Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 267-636-0 | CAS number: 67905-17-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Repeated dose toxicity: Oral
The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day, when rats were treated with the given test chemical during repeated dose toxicity study.
Repeated dose toxicity: Inhalation
A short-term toxicity study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation in production and/or use is not likely as based on the provided thorough and rigorous exposure assessment. Also, the given test chemical has very low vapor pressure 3.28E-013 Pa (2.46E-015 mm Hg), so the potential for the generation of inhalable vapors is very low. The normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore this end point for repeated inhalation toxicity was considered for waiver.
Repeated dose toxicity: Dermal
A short-term toxicity study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via dermal in production and/or use is not likely as based on the provided thorough and rigorous exposure assessment. Also, the acute dermal toxicity value for test chemical (as provided in section 7.2.3) is >2000 mg/kg body weight. Given the use of the chemical; repeated exposure by the dermal route is unlikely since the use of gloves is common practice in industries. Thus, it is expected that test chemical shall not exhibit 28 day repeated dose toxicity by the dermal route. In addition, there is no data available that suggests that test chemical shall exhibit repeated dose toxicity by the dermal route. Hence this end point was considered for waiver.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Toxic effect type:
- dose-dependent
Repeated dose toxicity: via oral route - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- Experimental data from various test chemicals
- Justification for type of information:
- Weight of evidence approach based on the available information from various test chemicals.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: As mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- WoE report is based on 3 repeated dose toxicity studies i.e. WoE-2, WoE-3 and WoE-4.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: 2. Crj: CD(SD) 3. Wistar 4. Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- 2. Age at study initiation of dosing: 10 weeks old
3. No data
4. No data - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 2. 0.5 % Methylcellulose aqueous solution 3. 1% CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose) aqueous solution 4. water
- Details on oral exposure:
- 2. PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test chemical was dissolved in 0.5 % Methylcellulose aqueous solution to give dose level of 0, 40, 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): 0.5 % Methylcellulose aqueous solution
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 40, 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day
3. PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle:0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (0, 94, 282 or 940 mg active dye/kg bw/day)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 ml/kg
4. PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Water is used as a vehicle
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 27, 109 or 435 mg active dye/kg bw/day) in water (5 ml/kg)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5ml/kg
- Lot/batch no. (if required):2060608
- Purity: 54.4%purity - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The prepared solution was confirmed by UV-visible absorbance method
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2. Male: 42 days / Female: 41 - 45 days (from 14 days before mating to day 4 of lactation)
3. 13 weeks
4. 13 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Remarks:
- 2. 0, 40, 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day
3. 0, 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (0, 94, 282 or 940 mg active dye/kg bw/day)
4. 0, 50, 200 or 800 mg/kg bw/day (0, 27, 109 or 435 mg active dye/kg bw/day) in water (5 ml/kg) by gavage. - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 2. Test group:
0 mg/Kg/day: 7 males and 12 females
40 mg/Kg/day: 12 males and 12 females
200 mg/Kg/day: 12 males and 12 females
1000 mg/Kg/day: 7 males and 12 females
Recovery group:
0 mg/Kg/day: 5 males and 5 females
1000 mg/Kg/day: 5 males and 5 females
3. 10 animals per sex and group
4. 10 animals per sex and group - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- 2.
- Rationale for selecting satellite groups: 5 females
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: Females, 14 days
3. - Dose selection rationale: Dose levels were selected on the basis of a previous 14-day oral toxicity study in rats.
4. - Dose selection rationale : Doses were selected on the basis of a previous 14-day oral toxicity study in rats. - Positive control:
- No data
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- 2. CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: No data
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. No data
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
- Time schedule: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): No data
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- Dose groups that were examined: No data
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No data
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. No data
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. TP, Alb, 2-Glob
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: No data
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. No data
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- Dose groups that were examined: No data
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other: No data
IMMUNOLOGY: No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- How many animals: No data
- Dose groups that were examined: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. No data
3. CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: No data available
- Cage side observations checked in table No data available
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule:Weekly
- Time schedule for examinations:Daily cage side observations were perform.
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Food intake is measured at week 13 ,other details are not given.
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data : No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: During acclimation period
- Dose groups that were examined:All animals in acclimation period and high dose animals in week 13.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: Not mentioned
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes (identity) -No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: 10 animals per sex and group for treatment
- Parameters checked in table were examined-No
URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: Week 13
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- Parameters checked in table.were examined.- No
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No data
4. DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes / No / No data
- Time schedule:
BODY WEIGHT: No changes in body weight and food intake were reported.
- Time schedule for examinations: Body weights were observed weekly
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No data available
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No food intake related changes reported
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data available
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations: Evaluation were done at the beginning of the treatment period and in week 13.
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data available
- How many animals:10 animals per sex and group
- Parameters checked in table -No.
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No ocular findings were observed
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- Dose groups that were examined:NA
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No details given
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data available
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. No data
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No data
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No data available
- Animals fasted: No data available
- How many animals:
- Parameters checked in table were examined-no
URINALYSIS: Yes
Time schedule for collection of urine: No data available
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data available
- Animals fasted: No data available - Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No data available
- Animals fasted: No data available
- How many animals: No data available
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No data available
- Time schedule for examinations: No data available - Sacrifice and pathology:
- 2. GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, no detailed data available
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes, no detailed data available
3. GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
4. GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes - Other examinations:
- No data
- Statistics:
- No data
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. effects observed, treatment-related - Colored feces were noted in male and female rats treated with 40, 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day
3. no effects observed - There were no adverse clinical signs were observed.
4. no effects observed - No remarkable clinical signs were observed just before death. Increased salivation was observed at all dose levels with a dose-dependent incidence. Loud breathing was noted in 1/10 females given 50 mg/kg bw/day, 1/10 females given 200 mg/kg bw/day, 2/10 females and 1/10 males given 800 mg /kg bw/day. Regurgitation occurred in all treatment groups (10 – 30%). - Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- 2. no mortality observed
3. no mortality observed - There were no deaths were observed.
4. no mortality observed - There were no treatment-related deaths. - Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. no effects observed
3. no effects observed - There were no changes in body weights were observed.
4. no effects observed - No treatment related changes observed. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. no effects observed
3. no effects observed - There were no changes in food intake were observed.
4. no effects observed - No treatment related changes observed. - Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. not specified
3. no effects observed - No substance related ocular findings were reported.
4. no effects observed - No ocular findings were reported. - Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. no effects observed
3. no effects observed - Statistically significant changes in haematological parameters at low dose included increased prothrombin time (low- and high-dose males) and activated partial thromboplastin time (high-dose males).
4. no effects observed - Statistically significant changes in haematological parameters included decreased values for white blood cells (high-dose males), leukocytes, (high-dose males), prothrombin time (highdose
females) and fibrinogen (high-dose females); and increased values for packed cell volume (high-dose females), mean cell volume (mid- and high-dose females), mean cell haemoglobin (mid-dose females), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (high-dose males), prothrombin time (high-dose males) and activated partial thromboplastin time (high-dose males). - Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. effects observed, treatment-related - Decrease in the TP, decrease in the Alb and increase in the percentage of alpha 2-Glob (Male) in 1000 mg/Kgday treated animals. Though albumin level (mg/dL) was significantly decreased in males of the high dose group, A/G ratio was not affected.
3. no effects observed - The changes observed in blood clinical chemistry laboratory parameters were considered to be of no toxicological significance.
4. no effects observed - Statistically significant changes in blood clinical chemistry parameters included slight decreases in inorganic phosphorus (males in all dose groups), glucose (mid-dose males and high-dosefemales), urea (high-dose males), alkaline phosphatase (high-dose males) and alanine aminotransferase (high-dose males). These changes were considered to be of no toxicological importance. - Urinalysis findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. effects observed, treatment-related - Abnormal color of urine was observed in males and females treated with 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day
3. no effects observed - The changes observed in urinalysis were considered to be of no toxicological significance.
4. no effects observed - The only finding in the urinalysis was an increased pH of urine in females (highdose). - Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. no effects observed
3. effects observed, non-treatment-related - In males given 1000 mg/kg bw/day, slightly increased locomotor activity was observed after 15 minutes; in absence of a clear dose-relationship this finding was considered to be fortuitous. Statistically significant decreased locomotor activity was observed after 45 minuts in females given 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day and persisted until the end of the measurement period in females given 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The toxicological significance was unclear, but in absence of this finding in males and in absence of similar parameters (general) a test article relation was considered to be unlikely. Changes in grip strength were reported in treated males and females. However, data did not show dose-relationship and no correlation between fore- and hind-limb strength. Effects therefore might not be related to the test substance.
4. not specified - Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. no effects observed
3. no effects observed - Statistically significant changes in relative organ weights included increased kidney weight in low- and mid-dose males, and decreased heart weight in mid-dose females. In absence of any dose relationship these findings were considered to be fortuitous.
4. no effects observed - There were no significant differences in organ weights between treated and control groups. - Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. effects observed, treatment-related - Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract in 40 mg/Kgday treated male animals. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract (Male/Female), Mucosal discoloration of alimentary tract (Male) in 200 mg/Kg/day treated animals. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract (Male/Female), Mucosal discoloration of alimentary tract (Male/Female) in 1000 mg/Kg/day treated animals.
3. effects observed, non-treatment-related - Dark blue faeces were observed at all dose levels and were related to the staining properties of the test substance. The only findings at necropsy were a blue discolouration of the mucosal surface of the stomach and/or intestines observed for a few animals given 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
4. effects observed, treatment-related - Findings at necropsy were dose-related greenish contents or greenish colorations of the mucosa of the digestive tract. At the microscopic examination, alveolar oedema together with pigmented granular material was noted. Coloured urine, faeces, fur and extremities were observed at all dose levels and were related to the staining properties of the test chemical. - Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 2. no effects observed
3. effects observed, non-treatment-related - The histopathological changes noted at the microscopic examination of tissues and organs of treated animals were similar in incidence, severity and morphological characteristics to those observed in the control group and therefore, not considered to be treatment-related.
4. no effects observed - The histopathological changes noted at the microscopic examination of tissues and organs of treated animals were similar in incidence, severity and morphological characteristics to those observed in the control group and therefore, not considered to be treatment-related. - Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not specified
- Other effects:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- 4. The only finding considered to be treatment-related was the increased activated partial thromboplastin time in high-dose males (+30% in mean).
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- 2
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- gross pathology
- haematology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: No significant effects were observed at 1000 mg/Kg/day
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- 3
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- haematology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- mortality
- ophthalmological examination
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- urinalysis
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- 4
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical biochemistry
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- haematology
- histopathology: non-neoplastic
- mortality
- organ weights and organ / body weight ratios
- Remarks on result:
- other: No effect observed
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg/day, when rats were treated with the given test chemical during repeated dose toxicity study.
- Executive summary:
Data available from the various sources was reviewed to determine the toxic nature of the given test chemical. The studies are as mentioned below:
Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG422) was performed to determine the toxic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed using Crl:CD (SD) male and female rats. Recovery group was also included in the study. The test chemical was dissolved in 0.5 % methylcellulose aqueous solution and used at dose level of 0, 40, 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day. The treated animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs, changes in body weight, food consumption, urinalysis, hematology, clinical chemistry and were subjected to gross and histopathology. No mortality was noted and no effects were observed in clinical signs, functional battery observations, body weight and food consumption changes, hematology, organ weights and histopathology. Colored feces (40, 200 and 1000 mg/Kg/day) and abnormal urine color (200 and 1000 mg/Kg/day) was noted in the treated animals. Decrease in the TP, decrease in the Alb and increase in the percentage of alpha 2-Glob (Male) in treated animals of 1000 mg/Kg/day. Though albumin level (mg/dL) was significantly decreased in males of the high dose group, A/G ratio was not affected. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract in 40 mg/Kgday treated male animals. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract (Male/Female), mucosal discoloration of alimentary tract (Male) in 200 mg/Kg/day treated animals. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract (Male/Female), mucosal discoloration of alimentary tract (Male/Female) in 1000 mg/Kg/day treated animals. Based on the observations of the study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for the test chemical is considered to be 1000 mg/Kg/day when male and female rats were exposed to the test chemical in combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG422).
In another repeated dose oral study, the given test chemical was assessed for its possible toxic potential. For this purpose sub-chronic toxicity study was conducted in 10 animals per sex and group Wistar rats. Daily oral gavage at 0 (vehicle, 1% aqueous solution of carboxymethylcellulose), 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (0, 94, 282 or 940 mg active dye/kg/day) at a dosing volume of 10 ml/kg was performed for 13 weeks. These dose levels were selected on the basis of a previous 14-day oral toxicity study in rats. Evaluations and measurements included mortality, daily cage-side observations, weekly body weight, food intake and detailed clinical observations, ophthalmoscopy (on all animals in acclimation period and on control and high dose animals in week 13), as well as functional parameters, hematology, blood clinical chemistry and urinalysis (week 13). At the end of the dosing period, animals were killed and subjected to macroscopic examination, selected organs were weighed, and organs/tissues were preserved. Microscopic examination was performed for specified tissues/organs from control and high dose rats, and for gross anomalies from all animals. There were no deaths, no adverse clinical signs or changes in body weights and food intake. No substance related ocular findings were reported. Dark blue faeces were observed at all dose levels and were related to the staining properties of the test substance. In males given 1000 mg/kg bw/day, slightly increased locomotor activity was observed after 15 minutes; in absence of a clear dose-relationship this finding was considered to be fortuitous. Statistically significant decreased locomotor activity was observed after 45 minuts in females given 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day and persisted until the end of the measurement period in females given 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The toxicological significance was unclear, but in absence of this finding in males and in absence of similar parameters (general and detailed clinical observations) a test article relation was considered to be unlikely. Changes in grip strength were reported in treated males and females. However, data did not show dose-relationship and no correlation between fore- and hind-limb strength. Effects therefore might not be related to the test substance. Statistically significant changes in haematological parameters at low dose included increased prothrombin time (low- and high-dose males) and activated partial thromboplastin time (high-dose males). The changes observed in blood clinical chemistry laboratory parameters and in urinalysis were considered by the study authors to be of no toxicological significance. Statistically significant changes in relative organ weights included increased kidney weight in low- and mid-dose males, and decreased heart weight in mid-dose females. In absence of any dose relationship these findings were considered to be fortuitous. The only findings at necropsy were a blue discolouration of the mucosal surface of the stomach and/or intestines observed for a few animals given 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The histopathological changes noted at the microscopic examination of tissues and organs of treated animals were similar in incidence, severity and morphological characteristics to those observed in the control group and therefore, not considered to be treatment-related. Under the condition of the study, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day (940 mg active dye/kg bw/day).
Both the above study results were supported with the sub-chronic toxicity study conducted by using the given test chemical in 10 animals per sex and group Sprague-Dawley rats at the doses 0, 50, 200 or 800 mg/kg bw/day (0, 27, 109 or 435 mg active dye/kg bw/day) in water (5 ml/kg) by gavage route 13 weeks. These doses were selected on the basis of a previous 14-day oral toxicity study in rats. Evaluations and measurements included mortality, daily clinical observations, weekly body weight and food intake, ophthalmoscopy (in acclimation once before the beginning of the treatment period and in week 13 on control and high dose animals), hematology, blood clinical chemistry and urinalysis (week 13). At the end of the dosing period, surviving animals were killed and subjected to a complete macroscopic examination, principal organs (adrenals, heart, kidneys, liver, ovaries, spleen, testes, thymus) were weighed, and a full spectrum of tissues were preserved. Microscopic examination was performed for specified tissues/organs from all decedent rats, control and high dose rats killed at the end of the study, as well as for gross anomalies, lungs, liver and kidneys from all animals. There were no treatment-related deaths. Two treated females (one given 200 mg/kg bw/day and one given 800 mg/kg bw/day) died during the study. Purplish colour and/or purplish and blue contents were observed in the lungs, in buccal and thoracal cavities and in the trachea of these females. No remarkable clinical signs were observed just before death; at the microscopic examination, alveolar oedema together with pigmented granular material was noted. Their death, therefore, to a gavage error and not to the administration of the test substance. Increased salivation was observed at all dose levels with a dose-dependent incidence. Loud breathing was noted in 1/10 females given 50 mg/kg bw/day, 1/10 females given 200 mg/kg bw/day, 2/10 females and 1/10 males given 800 mg /kg bw/day. Regurgitation occurred in all treatment groups (10 –30%). Coloured urine, faeces, fur and extremities were observed at all dose levels and were related to the staining properties of Jarocol Violet 43. No other clinical signs, no ocular findings or changes in body weight and food intake were reported. There were no significant differences in organ weights between treated and control groups. Findings at necropsy were dose-related greenish contents or greenish colorations of the mucosa of the digestive tract. The histopathological changes noted at the microscopic examination of tissues and organs of treated animals were similar in incidence, severity and morphological characteristics to those observed in the control group and therefore, not considered by the study authors to be treatment-related. Statistically significant changes in blood clinical chemistry parameters included slight decreases in inorganic phosphorus (males in all dose groups), glucose (mid-dose males and high-dose females), urea (high-dose males), alkaline phosphatase (high-dose males) and alanine aminotransferase (high-dose males). These changes were considered to be of no toxicological importance. Statistically significant changes in haematological parameters included decreased values for white blood cells (high-dose males), leukocytes, (high-dose males), prothrombin time (highdose females) and fibrinogen (high-dose females); and increased values for packed cell volume (high-dose females), mean cell volume (mid- and high-dose females), mean cell haemoglobin (mid-dose females), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (high-dose males), prothrombin time (high-dose males) and activated partial thromboplastin time (high-dose males). The only finding in the urinalysis was an increased pH of urine in females (highdose). The only finding considered to be treatment-related was the increased activated partial thromboplastin time in high-dose males (+30% in mean). Under the condition of the study, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level was considered to be 200 mg/kg bw/day (109 mg active dye/kg bw/day) based on the increased activated partial thromboplastin time in high-dose males.
Thus based on the above studies, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg body weight and hence is not likely to classify as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
- Justification for type of information:
- The study is ongoing and this information will be submitted later based on ECHA communication/decision number CCH-D-2114497522-42-01/F.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subchronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimicsh 2 and from handbook or collection of data.
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity: inhalation, other
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- a short-term toxicity study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation in production and/or use is not likely as based on the provided thorough and rigorous exposure assessment
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - systemic effects
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity: dermal, other
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- a short-term toxicity study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via the dermal route in production and/or use is not likely as based on the provided thorough and rigorous exposure assessment
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Repeated dose toxicity: dermal - local effects
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Repeated dose toxicity: Oral
Data available from the various sources was reviewed to determine the toxic nature of the given test chemical. The studies are as mentioned below:
Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG422) was performed to determine the toxic nature of the test chemical. The study was performed using Crl:CD (SD) male and female rats. Recovery group was also included in the study. The test chemical was dissolved in 0.5 % methylcellulose aqueous solution and used at dose level of 0, 40, 200 or 1000 mg/Kg/day. The treated animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs, changes in body weight, food consumption, urinalysis, hematology, clinical chemistry and were subjected to gross and histopathology. No mortality was noted and no effects were observed in clinical signs, functional battery observations, body weight and food consumption changes, hematology, organ weights and histopathology. Colored feces (40, 200 and 1000 mg/Kg/day) and abnormal urine color (200 and 1000 mg/Kg/day) was noted in the treated animals. Decrease in the TP, decrease in the Alb and increase in the percentage of alpha 2-Glob (Male) in treated animals of 1000 mg/Kg/day. Though albumin level (mg/dL) was significantly decreased in males of the high dose group, A/G ratio was not affected. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract in 40 mg/Kgday treated male animals. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract (Male/Female), mucosal discoloration of alimentary tract (Male) in 200 mg/Kg/day treated animals. Colored aqueous content in the alimentary tract (Male/Female), mucosal discoloration of alimentary tract (Male/Female) in 1000 mg/Kg/day treated animals. Based on the observations of the study, the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for the test chemical is considered to be 1000 mg/Kg/day when male and female rats were exposed to the test chemical in combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/ Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG422).
In another repeated dose oral study, the given test chemical was assessed for its possible toxic potential. For this purpose sub-chronic toxicity study was conducted in 10 animals per sex and group Wistar rats. Daily oral gavage at 0 (vehicle, 1% aqueous solution of carboxymethylcellulose), 100, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day (0, 94, 282 or 940 mg active dye/kg/day) at a dosing volume of 10 ml/kg was performed for 13 weeks. These dose levels were selected on the basis of a previous 14-day oral toxicity study in rats. Evaluations and measurements included mortality, daily cage-side observations, weekly body weight, food intake and detailed clinical observations, ophthalmoscopy (on all animals in acclimation period and on control and high dose animals in week 13), as well as functional parameters, hematology, blood clinical chemistry and urinalysis (week 13). At the end of the dosing period, animals were killed and subjected to macroscopic examination, selected organs were weighed, and organs/tissues were preserved. Microscopic examination was performed for specified tissues/organs from control and high dose rats, and for gross anomalies from all animals. There were no deaths, no adverse clinical signs or changes in body weights and food intake. No substance related ocular findings were reported. Dark blue faeces were observed at all dose levels and were related to the staining properties of the test substance. In males given 1000 mg/kg bw/day, slightly increased locomotor activity was observed after 15 minutes; in absence of a clear dose-relationship this finding was considered to be fortuitous. Statistically significant decreased locomotor activity was observed after 45 minuts in females given 300 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day and persisted until the end of the measurement period in females given 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The toxicological significance was unclear, but in absence of this finding in males and in absence of similar parameters (general and detailed clinical observations) a test article relation was considered to be unlikely. Changes in grip strength were reported in treated males and females. However, data did not show dose-relationship and no correlation between fore- and hind-limb strength. Effects therefore might not be related to the test substance. Statistically significant changes in haematological parameters at low dose included increased prothrombin time (low- and high-dose males) and activated partial thromboplastin time (high-dose males). The changes observed in blood clinical chemistry laboratory parameters and in urinalysis were considered by the study authors to be of no toxicological significance. Statistically significant changes in relative organ weights included increased kidney weight in low- and mid-dose males, and decreased heart weight in mid-dose females. In absence of any dose relationship these findings were considered to be fortuitous. The only findings at necropsy were a blue discolouration of the mucosal surface of the stomach and/or intestines observed for a few animals given 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The histopathological changes noted at the microscopic examination of tissues and organs of treated animals were similar in incidence, severity and morphological characteristics to those observed in the control group and therefore, not considered to be treatment-related. Under the condition of the study, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day (940 mg active dye/kg bw/day).
Both the above study results were supported with the sub-chronic toxicity study conducted by using the given test chemical in 10 animals per sex and group Sprague-Dawley rats at the doses 0, 50, 200 or 800 mg/kg bw/day (0, 27, 109 or 435 mg active dye/kg bw/day) in water (5 ml/kg) by gavage route 13 weeks. These doses were selected on the basis of a previous 14-day oral toxicity study in rats. Evaluations and measurements included mortality, daily clinical observations, weekly body weight and food intake, ophthalmoscopy (in acclimation once before the beginning of the treatment period and in week 13 on control and high dose animals), hematology, blood clinical chemistry and urinalysis (week 13). At the end of the dosing period, surviving animals were killed and subjected to a complete macroscopic examination, principal organs (adrenals, heart, kidneys, liver, ovaries, spleen, testes, thymus) were weighed, and a full spectrum of tissues were preserved. Microscopic examination was performed for specified tissues/organs from all decedent rats, control and high dose rats killed at the end of the study, as well as for gross anomalies, lungs, liver and kidneys from all animals. There were no treatment-related deaths. Two treated females (one given 200 mg/kg bw/day and one given 800 mg/kg bw/day) died during the study. Purplish colour and/or purplish and blue contents were observed in the lungs, in buccal and thoracal cavities and in the trachea of these females. No remarkable clinical signs were observed just before death; at the microscopic examination, alveolar oedema together with pigmented granular material was noted. Their death, therefore, to a gavage error and not to the administration of the test substance. Increased salivation was observed at all dose levels with a dose-dependent incidence. Loud breathing was noted in 1/10 females given 50 mg/kg bw/day, 1/10 females given 200 mg/kg bw/day, 2/10 females and 1/10 males given 800 mg /kg bw/day. Regurgitation occurred in all treatment groups (10 –30%). Coloured urine, faeces, fur and extremities were observed at all dose levels and were related to the staining properties of Jarocol Violet 43. No other clinical signs, no ocular findings or changes in body weight and food intake were reported. There were no significant differences in organ weights between treated and control groups. Findings at necropsy were dose-related greenish contents or greenish colorations of the mucosa of the digestive tract. The histopathological changes noted at the microscopic examination of tissues and organs of treated animals were similar in incidence, severity and morphological characteristics to those observed in the control group and therefore, not considered by the study authors to be treatment-related. Statistically significant changes in blood clinical chemistry parameters included slight decreases in inorganic phosphorus (males in all dose groups), glucose (mid-dose males and high-dose females), urea (high-dose males), alkaline phosphatase (high-dose males) and alanine aminotransferase (high-dose males). These changes were considered to be of no toxicological importance. Statistically significant changes in haematological parameters included decreased values for white blood cells (high-dose males), leukocytes, (high-dose males), prothrombin time (highdose females) and fibrinogen (high-dose females); and increased values for packed cell volume (high-dose females), mean cell volume (mid- and high-dose females), mean cell haemoglobin (mid-dose females), mean cell haemoglobin concentration (high-dose males), prothrombin time (high-dose males) and activated partial thromboplastin time (high-dose males). The only finding in the urinalysis was an increased pH of urine in females (highdose). The only finding considered to be treatment-related was the increased activated partial thromboplastin time in high-dose males (+30% in mean). Under the condition of the study, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level was considered to be 200 mg/kg bw/day (109 mg active dye/kg bw/day) based on the increased activated partial thromboplastin time in high-dose males.
Thus based on the above studies, the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was considered to be 1000 mg/kg body weight and hence is not likely to classify as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation.
Repeated dose toxicity: Inhalation
A short-term toxicity study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via inhalation in production and/or use is not likely as based on the provided thorough and rigorous exposure assessment. Also, the given test chemical has very low vapor pressure 3.28E-013 Pa (2.46E-015 mm Hg), so the potential for the generation of inhalable vapors is very low. The normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore this end point for repeated inhalation toxicity was considered for waiver.
Repeated dose toxicity: Dermal
A short-term toxicity study does not need to be conducted because exposure of humans via dermal in production and/or use is not likely as based on the provided thorough and rigorous exposure assessment. Also, the acute dermal toxicity value for test chemical (as provided in section 7.2.3) is >2000 mg/kg body weight. Given the use of the chemical; repeated exposure by the dermal route is unlikely since the use of gloves is common practice in industries. Thus, it is expected that test chemical shall not exhibit 28 day repeated dose toxicity by the dermal route. In addition, there is no data available that suggests that test chemical shall exhibit repeated dose toxicity by the dermal route. Hence this end point was considered for waiver.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data available and applying the weight of evidence approach, the given test chemical does not exhibit toxic nature upon repeated exposure by oral route of exposure. Hence, it is not likely to classify as toxic as per the criteria mentioned in CLP regulation. For repeated inhalation and repeated dermal toxicity wavier was added so, not possible to classify.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.