Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-781-3 | CAS number: 151-05-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- Prenatal developmental toxicity study
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 020
- Report date:
- 2020
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- α,α-dimethylphenethyl acetate
- EC Number:
- 205-781-3
- EC Name:
- α,α-dimethylphenethyl acetate
- Cas Number:
- 151-05-3
- Molecular formula:
- C12H16O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,1-dimethyl-2-phenylethyl acetate
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- The required quantity of test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate was weighed and mixed with 0.1% Tween 80 in water v/v in (G2- 1000 mg/kg body weight and 0.1% Tween 80 in water v/v vehicle control G1- 0 mg/kg body weight. The prepared dose formulation was used for 7 days based on the stability data .The vehicle control (G1-0 0 mg/kg body weight.) and test item (G2- 1000 mg/kg body weight, were administered to pregnant animals daily for GD 5 till GD 19 days by oral gavage once daily using calibrated syringe.. A constant dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight was utilized to deliver the required amount of dose throughout the treatment period.
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- A total number of 80 (30 male and 50 female) Sprague Dawley rats of about 12 to 13 weeks were received along with their health certificate for the Study.
Rats were housed in an experimental room maintained at 20.1 to 23.6 °C and 51 to 66% relative humidity with adequate fresh air supply (minimum 12 air changes/hour). Light and dark cycles of 12 hours, each were maintained throughout the experimental phase.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.1% Tween 80 (polysorbate 80, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate) in water
- Remarks:
- As the test item, Dimethyl benzyl carbinyl acetate is soluble in 0.1% Tween 80 in water v/v which is also one of the most common vehicles used toxicity studies.
- Details on exposure:
- The vehicle (G1 - 0.1% Tween 80) and the test item (G2 – Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate) were administered to pregnant females using disposal syringes from a calibrated batch and reusable stainless steel ball tipped intubation needle (16 to 18 gauge) as specified in Section 6.7.11 by oral (gavage).
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Preparation of Samples for Dose Concentration analysis on 27.04.2020:
An aliquot of 1000 μl was pipetted from each of the submitted samples (i.e., Top, Middle and Bottom layers), transferred separately into 100 ml volumetric flasks and the content was diluted up to mark using Acetonitrile and mixed thoroughly. From each of the above solutions 1000 μL aliquot was pipetted, transferred to the 10 mL of volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark using acetonitrile and filtered through 0.22 μm Nylon Syringe Filter to obtain samples for injection onto HPLC using the conditions described in section 3.1. All the samples were marked in terms of the respective layers from which they were prepared by the above mentioned procedure, vehicle also followed same procedure.
Preparation of Samples for Dose Concentration analysis on 21.05.2020:
An aliquot of 1500 μl was pipetted from each of the submitted samples (i.e., Top, Middle and Bottom layers), transferred separately into 100 ml volumetric flasks and the content was diluted up to mark using Acetonitrile and mixed thoroughly. From each of the above solutions 500 μL aliquot was pipetted, transferred to the 20 mL of volumetric flask and diluted up to the mark using acetonitrile and filtered through 0.22 μm Nylon Syringe Filter to obtain samples for injection onto HPLC using the conditions described in section 3.1. All the samples were marked in terms of the respective layers from which they were prepared by the above mentioned procedure, vehicle also followed same procedure.
The conditions in section 3.1:
Chromatographic Conditions
Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Butyrate
Instrument: Agilent 1260 HPLC
HPLC Column: Waters Exterra , C18 - 4.6 mm x 250, 5 micron
Mobile phase (A): Water
Mobile phase (B): Acetonitrile
Mobile phase Ratio: A:B = 20:80 % v/v
Stop time: 12 min
Injection Volume: 10.0 μL
Column Oven Temperature: 25.0°C
Flow Rate: 1.0 mL/min
Wavelength: 210 nm
Signal BW: 4 nm
Auto Sampler Cooler Temperature: 22°C
Retention Time: ~ 4.4 minutes
Conclusion:
This method is applicable to determine the Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetateat dose verification samples. The results Evaluated from the method validation parameters namely System suitability, specificity, linearity, Assay accuracy and precision data showed this method was acceptable for the determination of Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate in dose verification samples using HPLC conditions
Mean Recovery (%) of Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate was within 100 ± 15% % of its nominal concentration or theoretical concentration of individual layers (top, middle and bottom) in the dose formulation samples analyzed with relative standard deviation ≤10% (RSD). Hence the concentration claimed in the dose formulation samples was supported and it was found homogeneous in nature. - Details on mating procedure:
- After completion of acclimatization period, females were housed with males for pairing or cohabitation based on 1:1 ratio (one male: one female) for 14 days or until the evidence of mating, whichever is earlier. Each day, the evidence of mating was confirmed by presence of sperms in the vaginal lavage. The day of presence of sperms in the vaginal lavage was considered as day ‘0’ of the pregnancy or ‘GD 0 – (Gestation Day – 0)’ for the particular female. Subsequently, post detection of sperms in the vaginal lavage, females were separated from the male partner and housed individually through gestation period until their euthanasia on day 20 of gestation (GD20).
The cohabitation or pairing was done till availability of sufficient number (50 female) of confirmed mating (sperm positive in vaginal lavage) females. Sufficient number of confirmed mated females are achieved within 11 days.
After completion of successful cohabitation period, all the males were sent back to VBS animal holding/stock and extra females (both mated but negative for sperms and non-mated) was sent for euthanasia.
On the day of confirmation of pregnancy females were allotted into two groups. Based on the number of confirmed pregnant (sperm positive) females, they were allotted sequentially into G1, and G2. At same time, these females were given the permanent numbers based on allocation into two groups viz. 01 to 25 for G1 (Vehicle Control 0- mg/kg body weight), 26 to 50 for G2 (Limit dose -1000 mg/kg body weight.The details of permanent numbers allotment into the specific group was maintained in the raw data and reported in the study report. - Frequency of treatment:
- The vehicle (G1 - 0.1% Tween 80) and the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate (G2: 1000 mg/kg body weight) was administered orally gavage once daily to the pregnant females starting from Gestation Day 5 (GD 5) to till 19 (GD 19) of the respective females.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Remarks:
- A constant dose volume of 10 mL/kg body weight was utilized to deliver the required amount of dose throughout the treatment period. Amount of dose required for each animal was calculated based on the most recent body weights.
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- A limit dose of 1000 mg/kg body weight has been selected based on the results of a dose range finding study in pregnant females (Study No. 19-598-G).
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- An outline of the Study design is presented in the following table:
Treatment Details 0.1% Tween 80 (Vehicle Control) Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate (Limit Dose)
Groups G1 G2
Dose Level Control Limit Dose
Dose (mg/kg body weight) 0 1000
Female 1to 25 26 to 50
Male 30 (No Treatment) - Control animals:
- yes
- Details on study design:
- An outline of the Study design is presented in the following table:
Treatment Details 0.1% Tween 80 (Vehicle Control) Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate (Limit Dose)
Groups G1 G2
Dose Level Control Limit Dose
Dose (mg/kg body weight) 0 1000
Female 1to 25 26 to 50
Male 30 (No Treatment)
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Post necropsy and gross pathology examination, following observations were performed on each female:
Pregnancy status (Pregnant/Non pregnant)
Number of corpora lutea
Weight of gravid uterus
Number of implantations/sites
Number of live and dead fetuses
Number of early resorptions
Number of late resorptions
For apparently non-pregnant females, ammonium sulphide staining of the uterus were performed to identify the pre-implantation loss of the embryos. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- From each dam, half number of fetuses were subjected for evaluation of soft tissue alterations (visceral examination), head razor examination and remaining half for skeletal evaluation. For this, fetuses with odd numbers were subjected for skeletal evaluation and fetuses with even numbers were evaluated for visceral and head razor examination (Example, for a dam having 7 fetuses, fetus number 1, 3, 5 and 7 was processed for skeletal evaluation and fetus number 2, 4 and 6 was evaluated for visceral and head razor examination). However, if any fetus scheduled for visceral evaluation shows an abnormality that can best be confirmed and/or verified by skeletal examination and vice versa, the particular fetus were interchanged and subjected to particular type of evaluation. The details of such alterations were documented and reported in the study report
- Fetal examinations:
- Post uterine observations (as per Section 7.5.4), each fetus were identified individually as per in house procedure and placed along with its placenta in acrylic fetal trays or container filled with normal saline. Following observations were performed on each fetus:
Determination of sex
Weight of individual fetus
External abnormalities if any
The anogenital distance (AGD) was measured in all live fetuses from each dam. - Statistics:
- The following list of data (but not limited to) was subjected to statistical analyses by using SigmaPlot® 12 software (Systat, San Jose, California).
Feed consumption
Body weights and body weight gains
Organ weights (absolute and relative to body weight)
Maternal data
Fetal data
Thyroid Hormones analysis
Data was subjected to Modified-Levene equal-variance test (Brown and Forsythe, 1974) for homogeneity and the Shapiro-Wilk test (Shapiro and Wilk, 1965) for normality. A level of significance of p< 0.05 was required for the Modified-Levene’s test to reject the assumption. A level of significance of p< 0.05 was required for the Shapiro-Wilk test to reject the assumption. Normally distributed and homogenous data was submitted to One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test (Dunnett, 1955; Dunnett, 1964) for post hoc comparison. If the data is heterogeneous, it will be subjected to Kruskal-Wallis test (Kruskal and Wallis, 1952) and the Multiple Fisher non-parametric tests (Agresti, 1992). Statistical significance was reported at the alpha level of 0.05. Data was reported in terms of number of observations (N), group means and standard deviations (%, where applicable).
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment related clinical signs noticed in females of vehicle control (G1- 0
mg/kg body weight) and limit test Dose- G2 1000 mg/kg body weight throughout the
experiment period. - Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- There were no mortality and morbidity in the present study in vehicle control G1 and limit
test Dose- G2 1000 mg/kg body weight. - Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were no treatment related statistical significant changes noticed in the body weights,
body weight gain and feed consumption on female from limit dose G2 group animals when
compared with G1 group animals. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No statistical significant changes were observed in female of G2 group when compared
with G1 group females. - Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- On completion of the gross pathology examination, no abnormalities were observed in any
of the organs in gross pathology examination and no organs were collected and preserved. - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- External examination of none of the terminally euthanized female animals belonging to the
control (G1) and limit dose groups G2) did not revealed any external and internal
abnormalities, during gross pathology observation. - Neuropathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- External examination of none of the terminally euthanized female animals belonging to the
control (G1) and limit dose groups G2) did not revealed any external and internal
abnormalities, during gross pathology observation.
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- no effects observed
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- no effects observed
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Evaluation of maternal parameters viz: gravid uteri, total implantation, live fetus, number of corpora lutea, implantation sites, early and late resorptions, pre implantation loss, did not show any statistically significant difference in the treated groups as compared with vehicle control.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
Results (fetuses)
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no treatment related external, visceral, head- razor and skeletal abnormalities in the pups from the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate in control and treated groups. The abnormalities showed in the male and female pups were incidental and comparable.
- Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no treatment related external, visceral, head- razor and skeletal abnormalities in the pups from the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate in control and treated groups. The abnormalities showed in the male and female pups were incidental and comparable.
- Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no treatment related external, visceral, head- razor and skeletal abnormalities in the pups from the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate in control and treated groups. The abnormalities showed in the male and female pups were incidental and comparable.
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Total placenta weight, did not show any statistically significant difference in the treated groups as compared with vehicle control. Whereas, statistical significance decrease in male and female combined fetuses weight, male fetuses weight and female fetus weight in G2 and increase in anogenital distance (AGD) in male and female pups in G2 group as compared with vehicle control G1. Although statistically significant, above these parameters did not correlate with any other parameters/observations. Therefore, these significances have been considered as spontaneous/ incidental findings unrelated with the test item treatment as compared to control group G1.
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- There was no treatment related external, visceral, head- razor and skeletal abnormalities in the pups from the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate in control and treated groups. The abnormalities showed in the male and female pups were incidental and comparable.
Effect levels (fetuses)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
Group G1 G2
Dose (mg/kg b.wt.) 0 1000
Number of Females 25 25
Number of Mated Females 25 25
Number of Pregnant Females 24 23
Average Weight of Gravid Uteri (Mean ± SD) 48.2616 ± 6.9434 45.6832 ± 12.7079
Corpora Lutea (Total Number) 285 268
Corpora Lutea (Mean ± SD) 11.88± 2.01 11.65± 1.75
Implantations / Implantation Sites (Total Number) 226 210
Implantations / Implantation Sites (Mean ± SD) 9.42±1.53 9.48 ± 2.48
Number of Fetuses (Total) 222 205
Average Number of Male and Female Fetuses / Dam (Mean ± SD) 5.31 ± 2.91 5.47 ± 3.13
Average Number of Male Fetuses / Dam (Mean ± SD) 5.46 ± 2.78 5.28 ± 3.17
Average Number of Female Fetuses / Dam (Mean ± SD) 5.07 ± 3.05 5.79 ± 3.19
Number of Live Fetuses (Total) 222 205
Average Number of Live Fetuses / Dam (Mean ± SD) 9.25± 1.29 8.91 ± 2.61
Number of Dead Fetuses (Total) 0 0
Average Number of Dead Fetuses / Dam (Mean ± SD) 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
Pre-implantation Loss (Mean ± SD) 2.46 ± 1.28 2.17 ± 1.67
Pre-implantation Loss (%) 20.05 ± 9.03 19.32 ± 17.02
Post-implantation Loss (Mean ± SD) 0.17 ± 0.48 0.57 ± 0.95
Post-implantation Loss (%) 1.40 ± 3.95 8.87± 21.52
Total implantation Loss (Mean ± SD) 2.63 ± 1.35 2.74 ± 1.84
Total implantation Loss (%) 21.23 ±9.09 24.44 ± 20.37
Early Resorptions (Total) 4 8
Early Resorptions (Mean ± SD) 0.17 ± 0.48 0.57 ± 0.95
Early Resorptions (%) 1.77 3.81
Late Resorptions (Total) 0 0
Late Resorptions (Mean ± SD) 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
Late Resorptions (%) 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00
Average Weight (in g) of Fetuses (Male & Female) 3.4575± 0.3087 3.2885↓ ± 0.3239
Average Weight (in g) of Male Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 3.5312 ± 0.3079 3.3474 ↓ ± 0.3323
Average Weight (in g) of Female Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 3.3783 ± 0.2906 3.2340 ↓± 0.3076
Average placental Weight of Male and Female Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 0.5390 ± 0.0978 0.5555 ± 0.1060
Average placental Weight of Male Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 0.5426 ± 0.9992 0.5585 ± 0.1065
Average placental Weight of Female Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 0.5351 ± 0.0965 0.5528 ± 0.1059
Average of anogenital distance (AGD) Male+ Female Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 2.86 ±0.87 2.95 ±0.94
Average of anogenital distance (AGD) Male Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 3.60 ±0.46 3.81↑ ±0.52
Average of anogenital distance (AGD) Female Fetuses (Mean ± SD) 2.08 ±0.39 2.15↑ ±0.94
Key: Values are Mean ± SD, ↑ significantly (p<0.05) higher than control (G1) group. ↓significantly (p<0.05) lower than control (G1) group.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- To conclude, based on overall observations and under the circumstances of the present study, the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate when administered at 0, and 1000 mg/kg body weight by oral gavage route in Sprague Dawley rats for (GD 5-19) days did not produce any treatment related effects on the body weights or body weight gain/loss, feed consumption and fetal abnormalities. There were no treatment related clinical signs noticed in females all the dose levels. Based on the above observations, the dose of 1000 mg/kg body weight has been considered as No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for maternal toxicity and embryo fetal toxicity of the test item, Dimethyl Benzyl Carbinyl Acetate in Sprague Dawley rats.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.