Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-466-7 | CAS number: 60-27-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
- Study period:
- 1987
- Reliability:
- 3 (not reliable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- This study does not report the cytotoxicity observed in each test culture. Without a cytotoxicity measure for each test culture, it is impossible to determine whether the observed apparent positive response would be considered positive (biologically relevant) by current standards. That is, the concentration yielding the positive response might have caused excessive cytotoxicity - beyond that currently considered acceptable. Furthermore the concentrations are higher than those that are recommended by current test guidelines. For example OECD 473 in its current version recommends 10 mM or 2 mg/mL as highest test concentration. In the present study 5, 10 and 15 mg/L were chosen as concentrations. This means that also the lowest concentration of 5 mg/L is many times higher than the highest concentration recommended by OECD 473 (5 mg/L corresponds to 44 mM Creatinine, which is 4 times higher than recommended). Also at this concentration no significant effects were observed. At concentrations of 10 mg/L and above osmotic stress is also to be expected but not fully assessed within the report. Additionally, there was no information provided regarding test material details (purity, impurities), there is no reported positive control, there are no historical control data for the solvent “medium” and the test was not performed under GLP. Above and beyond all these aspects of inadequate reporting and interpretation, as well as concentration many times over the recommendation of todays Guidelines, which are located in the range of cytotoxicity and osmotic stress, Creatinine is an endogenous substance. Creatinine is a breakdown product of Creatine in muscle and is usually produced at a fairly constant rate by the body (depending on muscle mass). According to “Wissenschaftliche Tabellen, 7. Auflage, 1969, J.R. Geigy S.A., Basel, Schweiz” considerable amounts of Creatinine can be found in the different compartments and body fluids: Cord blood plasm or serum: 11.8 mg/L (6.4 – 17.2 mg/L) Blood plasm or serum, child (4-21 weeks): 9.5 mg/L (7.9 – 11.1 mg/L) Blood plasm or serum, child (1-6 years): 11.9 mg/L (7.5 -16.3 mg/L) Blood plasm or serum, adult:12.4 mg/L (6.6 – 18.2 mg/L) Liquor cerebrospinalis: 6-14 mg/L Gastric juice: 12-33 mg/L Urine, male (20-45 years): 1.8 (1.2 - 2.5 g/24h) Urine, female (20-45 years): 1.17 (0.01 - 1.33 g/24h) Sweat: 4.6 mg/L (2.1 - 8.4 mg/L) Mother’s milk: 11 mg/L (8 - 19 mg/L) Furthermore Creatinine is part of the diet and can be found in lean meat in constant content of 0.02 – 0.04 % (G.Mayer, H.Knapp, RÖMPP, Thieme Verlag, 2009).
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- OECD TG 473 was adopted in 1983 and may have been available at the time of the test. It is unclear whether the test was conducted prior to or after 1983; for deviations see details on materials and methods below, and applicant's summary and conclusions.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Chinese Hamster Lung Fibroblasts (CHL)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Eagle's MEM + 10% calf serum
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: 25 chromosomes ( Chinese Hamsters normally have 22 chromosomes)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5, 10, and 15 mM
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Cell culture medium
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cell culture medium
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- no
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium. This experiment was only conducted without S9 mix.
DURATION:
The test agent was added and allowed to remain in the cultures until chromosome preparations were made 24 and 48 hours after the start of the treatment.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
44x10^3/ml cells were seeded in a 6cm plastic petri dish with 5ml culture medium and allowed to grow for 3 days. It is unclear how many cells were treated with test chemical. 100 metaphases per test concentration were analyzed.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: In a preliminary experiment, test agent was added to a 3 day old monolayer culture and allowed to grow for 2 days. Medium was removed, cells were stained and an estimate of the test agent cell inhibition was determined microscopically based on the amount of cell staining. This approach was used for selecting test concentrations in the full experiment. There was no individual culture measure of cytotoxicity in the full experiment.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- One hundred well spread metaphases were evaluated for structural chromosome and chromatid gaps, breaks and exchanges. These along with fragments were enumerated as a percentage of cells containing the particular event. Determination of polyploidy: only the incidence of obvious polyploidy cells per 100 metaphases was recorded.
OTHER:
- Colcemid was added to all cultures 2 hours before harvest to arrest cells in metaphase
- Cells were harvested by trypsinization, fixed, cell pellets dropped onto slides, metaphase spreads were stained and scored microscopically. - Evaluation criteria:
- Negative: < 5 %
Inconclusive: 5 to <10 %
Positive: ≥ 10 % - Statistics:
- While statistics were not used to evaluate whether a response was positive or negative two different types of potency values were calculated for any chemical giving a positive response. D20 value was calculated, which is the concentration required to induce any aberration in 20 % of metaphases. TR value was calculated, which indicates the incidence of aberrant cells with chromatid exchange per unit concentration.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung (CHL/IU)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- ambiguous
- Remarks:
- The result was determined positive; however, because there is no cytotoxicity measure for the individual test cultures, it is impossible to confirm that the response is biologically relevant and would be considered positive by today’s standards.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not determined
- Remarks:
- In a preliminary experiment, the laboratory used a method to provide an estimate of cytotoxicity to establish the test concentrations. There is no estimate in the full experiment of individual test culture cytotoxicity.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- Creatinine at the 24 hour exposure gave 43 % of the cells containing aberrations at the 10 mM concentration. It should be noted that this includes 10 % cells with gaps (which are not normally included when scoring aberrations) and after 48 hours of exposure, gave 10 % of the cells with aberrations at the 10mM concentration.
- Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: Chinese Hamster Lung Fibroblasts (CHL)
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
ambiguous without metabolic activation Because there is no concurrent measurement of test culture cytotoxicity, it’s impossible to reach a conclusion of creatinine’s clastogenicity. Also, the test was only conducted without S9, which provides no information as to whether S9 would alter results
Overall, it is not possible to make a firm conclusion as to whether creatinine is or is not clastogenic. This is based on the fact that there is no concurrent individual cytotoxicity measure which would provide information as to whether the test concentration used would be considered appropriate by today’s standards. It is now recognized that excess cytotoxicity can give positive results that are not biologically relevant. - Executive summary:
In a mammalian cell chromosome aberration assay, Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cultures (CHL cells) were exposed to creatinine at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, and 15 mg/mL without exogenous metabolic activation. While test concentrations were selected based on a preliminary study to access relative cell growth inhibition in the monolayer cultures, there were no cytotoxicity measures associated with the specific test cultures in the full experiment. Exposure was for 24 and 48 hours. Two hours before harvest, colcemid was added to block cells in metaphase, cells were harvested, fixed, slides prepared and stained. 100 well spread metaphases were evaluated and the percentage of cells containing chromosome or chromatid gaps, breaks and rearrangements enumerated. The 15 mg/mL cultures were not evaluated due to severe toxicity (likely no metaphases available to score). The 10 mg/mL cultures, both the 24 and 48 hour exposures, were reported by the test laboratory to be positive.
However this study does not report the cytotoxicity observed in each test culture. Without a cytotoxicity measure for each test culture, it is impossible to determine whether the observed apparent positive response would be considered positive (biologically relevant) by current standards. That is, the concentration yielding the positive response might have caused excessive cytotoxicity - beyond that currently considered acceptable.
Furthermore the concentrations are higher than those that are recommended by current test guidelines. For example OECD 473 in its current version recommends 10 mM or 2 mg/mL as highest test concentration. In the present study 5, 10 and 15 mg/L were chosen as concentrations. This means that also the lowest concentration of 5 mg/L is many times higher than the highest concentration recommended by OECD 473 (5 mg/L corresponds to 44 mM Creatinine, which is 4 times higher than recommended). Also at this concentration no significant effects were observed.
At concentrations of 10 mg/L and above osmotic stress is also to be expected but not fully assessed within the report. Additionally, there was no information provided regarding test material details (purity, impurities), there is no reported positive control, there are no historical control data for the solvent “medium” and the test was not performed under GLP.
Above and beyond all these aspects of inadequate reporting and interpretation, as well as concentration many times over the recommendation of todays Guidelines, which are located in the range of cytotoxicity and osmotic stress, Creatinine is an endogenous substance.
Creatinine is a breakdown product of Creatine in muscle and is usually produced at a fairly constant rate by the body (depending on muscle mass). According to “Wissenschaftliche Tabellen, 7. Auflage, 1969, J.R. Geigy S.A., Basel, Schweiz” considerable amounts of Creatinine can be found in the different compartments and body fluids:
Cord blood plasm or serum: 11.8 mg/L (6.4 – 17.2 mg/L)
Blood plasm or serum, child (4-21 weeks): 9.5 mg/L (7.9 – 11.1 mg/L)
Blood plasm or serum, child (1-6 years): 11.9 mg/L (7.5 -16.3 mg/L)
Blood plasm or serum, adult:12.4 mg/L (6.6 – 18.2 mg/L)
Liquor cerebrospinalis: 6-14 mg/L
Gastric juice: 12-33 mg/L
Urine, male (20-45 years): 1.8 (1.2- 2.5 g/24h)
Urine, female (20-45 years): 1.17 (0.01-1.33 g/24h)
Sweat: 4.6 mg/L (2.1-8.4 mg/L)
Mother’s milk: 11 mg/L (8-19 mg/L)
Furthermore Creatinine is part of the diet and can be found in lean meat in constant content of 0.02 – 0.04 % (G.Mayer, H.Knapp, RÖMPP, Thieme Verlag, 2009).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 08.05. - 09.07.2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Gene involved in histidine synthesis.
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian Microsomal Fraction S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- On the day of the experiment, the test item Creatinine was dissolved in deionised water. The solvent was chosen because of its solubility properties and its relative nontoxicity to the bacteria.
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine; 2-aminoanthracene
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is considered as a mutagen if a biologically relevant increase in the number of revertants exceeding the threshold of twice (strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA) or thrice (strains TA 1535 and TA 1537) the colony count of the corresponding solvent control is observed.
A dose dependent increase is considered biologically relevant if the threshold is exceeded at more than one concentration.
An increase exceeding the threshold at only one concentration is judged as biologically relevant if reproduced in an independent second experiment.
A dose dependent increase in the number of revertant colonies below the threshold is regarded as an indication of a mutagenic potential if reproduced in an independent second experiment. However, whenever the colony counts remain within the historical range of negative and solvent controls such an increase is not considered biologically relevant. - Statistics:
- According to the OECD guideline 471, a statistical analysis of the data is not mandatory.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
During the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, Creatinine did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, Creatinine is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay. - Executive summary:
A study was performed to investigate the potential of Creatinine to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using th eSalmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation according to the OECD Guideline 471 ("Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test"). Each concentration, including the positive and negative controls, was tested in triplicate. The test item was tested at the following concentrations:
Pre-Experiment/Experiment I: 3; 10; 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment II: 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
No precipitation of the test item occured up to the highest invested dose. The plates incubated with the test item showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in all strains used.
No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants (below the indication factor of 0.5), occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with Creatinine at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test item did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used.
Therefore, Creatinine is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 04.09. - 06.09.2002
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: DIN 38415 part 4
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only two strains of Salmonella typhimurium were used.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- gene involved in histidine synthesis
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- n. a.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- n. a.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian Microsomal S9 Mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5 mg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- none
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylendiamin
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Testmedium: Mininmal-Glucose-Agar, Top-Agar
Incubation temperature: 37 +/- 1 °C
Test duration: 48 h
Number of replications: 4 replicates per each strain, 4 replicates for the negative control and 4 replicates for each positive control
Titer determination: TA98 > 1.000.000.000 Bact./mL; TA100 1.700.000.000 Bact./mL - Evaluation criteria:
- A test substance is regarded as mutagenic if it induces in at least one of the two used strains, with our without S9 mix, an increase of the mutant number at least twice of the negative controll (Induction rate I >= 2) which shows an dose-response relationship.
Furthermore in each case in strain TA 100 an increase (Induction difference ID) of at least 100 mutants/plate in the mean and an increase of at least 30 mutants/plate in the mean for TA98 has to be obtained. - Statistics:
- no data
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Creatinine has no mutagenic potential under the conditions of this study. - Executive summary:
The test item Creatinine was investigated for its potential to induce gene mutations in a test according to DIN 38415 part 4 using two strains of Salmonella typhimurium (T98 and T100).
No substantial increases in revertant colony numbers of any of the two tester strains were observed following treatment with Creatinine at any concentration level, eighter in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 -mix).
Therefore Creatinine is not considered to be mutagenic in bacterial cells.
Referenceopen allclose all
Creatinine (CAS No 60-27-5) |
||||||||||||
Solvent: Medium |
||||||||||||
Time (h) |
Concentration (mg/mL) |
Number of metaphases |
Polyploidy (%) |
Judge |
Cells with structural chromosome aberrations (%) |
|||||||
CTG |
CTB |
CTE |
FRG |
CSB |
CSE |
Total |
Judge |
|||||
24 |
None |
100 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
24 |
5 |
100 |
1 |
– |
1 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
– |
24 |
10 |
100 |
1 |
– |
10 |
32 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
43 |
+ |
24 |
15 |
– |
– |
TOX |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
TOX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
5 |
100 |
3 |
– |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
– |
48 |
10 |
100 |
17 |
+ |
1 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
+ |
48 |
15 |
– |
– |
TOX |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
– |
TOX |
Parameter |
Value |
Induction rate I |
TA98: at all concentrations used < 2 TA100: at all concentrations used < 2 |
Dose response relationship |
Inexistent |
Induction difference ID |
TA98: at all concentrations used < 2 TA100: at all concentrations used < 2 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Creatinine was tested negative for genotoxic effects in two Ames-Tests according to OECD 471 and DIN 38415 part 4, respectively. Concentrations up to the limit dose were used. No cytotoxic effects were observed.
Also one positive test on chromosome aberration is available for Creatinine. However this study does not report the cytotoxicity observed in each test culture. Without a cytotoxicity measure for each test culture, it is impossible to determine whether the observed apparent positive response would be considered positive (biologically relevant) by current standards. That is, the concentration yielding the positive response might have caused excessive cytotoxicity - beyond that currently considered acceptable.
Furthermore the concentrations are higher than those that are recommended by current test guidelines. For example OECD 473 in its current version recommends 10 mM or 2 mg/mL as highest test concentration. In the present study 5, 10 and 15 mg/L were chosen as concentrations. This means that also the lowest concentration of 5 mg/L is many times higher than the highest concentration recommended by OECD 473 (5 mg/L corresponds to 44 mM Creatinine, which is 4 times higher than recommended). Also at this concentration no significant effects were observed.
At concentrations of 10 mg/L and above osmotic stress is also to be expected but not fully assessed within the report. Additionally, there was no information provided regarding test material details (purity, impurities), there is no reported positive control, there are no historical control data for the solvent “medium” and the test was not performed under GLP.
Above and beyond all these aspects of inadequate reporting and interpretation, as well as concentration many times over the recommendation of todays Guidelines, which are located in the range of cytotoxicity and osmotic stress, Creatinine is an endogenous substance.
Creatinine is a breakdown product of Creatine in muscle and is usually produced at a fairly constant rate by the body (depending on muscle mass). According to “Wissenschaftliche Tabellen, 7. Auflage, 1969, J.R. Geigy S.A., Basel, Schweiz” considerable amounts of Creatinine can be found in the different compartments and body fluids:
Cord blood plasm or serum: 11.8 mg/L (6.4 – 17.2 mg/L)
Blood plasm or serum, child (4-21 weeks): 9.5 mg/L (7.9 – 11.1 mg/L)
Blood plasm or serum, child (1-6 years): 11.9 mg/L (7.5 -16.3 mg/L)
Blood plasm or serum, adult:12.4 mg/L (6.6 – 18.2 mg/L)
Liquor cerebrospinalis: 6 - 14 mg/L
Gastric juice: 12 - 33 mg/L
Urine, male (20-45 years): 1.8 (1.2- 2.5 g/24h)
Urine, female (20-45 years): 1.17 (0.01 -1.33 g/24h)
Sweat: 4.6 mg/L (2.1 - 8.4 mg/L)
Mother’s milk: 11 mg/L (8 - 19 mg/L)
Furthermore Creatinine is part of the diet and can be found in lean meat in constant content of 0.02 – 0.04% (G.Mayer, H.Knapp, RÖMPP, Thieme Verlag, 2009).
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Creatinine was tested negative for genotoxic effects in two Ames-Tests according to OECD 471 and DIN 38415 part 4, respectively. Concentrations up to the limit dose were used. No cytotoxic effects were observed.
Also one positive test on chromosme aberration is available for Creatinine. However this study does not report the cytotoxicity observed in each test culture. Furthermore there was no information provided regarding test material details, there is no reported positive control, there are no historical control data for the solvent used and the test was not performed under GLP. Above and beyond all these aspects Creatinine is an endogenous substance and is also part of the diet (see under "Discussion").
Therefore Creatinine does not have to be classified.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.