between each group versus the vehicle control. This test was also used to compare vehicle control and positive control to determine acceptable criteria of a valid test.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- on liver cells
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- on duodenum cells
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- A slight decrease in spontaneous motor activity was noted at 1000 mg/kg b.w. 15 minutes and between 2 to 4 hours after the 2nd treatment.
Liver cells
Determination of the cytotoxicity of the test item
A statistically increase in the percentage of hedgehogs was observed in the 1000 mg/kg b.w./day (x2) treated groups when compared to the vehicle group with 4.12% of ghost cells vs. 2.31% in the relative control group.
Determination of the genotoxicity of the test item
No statistically significant increase in the mean of medians for the percentage of DNA in tail was induced at the three analysed doses of 1000, 500 and 250 mg/kg b.w./day (x2), vs. the vehicle control. Indeed, the means of medians of the percentage of tail DNA ranged from 0.13 to 0.68% vs. 0.09% in the respective vehicle control.
No assessment of systemic exposure was done, however clinical signs such as decrease in spontaneous motor activity were observed at the top dose tested and a slight increase in the percentage of ghost cells was noted.
The test item Bisisopropyl peroxydicarbonate was thus not genotoxic in rat liver. Indeed, no primary DNA damage was detected.
Duodenum cells
Determination of the cytotoxicity of the test item
No statistically significant increase in the percentage of hedgehogs was noted at the doses tested of 1000, 500 or 250 mg/kg b.w./day (x2) treated groups when compared to the vehicle group.
Determination of the genotoxicity of the test item
No statistically significant increases in the mean of medians for the percentage of DNA in tail was induced at the three tested doses of 1000, 500 and 250mg/kg b.w./day (x2), vs. the vehicle control. Indeed, the means of medians of the percentage of tail DNA ranged from 1.23 to 2.29% vs. 2.79% in the respective vehicle control.
The test item Bisisopropyl peroxydicarbonate was thus not genotoxic in rat duodenum. Indeed, no primary DNA damage was detected.
Glandular stomach cells
In progress.
Analytical results:
The control of concentrations of Bisisopropyl peroxydicarbonate in treatment preparations was performed in a GLP compliant laboratory following a validated method. The resuslts are reliable; concentrations were determined to be within the range 85-115% of the treatment with percent recovery between the theoretical and actual concentrations of -1 or -0.7% at the concentrations ranging from 25 to 100 mg/mL (report in progress).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under our experimental conditions, the test item does not present DNA strand breaks and/or alkali-labile sites inducer activities toward the liver and the duodenum from CD Sprague-Dawley male rats.
Investigations on the glandular stomach are in progress. - Executive summary:
The search for potential genotoxic activity of Bisisopropyl peroxydicarbonate (CAS 105-64-6) was assessed using the in vivo comet assay in the liver, glandular stomach and duodenum in the rat.
The treatment was carried out by oral route (gavage), using 1 daily treatment for 2 consecutive days with the OCDE guideline 489 (2016) at the dose-levels of 1000 – 500 – 250 mg/kg b.w./day base on the results of preliminary assay up to 2000 mg/kg b.w./day.No increase in the percentage of DNA in tail was observed in liver and duodenum.
Investigations on the glandular stomach are in progress.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.