Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1997-12-02 till 1998-01-14
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
Adopted June 7, 1984
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
adopted December, 1992
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ISO 8692 (Water Quality - Fresh Water Algal Growth Inhibition Test with Scenedesmus subspicatus and Selenastrum capricornutum)
Version / remarks:
15 November 1989
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
During the test samples of 10 mLwere taken from three concentrations (10, 32 and 180 mg/L) and the negative control at the start and the end of the test. The samples were frozen until analysis.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Stock solutions were prepared at 100 and 180 mg/L in ISO medium. Prior to dilutions, the stock solutions were treated with ultrasonic waves for approximately 15 min and cooled afterwards from a temperature of 29°C to 22.2°C. After preparation, volumes of 50 mL were added to each replicate of the respective test concentration.
Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: green algae
- Strain: CCAp 278/4
- Source: not available
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 4 days
- Method of cultivation: on agar

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: no, same as test conditions
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
24 mg CaCO3/L
Test temperature:
22.5 - 23.0°C
pH:
8.5 - 8.0
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: 10, 18, 32, 56, 100 and 180 mg/L
Mean measured concentrations: 10.21, not measured, 33.15, not measured, not measured, 174.5 mg/L (Details in Table 1 below)
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: glass vessels
- Material, fill volume: glass, 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: 10,000 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 554,000 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 5
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): 3

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Preparation of dilution water: ISO medium according to OECD 202

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuous
- Light intensity and quality: TLS lamps of 18 Watt (Philips, Spain), 7500 - 8000 lux

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED
- Determination of cell concentrations: counting chamber at beginning
- Determination of cell densities: spectrophotometric measurement at 720 nm (Lambda, Perkin-Elmer, Illinois, USA; 5 cm cuvette)
Temperature was measured every day, pH at beginning and end of test

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: yes
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
173.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
44.7 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
32 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
83.2 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
32 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
26.8 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control: yes
- Observation of abnormalities: no
- Unusual cell shape: no
- Colour differences: no
- Flocculation: no
- Adherence to test vessels: no
- Aggregation of algal cells: no
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no
- Any observations that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: no

Validation criteria:
In the controls, cell density increased by an average factor of > 16 within 3 days. Analysis of samples showed that the actual exposure concentrations remained above 80 % relative to the initial concentrations. Further, all test conditions remained within the ranges prescribed by the protocol.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
The 72-hour EC50 for growth inhibition (EC50; 72h) was 0.60 mg/L. The 72-hour EC50 for growth rate reduction (EC50; 72h) was 1.48 mg/L. These results were in agreement with what was expected on the basis of historical data: The historical ranges of the 72h EC50 for growth inhibition lie between 0.32 and 1.8 mg/L and the 72h EC50 for growth rate reduction lie between 0.56 and 3.2 mg/L.

Table 1: Concentrations of the test item in test medium

Time [hours]

Concentration [mg/L]

Nominal

Analysed*

Relative to nominal [%]

0

0

n.d.

n.a.

10

10.6

106

32

34.9

109

180

170

94

1801

176

98

72

0

n.d.

n.a.

10

9.82**

98

32

31.4

98

180

179

100

1801

187**

104

*Mean of duplicate analysis. The maximum deviation between the responses was calculated for each sample and was < 10%

**Single analysis; one chromatogram was integrated incorrectly

1Without algae

n.d. not detected

n.a. not applicable

 

Table 2: Mean cell densities during test

Concentrations (mg/L)

Mean cell densities during exposure (x 104cells /mL)

0h

24h

48h

72h

0

1.00

4.55

16.5

55.4

10

1.00

4.70

17.4

58.1

18

1.00

4.99

16.3

53.3

32

1.00

4.94

15.2

49.4

56

1.00

4.89

11.8

33.9

100

1.00

4.46

7.8

14.5

180

1.00

3.97

6.2

6.8

 

Table 3: Percentage reduction of growth rate at different time intervals

Concentrations (mg/L)

Growth rate (cells/mL/h1):

24-72h mean

Reduction (%)

0-72h mean

Reduction (%)

Blank - control

0.05208

 

0.05573

 

10.00

0.05234

-0.5

0.05637

-1.2

18.00

0.04930

5.3

0.05518

1.0

32.00

0.04796

7.9

0.05415

2.8

56.00

0.04016

22.9

0.04881

12.4

100.00

0.02445

53.0

0.03705

33.5

180.00

0.01088

79.1

0.02641

52.6

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
An aqueous solution of the test item in an static system revealed an aquatic toxicity towards algae: Growth rate after 72h: EC50: 173.4 mg/L, EC10: 44.7 mg/L, NOEC: 32 mg/L. Biomass after 72h: EC50: 83.2 mg/L, EC10: 26.8 mg/L, NOEC: 32 mg/L.
Executive summary:

The influence of the test material on the growth and growth rate of the green algae species Desmodesmus subspicatus was tested according to OECD 201 and EU Method C.3. After a range-finding test, a final test was performed exposing exponentially growing algal cultures to the test item in concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56, 100 and 180 mg/L, increasing with a factor of 1.8. The initial cell density was 10E04 cells/mL. The total test period was 72 hours. Samples for analysis of actual test concentrations were taken at the start and the end of the test period. Analysis of the samples taken during the final test showed that the actual concentrations were in agreement with nominal concentrations (94-109% relative to nominal). All validation criteria were fulfilled. Under the conditions of the present study the test item inhibited cell growth and reduced growth rate of this fresh water algae species significantly at 56 mg/L and higher. The EC50 for cell growth inhibition (EC50; 72h) was 83.2 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 73.2 to 95.2 mg/L. The EC10 for cell growth inhibition (EC10; 72h) was 26.8 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 22.0 to 30.6 mg/L. The EC50 for growth rate reduction (EC50; 72h) was 173.4 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 149.5 to 207.0 mg/L. The EC10 for growth rate reduction (EC10; 72h) was 44.7 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 38.0 to 49.4 mg/L. The NOEC for cell growth inhibition and growth rate reduction was 32 mg/L.

Description of key information

An aqueous solution of the test item in an static system revealed an aquatic toxicity towards algae: Growth rate after 72h: EC50: 173.4 mg/L, EC10: 44.7 mg/L, NOEC: 32 mg/L. Biomass after 72h: EC50: 83.2 mg/L, EC10: 26.8 mg/L, NOEC: 32 mg/L (reference 6.1.5 -1).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
173.4 mg/L
EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
44.7 mg/L

Additional information

The influence of the test material on the growth and growth rate of the green algae species Desmodesmus subspicatus was tested according to OECD 201 and EU Method C.3. After a range-finding test, a final test was performed exposing exponentially growing algal cultures to the test item in concentrations of 10, 18, 32, 56, 100 and 180 mg/L, increasing with a factor of 1.8. The initial cell density was 10E04 cells/mL. The total test period was 72 hours. Samples for analysis of actual test concentrations were taken at the start and the end of the test period. Analysis of the samples taken during the final test showed that the actual concentrations were in agreement with nominal concentrations (94-109% relative to nominal). All validation criteria were fulfilled. Under the conditions of the present study the test item inhibited cell growth and reduced growth rate of this fresh water algae species significantly at 56 mg/L and higher. The EC50 for cell growth inhibition (EC50; 72h) was 83.2 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 73.2 to 95.2 mg/L. The EC10 for cell growth inhibition (EC10; 72h) was 26.8 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 22.0 to 30.6 mg/L. The EC50 for growth rate reduction (EC50; 72h) was 173.4 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 149.5 to 207.0 mg/L. The EC10 for growth rate reduction (EC10; 72h) was 44.7 mg/L with a 95 % confidence interval ranging from 38.0 to 49.4 mg/L. The NOEC for cell growth inhibition and growth rate reduction was 32 mg/L (reference 6.1.5 -1).