Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1997-12-18 till 1998-01-16
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.7 (Degradation: Abiotic Degradation: Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Version / remarks:
December 1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Pretest: The concentration of the test substance was determined immediately after preparation (t=0), after 2.4 h and after 5 days.
Test 1: The concentration of the test substance was determined immediately after preparation (t=0) and 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 and 6 hours after t=0.
Test 3: The concentration of the test substance was determined immediately after preparation (t=0), after 16 and 19 h after t=0.
Buffers:
- pH: 4
sterile 0.05 M acetat buffer (sodium acetate/ acetatic acid/ Milli-Q water)

- pH: 7
sterile 0.05 M phosphate buffer (potassium dihydrogenphosphate/ sodium hydroxide/ Milli-Q water)

- pH: 9
sterile 0.05 M borate buffer (boric acid/ potassium chloride/ sodium hydroxide/ Milli-Q water)
Details on test conditions:
Preparation of the test solutions
Prior to the performance of each test, the test solutions were freshly prepared. Therefore, an accurately weighed amount of approximately 23-32 mg test substance was added to 50.0 mL buffer solution pH 4, pH 7 or pH 9. After sonication for approximately 15 minutes, the resultant solutions were filter-sterilized through a 0.2 µm membrane filter (FP 030/3, Schleicher & Schuell, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands) and transferred into sterile glass vessels. To exclude oxygen, nitrogen gas was bubbled through each solution for approximately 5 minutes. Thereafter, each vessel was tightly sealed with a septum crimp cap.

Preliminary test
After preparation, the test solutions at pH 4, pH 7 and pH 9 were placed in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 50.0 ± 0.6°C in the dark. The concentration of the test substance was determined immediately after preparation (t=0), after 2.4 hours and after 5 days.

Testing of pseudo-first order behaviour (Test 1 according to EEC guideline C.7)
During the preliminary test, significant hydrolysis (i.e. a decrease in test substance concentration at 50°C < 50% after 2.4 hours but > 10% after 5 days) was observed at pH 4. Therefore, Test 1 was carried out at this pH value. After preparation, the test solution at pH 4 was placed in a thermostatically controlled water bath at 40.7 ± 0 1°C in the dark. The concentration of the test substance at pH 4 was determined immediately after preparation (t=0) and 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5 and 6 hours after t=0. For each test solution, the logarithms of the relative concentrations between 20% and 70% hydrolysis were plotted against time. When this is a straight line, the reaction is considered to be (pseudo)-first order and Test 3 according to EEC guideline C.7 must be performed. The results from Test 1 for pH 4 were also used for the calculation of k(25°C) in Test 3. For that purpose, the logarithms of all relative concentrations were plotted against time.

Determination of the half life time (t1/2) at 25°C (Test 3 according to EEC guideline C.7)
Because the resultant line from Test 1 was a straight line for pH 4 Test 3 was carried out. This test was performed at 30.5°C. After preparation, the test solution was placed in a thermostatically controlled water bath at the specified temperature, and in the dark. For pH 4 and 30.5°C, the concentration of the test substance was determined immediately after preparation (t=0) and 16 and 19 hours after t=0. The logarithms of all relative concentrations were plotted against time for these pH values. The results from Test 1 for pH 4 at 40.7°C were also used.

pH measurements
For each test solution the pH value at room temperature was determined at the beginning and at the end of each test.

Duration:
5 d
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
Initial conc. measured:
0.359 g/L
Duration:
5 d
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
Initial conc. measured:
0.479 g/L
Duration:
5 d
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
Initial conc. measured:
0.365 g/L
Number of replicates:
Preliminary test, Test 1 and Test 3: duplicate analysis
Positive controls:
not specified
Negative controls:
not specified
Preliminary study:
At pH 7 and pH 9, a decrease in concentration < 10% was observed after 5 days (half-life time at 25°C > 1 year). Therefore, no further testing was necessary at pH 7 and pH 9. At pH 4, a decrease in concentration < 50% after 2.4 hours but > 10% after 5 days was observed. In order to determine if hydrolysis of the test item is a pseudo-first order reaction, a subsequent test was performed at pH 4.
Test performance:
Test 1:
For the test solution pH 4, the plot of the logarithms of the relative concentrations between 20% and 70% hydrolysis against time is a straight line. Therefore, the reaction at pH 4 is considered to be (pseudo) first order. Hence, the half-life time at 25 °C was determined at this pH value in a subsequent test. The results of Test 1 are also used.
Test 3:
From each regression line, the rate constants and the corresponding half-life time at 25 °C were calculated.
Transformation products:
not specified
% Recovery:
0
pH:
4
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
104
pH:
7
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
% Recovery:
109
pH:
9
Temp.:
50 °C
Duration:
5 d
Key result
pH:
4
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
35 h
Key result
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Key result
pH:
9
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 1 yr
Details on results:
Please see Table 1 and 2 below for details on Test 1 and Test 3.

Table 1: Results of Test 1 at 40.7 °C ± 0.1°C

code pH

Measured pH value

Time (hours)

Concentration test substance [g/L]*

Relative concentration [%]

logarithm rel. conc.

4

4.0

0

0.512

100

2.00

4.0

1

0.467

91.3

1.96

4.0

2

0.409

79.9

1.901

4.0

3

0.368

71.9

1.861

4.0

3.5

0.352

68.7

1.841

4.0

4

0.323

63.1

1.801

4.0

4.5

0.318

62.1

1.791

4.0

5

0.283

55.3

1.741

4.0

5.5

0.27

52.8

1.721

4.0

6

0.254

49.6

1.701

*Mean value of duplicate analysis. The maximum deviation between the responses was < 10%.

1Value between 20% and 70% hydrolysis

 

Table 2: Results of Test 3 at 30.5 ± 0.1°C 

Code pH

Measured pH value

Time [hours]

Concentration test substance*[g/L]

Relative concentration [%]

logarithm rel. conc.

4

4.0

0

0.411

100

2.00

4.0

16

0.232

56.6

1.75

4.0

19

0.198

48.1

1.68

 *Mean value of duplicate analysis. The maximum deviation between the responses was < 10%.

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The test item is hydrolytically stable (t1/2 > 1 year) at pH 7 and 9. At pH 4, the half-life time (t1/2) is 35 h at 25 °C.
Executive summary:

The determination of the hydrolysis as a function of pH was based on the EEC-Directive 92/69 EEC, Part C, Methods for the determination of Ecotoxicity, C.7: “Abiotic degradation: Hydrolysis as a function of pH”. The test item was determined to be hydrolytically stable (half-life time at 25 °C > 1 year) at pH 7 and pH 9 under the conditions of the test. At pH 4, a decrease in concentration < 50 % after 2.4 hours but > 10% after 5 days was observed. In order to determine if hydrolysis of the test item is a pseudo-first order reaction, a subsequent test was performed. The plot of the logarithms of the relative concentrations between 20 % and 70 % hydrolysis against time was a straight line. Therefore, the reaction at pH4 is considered to be (pseudo)-first order. Hence the half-life time at 25 °C was determined in a subsequent test. At pH 4, the half-life times were 18 h (30.5°C) and 5.9 h (40.7°C). From these values the half-life time at pH 4 and 25 °C was calculated to be 35 h.

Description of key information

The test item is hydrolytically stable (t1/2 > 1 year) at pH 7 and 9. At pH 4, the half-life time (t1/2) is 35 h at 25 °C (reference 5.1.2 -1).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

The determination of the hydrolysis as a function of pH was based on the EEC-Directive 92/69 EEC, Part C, Methods for the determination of Ecotoxicity, C.7: “Abiotic degradation: Hydrolysis as a function of pH”. The test item was determined to be hydrolytically stable (half-life time at 25 °C > 1 year) at pH 7 and pH 9 under the conditions of the test. At pH 4, a decrease in concentration < 50 % after 2.4 hours but > 10% after 5 days was observed. In order to determine if hydrolysis of the test item is a pseudo-first order reaction, a subsequent test was performed. The plot of the logarithms of the relative concentrations between 20 % and 70 % hydrolysis against time was a straight line. Therefore, the reaction at pH4 is considered to be (pseudo)-first order. Hence the half-life time at 25 °C was determined in a subsequent test. At pH 4, the half-life times were 18 h (30.5°C) and 5.9 h (40.7°C). From these values the half-life time at pH 4 and 25 °C was calculated to be 35 h (reference 5.1.2 -1).