Registration Dossier

Environmental fate & pathways

Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

Bioaccumulation: aquatic:

BCFss 1011 l/kg (0.80 µg a.i./l); 384 (4.4 µg a.i./l)

BCFk 2992 l/kg (0.80 µg a.i./l); 1208 (4.4 µg a.i./l)

Lipid normalised (to 5%) values are:

BCFss 934 l/kg (0.80 µg a.i./l); 255 l/kg (4.4 µg a.i./l) and BCFk 2765 l/kg (0.80 µg a.i./l); 803 l/kg (4.4 µg a.i./l).

A BCF value of 2765 is used as a worst case. Depuration rate constants: 0.161 d-1(0.8 µg a.i./l); 0.0125 d-1(4.4 µg a.i./l). 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

BCF (aquatic species):
2 765

Additional information

Steady-state BCF values of 1011 l/kg (0.80 µg a. i. /l) and 384 (4.4 µg a. i. /l) and kinetic BCF values of 2992 l/kg (0.80 µg a. i. /l) and 1208 (4.4 µg a. i. /l) were determined for tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane in a reliable study conducted according to an appropriate test protocol, and in compliance with GLP.

Lipid normalised (to 5%) values are: BCFss= 934 l/kg (0.80 µg a.i./l) and 255 l/kg (4.4 µg a.i./l) and BCFk= 2765 l/kg (0.80 µg a.i./l) and 803 l/kg (4.4 µg a.i./l).

Fish bioconcentration (BCF) studies are most validly applied to substances with log Kow values between 1.5 and 6. Practical experience suggests that if the aqueous solubility of the substance is low (i.e. below ~0.01 to 0.1 mg/l) (REACH Guidance R.11; ECHA, 2014), fish bioconcentration studies might not provide a reliable BCF value because it is very difficult to maintain exposure concentrations. Dietary bioaccumulation (BMF) tests are practically much easier to conduct for poorly water-soluble substances, because a higher and more constant exposure to the substance can be administered via the diet than via water. In addition, potential bioaccumulation for such substances may be expected to be predominantly from uptake via feed, as substances with low water solubility and high Koc will usually partition from water to organic matter.

However, there are limitations with laboratory studies such as BCF and BMF studies with highly lipophilic and adsorbing substances. Such studies assess the partitioning from water or food to an organism within a certain timescale. The studies aim to achieve steady-state conditions, although for highly lipophilic and adsorbing substances such steady-state conditions are difficult to achieve. In addition, the nature of BCF and BMF values as ratio values, means that they are dependent on the concentration in the exposure media (water, food), which adds to uncertainty in the values obtained.

For highly lipophilic and adsorbing substances, both routes of uptake are likely to be significant in a BCF study, because the substance can be absorbed by food from the water. 

Dual uptake routes can also occur in a BMF study, with exposure occurring via water due to desorption from food, and potential egestion of substance in the faeces and subsequent desorption to the water phase. Although such concentrations in water are likely to be low, they may result in significant uptake via water for highly lipophilic substances.

Gosset al. (2013) put forward the use of elimination half-life as a metric for the bioaccumulation potential of chemicals. Using the commonly accepted BMF and TMF threshold of 1, the authors derive a threshold value for kelimination of >0.01 d-1 (half-life 70d) as indicative of a substance that does not bioaccumulate.

Depuration rates from BCF and BMF studies, being independent of exposure concentration and route of exposure, are considered to be a more reliable metric to assess bioaccumulation potential than the ratio BCF and BMF values obtained from such studies.

The depuration rate constants of 0.161 d-1(0.8 µg a.i./l) and 0.0125 d-1(4.4 µg a.i./l) obtained from the BCF study with tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane are considered to be valid and to carry most weight for bioaccumulation assessment of the substance. These rates are indicative of a substance which does not bioaccumulate.

Burkhard, L. P.et al., 2012 has described fugacity ratios as a method to compare laboratory and field measured bioaccumulation endpoints. By converting data such as BCF and BSAF (biota-sediment accumulation factor) to dimensionless fugacity ratios, differences in numerical scales and unit are eliminated.

Fugacity is an equilibrium criterion and can be used to assess the relative thermodynamic status (chemical activity or chemical potential) of a system comprised of multiple phases or compartments (Burkhard, L. P.et al., 2012). At thermodynamic equilibrium, the chemical fugacities in the different phases are equal. A fugacity ratio between an organism and a reference phase (e. g. water) that is greater than 1, indicates that the chemical in the organism is at a higher fugacity (or chemical activity) than the reference phase.

The fugacity of a chemical in a specific medium can be calculated from the measured chemical concentration by the following equation:

f = C/Z

Where f is the fugacity (Pa), C is concentration (mol/m3) and Z is the fugacity capacity (mol(m3. Pa)).

The relevant equation for calculating the biota-water fugacity ratio (Fbiota-water) is:

Fbiota-water= BCFWD/LW/ Klwx ¿l/ ¿B

where BCFWD/LW is the ratio of the steady-state lipid-normalised chemical concentration in biota (µg-chemical/kg-lipid) to freely dissolved chemical concentration in water (µg-dissolved chemical/L-water), Klw is the lipid-water partition coefficient and ¿l is the density of lipid and ¿B is the density of biota.

It can be assumed that n-octanol and lipid are equivalent with respect to their capacity to store organic chemicals, i.e. Klw= Kow. For some substances with specific interactions with the organic phase, this assumption is not sufficiently accurate. Measurement of Klw values for siloxane substances is in progress. Initial laboratory work with olive oil as lipid substitute indicates that the assumption that Klw= Kow is appropriate (Reference: Dow Corning Corporation, personal communication). However, the calculated fugacity ratios presented here should be used with caution at this stage. 

The table below presents fugacity ratios calculated from the BCF data for tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane, using Kow for Klw.

Calculated biota-water fugacity ratios for tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane

Substance

Endpoint

Exposure concentration

BCF Value

Fbiota-water*

Tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane

BCFss

0.80 µg a.i./l

1011

2.35E-05

Tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane

BCFss

4.4 µg a.i./l

384

6.43E-06

Tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane

BCFk

0.80 µg a.i./l

2992

6.97E-05

Tris(trimethylsiloxy)phenylsilane

BCFk

4.4 µg a.i./l

1208

2.02E-05

*Using log Kow 9

The fugacity-based BCFs directly reflect the thermodynamic equilibrium status of the chemical between the two media included in the ratio calculations. The fugacity ratios calculated are all below 1, indicating that the chemical in the organism tends to be at a lower fugacity (or chemical activity) than in the water. It should be noted however, that the BCF studies may not have reached true steady-state in the timescale of the laboratory studies. The fugacity ratios indicates that uptake may be less than expected on thermodynamic grounds, suggesting that elimination is faster than might be expected on grounds of lipophilicity alone.

References

Burkhard, L. P., Arnot, J. A., Embry, M. R., Farley, K. J., Hoke, R. A., Kitano, M., Leslie, H. A., Lotufo, G. R., Parkerton, T. F., Sappington, K. G., Tomy, G. T. and Woodburn, K. B. (2012). Comparing Laboratory and Field Measured Bioaccumulation Endpoints. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 8, 17-31.

Goss, K-U., Brown, T. N. and Endo, S. (2013). Elimination half-life as a metric for the bioaccumulation potential of chemicals in aquatic and terrestrial food chains. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 32, 1663-1671.

Peter Fisk Associates. (2014i). Peter Fisk Associates. Siloxane analogue report. PFA.300.005.008.R1