Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

To assess the genetic toxicity in vitro of the substance with CAS 2218502-12-4 (Direct Black 168 NaLi salts), relevant in vitro studies conducted on the similar substance (read-across) with CAS 93281-13-1(Direct Black 168 NaLi) have been chosen.


The outcome of the studies with the source substance showed that it induced point mutations by frameshifts in the genome of strain TA1538; indication of a possible mutagenic response has also been recorded in strain TA1537. The substance did not induce structural chromosome aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line.


Based on the structural similarity, the same behaviour of the target substance could be expected. Both substances CAS 218502-12-4 (Direct Black 168 NaLi salt) and CAS 93281-13-1 (Direct Black 168 Na salt) have the same organic anionic structure. The differences are considered to be not able to impact the study outcome, thus the read-across can be considered as reliable and appropriate to evaluate the endpoint. Details on read-across approach are given in the section 13 of IUCLID file.


 

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
genetic toxicity in vitro, other
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
See the report for the analogue approach justification in section 13 "Other reports"
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
In conc. higher tan 1 microg/ml (without S9 mix) and 30 microg/ml (with S9 mix)
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1538
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
positive
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
ambiguous
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (positive)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

To assess the genetic toxicity in vivo of the substance with CAS 2218502-12-4 (Direct Black 168 NaLi salts), relevant in vivo studies conducted on the similar substance (read-across) with CAS 93281-13-1(Direct Black 168 NaLi) have been chosen.


The outcome of the studies with the source substance showed that it did not induce micronulei in the bone narrow cells of the mouse and dit not induce DNA-damage leading to repair synthesis in the hepatocytes of the treated rats.


Based on the structural similarity, the same behaviour of the target substance could be expected. Both substances CAS 218502-12-4 (Direct Black 168 NaLi salt) and CAS 93281-13-1 (Direct Black 168 Na salt) have the same organic anionic structure. The differences are considered to be not able to impact the study outcome, thus the read-across can be considered as reliable and appropriate to evaluate the endpoint. Details on read-across approach are given in the section 13 of IUCLID file.


 

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
genetic toxicity in vivo, other
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
See the report for the analogue approach justification in section 13 "Other reports"
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
yes
Remarks:
slight toxic reactions
Sex:
male
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Remarks on result:
other: unscheduled DNA synthesis
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Following the criteria as described in Annex 1 of Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, and based on the available data, the substance is not classified for genetic toxicity