Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 910-704-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Health surveillance data
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- health surveillance data
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- no data available
- Reliability:
- other: high
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Well-documented publication on cancer risks due to exposure to Portland cement dust. Local effects in the respiratory tract following inhalation of lime dust are attributed to the alkaline reaction of lime in contact with water (in this case the humidity of mucous membranes). Addition of water to cement or Portland cement can raise the pH to values exceed 13, thus giving a more alkaline mixture than that from CaO and Ca(OH)2. Since pH change is the primary adverse effect leading to irritation of the mucosa and impaired ventilatory function, (Portland) cement can be used as a surrogate to predict effects and safe exposure levels for lime. The following additional information should be considered: (Portland) cement contains hexavalent chromium which is, however, not contained in lime at significant concentrations. Until the addition of ferrous sulphate became a common procedure, cement contained about 5-10 mg Cr(VI)/kg of cement; a content of 20 mg Cr(VI)/kg has also been reported . After the addition of ferrous sulphate, the level of Cr(VI) decreased to less than 2 mg/kg. This reasoning was also used by the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) in their recommendation occupational exposure limits for calcium oxide (CaO) and calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) (see 7.5.3, Repeated dose toxicity: inhalation). The current paper was considered by SCOEL for establishing the STEL and the 8 h TWA OEL for lime, employing read-across from (Portland) cement to lime.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Exposure to cement dust at a Portland cement factory and the risk of cancer
- Author:
- Vestbo, J.; et al.
- Year:
- 1 991
- Bibliographic source:
- Br. J. Ind. Med. 48, 803- 807
Materials and methods
- Study type:
- health record from industry
- Endpoint addressed:
- repeated dose toxicity: inhalation
- carcinogenicity
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline available
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Cross-sectional study on mortality from all cancers, respiratory cancer, and stomach cancer in Portland cement workers
- GLP compliance:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- cement dust
- IUPAC Name:
- cement dust
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cement dust
No further details are given.
Constituent 1
Method
- Type of population:
- occupational
- Ethical approval:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- The cohort for analysis sampled in 1973 in Aalborg (Denmark) consisted of 1401 male subjects aged 46-69 (546 Portland cement workers and 858 randomly sampled men of similar age and area of residence). All subjects were examined with lung function tests and interviews including the BMRC questionnaire, questions on lifelong occupational and smoking histories. No regular dust measurements were conducted before 1974. Personal dust sampling during the 1st half of 1974, however, showed 9 % of respirable dust measurements above 5 mg/m³.
Information on all incident cancer cases from the time of examination in 1974 to 15 June 1985 was obtained from the Danish Cancer Registry.
Results and discussion
- Results:
- No increased risk of overall cancer was found among cement workers. Among men with more than 20 years of exposure to cement dust, 14 cases of respiratory cancer (including cancer of the larynx and trachea) were observed (ratio observed/expected 1.52; 95 % CI: 0.90-2.57) when compared with all Danish men. Men with 1-20 years of exposure had a ratio observed/expected of 1.14 (95 % CI: 0.59-2.19) based on nine cases of cancer. No increased risk of stomach cancer was observed.
After excluding all men with documented exposure to asbestos during an employment in an asbestos cement factory no increased risk of overall cancer or respiratory cancer was found among cement workers compared with white collar workers from the local reference population, using a Cox regression model controlling for age and smoking habits. Relative risks were 0.5 (95 % CI: 0.1-1.5) and 1.0 (95 % CI: 0.4-2.6) for men with 1-20 and more than 20 years of exposure to cement dust, respectively, compared with white collar workers.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- See section "results".
This study was used by SCOEL for establishing OELs for lime dust. Data on Portland cement as a surrogate were used as supportive information, based on the reasoning of similar pH, being the causative factor for respiratory effects in both lime and Portland cement dust.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.