Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
Reaction mass of sodium potassium 7-amino-4-hydroxy-3,8-bis(2-{2-sulfonato-4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)naphthalene-2-sulfonate, sodium potassium 7-amino-3-{2-[4-(ethenesulfonyl)-2-sulfonatophenyl]diazen-1-yl}-4-hydroxy-8-(2-{2-sulfonato-4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)naphthalene-2-sulfonate, sodium potassium 7-amino-8-{2-[4-(ethenesulfonyl)-2-sulfonatophenyl]diazen-1-yl}-4-hydroxy-3-(2-{2-sulfonato-4-[2-(sulfonatooxy)ethanesulfonyl]phenyl}diazen-1-yl)naphthalene-2-sulfonate and sodium potassium 7-amino-3,8-bis({2-[4-(ethenesulfonyl)-2-sulfonatophenyl]diazen-1-yl})-4-hydroxynaphthalene-2-sulfonate
EC number: 952-120-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic in Ames assay
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 17, 1998 to December 14, 1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- "Kanpoan No. 287 ~ Environment Protection Agency"
"Eisei No. 127 -- Ministry of Health & Welfare"
"Heisei 09/10/31 Kikyoku No. 2 - Ministry of International Trade & Industry" - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Swiss GLP
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: TVR50
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: September 01, 2004
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: 24 hours in water, saline, polyethylene glycol, CMC, vaseline, and FCA - Target gene:
- The Salmonella typhimurium histidine (his) and the E. coli tryptophan (trp) reversion system
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 liver microsomal fraction from rat treated with phenobarbital and ß-Naphthoflavone.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation): 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation): 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent: deionized water
The solvent was chosen because of its solubility properties. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation- TA 1535, TA 100
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation- TA 1537, TA 98
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation- WP2 uvrA
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation- TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, WP2 uvrA
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- When summarised the mutations of the TA strains and the E. coli strain, used in this study can be described as follows:
Salmonella typhimurium
TA 1537: his C 3076; rfa-; uvrB-: frame shift mutations
TA 98: his D 3052; rfa-; uvrB-;R-factor: frame shift mutations
TA 1535: his G 46; rfa-; uvrB-: base-pair substitutions
TA 100: his G 46; rfa-; uvrB-;R-factor: base-pair substitutions
Escherichia coli
WP2 uvrA: trp; uvrA: base-pair substitutions and others
Regular checking of the properties of the strains regarding the membrane permeability and ampicillin resistance as well as spontaneous mutation rates is performed in RCC Cytotest Cell Research according to Ames et al.. In this way it was ensured that the experimental conditions set down by Ames were fulfilled.
The bacterial strains TA 1535, TA 98, and TA 100 were obtained from Dr. B.N. Ames (University of California, 94720 Berkeley, U.S.A.). The bacterial strain TA 1537 was obtained from BASF (D-67063 Ludwigshafen). The bacterial strain WP2 uvrA was obtained from Dr. Heinz Träger, Knoll AG, D-67008 Ludwigshafen. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test article is considered positive if either a dose related and reproducible increase in the number of revertants or a biologically relevant and reproducible increase for at least one test concentration is induced.
A test article producing neither a reproducible and dose related increase in the number of revertants, nor a biologically relevant and reproducibly positive response at any one of the test points is considered non-mutagenic in this system.
A mutagenic response is described as follows:
A test article is considered mutagenic if in the strains TA 98, TA 100, and WP2 uvrA the number of reversions will be at least twice as high and in the strains TA 1535 and TA 1537 at least three times higher as compared to the spontaneous reversion rate.
Also, a dose-dependent and reproducible increase in the number of revertants is regarded as an indication of possibly existing mutagenic potential of the test article regardless whether the highest dose induced the above described enhancement factors or not. - Statistics:
- No statistical evaluation of data was required.
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and E. Coli WP2 uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- (5000 µg/plate), slight effects seen with TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and E. Coli WP2 uvrA
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- ( 5000 µg/plate)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Non mutagenic
- Conclusions:
- FAT 40'571/A is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to investigate the potential of FAT 40'571/A to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using theSalmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA. This test was carried out according to OECD 471 and EU B.13 guidelines. The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate.
The test article was tested at the 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate concentrations.
The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation in both independent experiments. Slight toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in strain TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate with S9 mix in experiment II.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with FAT 40'571/A at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, FAT 40'571/A is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Reference
The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without S9 mix in both experiments.
Slight toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in strain TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate with S9 mix in experiment II.
In experiment II, the colony count of the negative control without S9 mix in strain TA 98 did not quite reach the lower limit of our historical range of negative control data. This effect is caused by statistical fluctuations of the rather low numbers of colonies in strain TA 98. Since the results of this study are based on the corresponding solvent control, which remained well within the range of our historical controls, this effect is judged irrelevant.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment with the test substance at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
A study was performed to investigate the potential to induce gene mutations according to the plate incorporation test (experiment I) and the pre-incubation test (experiment II) using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA. This test was carried out according to OECD 471 and EU B.13 guidelines. The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation. Each concentration, including the controls, was tested in triplicate. The test article was tested at the 33; 100; 333; 1000; 2500; and 5000 µg/plate concentrations. The plates incubated with the test article showed normal background growth up to 5000 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation in both independent experiments. Slight toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in strain TA 98 at 5000 µg/plate with S9 mix in experiment II.
No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment at any dose level, neither in the presence nor absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix). There was also no tendency of higher mutation rates with increasing concentrations in the range below the generally acknowledged border of biological relevance. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies.
In conclusion, it can be stated that during the described mutagenicity test and under the experimental conditions reported, the test article did not induce gene mutations by base pair changes or frameshifts in the genome of the strains used. Therefore, the test substance is considered to be non-mutagenic in this Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test substance is not considered to be classified for genotoxicity according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.