Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Study period:
Feb 2005
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: well reported GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005
Report date:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Flufenamic acid
EC Number:
208-494-1
EC Name:
Flufenamic acid
Cas Number:
530-78-9
Molecular formula:
C14H10F3NO2
IUPAC Name:
2-{[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]amino}benzoic acid
Details on test material:
Flufenaminsäure, yellow powder, Batch BXR2GXS, content 99.0%

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
NMRI
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
0 (vehicle control), 2, 10 and 50%
No. of animals per dose:
6 females

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: NMRI mice did not show an increase in the stimulation indices for cell counts or for weights of the draining lymph nodes.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The "positive level" of ear swelling (i.e. increase of about 10% of the control values) has not been reached or exceeded in any dose group. However, there was a statistical significant increase after application of 10% test item. A significant increase compared to vehicle treated animals regarding ear weight was detected in the low and mid dose group.

The body weights of the animals were not affected by any treatment.

Tabular summary of the LLNA/IMDS results:

   Direct LLNA     Ear swelling (in 0.01 mm)        Ear weight (in mg per 8 mm diameter punch)   
 Dose (%)  Weight index (mean +/- SD in %)  Cell count index (mean +/- SD in %)  day 1 (mean +/- SD in %)  day 4 (mean +/- SD in %)  Index day 4   day 4 (mean +/- SD in %)  Index day 4
 0 (DMF)  1.00 +/- 16.33 1.00 +/- 25.06   17.75 +/- 4.88  17.25 +/- 6.60  1.00  11.09 +/- 4.85  1.00
 2  1.10 +/- 23.94  1.14 +/- 29.26  17.75 +/- 4.88  17.50 +/- 5.71  1.01  12.18* +/- 5.88  1.10
 10  1.25 +/- 14.24  1.19 +/- 26.18  18.08 +/- 5.51  18.67* +/- 5.75  1.08  13.18* +/- 9.09  1.19
 50  0.95 +/- 32.65  0.91 +/- 48.10  17.92 +/- 4.43  17.00 +/- 5.61  0.99  10.65 +/- 6.63  0.96

* statistically significant increase (p <= 0.05)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Executive summary:

To determine the skin-sensitizing properties of Flufenamic acid the LLNA was performed on female NMRI mice according to OECD guideline 429 and EPA OPPTS 870.2600. The study was conducted with the following test substance concentrations: 2, 10 and 50%

The results showed that the test item has no sensitising potential in mice after dermal application of up to and including 50% concentration. However, the study does point to a non-specific (irritating) immunostimulating potential of the test item since a significant increase compared to vehicle treated animals regarding ear swelling was detected in the mid dose group. In addition, a statistically significant increase was detected for the ear weight in the low and mid dose group. It must be concluded that the test item has an irritating potential starting at the lowest concentration tested, i.e. 2%.