Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
For details and justification of read-across please refer to the attached report in section 13 of IUCLID.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Key result
Duration:
48 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 0.17 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mobility
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limit
Remarks:
ca. 0.14 - 0.19
Details on results:
Test evaluations were done according to the guidelines by visual assessment of the mobility of the daphnids after 24 and 48 hours.
The EC50 was calculated by using the Probit model and by graphical determination on logarithmic probability paper.
The concentration of the test substance at the beginning and at the end of the test was analysed by the analytical Service Klybeck.

The EC0 and the EC100 after 48 h of exposure was 0.08 mg/L and 0.45 mg/L, respectively.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
EC50 (24 h) = 0.9 ppm (range: 0.8 - 1.5 ppm)

1) Analytical results of test substance measurements:

Nominal concentration [ppm]

Concentration start [ppm]

Concentration end [ppm]

Mean value* [ppm]

0.10

0.08

0.07

0.08

0.18

0.14

0.13

0.14

0.32

0.26

0.23

0.25

0.58

0.47

0.42

0.45

1.00

0.80

0.75

0.78

* used for calculation of EC50 value

2) Oxygen concentration and pH

The oxygen concentration and the pH was controlled at the beginning and at the end of the test.

Start:        - Oxygen: saturated

- pH: 8.0 (highest test concentration)

- Temp.: 21° C

End:

Nominal Conc. [ppm]

0.1

0.18

0.32

0.58

1.0

Blank

Oxygen [%]

96

96

96

97

96

97

pH

7.9

7.8

7.9

7.9

7.9

7.7

Temp. [°C]

21

21

21

21

21

21

 

3) Influence of the Test Item on the immobilisation of Daphnia magna:

Nominal concentration [ppm]

No. of animals

No. of responses

Immobility [%]*

24 h

48 h

24 h

48 h

0 (Blank)

10

0

0

0

0

10

0

0

0.08

10

0

0

0

0

10

0

0

0.14

10

1

4

5

20

10

0

0

0.25

10

9

9

95

95

10

10

10

0.45

10

9

10

90

100

10

9

10

0.78

10

10

10

100

100

10

10

10

 * calculated for 20 animals

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The 48-h EC50 of the test item to Daphnia magna under the conditions of the OECD test guideline 202 is 0.17 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.17 mg/L.
Executive summary:

The 48h acute toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna was studied under static conditions. Daphnids were exposed to 0 (blank control), 0.08, 0.14, 0.25, 0.45, 0.78 ppm (measured concentration). Mortality/immobilisation were observed daily. 

The 48h EC50was 0.17 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.17 mg/L. The 48h EC0 based on mortality/immobilisation was 0.08 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.08 mg/L. 

 

Based on the results of this study, the test item would be classified in category Acute 1 & Chronic 1 in accordance with the classification system of the GHS.

 

This study is classified as acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirements for an acute toxicity study with freshwater invertebrates.

 

Results Synopsis

Test Organism Age (e.g. 1stinstar): < 24 h

Test Type: Static

 

EC0:  0.08 mg/L

EC50:  0.17 mg/L                       95% C.I.:  0.14 -0.19 mg/L

Endpoint(s) Effected:  mortality/immobilisation

This information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the substance to be registered.

For details and justification of read-across please refer to the attached report in section 13 of IUCLID.

Endpoint:
short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
04.10 - 06.10.1990 and 08.09 - 10.09.1990
Reliability:
3 (not reliable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Results from test 1 are not conclusive based on lacking documentation
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
only mortality is recorded
GLP compliance:
not specified
Analytical monitoring:
not specified
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Dilution water parameters:
Dilution water: IR-Lake mixture
Specific conductance: 150 micromhos at 25°C
Test organisms (species):
Ceriodaphnia dubia
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
48 h
Hardness:
50 ppm as calcium carbonate
Test temperature:
20°C ± 1°C
pH:
6.87 - 6.99
Dissolved oxygen:
8.5 - 9.3 ppm
Salinity:
not applicable
Conductivity:
140 - 150 micromhos at 25 °C
Nominal and measured concentrations:
First test: 1/ 50/ 100/ 1000 / 2500/ 5000/ 10 000 ppm
Second test: 0.2 / 0.4 / 0.6 / 1 ppm
Details on test conditions:
Not reported
Reference substance (positive control):
no
Duration:
48 h
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 1.1 other: ppm
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks on result:
other: Results from test 1
Duration:
48 h
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 0.165 other: ppm
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
act. ingr.
Basis for effect:
mortality
Remarks on result:
other: Results from test 1; recalculation of results based on concentration of active ingredient
Details on results:
- Mortality of control: 0
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
Results with reference substance (positive control):
n.a.
Reported statistics and error estimates:
no statistics reported

The first test (results see table 1) applied concentrations from 1 ppm up to 10 000 ppm, revealing 90 % death at 1ppm. As noted in handwriting on the test report, the LC50 after an additional acute testing is stated to be 1.1 ppm. However, it is not clear from the data reported how this result was obtained.

The second test (see results in table 2) was conducted with a smaller spacing factor between the concentrations and overall lower concentrations from 0.2 ppm to 1ppm. The LC50 was determined to be > 1.0 ppm.

Table 1: Mixing ratio and results of test # 9009049-02 (conducted: 1990-09-18 to 1990-09-20); Primary stock = 20,000 ppm; * secondary stock = 100 ppm; High conc. at 0 hr.: Dissolved Oxygen = 9.0 ppm, pH = 2.86.

Chamber

Toxicant ppm

Total volum mls

Volume dilution mls

Volume toxicant mls

Volume transfer mls

# of organisms

Deaths at 48 hrs

1

0

100

90

0

10

10

0

2

0

100

90

0

10

10

0

3

1

100

89

*1

10

10

9

4

1

100

89

*1

10

10

9

5

50

100

40

*50

10

10

10

6

50

100

40

*50

10

10

10

7

100

100

89.5

0.5

10

10

10

8

100

100

89.5

0.5

10

10

10

9

1000

100

85

5

10

10

10

10

1000

100

85

5

10

10

10

11

2500

100

77.5

12.5

10

10

10

12

2500

100

77.5

12.5

10

10

10

13

5000

100

65

25

10

10

10

14

5000

100

65

25

10

10

10

15

10000

100

40

50

10

10

10

16

10000

100

40

50

10

10

10

Table 2: Mixing ratio of test medium and toxicant and results of test # 9011113-02 (conducted: 1990-10-04 to 1990-10-06).

Chamber

Toxicant ppm

Total volum mls

Volume dilution mls

Volume toxicant mls

Volume transfer mls

# of organisms

Deaths at 48 hrs

1

0

100

90

0

10

10

0

2

0

100

90

0

10

10

0

3

0.2

100

88

2

10

10

0

4

0.2

100

88

2

10

10

0

5

0.4

100

86

4

10

10

0

6

0.4

100

86

4

10

10

0

7

0.6

100

84

6

10

10

0

8

0.6

100

84

6

10

10

0

9

1

100

80

10

10

10

3

10

1

100

80

10

10

10

5

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not applicable
Conclusions:
The 48 hr LC50 was 1.1 ppm, and 0.165 ppm for the active ingredient.  No sublethal effects were recorded.  
Executive summary:

The 48 hr acute toxicity of the test item to Ceriodaphnia dubia was studied under static conditions. Daphnids were exposed to blank control and test chemical at (nominal) concentration of 1, 50, 100, 1000, 2500, 5000, 10000 ppm (test 1) and 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 1 ppm (test 2). Mortality was observed at test termination. The 48 hour LC50 reported in test 1 (after conducting an additional test) was 1.1 ppm, corresponding to 0.165 ppm for the active ingredient. The LC50 from test 2 was determined to be > 1 ppm (> 0.15 ppm a.i.). No sublethal effects were recorded in both test.  

Based on the results of this study the test material would be classified as Acute toxic 1 and Chronic toxic 1 to Ceriodaphnia dubia in accordance with CLP.

This study is classified as supplementary and does not satisfy the guideline requirements for an acute toxicity study with freshwater invertebrates.

 

Results Synopsis

 

Test Organism Age: 1stinstar

Test Type : Static

 

LC50:  1.1 ppm, and  0.165 ppm for the active ingredient (a.i.), respectively (results reported in test 1 after having conducted an additional experiment)

NOEC: 0.6 ppm, and 0.09 ppm for the a. i., respectively (results from test 2)

                 

Endpoint(s) Effected:  mortality

Endpoint:
short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
26.-28.11.1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 202 (Daphnia sp. Acute Immobilisation Test)
Version / remarks:
Part I, 1984
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.2 (Acute Toxicity for Daphnia)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
No data.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
No data.
Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: water flea
- Strain/clone: n.a.
- Source: daphnids were bred in the laboratories of the TF Product Ecology under standardized conditions
- Age of parental stock (mean and range, SD): < 24 h
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
48 h
Hardness:
136 mg/L CaCO3
Alkalinity: 0.8 mmol/L
Test temperature:
21 °C
pH:
7.8 - 8.2
Dissolved oxygen:
Test media were saturated with oxygen at the beginning of the test.
Salinity:
no data
Conductivity:
no data
Nominal and measured concentrations:
nominal: 0.1, 0.18, 0.32, 0.58 and 1.0 ppm
measured mean concentration: 0.08, 0.14, 0.25, 0.45, 0.78 ppm
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: beaker
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 250 ml beakers containing 100 ml test medium
- Aeration: no
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): n.a.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): /
- No. of organisms per vessel: 10
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 2
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 2

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: bidistilled water
- Alkalinity: 0.8 mmol/L
- Ca/mg ratio: 4:1
- Intervals of water quality measurement: at beginning and at end of the test

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 16 h light, 8 h dark
- Light intensity: no data

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : mobility after 24 and 48 h

VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes (blank control)

RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Test concentrations: no details reported
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
48 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
ca. 0.17 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
mobility
Remarks on result:
other: 95% confidence limit
Remarks:
ca. 0.14 - 0.19
Details on results:
Test evaluations were done according to the guidelines by visual assessment of the mobility of the daphnids after 24 and 48 hours.
The EC50 was calculated by using the Probit model and by graphical determination on logarithmic probability paper.
The concentration of the test substance at the beginning and at the end of the test was analysed by the analytical Service Klybeck.

The EC0 and the EC100 after 48 h of exposure was 0.08 mg/L and 0.45 mg/L, respectively.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
EC50 (24 h) = 0.9 ppm (range: 0.8 - 1.5 ppm)

1) Analytical results of test substance measurements:

Nominal concentration [ppm]

Concentration start [ppm]

Concentration end [ppm]

Mean value* [ppm]

0.10

0.08

0.07

0.08

0.18

0.14

0.13

0.14

0.32

0.26

0.23

0.25

0.58

0.47

0.42

0.45

1.00

0.80

0.75

0.78

* used for calculation of EC50 value

2) Oxygen concentration and pH

The oxygen concentration and the pH was controlled at the beginning and at the end of the test.

Start:        - Oxygen: saturated

- pH: 8.0 (highest test concentration)

- Temp.: 21° C

End:

Nominal Conc. [ppm]

0.1

0.18

0.32

0.58

1.0

Blank

Oxygen [%]

96

96

96

97

96

97

pH

7.9

7.8

7.9

7.9

7.9

7.7

Temp. [°C]

21

21

21

21

21

21

 

3) Influence of the Test Item on the immobilisation of Daphnia magna:

Nominal concentration [ppm]

No. of animals

No. of responses

Immobility [%]*

24 h

48 h

24 h

48 h

0 (Blank)

10

0

0

0

0

10

0

0

0.08

10

0

0

0

0

10

0

0

0.14

10

1

4

5

20

10

0

0

0.25

10

9

9

95

95

10

10

10

0.45

10

9

10

90

100

10

9

10

0.78

10

10

10

100

100

10

10

10

 * calculated for 20 animals

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The 48-h EC50 of the test item to Daphnia magna under the conditions of the OECD test guideline 202 is 0.17 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.17 mg/L.
Executive summary:

The 48h acute toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna was studied under static conditions. Daphnids were exposed to 0 (blank control), 0.08, 0.14, 0.25, 0.45, 0.78 ppm (measured concentration). Mortality/immobilisation were observed daily. 

The 48h EC50was 0.17 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.17 mg/L. The 48h EC0 based on mortality/immobilisation was 0.08 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.08 mg/L. 

 

Based on the results of this study, the test item would be classified in category Acute 1 & Chronic 1 in accordance with the classification system of the GHS.

 

This study is classified as acceptable and satisfies the guideline requirements for an acute toxicity study with freshwater invertebrates.

 

Results Synopsis

Test Organism Age (e.g. 1stinstar): < 24 h

Test Type: Static

 

EC0:  0.08 mg/L

EC50:  0.17 mg/L                       95% C.I.:  0.14 -0.19 mg/L

Endpoint(s) Effected:  mortality/immobilisation

Description of key information

The 48h acute toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna was studied under static conditions in accordance with OECD test guideline 202 (Mätzler, 1992). Daphnids were exposed to 0 (blank control) and mean measured concentrations of 0.08, 0.14, 0.25, 0.45, 0.78 ppm. The 48h EC50 was 0.17 ppm, corresponding to ca. 0.17 mg/L. 

As supporting study, one additional test on the target substance is presented. However, this test is not fulfilling the OECD TG criteria, and is only very briefly documented (Anonymous, 1990). The determined 48h LC50 for Ceriodaphnia dubia of 0.165 ppm (based on the active ingredient concentration) is in line with the findings of Mätzler (1992).

The 48h EC50 of ca. 0.17 mg/L (Mätzler, 1992), which is based on the test item containing > 90 % active ingredient, is carried forward as key value in the risk assessment.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Fresh water invertebrates

Fresh water invertebrates
Effect concentration:
0.17 mg/L

Additional information

The key information is used in a read-across approach in the assessment of the substance to be registered.

For details and justification of read-across please refer to the attached report in section 13 of IUCLID.