Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-351-5 | CAS number: 139-07-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 30, 1990 to November 20, 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Justification for type of information:
- Refer to section 13 of IUCLID for details on the read-across justification. The study with the read across substance is considered sufficient to fulfil the information requirements.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: U.S. EPA FIFRA 72-4 (b)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- but not expected to impact the results; Refer to 'Any other information on material and methods incl. tables' field for details
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- Dilution water:
The base water used was Millipore Milli-Q™ deionized reverse osmosis treated well water.
Preparation of stock solution:
14C-test substance primary stock solutions were used to prepare test solutions for daphnid exposure. The primary stock solutions of 14C-test substance were prepared by adding measured aliquots of 14C-test substance to measured amounts of deionized water in volumetric glassware followed by shaking to ensure homogeneity. Three separate primary stock solutions were made and used during the course of the study. The 14C-test substance concentrations of the primary stock solutions were verified by liquid scintillation counting (LSC).
Test solution preparation:
Test solutions used in the study were prepared by daily adding measured aliquots of 14C-test substance primary stock solutions to dilution water in 2L volumetric flasks and bringing the volume to 2 L. Prior to adjusting the final volume to 2L, algal cells and a prepared food suspension were added to the dilution water in the 2L volumetric flask. After addition of the stocl solution and food, the test solutions were vigorously mixed to ensure homogeneity and solubilisation of the test substance.
- Test solutions were renewed daily and prepared immediately before use. At renewal, daphnids were transferred by wide-bore pipette from vessels with the 24-h test solution to the appropriate test vessels containing new test solution. In order to verify test substance concentrations in the test solutions for the deifinitive study, triplicate 1 mL aliquots were taken daily from each newly made test solutions (new solution) before transfer to the individual test vessels and from the three replicates from each test solution and control 24 h later at the time of renewal (old solutions) and counted by LSC. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- - Daphnia magna was originally obtained from U. S. EPA’s Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN and was cultured in an environmental chamber under controlled conditions (temperature: 20±2°C; photo-period: 16-h light - 8-h dark; light intensity: 50-150 fc).
- Daphnia were cultured in 1L glass beakers (10 Daphnia per beaker) containing 800 mL of hard re-constituted laboratory water.
- Each beaker received 1.8E08 cells/L selenastrum capricornutum and 5 mL of a yeast/trout food/cerophyl suspension three times each week when the culture water was changed. Selenastrum was obtained from Battelle in-house cultures (algal slants originally obtained from the university of Texas at Austin). Purina brand trout chow, Fleischmann brand yeast and Sigma chemical company cerphyl were sources for the YTC suspension.
- Survival and reproduction of culture animals were checked each time the culture water was changed. After 28d, the adults were discarded and new cultures were started.
- 24h before the start of the test, young were removed from the beakers to ensure that only daphnids less than 24-h old would be used to start the test. the young daphnids were from 22d old cultures. There was 100% survival of cultures animals and an average of 8.6 young produced per female per reproductive day the week before the toxicity test. - Test type:
- other: daily static renewal without aeration
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 160.5 mg/L as CaCO3 (124 to 228 mg/L)
- Test temperature:
- 18.1 to 22°C
- pH:
- 7.4 to 8.4
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 5.6 to 9.6 mg/L (represents 64to 109% air saturation at 20°C)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal concentrations of 0 (dilution water control), 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L.
- Measured concentration: 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg/L - Details on test conditions:
- Test system:
- Test vessel: Ten 250 mL test vessels contained 200 mL of test solution (depth of 60 mm) were used for each concentration and control.
- Number of replicates: Two for control and each test concentration.
- Number of Daphids: Seven of the ten test vessels contained an individual daphnid in each vessel while the three remaining vessels for each test concentration and control contained five daphnids each (total number of daphnids = 22 per test concentration or control).
- Aeration: No
Test conditions:
- Daphnia magna less than 24h old were exposed to mean analytical concentrations of 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg/L of the test substance in a 21d daily static-renewal test without aeration. Each concentration was run in duplicate. Test solutions were renewed daily and prepared immediately before use. Observations on daphnid behaviour, the number of live and dead (or immobilised) organisms, and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination.
- Test temperature: 20±2°C
- Photoperiod: 16h light and 8h darkeness
- Light intensity: 103.9 fc
Observations:
- Parameters observed: The number of live and dead (or immobilized) organisms, and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination.
- Actual measurements of the test daphnids were made in ocular units and converted to mm (1 ocular unit = 0.07 mm).
- Reproduction and growth (length) data were only collected from the seven individually exposed replicates in each exposure concentration and control. Survival data were collected for all exposure beakers.
Range-finding study:
- A 9 -d range finding experiment with Daphnia magna neonates (<24h old) were exposed to five nominal conentrations 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg/L of 14C-test substance and a dilution water control.
- Two replicates each were used.
- Five neonates were placed in each test concentration and control vessel (total of 12 beakers and 60 daphnids) with a wide-bore pipette.
- Test vessels were maintained in an environmental chamber at a temperature of 20±2°C. Aeration was not used.
- For the duration of the test, observations were made on survival and reproduction of the test organisms.
- Test substance concentration were verified by using LSC.
- Based on the results from the range finding study, the definitive chronic toxicity was conducted at nominal concentrations of 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L 14C-test substance.
Statistics:
Fisher’s Exact Test, analysis of variance, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 4.15 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: mortality, reproduction and growth
- Details on results:
- Range-finding study:
- At test termination survival was ≥90% in all test concentrations and control.
- Total reproduction (live plus dead young) in the nominal 14C-test concentrations of 0 (control), 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg/L was 42, 51, 58, 52, 0 and 0 young respectively.
- At test termination, a total of 2, 33 and 41 aborted eggs were found in the 1, 5, and 10 µg/L nominal test concentrations respectively.
- The overall mean of analytical values for the 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg/L nominal concentrations were 0.06, 0.5, 0.96, 5.02 and 9.24 µg/L respectively.
Main study:
- The LC50 values was >4.15µg/L.
- At the end of the 21-d exposure, there was 86% survival of the test organisms in the highest measured test concentration (4.15 µg/L) and 95% or greater survival in the remaining test concentrations and in the dilution water control. Survival in all the test concentrations was not significantly different (p>0.05) from the control.
- The NOEC and LOEC for survival, therefore, were >4.15 and >4.15 µg/L of the test substance respectively.
- Reproduction of the test organisms was not significantly affected (p>0.05) in any of the test concentrations when compared to the control by ANOVA. The NOEC determined from the 21d reproductive data was ≥4.15 µg/L of the test substance.
- The growth of the test organisms at the end of the 21-d exposure period was also not significantly different (p>0.05) in any of the test concentration when compared with control using ANOVA. The NOEC and the LOEC determined from the 21d growth data was ≥4.15 and >4.15 µg/L respectively. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Fisher’s Exact Test, analysis of variance, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of the read across study, the 21d chronic NOEC for mortality, reproduction and growth of Daphnia can be considered to to be 4.15 µg a.i./L (measured)
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the long-term toxicity of the read across substance, C12-16 ADBAC (30% active with 98.4% radiolabeled purity) to aquatic invertebrates, according to U.S. EPA FIFRA 72-4 (b), in compliance with GLP. Based on the outcome of a 9-day range-finding study, 22 immature Daphnia magna per group were exposed to the read across substance at nominal concentrations 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L, for 21 d under daily static-renewal conditions. The radiolabeled test concentrations were verified analytically by liquid scintillation counting. The mean measured concentrations were determined to be 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg a.i./L. Observations on daphnid behaviour, the number of immobilised organisms and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination. No treatment related effects were observed in the definitive study at measured concentration up to 4.15 µg a.i./L. However, reproduction was clearly found to be affected at measured concentrations ≥ 5.02 µg/L in the range-finding study. The possible explanation for this result was correlated to the higher measured concentration achieved in the range-finding study (i.e., 5.02 µg/L) compared to the definitive study (i.e., 4.15 µg/L) for the nominal test concentration of 5 µg/L. While an effect level was not demonstrated in the definitive study, the principle objective of the of the definitive study was considered to be still accomplished, since the no-effect levels for the parameters of reproduction and growth were clearly defined at levels just below concentrations which showed effects in the range-finding study. Therefore, by supplementing the results of the 21-d definitive test with those from the 9-d range-finding test, the NOEC and LOEC for reproduction were considered to be at 4.15 and 5.02 µg a.i./L, respectively. In addition, based on the absence of significant effects on survival and growth parameters compared with the control group, their NOECs and LOECs were considered at ≥ 4.15 and > 4.15 µg a.i./L, respectively. The maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC) derived based on these results was 4.56 µg a.i./L. Under the conditions of the study, the 21-d chronic NOEC for mortality, reproduction and growth of Daphnia magna was considered to be ≥ 4.15 µg a.i./L and the MATC was 4.56 µg/L (McIntyre, 1992). Based on the results of the read across study, similar NOECs can be considered for the test substance.
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 30, 1990 to November 20, 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: U.S. EPA FIFRA 72-4 (b)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- but not expected to impact the results; Refer to 'Any other information on material and methods incl. tables' field for details
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Alkyl(C12-C16)dimethylbenzylammonium chloride (ADBAC) (i.e., benzyl C12-16 alkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride)
- Physical state: Light beige solid
- Analytical purity: 30% w/w a.s. in aqueous solution
- Radiochemical purity (if radiolabelling): 98.4% purity (C14-ADBAC) 96.5% (by TLC) and 95.5% (by HPLC).
- Locations of the label (if radiolabelling): 14 C carbon of the benzene ring
- Stability under test conditions: The non-radiolabelled a.s., ADBAC, is hydrolytically and photolytically stable under the conditions of this study and has been shown to be stable in aqueous, alcohol and alcohol/aqueous solutions for extended periods, e.g. at least five years under standard laboratory conditions.
- Storage conditions: Under referigeration - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on test solutions:
- Dilution water:
The base water used was Millipore Milli-Q™ deionized reverse osmosis treated well water.
Preparation of stock solution:
14C-test substance primary stock solutions were used to prepare test solutions for daphnid exposure. The primary stock solutions of 14C-test substance were prepared by adding measured aliquots of 14C-test substance to measured amounts of deionized water in volumetric glassware followed by shaking to ensure homogeneity. Three separate primary stock solutions were made and used during the course of the study. The 14C-test substance concentrations of the primary stock solutions were verified by liquid scintillation counting (LSC).
Test solution preparation:
Test solutions used in the study were prepared by daily adding measured aliquots of 14C-test substance primary stock solutions to dilution water in 2L volumetric flasks and bringing the volume to 2 L. Prior to adjusting the final volume to 2L, algal cells and a prepared food suspension were added to the dilution water in the 2L volumetric flask. After addition of the stocl solution and food, the test solutions were vigorously mixed to ensure homogeneity and solubilisation of the test substance.
- Test solutions were renewed daily and prepared immediately before use. At renewal, daphnids were transferred by wide-bore pipette from vessels with the 24-h test solution to the appropriate test vessels containing new test solution. In order to verify test substance concentrations in the test solutions for the deifinitive study, triplicate 1 mL aliquots were taken daily from each newly made test solutions (new solution) before transfer to the individual test vessels and from the three replicates from each test solution and control 24 h later at the time of renewal (old solutions) and counted by LSC. - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- - Daphnia magna was originally obtained from U. S. EPA’s Environmental Research Laboratory, Duluth, MN and was cultured in an environmental chamber under controlled conditions (temperature: 20±2°C; photo-period: 16-h light - 8-h dark; light intensity: 50-150 fc).
- Daphnia were cultured in 1L glass beakers (10 Daphnia per beaker) containing 800 mL of hard re-constituted laboratory water.
- Each beaker received 1.8E08 cells/L selenastrum capricornutum and 5 mL of a yeast/trout food/cerophyl suspension three times each week when the culture water was changed. Selenastrum was obtained from Battelle in-house cultures (algal slants originally obtained from the university of Texas at Austin). Purina brand trout chow, Fleischmann brand yeast and Sigma chemical company cerphyl were sources for the YTC suspension.
- Survival and reproduction of culture animals were checked each time the culture water was changed. After 28d, the adults were discarded and new cultures were started.
- 24h before the start of the test, young were removed from the beakers to ensure that only daphnids less than 24-h old would be used to start the test. the young daphnids were from 22d old cultures. There was 100% survival of cultures animals and an average of 8.6 young produced per female per reproductive day the week before the toxicity test. - Test type:
- other: daily static renewal without aeration
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 160.5 mg/L as CaCO3 (124 to 228 mg/L)
- Test temperature:
- 18.1 to 22°C
- pH:
- 7.4 to 8.4
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 5.6 to 9.6 mg/L (represents 64to 109% air saturation at 20°C)
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- - Nominal concentrations of 0 (dilution water control), 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L.
- Measured concentration: 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg/L - Details on test conditions:
- Test system:
- Test vessel: Ten 250 mL test vessels contained 200 mL of test solution (depth of 60 mm) were used for each concentration and control.
- Number of replicates: Two for control and each test concentration.
- Number of Daphids: Seven of the ten test vessels contained an individual daphnid in each vessel while the three remaining vessels for each test concentration and control contained five daphnids each (total number of daphnids = 22 per test concentration or control).
- Aeration: No
Test conditions:
- Daphnia magna less than 24h old were exposed to mean analytical concentrations of 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg/L of the test substance in a 21d daily static-renewal test without aeration. Each concentration was run in duplicate. Test solutions were renewed daily and prepared immediately before use. Observations on daphnid behaviour, the number of live and dead (or immobilised) organisms, and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination.
- Test temperature: 20±2°C
- Photoperiod: 16h light and 8h darkeness
- Light intensity: 103.9 fc
Observations:
- Parameters observed: The number of live and dead (or immobilized) organisms, and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination.
- Actual measurements of the test daphnids were made in ocular units and converted to mm (1 ocular unit = 0.07 mm).
- Reproduction and growth (length) data were only collected from the seven individually exposed replicates in each exposure concentration and control. Survival data were collected for all exposure beakers.
Range-finding study:
- A 9 -d range finding experiment with Daphnia magna neonates (<24h old) were exposed to five nominal conentrations 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg/L of 14C-test substance and a dilution water control.
- Two replicates each were used.
- Five neonates were placed in each test concentration and control vessel (total of 12 beakers and 60 daphnids) with a wide-bore pipette.
- Test vessels were maintained in an environmental chamber at a temperature of 20±2°C. Aeration was not used.
- For the duration of the test, observations were made on survival and reproduction of the test organisms.
- Test substance concentration were verified by using LSC.
- Based on the results from the range finding study, the definitive chronic toxicity was conducted at nominal concentrations of 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L 14C-test substance.
Statistics:
Fisher’s Exact Test, analysis of variance, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 4.15 µg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (initial)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Basis for effect:
- other: mortality, reproduction and growth
- Details on results:
- Range-finding study:
- At test termination survival was ≥90% in all test concentrations and control.
- Total reproduction (live plus dead young) in the nominal 14C-test concentrations of 0 (control), 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg/L was 42, 51, 58, 52, 0 and 0 young respectively.
- At test termination, a total of 2, 33 and 41 aborted eggs were found in the 1, 5, and 10 µg/L nominal test concentrations respectively.
- The overall mean of analytical values for the 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5 and 10 µg/L nominal concentrations were 0.06, 0.5, 0.96, 5.02 and 9.24 µg/L respectively.
Main study:
- The LC50 values was >4.15µg/L.
- At the end of the 21-d exposure, there was 86% survival of the test organisms in the highest measured test concentration (4.15 µg/L) and 95% or greater survival in the remaining test concentrations and in the dilution water control. Survival in all the test concentrations was not significantly different (p>0.05) from the control.
- The NOEC and LOEC for survival, therefore, were >4.15 and >4.15 µg/L of the test substance respectively.
- Reproduction of the test organisms was not significantly affected (p>0.05) in any of the test concentrations when compared to the control by ANOVA. The NOEC determined from the 21d reproductive data was ≥4.15 µg/L of the test substance.
- The growth of the test organisms at the end of the 21-d exposure period was also not significantly different (p>0.05) in any of the test concentration when compared with control using ANOVA. The NOEC and the LOEC determined from the 21d growth data was ≥4.15 and >4.15 µg/L respectively. - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Fisher’s Exact Test, analysis of variance, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of the study, the 21d chronic NOEC for mortality, reproduction and growth of Daphnia was considered to to be ≥ 4.15 µg a.i./L (measured)
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the long-term toxicity of the test substance, C12-16 ADBAC (30% active with 98.4% radiolabeled purity) to aquatic invertebrates, according to U.S. EPA FIFRA 72-4 (b), in compliance with GLP. Based on the outcome of a 9-day range-finding study, 22 immature Daphnia magna per group were exposed to the test substance at nominal concentrations 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L, for 21 d under daily static-renewal conditions. The radiolabeled test concentrations were verified analytically by liquid scintillation counting. The mean measured concentrations were determined to be 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg a.i./L. Observations on daphnid behaviour, the number of immobilised organisms and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination. No treatment related effects were observed in the definitive study at measured concentration up to 4.15 µg a.i./L. However, reproduction was clearly found to be affected at measured concentrations ≥ 5.02 µg/L in the range-finding study. The possible explanation for this result was correlated to the higher measured concentration achieved in the range-finding study (i.e., 5.02 µg/L) compared to the definitive study (i.e., 4.15 µg/L) for the nominal test concentration of 5 µg/L. While an effect level was not demonstrated in the definitive study, the principle objective of the of the definitive study was considered to be still accomplished, since the no-effect levels for the parameters of reproduction and growth were clearly defined at levels just below concentrations which showed effects in the range-finding study. Therefore, by supplementing the results of the 21-d definitive test with those from the 9-d range-finding test, the NOEC and LOEC for reproduction were considered to be at 4.15 and 5.02 µg a.i./L, respectively. In addition, based on the absence of significant effects on survival and growth parameters compared with the control group, their NOECs and LOECs were considered at ≥ 4.15 and > 4.15 µg a.i./L, respectively. The maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC) derived based on these results was 4.56 µg a.i./L. Under the conditions of the study, the 21-d chronic NOEC for mortality, reproduction and growth of Daphnia magna was considered to be ≥ 4.15 µg a.i./L and the MATC was 4.56 µg/L (McIntyre, 1992).
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. NOEC and LOEC results
Parameter |
Concentration (µg/l) |
|
Mortality |
NOEC |
≥4.15 |
LOEC |
> 4.15 |
|
Reproduction |
NOEC |
≥4.15 |
LOEC |
5.02 |
|
Growth |
NOEC |
≥4.15 |
LOEC |
> 4.15 |
No treatment related effects were observed in the definitive 21d study which was conducted at nominal test concentrations of 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L. This result was surprising in light of the fact that marked effects on reproduction were observed at nominal concentrations at or above 5 µg/L in the 9 -day range-finding study.
One possible explanation for these results was that the mean analytical or actual test concentration acheived in the nominal 5 µg/L treatment group for the 9 -day range finding study was 5.02 µg/L, while the analytical test concentration for the definitive study was only 4.15 µg/L. While no effects were observed in the definitive study, the data from the range finding study clearly demonstrates effects on reproduction at test concentrations at or above 5.02 µg/L. In addition, the 48 -h LC50 in daphnids was determined at this laboratory to be 5.8 µg/L. Therefore, while an effect level was not demonstrated in the definitive study, the principle objective of the definitive study was still accomplished since the no-effect levels for the paramters of reproduction and growth were clearly defined at levels just below concentrations which have been shown to produce effects on reproduction and survival.
By supplementing the results of the 21 d definitive test with those from the 9 d range finding test, the following conclusions were drawn:
- The NOEC and LOEC for reproduction were 4.15 µg/L and 5.02 µg/L respectively.
- The MATC derived for the combined test results was 4.56 µg/L.
- The NOEC and LOEC for survival and growth are ≥4.15 and >4.15 µg/L µg/L respectively.
Table 1. NOEC and LOEC results
Parameter |
Concentration (µg/l) |
|
Mortality |
NOEC |
≥4.15 |
LOEC |
> 4.15 |
|
Reproduction |
NOEC |
≥4.15 |
LOEC |
5.02 |
|
Growth |
NOEC |
≥4.15 |
LOEC |
> 4.15 |
No treatment related effects were observed in the definitive 21d study which was conducted at nominal test concentrations of 0.5, 0.9, 1.6, 2.8 and 5 µg/L. This result was surprising in light of the fact that marked effects on reproduction were observed at nominal concentrations at or above 5 µg/L in the 9 -day range-finding study.
One possible explanation for these results was that the mean analytical or actual test concentration acheived in the nominal 5 µg/L treatment group for the 9 -day range finding study was 5.02 µg/L, while the analytical test concentration for the definitive study was only 4.15 µg/L. While no effects were observed in the definitive study, the data from the range finding study clearly demonstrates effects on reproduction at test concentrations at or above 5.02 µg/L. In addition, the 48 -h LC50 in daphnids was determined at this laboratory to be 5.8 µg/L. Therefore, while an effect level was not demonstrated in the definitive study, the principle objective of the definitive study was still accomplished since the no-effect levels for the paramters of reproduction and growth were clearly defined at levels just below concentrations which have been shown to produce effects on reproduction and survival.
By supplementing the results of the 21 d definitive test with those from the 9 d range finding test, the following conclusions were drawn:
- The NOEC and LOEC for reproduction were 4.15 µg/L and 5.02 µg/L respectively.
- The MATC derived for the combined test results was 4.56 µg/L.
- The NOEC and LOEC for survival and growth are ≥4.15 and >4.15 µg/L µg/L respectively.
Description of key information
Based on the results of the read across study, the 21 d NOEC of the test substance, C12 ADBAC, for toxicity to daphnia can also be considered to be ≥ 4.15 µg a.i./L (≥ 0.00415 mg a.i./L; measured).
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 4.15 µg/L
Additional information
A study was conducted to determine the long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates of the read across substance, C12-16 ADBAC (purity: 30%), according to U.S. EPA FIFRA 72-4 (b), in compliance with GLP.Daphnia magna(22 per group) were exposed to mean measured concentrations of 0, 0.41, 0.71, 1.33, 2.31 and 4.15 µg a.i./L for 21 d. Analytical dose verification was conducted. Observations on daphnid behaviour, the number of immobilised organisms and the number of young produced were made at each renewal day and at test termination. No effects were observed on survival, reproduction and growth at measured concentration up to 4.15 µg a.i./L test substance. However, reproduction was clearly affected at measured concentrations ≥ 5.02 µg/L in a range-finding study. Based on these results, the NOEC and LOEC for reproduction were considered to be at 4.15 and 5.02 µg a.i./L, respectively. The maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC) derived from these results was 4.56 µg a.i./L. The NOEC and LOEC for survival and growth were ≥ 4.15 and > 4.15 µg a.i./L, respectively. Based on the results of the read across study, the 21d chronic NOEC for mortality, reproduction and growth (Daphnia magna) is considered to be ≥ 4.15 µg a.i./L (≥ 0.00415 mg a.i./L). The maximum acceptable toxicant concentration (MATC) is 4.56 µg/L (McIntyre, 1992).Based on the results of the read across study, the 21 d NOEC of the test substance, C12 ADBAC, for toxicity to daphnia can also be considered to be ≥ 4.15 µg a.i./L (≥ 0.00415 mg a.i./L; measured).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.