Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Nov./Dec. 1989
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1990

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
HPRT assay testing for reversion to resistance to the purine-analogue, 6-thioguanine, as result of a mutation in the X-chromosome-linked hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT).
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Silicon dioxide
EC Number:
231-545-4
EC Name:
Silicon dioxide
Cas Number:
7631-86-9
Molecular formula:
O2Si
IUPAC Name:
dioxosilane
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report) = Cab-O-Sil EH-5

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: Ham´s F-12 medium without hypoxanthine with 5 % FBS, 1 % penicilin-streptomycin and 1 % L-glutamine
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: no data
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: no data
-Source: A. Hsie, Oak Ridge National Laboratories, directly received in frozen state
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor induced rat liver S9 (adult male SD rats)
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
10, 50, 100, 150, and 250 µg/mLNgative (without S9) and 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 µg/mL (with S9)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO, 1 % final concentration
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: No data
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
untreated
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: Ethyl methanesulphonate (without S9) and benzo(a)pyrene (with S9)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 18 - 24 hours at 37 +-1 °C, 5 x10^5 cell/25 mL flask in 5 +- 1% CO2 atmosphere
- Exposure duration: 5 h (without and with S9)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Post exposure: 18 - 24 h, followed by 7 - 9 days including subculturing of 2 - 3 day intervals
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): In the presence of 6-thioguanine, 7 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 15 - 17 days

STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 10 % Giemsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2 x10^5 cells /100 mm dish (five-fold) = in total 10^6 cells per concentration

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- in parallel as cloning efficiency (triplicates with each 100 cells/60 mm dish)


Evaluation criteria:
A response was not considered positive unless the mutant frequency exceeded 20 mutants per 10^6 clonable cells.
Significant if twice that of background and at least 11 mutants per 10^6 cells above background (solvent and untreated control).
Positive if dose-dependen increase in mutant frequency combined with significant increase at one or more test concentrations.
Suspect if no dose-response.
Statistics:
Frequency of spontaneous mutations (if showing wide variation): C.I. (Conf. Interval) calculated by application of the one-sided student´s test from the historical background rate (upper limit of C.I.: 11 spontaneous mutants/10^6 cells).

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
other: Not pronounced in the mutation test, while a concurrent cytotoxicity test showed considerable inhibition of the cloning efficiency over the same dose ranges.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: 9 concentrations between 0.1 and 500 µg/mL tested with and without S9, toxicity based on colony-forming efficiency

Any other information on results incl. tables

From Report Tab. 3 and 4

With S9 (all data relating to x mutants/106 cells)

negative controls: 1 and 7.2

positive control: 351

treated cells: no dose response

1 and <1 at higher dose levels (100 to 250 µg/mL) with cytotoxicity noted at 250 µg/mL.

7.3 and 10.3 at the lower dose levels (10 and 50 µg/mL, respectively).

Without S9 (all data relating to x mutants/106 cells)

negative controls: 0.8 and 8.0

positive control: 184

treated cells: no dose response

<1 to 8.2

no pronounced cytotoxcity noted at any dose level

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results: negative