Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-088-3 | CAS number: 7785-84-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- three-generation reproductive toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- no data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Remarks:
- Well documented study with the following deviations: Only one dose level was included in the study. Test material was not analyzed in diet. No impurity profile of test material was provided. Source of animals was not specified. The group size was smaller than the 20 females and 10 males required in OECD guideline 416. There was no recorded acclimation period for the P generation. Only one dose tested. Daily observation of clinical signs of parents and observations of abnormal behaviour of offspring are not reported. Body Weights: parental body weights were not recorded during gestation and lactation. Food consumption was not determined. Estrus cycle was not evaluated. Sperm parameters were not included. Offspring sex and sex ratios were not determined. Litter body weight was reported; however, individual pup body weights were not recorded. There is no report of gross pathology and necropsy observations. Organ weight data for the uterus, ovaries, epididymides, prostate, seminal vesicles, pituitary gland, adrenals and thyroid gland were not included. Histopathology was conducted only on the F3b offspring and did not include the following organs: uterus, cervix, vagina, epididymides, seminal vesicles, prostate, coagulating gland, pituitary gland. Note that the known target organ (kidney) was evaluated. Statistics are not reported. Study has been reviewed by an expert assessor (see expert report attached) and determined to be suitable for use for the purposes of REACH registration.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 960
- Report date:
- 1960
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Groups of male (8/group) and female (16/group) rats were fed control diet or diet treated with 0.05% test material for 100 days (P1) generation. Body weights were measured weekly during the 100 day pre-mating exposure for each generation. Each male was caged with two females for 7 days until conception occurred. Pregnancy rates were determined. The first litter born of the parental animals was designated as the F1a litter. Upon delivery, offspring were counted and average litter weights determined. Pup survival was determined on days 1-5 and days 6-21. On day 5, pups were culled to 10 per litter. Body weights per litter were determined on day 21. The F1a litter was sacrificed at 30 days postnatally. Parental animals were mated again 10 days after the sacrifice of the F1a litter (ten-day interim period). Mating took place for 7 days. A second litter (F1b) was born after approximately 21 days of gestation. Upon delivery, offspring were counted and the average litter weights determined. Pup survival was determined on days 1-5 and days 6-21. On day 5 pups were culled to 10 per litter. Body weights per litter were determined on day 21. Following weaning of the F1b litter, 8 males and 16 females from the F1b litter from the control group and the treated group were fed their respective diets for 100 days. Again two litters (F2a and F2b) were produced in the same sequence described for the F1 litters. Parental animals were mated for 7 days after the ten-day interim period after the sacrifice of the F2a litter (pups were 30 days old). Following birth of the F2b litter the same offspring and parental parameters were measured. Eight males and 16 females of the F2b litter were designated for continual exposure for another 100 days. Upon completion of the exposure of the F2b litter, animals were mated again to produce the F3a and F3b litters in the same manner described above. The ten males and ten females from the final litter, the F3b litter, were evaluated for body weight, histopathology (liver, kidneys, gonads, lungs, brain, stomach, heart, spleen, adrenal, stomach, large and small intestines, bladder, bone marrow, muscle, pancreas, lymph nodes, gut) and organ weights (liver, kidneys, testes, lungs, brain, stomach, heart, spleen). Individual animal data were collected and recorded throughout the study.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- study predates GLP
- Limit test:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Trisodium trimetaphosphate
- EC Number:
- 232-088-3
- EC Name:
- Trisodium trimetaphosphate
- Cas Number:
- 7785-84-4
- Molecular formula:
- H3O9P3.3Na or O3P3.3Na
- IUPAC Name:
- Sodium trimetaphosphate
- Test material form:
- other: granules
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Sodium Trimetaphosphate
- Substance type: Granular
- Physical state: Solid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Lot/batch No.: Lot #195001-8, E9309 and 4-CEC
- Stability under test conditions: Test material is stable at room temperature
- Other: Specification: Granular sodium trimetaphosphate from Calgon, Inc.
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- other: Rochester Strain (Ex-Wistar 1923)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: (P) x wks; (F1) x wks
- Weight at study initiation: Body weight was approximately 60 grams for males and 59 grams for females at the start of the 100 day exposure.
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: not applicable
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- other: not applicable
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- No data
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Length of cohabitation: 7 days
- Any other deviations from standard protocol: Litters were culled to ten pups on day 5 of lactation. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no data
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Exposure took place for 100 days prior to mating, 21 days of gestation and during lactation. Litters were culled to ten pups with approximately 5/sex/group on postnatal day 5. For the F1, F2, F3-generations, offspring were weaned and exposed during an interim period of 10 days and then during a mating period of 7 days. Dams were exposed continually during gestation and lactation. Offspring of the second litter were again mated for 7 days after a 10 day interim period following weaning. The first litters (F1a, F2a, F3a) were sacrificed at 30 days of age. The second litters (F1b, F2b) were used to produce the succeeding generation. The F3b pups were used for the histopathology evaluation and organ weight determinations.
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily, ad libitum
- Details on study schedule:
- Beginning with the original groups of rats, 16 female and 8 male rats were removed at the age of 100 days and mated. The matings were carried out in such a way that male rats were rotated through cages each housing two female rats.
For the F1, F2, F3-generations, offspring were weaned and exposed during an interim period of 10 days and then during a mating period of 7 days.
Offspring of the second litter were again mated for 7 days after a 10 day interim period following weaning.
The first litters (F1a, F2a, F3a) were sacrificed at 30 days of age. The second litters (F1b, F2b) were used to produce the succeeding generation. The F3b pups were used for the histopathology evaluation and organ weight determinations.
Litters were culled to ten pups with approximately 5/sex/group on postnatal day 5.
Doses / concentrations
- Dose / conc.:
- 0.05 other: % w/w nominal in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- P1, F1, F2, F3: 16 females and 8 males
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale:
The reproduction study began with 16 female and 8 male rats from the control diet group and from the group given the diet containing 1% of TMP in the 2-year study. When it was discovered that the male rats given a 1% Trimetaphosphate diet were not maintaining normal growth, it was obvious that this level was unsuitable one for reproduction study. Consequently additinoal diet groups were started at 0.1% and at 0.05% to be sure that no detectable effect could be laid to the TMP in the diet. The continued stress of repeated production of generations and litters of rats could then be tested. In 1957 it was decided to conduct a reproduction study on rats maintained on the diet containing 0.05% trimetaphosphate.
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): no data
- Other: no data - Positive control:
- no data
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: no data
- The animals were monitored for general well-being.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Weekly during the 100 day pre-mating period, but not evaluated during gestation and lactation. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Not evaluated.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- The following were not evaluated: testis weight, epididymis weight, daily sperm production, sperm count in testes, sperm count in epididymides, enumeration of cauda epididymal sperm reserve, sperm motility, sperm morphology.
- Litter observations:
- number of pups, stillbirths, live births, weight gain per litter
The following was not evaluated: sex of pups, presence of gross anomalies, physical or behavioural abnormalities. No individual pup body weights. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of [external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.]
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table [#] were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- ORGAN WEIGHTS; F3b:
liver, kidneys, testes, lungs, brain, stomach, heart, spleen on 10/sex/group from the F3b offspring at 21 days of age.
The following was not evaluated: Uterus, ovaries, epididymides (total and cauda), prostate, seminal vesicles, pituitary, thyroid, adrenal glands
HISTOPATHOLOGY; F3b:
Kidneys, heart, brain, spleen, lungs, liver, ovaries, testes, adrenal, urinary bladder, stomach, large and small intestines, muscle, bone marrow, muscle, pancreas, gut and lymph noted on F3b animals.
The following was not evaluated: Vagina, uterus, epididymis, seminal vesicle, prostate
coagulating gland.
Not evaluated
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 0.05 other: % w/w
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects noted
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- ca. 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects noted
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F1 generation
Effect levels (F1)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 0.05 other: % w/w
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects notes
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- ca. 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects noted
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F2 generation
Effect levels (F2)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 0.05 other: % w/w
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Remarks on result:
- other: no effects noted
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- ca. 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects noted
- Remarks on result:
- other: calculated
Target system / organ toxicity (F2)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- no
Any other information on results incl. tables
NOAEL calculated in accorance with Appendix F, guidelines for the preparation of toxicological working papers for the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives, December 2000.
This study included only one dose level of the test material, 0.05% in the diet. Table 1 summarizes results on many parameters. There was no treatment-related effect on litter weights. The fertility index, duration of pregnancy, live birth index, litter size, litter weights, average pup weights, number of pups per litter, survival index, viability index and lactation index were all comparable between control and treated groups. Organ weights were similar between control and treated groups. Treated females of the F3b generation had somewhat lower spleen weights than control animals. There were no treatment-relatedhistopathologicalfindings.
Table 1. Reproductive toxicity
Parameter |
|
Control |
High dose |
|||
Generation |
M |
F |
M |
F |
||
Mortality |
Incidence |
P |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
F1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
F2 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
F3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Food consumption |
% of control |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Body weight gain |
% of control |
|
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
Clinical Observations specify effects |
Incidence |
|
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
Organ weights (F3b) Liver Kidneys Testes Lungs Brain Stomach Heart Spleen |
% of control
|
|
|
|
95.6 98.9 92.1 95.4 100.6 88.0 89.4 83.7 |
96.8 91.9 - 93.4 105.5 92.5 90.5 69.2 |
Pathology |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Histopathologicexamination: F3b |
Incidence |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test material did not cause any adverse effects on fertility, reproductive performance, offspring viability, offspring survival and offspring body weight in male and female rats when administered continuously for three generations in the diet at a dose level of 0.05% in the diet. The test material did not cause any treatment-related effects on organ weights or any histopathological findings on the tissues evaluated at a dose level of 0.05% in the diet.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.