Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 626-470-2 | CAS number: 5405-40-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2004-10-26 to 2005-02-04
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: OECD guideline compliant GLP compliant
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
- Report date:
- 2005
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- as at 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- as at 1996
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Version / remarks:
- as at 2003
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000, including the most recent partial revisions.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- DL-alpha-Hydroxy-beta, beta-dimethyly-butyrolacton
- IUPAC Name:
- DL-alpha-Hydroxy-beta, beta-dimethyly-butyrolacton
- Reference substance name:
- DL-Lactone
- IUPAC Name:
- DL-Lactone
- Reference substance name:
- DL-Pantlactone
- IUPAC Name:
- DL-Pantlactone
- Reference substance name:
- RS-Pantolactone
- IUPAC Name:
- RS-Pantolactone
- Reference substance name:
- (±)-dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethylfuran-2(3H)-one
- EC Number:
- 201-210-7
- EC Name:
- (±)-dihydro-3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethylfuran-2(3H)-one
- Cas Number:
- 79-50-5
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-hydroxy-4,4-dimethyldihydrofuran-2(3H)-one
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): dl-Lactone
- Physical state: white crystalline mass
- Analytical purity: 99.6 %
- Purity test date: not reported
- Lot/batch No.: 451
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 September 2005
- Stability under test conditions: Stable under storage conditions, Stability in vehicle (water) at least for 4 h
- Storage condition of test material: In refrigerator in the dark
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Constituent 3
Constituent 4
Constituent 5
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Dunkin-Hartley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Kisslegg, Germany
- Age at study initiation: approx. 4 weeks (nulliparous and non-pregnant)
- Weight at study initiation: 337 - 410 g (on day 1 of testing period)
- Housing: Group housing of maximally 5 animals per labelled cage (74 cm x 54 cm x 25 cm height) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material (Woody-Clean type 3/4; Tecnilab-BMI BV, Someren , The Netherlands).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, standard guinea pig diet, including ascorbic acid (1000 mg/kg); (Charles River Breeding and Maintenance Diet for
Guinea Pigs, Altromin, Lage, Germany) + hay (B.M.I., Helmond, The Netherlands) provided at least twice a week.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21.0 ± 3.0 (actual range: 19.3 - 21.8),
- Humidity (%): 30-70 (actual range: 45 - 91)
- Air changes (per hr): ca. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: Start: 26 October 2004, Completion: 26 November 2004
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal and epicutaneous
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- INDUCTION
Intradermal injection:
A. 1:1 Mixture of FCA and water for injection.
B. A 5% test substance concentration (Experimental); vehicle (Control).
C. 1:1 Mixture of FCA and a 10% concentration (Experimental) or vehicle (Control).
Epidermal exposure:
D. A 50% test substance concentration (Experimental); vehicle (Control).
CHALLENGE
50% test substance concentration (Experimental); vehicle (Control).
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Concentration / amount:
- INDUCTION
Intradermal injection:
A. 1:1 Mixture of FCA and water for injection.
B. A 5% test substance concentration (Experimental); vehicle (Control).
C. 1:1 Mixture of FCA and a 10% concentration (Experimental) or vehicle (Control).
Epidermal exposure:
D. A 50% test substance concentration (Experimental); vehicle (Control).
CHALLENGE
50% test substance concentration (Experimental); vehicle (Control).
- No. of animals per dose:
- controls: 5
treated group: 10 - Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS:
Intradermal injection: one animal injected with 50 % and 20 % of test item in vehicle (water) at different sites (0.1 ml/site); one animal injected with 10 % and 5 % of test item in vehicle (water) at different sites 0.1 ml/site);
Epidermal exposure: two animals exposed for 24 h semi-occlusively with 50 % and 20 % of test item in vehicle (water) at different sites (0.5 ml each); two animals exposed for 24 h semi-occlusively with 10 % and 5 % of test item in vehicle (water) at different sites (0.5 ml each);
Exposure conditions same as for main experiment (see below)
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: once intradermally, once epidermally
- Exposure period: intradermal injection on day 3, epidermal exposure on day 10 for 24 h
- Test groups: 10 females
- Control group: 5 females
- Site: scapular
- Frequency of applications: single intradermal injection, single epidermal exposure
- Duration: see "exposure period" above
- Concentrations: see "Concentration" above
- Approximately 24 hours before the epidermal induction exposure all animals were treated with 10% SDS.
- Coverage for epidermal exposure: 2 x 3 cm² metalline patch (Lohmann GmbH, Neuwied, Germany), mounted on Micropore tape (3M, St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A. (Micropore and Coban), which was wrapped around the abdomen and secured with Coban elastic bandage (3M, St. Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A. (Micropore and Coban).
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: once
- Day(s) of challenge: 22
- Exposure period: 24 h
- Test groups: 10 females
- Control group: 5 females
- Site: flank
- Concentrations: see "Concentration" above
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 h after removal of dressing
OTHER OBSERVATIONS
Mortality/Viability was controlled twice daily.
Toxicity was observed at least once daily.
Body Weight was measured on day 1 and at termination. - Challenge controls:
- - no naive controls were used
- controls received same treatment as exposure group except that animal received only the vehicle (water) instead of the test item solution - Positive control substance(s):
- no
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 0
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 5
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50 % (w/v)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 % (w/v). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
- Reading:
- 2nd reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 48
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 50 % (w/v)
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- none
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 50 % (w/v). No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Any other information on results incl. tables
- Table 1: Preliminary Irritation Study, Skin Reactions after Intradermal Injection
Animal number |
Conc % |
24 hours after injection |
48 hours after injection |
||
|
|
Erythema, (grade) |
Necrosis, (mm) |
Erythema, (grade) |
Necrosis, (mm) |
88 |
50 |
|
8 |
|
9 |
20 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
|
89 |
10 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
5 |
1 |
|
1 |
|
Table 2: Preliminary Irritation Study,Skin Reactions after Epidermal Exposure
Animal number |
Conc % |
24 hours after exposure |
48 hours after exposure |
||
|
|
Erythema, (grade) |
Necrosis, (mm) |
Erythema, (grade) |
Necrosis, (mm) |
86 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
87 |
50 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
20 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
88 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- Table 3: Induction Readings
Animal Number |
|
Intradermal injection (Day 3) A |
|
Epidermal exposure (Day 10) |
||||
Control |
E |
N |
E |
N |
E |
N |
Erythema |
Oedema |
71 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
72 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
73 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
74 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
75 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Experimental |
E |
N |
E |
N |
E |
N |
|
|
76 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
77 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
78 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
79 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
81 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
82 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
83 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
84 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
85 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
A: 1:1 Mixture of FCA and water for injection.
Skin effects intradermal injections:
E: Erythema (grade)
N: Signs of necrosis (mm in diameter)
- Table 4: Challenge Readings
Animal number |
DAY 24 |
DAY 25 |
|
||
|
50%# |
Vehicle* |
50%# |
Vehicle* |
|
Control |
|
|
|
|
|
71 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
72 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
73 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
74 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
75 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Experimental |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
77 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
78 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
79 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
80 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
80 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
81 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
82 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
83 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
84 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
85 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
not sensitised |
#: Test substance concentration.
*: Water (Milli-U)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- RS-Pantolactone was tested for its skin sensitization potential according to OECD 406 following the GPMT test setting. The test item did not show any skin sensitisation potential in guinea pigs.
- Executive summary:
RS-Pantolactone (named D,L-Lactone in the study report) was tested for its skin sensitization potential according to OECD 406 following the GPMT test setting, EC Commission Directive 96/54/EC, Part B.6, "Skin Sensitisation" (1996), EPA OPPTS 870.2600 "Skin Sensitisation" (2003) and JMAFF: Japanese Test Guidelines (2000) including the most recent partial revisions, and was based on the method described by Magnusson and Kligman, "Allergic Contact Dermatitis in the Guinea Pig - Identification of Contact Allergens" (1970).
Test substance concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study.
In the main study, ten experimental animals were intradermally injected with a 5% concentration and epidermally exposed to a 50% concentration. Five control animals were similarly treated, but with vehicle alone (water). Injection sites treated with FCA showed transient erythema of grades 1 to 2 in both groups. Approximately 24 hours before the epidermal induction exposure all animals were treated with 10% SDS. Two weeks after the epidermal application all animals were challenged with a 50% test substance concentration and the vehicle.
There was no evidence that RS-Pantolactone had caused skin hypersensitivity in the guinea pig, since no responses were observed in the experimental animals in the challenge phase.
This result indicates a sensitisation rate of 0 per cent.
By expert judgment it is conclude that L-Pantolactone is not sensitising on skin.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.