Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
28 day study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998
Report date:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,5,5-trimethylhexanal
EC Number:
226-603-0
EC Name:
3,5,5-trimethylhexanal
Cas Number:
5435-64-3
Molecular formula:
C9H18O
IUPAC Name:
3,5,5-trimethylhexanal
Details on test material:
3,5,5-Trimethylhexanal
GLP-Reg.-No. 0637/81 762
Institute-Reg.-No. 0188
Date of production: february/march 1996
Durability: > 1 year
Purity dated 09.05.1996
- 1. 1H und 13C-NMR-spectroscopy: about 97 % Mol-%
- 2. gaschromatography: content: 91,2 mass-%
- 3. water content: 0,05 %
Expiry date: not before may 1998
Properties: clear liquid
Homogeneity: liquid is visually homogeneous
Density (20 ° C): about 0,8184 g/cm3
Solubility in water (20 ° C): < 0,1 g/l
pH: no data
Storage: room temperature, in close containers under inert gas

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelmann GmbH, 33176 Borchen
- Age at study initiation: six to eight weeks
- Weight at study initiation: weight variation did not exceed +/- 20 % of the mean body weight
- Housing: Animals were housed in Makrolon type IV cages, each cage containing 5 rats.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Sniff R 10 diet in pelletform (laboratory standard rat diet), food was offered ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): The animals received tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Animals were acclimatized under study conditions (except administraion of test substance) for at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22° C +/- 3 ° C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Bedding: The bedding used was soft wood Type HW 300/500 W


Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
corn oil
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:

DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): Dosing formulations were prepared weekly. The test substance was transferred to a beaker.
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): A corrosponding weight of corn oil, calculated for the target dosages,
was filled into the beaker and war stirred by means of magnetic stirrer for 15 minutes.
- Storage temperature of food: room temperature


Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
yes
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
The homogeneity, the concentration and the stability of the test substance formulations were determined by Hüls Infracor GLP-Institute. Samples of all dose levels were taken repeatedly and were analyzed for concentration of the testsubstance.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 days (27 days substitute animal No. 19 and 30)
Frequency of treatment:
once a day, seven days per week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
0 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
control
Dose / conc.:
50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
low dose
Dose / conc.:
150 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
mid dose
Dose / conc.:
250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Remarks:
high dose
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 groups, each of 10 rats (five males and five females) were dosed.
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: The dose levels were chosen based on the results of a range-finding study performed at the Hüls Infracor GLP-Institute
- two female animals of the 500 mg/kg high dose group died. Therefore the highest dose was reduced to 250 mg/kg
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: 2-week recovery period in the control and high dose groups.

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
An observation of the animals for genearl health state, behavioural changes and toxicosis as well as for mortality was made twice daily, preferably in the early morning and in the late afternoon.
Once a day a clinical observation was performed, preferrable at the same time each dy and considering the peak period of anticipated effects after dosing. At weekends the animals were observed once a day about one hour after application.

Once a week in addition to the normal daily clinical observation a detailed functional observation of each animal was conducted.

In the 4th week of the dosing period an assessment of the motoractivity was performed.

Individual bodyweights were recorded at time of the allocation of animals to groups, prior to dosing on the day of commencement of treatment and subsequently at weekly intervals throughout the study. LAst recordings of bodyweights were performed at the day of necrospy.

Food consumption was measured in weekly intervals throughout the study. Mean food intake was calculated for each rat.





Sacrifice and pathology:
Necrospy
On completion of the dosing period and recovery period animals were killed by CO2-asphyxiation and exsanguniation. A complete autoipsy including a macropathological examination was performed.
Statistics:
Comparisons were performed between vehicle control group and low, medium and high dose groups and between the recovery control group and the high dose recovery group.
Body weights and organ weights were analysed using Kruskal Wallis non parametric analysis of variance.
Haematological data were analysed by ANOVA incorporating a Bartlett's test for homogenicity and variance.

Group means and standard deviation were calculated were appropriate.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Mortality:
mortality observed, treatment-related
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Food efficiency:
effects observed, treatment-related
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Haematological findings:
no effects observed
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, treatment-related
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
ca. 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Sex:
male/female

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Dose related clinical effects as piloerection and squatting/hunchback position were observed in the male and female high dose groups during the
first functional observation in the "Open filed" after application of the test substance at a dose level of 500 mg/kg/day. Two female animals of the
high dose groups died overnight and were replaced by substitutes. After reduction of the high dose to 250 mg/kg/day on the second day of the
study only individual animals of the high dose groups showed dose-related clinical signs. One female animal of the high dose group died the third day of the study most likely as a result of the application of 500 mg/kg/day the first day of the study. During the recovers period no clinical signs were observed.

High dose femals showed at the end of the treatment period also a statistically significant decrease of absolute bodyweight change (BWCHABS) and a slightly reduced group mean weekly bodyweight (BWN) were compared with control. Evidence of resersibility was found in the recovery groups.

A dose-related decrease of Triglyceride (TRIG) and Total Bilirubin (TBIL) values were observed in animals of both sexes. But apart from the TRIG-
value of the high dose female group all values were within the normal range of our historical backbround data. Evidence of reversibility was found
in the recovery groups.

Centrolobular hypertrophy (minimal slight degree) in correlation with statistically significant higher relative and absolute liver weights and focal
periportal vacuolation in treated females were considered to be substance-related. However, none of the livers examiniated showed nuclear or
cytoplasmic degenerative or necrotic changes of hepatocytes. The female group mean liver weight showed still as statistically significant increase at
the end of the recovery period. But the group mean relative liver weight of treated females showed no statistically significant difference when
compared with female high dose recovery control. It is suggested that the liver changes observed are an expression of a reversible adaptive
response of the liver to the test substnce. As such, it is generally not considered as adverse effect.

The effects caused by the test substance were more pronouned in female animals. None of the effects were irreversible. Therefore, in our
experimental conditions, the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAL) is 250 mg/kg/day.
Executive summary:
s. attached background material