Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.3 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
75
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
20 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
24.7 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

There is no adequate experimental data on the inhalation route available. Therefore, the worker-DNEL long-term for inhalation route - systemic is derived from the NOAEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day, obtained in the key subacute oral repeated dose study in Wistar rats. The NOAECcorr. is calculated as follows:

- standard respiratory volume rat = 0.38 m³/kg/8h

- standard respiratory volume human = 6.7 m³/8h

- worker respiratory volume = 10 m³/8h

- absorption (oral, rat) = 50 %

- absorption (inhalative, human) = 100 % (default)

--> modified dose descriptor (corrected inhalatory NOAEC) = 20 mg/kg bw/day * (1/0.38 m³/kg/d) * (6.7 m³ (8h)/10 m³ (8h)) * (0.5/1) * (7 exposure days/week; rat/5 exposure days/week; worker) = 24.7 mg/m³

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL)
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (subacute --> chronic)
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for intraspecies differences:
5
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (good/standard quality of the database)
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.3 mg/m³
DNEL related information
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

There is no adequate experimental data on the inhalation route available. The worker-DNEL long-term for inhalation route - systemic is asumed for this exposure scenario as well.

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Most sensitive endpoint:
skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
low hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - workers

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.06 mg/m³
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
150
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
20 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEC
Value:
8.7 mg/m³
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

There is no adequate experimental data on the inhalation route available. Therefore, the general population-DNEL long-term for inhalation route - systemic is derived from the NOAEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day, obtained in the key subacute oral repeated dose study in Wistar rats. The NOAECcorr. is calculated as follows:

- standard respiratory volume rat = 1.15 m³/kg/24h

- absorption (oral, rat) = 50 %

- absorption (inhalative, human) = 100 % (default)

--> modified dose descriptor (corrected inhalatory NOAEC) = 20 mg/kg bw/day * (1/1.15 m³/kg/d) * (0.5/1) = 8.7 mg/m³

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL)
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (subacute --> chronic)
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
1
Justification:
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH Guidance (good/standard quality of the database)
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
ECHA REACH
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.033 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
20 mg/kg bw/day
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
20 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

There are no relevant experimental data on repeated exposure by the dermal route.

The consumer DNEL long-term for dermal route - systemic is derived from the NOAEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day obtained in the key subacute repeated dose oral toxicity study in Wistar Han rats (Research Institute for Organic Syntheses Inc., 2011). The dermal NOAEL is calculated as follows: NOAELdermal = NOAELoral*ABSoral-rat/ABSderm-human = 20 mg/kg bw/day*(0.5/0.5) = 20 mg/kg bw/day.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Default assessment factor for remaining interspecies differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
The ECHA default value for the group "general population" is used.
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
Value:
0.033 mg/kg bw/day
Most sensitive endpoint:
repeated dose toxicity
Route of original study:
Oral
DNEL related information
DNEL derivation method:
ECHA REACH Guidance
Overall assessment factor (AF):
600
Modified dose descriptor starting point:
NOAEL
Value:
20 mg/kg bw/day
Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:

Not applicable.

AF for dose response relationship:
1
Justification:
The dose response relationship is considered unremarkable, therefore no additional factor is used.
AF for differences in duration of exposure:
6
Justification:
The default extrapolation factor for exposure duration is used: subacute (starting point) to chronic (end point).
AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
4
Justification:
The default allometric scaling factor for the differences between rats and humans is used.
AF for other interspecies differences:
2.5
Justification:
Default ECHA assessment factor for remaining interspecies differences
AF for intraspecies differences:
10
Justification:
The ECHA default value for the group "general population" is used.
AF for the quality of the whole database:
1
Justification:
The quality of the whole data base is considered to be sufficient and uncritical.
AF for remaining uncertainties:
1
Justification:
The approach used for DNEL derivation is conservative. No further assessment factors are required.
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
medium hazard (no threshold derived)

Additional information - General Population