Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-579-4 | CAS number: 1449104-34-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
negative, in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (with and without S-9 activation), OECD TG 471, 2018
negative, in vitro bacterial reverse mutation (with and without S-9 activation), OECD TG 471, 2020
negative, in vitro chromosome aberration test (with and without S-9 activation), OECD TG 473, 2018
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 09-03-2018 to 10-04-2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (24 November 2000)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: July 2017 ; signature: November 2017
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine or tryptophan locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 (pre-incubation method): 0, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (TA-strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix) employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. Specifically: 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, and 15 µg/plate.
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method): Up to eight test item dose levels were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both a minimum of four non-toxic doses and the toxic/guideline limit of the test item. The dose levels were selected based on the results of Experiment 1.
Salmonella strains (All); TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (absence of S9-mix): 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains TA100 and TA1537 (presence of S9-mix): 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains TA1535 (presence of S9-mix): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 µg/plate.
Salmonella strain TA98 (presence of S9-mix): 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate.
E.coli strain WP2uvrA (absence and presence of S9-mix): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed. Dimethyl sulphoxide was selected as the vehicle.
- Other: Formulated concentrations were adjusted/increased to allow for the stated water/impurity content. See 'Test Material Information' for further details. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation) ; Experiment 2. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation).
The choice of application was due to the test item to either have unknown volatility or was suspected to be volatile, therefore all testing was performed using the pre-incubation method (20 minutes at 37 ± 3 °C) except for the untreated controls.
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1. All of the plates were pre-incubated in sealed, small volume containers, by application of 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media. All of the plates were sealed in anaerobic jars or bags (one jar/bag for each concentration of test item/vehicle) during the incubation procedure (37 ± 3 ºC for approximately 48 to 72 hours) to minimize potential losses of the test item from the plates. After incubation, the plates were scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts may be performed, where automated counting cannot be performed: e.g. colonies spreading, colonies on the edge of the plates and artefacts on the plates, thus distorting the actual plate count.
Experiment 2. 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media Subsequently, the procedure for incubation and duration was the same as in Experiment 1.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine-deficient agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Rationale for test conditions:
- In accordance with the OECD TG 471 guidelines.
- Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out of historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
5. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
A test item is considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
In instances of data prohibiting definitive judgement about test item activity are reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical methods (Mahon, et al.); as recommended by the UKEMS Subcommittee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing, Report - Part III (1989).
Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control. - Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The current Positive HCD dataset is presented in the full study report.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The current background spontaneous revertant counts in concurrent untreated controls and/or or vehicle controls ; historic negative controls are presented in the full study report. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
Under the conditions of this study the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item using the Ames pre incubation method at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate. Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (all TA-strains) dosed in the absence of S9-mix employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Eight test item dose levels were again selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve a minimum of four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and ranged between 0.015 and 5000 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or the toxic limit of the test item depending on the strain type and presence of S9-mix.The test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate. In the presence S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were notedfor all of the Salmonella strains initially from 150 μg/plate. No toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA at any test item dose level in either the absence or presence S9-mix. In Experiment 2, both the maximum dose level (5000 μg/plate) or the toxic limit was employed as the maximum concentration in the second mutation test, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The test item induced an identical toxic response to the first experiment with weakened bacterial background lawns noted from 15 μg/plate to all Salmonella strains dosed in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Again, no toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA at any test item dose level. No precipitates were observed at any dose level in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9‑mix). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29-04-2020 to 26-05-2020
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), and Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Guidelines (31 March 2011)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH S2(R1) guideline adopted June 2012 (ICH S2(R1) Federal Register. Adopted 2012; 77:33748-33749)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine or tryptophan locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system: Rat liver S9
- source of S9: purchased (dates and QC/Production Certificate within full study report) ; S9 Microsomal fraction: Lot No. 4146
- method of preparation of S9 mix: Documented in the full study report. Stored at -70ºC prior to use and prepared with sterilised co-factors and stored on ice during the duration of the test
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: 10% S9
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): A QC/Production Certificate which is equivalent to a Certificate of S9 Efficacy is presented in the full study report. Additionally, concurrent positive control substances all produced marked increases in the number of revertant colonies and the activity of the S9 fraction was found to be satisfactory - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 (pre-incubation method):
(presence of S9-mix): 0, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
(absence of S9-mix): 0, 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15 and 50 µg/plate
Experiment 2 (pre-incubation method): Up to eight test item dose levels were selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve both a minimum of four non-toxic doses and the toxic/guideline limit of the test item. The dose levels were selected based on the results of Experiment 1.
Salmonella strains; TA98, TA1535 and TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA (presence of S9-mix): 0, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 and 1500 µg/plate
Salmonella strain TA100 (presence of S9-mix): 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150 and 500 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains (all); TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA (absence of S9-mix): 0, 0.015, 0.05, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15 and 50 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was immiscible in sterile distilled water at 50 mg/mL but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration in solubility checks performed. Dimethyl sulphoxide was selected as the vehicle.
- Other: Formulated concentrations were adjusted/increased to allow for the stated water/impurity content. See 'Test Material Information' for further details. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Experiment 1. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation) ; Experiment 2. in medium; in agar (pre-incubation).
The choice of application was due to the test item to either have unknown volatility or was suspected to be volatile, therefore all testing was performed using the pre-incubation method (20 minutes at 37 ± 3 °C) except for the untreated controls.
DURATION
- Exposure duration:
Experiment 1. All of the plates were pre-incubated in sealed, small volume containers, by application of 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media. All of the plates were sealed in anaerobic jars or bags (one jar/bag for each concentration of test item/vehicle) during the incubation procedure (37 ± 3 ºC for approximately 48 to 72 hours) to minimize potential losses of the test item from the plates. After incubation, the plates were scored for the presence of revertant colonies using an automated colony counting system. The plates were viewed microscopically for evidence of thinning (toxicity). Manual counts may be performed, where automated counting cannot be performed: e.g. colonies spreading, colonies on the edge of the plates and artefacts on the plates, thus distorting the actual plate count.
Experiment 2. 0.1 mL of the appropriate bacterial strain culture, 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer OR S9-mix (as appropriate) and 0.1 mL of the test item formulation, vehicle or 0.1 mL of appropriate positive control were incubated at 37 ± 3 ºC for 20 minutes (with shaking) prior to addition of 2 mL of molten amino-acid supplemented media Subsequently, the procedure for incubation and duration was the same as in Experiment 1.
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine-deficient agar
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth - Rationale for test conditions:
- In accordance with the OECD TG 471 guidelines.
- Evaluation criteria:
- There are several criteria for determining a positive result. Any, one, or all of the following can be used to determine the overall result of the study:
1. A dose-related increase in mutant frequency over the dose range tested (De Serres and Shelby, 1979).
2. A reproducible increase at one or more concentrations.
3. Biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges.
4. Fold increase greater than two times the concurrent solvent control for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out of historical range response (Cariello and Piegorsch, 1996)).
5. Statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS (Mahon et al., 1989).
A test item is considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
In instances of data prohibiting definitive judgement about test item activity are reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Statistical methods (Mahon, et al.); as recommended by the UKEMS Subcommittee on Guidelines for Mutagenicity Testing, Report - Part III (1989).
Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- See table 1 and 2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
- Positive historical control data: The current Positive HCD dataset is presented in the full study report.
- Negative (solvent/vehicle) historical control data: The current background spontaneous revertant counts in concurrent untreated controls and/or or vehicle controls ; historic negative controls are presented in the full study report. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative
Under the conditions of this study the test item was considered to be non-mutagenic in the presence and absence of S9 activation. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item using the Ames pre incubation method at eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate. Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (all TA-strains) dosed in the absence of S9-mix employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Eight test item dose levels were again selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve a minimum of four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and ranged between 0.015 and 1500 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or the toxic limit of the test item depending on the strain type and presence of S9-mix. In the first mutation test, the test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn of all of the tester strains, initially from 5 and 150 µg/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 mix), respectively. Based on the results of Experiment 1, the toxic limit of the test item was selected as the maximum dose concentration in the second mutation test (pre-incubation method). The test item once again induced a toxic response with a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns noted to all of the tester strains, initially from 15 and 150 µg/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 mix), respectively. There were no biologically relevant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1. One statistically significant value was noted (TA100 at 15 µg/plate in the presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), however as the maximum fold increase was only 1.1 times the concurrent vehicle control and the mean colony count was within the in-house historical vehicle/untreated control range for the strain the response was considered of no biological relevance. Similarly, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre incubation method). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20-04-2018 to 27-06-2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Version / remarks:
- : Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), and Ministry of the Environmental (MOE) Guidelines of 31 March 2011
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: 40 CFR 799.9537 TSCA in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- inspected: July 2017 ; signature: November 2017
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Target gene:
- not applicable (chromosome aberration test)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: Human lymphocytes
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- For each experiment, sufficient whole blood was drawn from the peripheral circulation of a non smoking volunteer (aged 18-35) who had been previously screened for suitability. The volunteer had not knowingly been exposed to high levels of radiation or hazardous chemicals and had not knowingly recently suffered from a viral infection. Based on over 20 years in house data for cell cycle times for lymphocytes using BrdU (bromodeoxyuridine) incorporation to assess the number of first, second and third division metaphase cells to calculate the average generation time (AGT) for human lymphocytes it is considered to be approximately 16 hours. Therefore using this average the in-house exposure time for the experiments for 1.5 x AGT is 24 hours. Further details on the donors is available in the full study report.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 Microsomal fraction: Lot No. PB/βNF S9 29/03/2018
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The maximum dose level was 1940 µg/mL, calculated to be equivalent to 10 mM concentration, the maximum recommended dose level. There was no significant change in pH when the test item was dosed into media and the osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm (Scott et al., 1991) within the 0 to 1940 μg/mL range (full results recorded in the full study report). Formulated concentrations were adjusted/increased to allow for the stated water/impurity content. See 'Test Material Information' for further details.
I. Preliminary toxicity test: 0 (control) , 7.6, 15.2, 30.3, 60.6, 121.3, 242.5, 485, 970 and 1940 μg/mL
Within three exposure groups:
i) 4-hours exposure to the test item without S9-mix, followed by a 20-hour recovery period in treatment-free media, 4(20)-hour exposure.
ii) 4-hours exposure to the test item with S9-mix (2%), followed by a 20-hour recovery period in treatment-free media, 4(20)-hour exposure.
iii) 24-hour continuous exposure to the test item without S9-mix.
II. Main Test:
4(20)-hour without S9: 0*, 10, 15*, 30*, 60*, 80, 120, 240 μg/mL and MMC 0.4* μg/mL
4(20)-hour with S9: 0*, 10, 15, 30*, 60*, 80*, 120, 240, μg/mL and CP 4* μg/mL
24-hour without S9: 0*, 10, 20, 30, 40*, 50*, 60*, 120 μg/mL and MMC 0.1* μg/mL
where:
* = dose levels selected for metaphase analysis
MMC= Mitomycin C
CP = Cyclophosphamide - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: In a previously conducted OECD TG 471 study (cited in the full study report), the test item was immiscible in aqueous media at 50 mg/mL but was miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at the same concentration. A further solubility check was performed within this study. Dimethyl sulphoxide and acetone indicated that the test item was miscible at 194 mg/mL. Dimethyl sulphoxide was chosen due to better suitability when used with human lymphocytes. The maximum dose level (determined prior to the test based on molecular weight) was 1940 µg/mL, which was calculated to be equivalent to 10 mM, the maximum recommended dose level. There was no significant change in pH when the test item was dosed into media and the osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm (Scott et al., 1991) within the 0 to 1940 μg/mL range (full results recorded in the full study report). The test item was formulated within two hours of it being applied to the test system.
- Other: Formulated concentrations were adjusted/increased to allow for the stated water/impurity content. See 'Test Material Information' for further details - Untreated negative controls:
- other: Vehicle control served as the negative control
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation, 0.4 μg/ml for 4(20)-hour and 0.1 μg/ml for 24 h exposure periods, respectively ; Full details on the positive controls is reported in the full study report.
- Untreated negative controls:
- other: Vehicle control served athe negative control
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation 4 μg/ml for a 4(20)-hour exposure period ; Full details on the positive controls is reported in the full study report.
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: Other:
Duplicate lymphocyte cultures (A and B) were established for each dose level by mixing the following components, giving, when dispensed into sterile non-vented plastic flasks for each culture: 8.05 to 9.05 mL MEM, 10% (FBS); 0.1 mL Li-heparin; 0.1 mL phytohaemagglutinin; 0.75 mL heparinized whole blood
DURATION
- Preincubation period: Not reported.
- Exposure duration:
The preliminary toxicity test was performed using both of the exposure conditions as described for both experiments (below) in the absence of metabolic activation only.
I. With Metabolic Activation (S9) Treatment:
- After approximately 48 hours incubation at approximately 37 ºC, 5% CO2 in humidified air, the cultures were transferred to tubes and centrifuged. Approximately 9 mL of the culture medium was removed, reserved, and replaced with the required volume of MEM (including serum) and 0.1 mL (100 μL) of the appropriate solution of vehicle control or test item was added to each culture. For the positive control, 0.1 mL of the appropriate solution was added to the cultures. 1 mL of 20% S9-mix (i.e. 2% final concentration of S9 in standard co-factors) was added to the cultures of the Preliminary Toxicity Test and of the Main Experiment. After 4 hours at approximately 37 ºC, 5 % CO2 in humidified air the cultures were centrifuged, the treatment medium removed by suction and replaced with an 8 mL wash of MEM culture medium. After a further centrifugation the wash medium was removed by suction and replaced with the original culture medium. The cells were then re-incubated for a further 20 hours at approximately 37 ºC in 5 % CO2 in humidified air.
II. Without Metabolic Activation (S9) Treatment:
- After approximately 48 hours incubation at approximately 37 ºC with 5% CO2 in humidified air the cultures were decanted into tubes and centrifuged. Approximately 9 mL of the culture medium was removed and reserved. The cells were then resuspended in the required volume of fresh MEM (including serum) and dosed with 0.1 mL (100 μL) of the appropriate vehicle control, test item solution or 0.1 mL of positive control solution. The total volume for each culture was a nominal 10 mL. After 4 hours at approximately 37 ºC, 5% CO2 in humidified air, the cultures were centrifuged the treatment medium was removed by suction and replaced with an 8 mL wash of MEM culture medium. After a further centrifugation the wash medium was removed by suction and replaced with the reserved original culture medium. The cells were then returned to the incubator for a further 20 hours at approximately 37 ºC in 5 % CO2 in humidified air.
In the 24-hour exposure in the absence of S9, the exposure was continuous. Therefore, when the cultures were established the culture volume was a nominal 9.9 mL. After approximately 48 hours incubation the cultures were removed from the incubator and dosed with 0.1 mL of vehicle control, test item dose solution or 0.1 mL of positive control solution. The nominal final volume of each culture was 10 mL. The cultures were then incubated at approximately 37 ºC, 5% CO2 in humidified air for 24 hours.
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): demecolcine (Colcemid 0.1 μg/ml)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The study conducted two replicates (A and B) at each dose level and exposure duration groups.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: A total of 2000 lymphocyte cell nuclei were counted and the number of cells in metaphase recorded and expressed as the mitotic index and as a percentage of the vehicle control value.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index
The slides were checked microscopically to determine the quality of the metaphases and also the toxicity and extent of precipitation, if any, of the test item. These observations were used to select the dose levels for mitotic index evaluation.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes. Cells with 69 chromosomes or more were scored as polyploid cells and the incidence of polyploid cells (%) reported. Many experiments with human lymphocytes have established a range of aberration frequencies acceptable for control cultures in normal volunteer donors. The current historical range was reported in the full study report.
- Other: Scoring: Where possible, 300 consecutive well-spread metaphases from each concentration (150 per duplicate) were assessed for observations, if the cell had 44 to 48 chromosomes, any breaks, fragments, deletions, exchanges and chromosomal disintegrations were recorded as structural chromosome aberrations according to the simplified system of Savage (1976), ISCN (1985). Where the analysis of the slide resulted in a large frequency of aberrant cells then the analysis was terminated after a total of 15 metaphases with aberrations (excluding gaps) were recorded. Cells with chromosome aberrations were reviewed as necessary by a senior cytogeneticist prior to decoding the slides. - Evaluation criteria:
- Positive response criteria
A test item can be classified as genotoxic if:
1) The number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations is outside the range of the laboratory historical control data.
2) At least one concentration exhibits a statistically significant increase in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations compared to the concurrent negative control.
3) The observed increase in the frequency of cells with structural aberrations is considered to be dose-related.
Negative response criteria
A test item can be classified as non-genotoxic if:
1) The number of cells with structural aberrations in all evaluated dose groups should be within the range of the laboratory historical control data.
2) No toxicologically or statistically significant increase of the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations is observed following statistical analysis.
3) There is no concentration-related increase at any dose level.
In case the response is neither clearly negative nor clearly positive as described above or in order to assist in establishing the biological relevance of a result, the data should be evaluated by expert judgment.
Statistical analysis is also performed (see: ‘Statistics’). Biological relevance of the results are to be considered first. Statistical methods are used to analyze the increases in aberration data as recommended in the OECD 473 guideline. However, statistical significance will not be the only determining factor for a positive response. A toxicologically significant response is recorded when the p value calculated from the statistical analysis of the frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps is less than 0.05 when compared to its concurrent control and there is a dose-related increase in the frequency of cells with aberrations which is reproducible. Incidences where marked statistically significant increases are observed only with gap-type aberrations will be assessed on a case by case basis. - Statistics:
- The frequency of cells with aberrations excluding gaps and the frequency of polyploid cells was compared, where necessary, with the concurrent vehicle control value using Fisher's Exact test. (Richardson et al. Analysis of data from in vitro cytogenetic assays. In Statistical Evaluation of mutagenicity test data: UKEMS sub-committee on guidelines for mutagenicity testing. Report Part III (Ed: Kirkland, D.J.), Cambridge University Press (1989)
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: Human lymphocytes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: There was no significant change in pH when the test item was dosed into media
- Effects of osmolality: There was no significant change osmolality (did not increase by more than 50 mOsm) when the test item was dosed into media
- Evaporation from medium: Not reported. Sterile non-vented plastic flasks for each culture, thereby preventing evaporation from medium.
- Water solubility: Not applicable.
- Precipitation: In the preliminary test: A precipitate of the test item was observed in the parallel blood-free cultures at the end of the exposure at and above 121.3 µg/mL in all of the exposure groups.
Main test: Precipitate observations were made at the end of exposure in blood-free cultures and was noted at 240 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group dosed in the absence of S9 and at and above 120 μg/mL in the presence of S9 and 24-hour exposure group. The qualitative assessment of the slides determined that the toxicity was similar to that observed in the Cell Growth Inhibition Test and that there were metaphases suitable for scoring present at up 60 and 80 μg/mL of test item in the 4(20)-hour exposure groups and up to 60 µg/mL in the 24-hour continuous exposure group.
- Other confounding effects: In the preliminary test: Hemolysis was observed following exposure to the test item at and above 60.6 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation (S9), at and above 30.3 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour in the presence of S9 and at and above 121.3 μg/mL in the 24-hour continuous exposure group. Hemolysis is an indication of a toxic response to the erythrocytes and not indicative of any genotoxic response to the lymphocytes. Additionally, a reduced cell pellet was observed at and above 121.3 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure groups and at and above 242.5 μg/mL in the 24-hour exposure group. A reduced pellet signifies that maximum exposure is occurring in the remaining cell population. In the main test: Hemolysis was again observed in the Main Experiment at and above 30 μg/mL in the in the presence of S9 and at and above 60 μg/mL in the absence of S9. Additionally, a reduced cell pellet was observed at and above 80 μg/mL in the short exposure groups only.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The dose range for the Preliminary Toxicity Test was 0 to 1940 μg/mL. The maximum dose was the maximum recommended dose level. The selection of the maximum dose level was based on toxicity for the main test. Specifically based on precipitation and cell cytotoxicity. 60 to 80 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure groups and up to 60 µg/mL in the 24-hour continuous exposure group.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
- All vehicle (DMSO) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes. (Within the Historic Control Data range presented in the full study report).
- All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations. (statistically significant p ≤ 0.01 or were within the Historic Control Data range presented in the full study report).
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: See ‘other confounding effects’ listed above. - Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
Negative
Under the conditions of this study, the test item was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro. - Executive summary:
The study was performed to the requirements of OECD TG 473 and Japan METI guidelines under GLP conditions to assess the potential chromosomal mutagenicity of the test item, on the metaphase chromosomes of normal human lymphocyte cultured mammalian cells. Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test item, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at three dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. In this study, three exposure conditions were investigated; a 4-hour exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period, 4-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period and a 24-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation. The dose levels used in the Main Experiment were selected using data from the Preliminary Toxicity Test (Cell Growth Inhibition Test) between 7.6 to 1940 μg/mL where the results indicated that the maximum concentration should be limited on precipitation and toxicity for all exposure groups for dose selection. Precipitation and toxicity closely coincided. The dose levels selected for the Main Test were as follows: 4(20)-hour with and without S9-Mix (2%) : 0, 10, 15, 30, 60, 80, 120, 240 μg/mL and 24-hour continuous exposure without S9: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120 μg/mL. All vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes. All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9 mix were validated. The test item was toxic to human lymphocytes and but did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, using a dose range that included a dose level that either induced or exceeded 55±5% mitotic inhibition. Under the conditions of this study, the test item was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1 : Test Results: Experiment 1 with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 † |
TA1535 † |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 † |
TA1537 † |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
118 115 127 |
(120) 6.2# |
11 20 12 |
(14) 4.9 |
33 18 27 |
(26) 7.5 |
22 19 22 |
(21) 1.7 |
16 17 5 |
(13) 6.7 |
|
0.015 µg |
129 119 125 |
(124) 5.0 |
10 14 13 |
(12) 2.1 |
N/T |
24 20 17 |
(20) 3.5 |
8 7 4 |
(6) 2.1 |
||
0.05 µg |
130 128 115 |
(124) 8.1 |
18 7 14 |
(13) 5.6 |
N/T |
14 14 18 |
(15) 2.3 |
8 5 7 |
(7) 1.5 |
||
0.15 µg |
115 109 124 |
(116) 7.5 |
15 10 14 |
(13) 2.6 |
N/T |
22 21 14 |
(19) 4.4 |
8 3 4 |
(5) 2.6 |
||
0.5 µg |
96 116 123 |
(112) 14.0 |
8 8 10 |
(9) 1.2 |
N/T |
19 17 26 |
(21) 4.7 |
3 4 4 |
(4) 0.6 |
||
1.5 µg |
114 136 131 |
(127) 11.5 |
16 8 19 |
(14) 5.7 |
30 24 38 |
(31) 7.0 |
18 13 21 |
(17) 4.0 |
7 3 4 |
(5) 2.1 |
|
5 µg |
105 93 100 |
(99) 6.0 |
12 11 11 |
(11) 0.6 |
25 28 32 |
(28) 3.5 |
16 19 17 |
(17) 1.5 |
7 8 7 |
(7) 0.6 |
|
15 µg |
89 S 88 S 89 S |
(89) 0.6 |
8 S 8 S 5 S |
(7) 1.7 |
28 40 33 |
(34) 6.0 |
17 S 14 S 11 S |
(14) 3.0 |
2 S 3 S 4 S |
(3) 1.0 |
|
50 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
6 S 8 S 12 S |
(9) 3.1 |
40 39 36 |
(38) 2.1 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
150 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
37 34 21 |
(31) 8.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
31 32 26 |
(30) 3.2 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
1500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
29 22 24 |
(25) 3.6 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
5000 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
34 46 19 |
(33) 13.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
564 352 374 |
(430) 116.6 |
173 201 213 |
(196) 20.5 |
549 522 443 |
(505) 55.1 |
324 336 341 |
(334) 8.7 |
162 86 224 |
(157) 69.1 |
||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
137 136 131 |
(135) 3.2# |
9 12 15 |
(12) 3.0 |
37 49 47 |
(44) 6.4 |
24 24 26 |
(25) 1.2 |
14 7 12 |
(11) 3.6 |
|
1.5 µg |
131 134 128 |
(131) 3.0 |
14 8 16 |
(13) 4.2 |
49 32 34 |
(38) 9.3 |
24 19 22 |
(22) 2.5 |
7 10 12 |
(10) 2.5 |
|
5 µg |
134 135 138 |
(136) 2.1 |
15 13 6 |
(11) 4.7 |
35 33 40 |
(36) 3.6 |
17 30 36 |
(28) 9.7 |
5 5 5 |
(5) 0.0 |
|
15 µg |
128 129 123 |
(127) 3.2 |
11 10 15 |
(12) 2.6 |
34 39 39 |
(37) 2.9 |
32 28 27 |
(29) 2.6 |
8 13 6 |
(9) 3.6 |
|
50 µg |
110 127 124 |
(120) 9.1 |
9 10 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
53 36 40 |
(43) 8.9 |
27 31 26 |
(28) 2.6 |
7 5 13 |
(8) 4.2 |
|
150 µg |
74 S 93 S 77 S |
(81) 10.2 |
15 12 12 |
(13) 1.7 |
29 50 48 |
(42) 11.6 |
31 21 28 |
(27) 5.1 |
4 S 9 S 10 S |
(8) 3.2 |
|
500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
10 S 14 S 5 S |
(10) 4.5 |
38 41 40 |
(40) 1.5 |
26 22 26 |
(25) 2.3 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
1500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 S 3 S 4 S |
(5) 2.6 |
38 34 26 |
(33) 6.1 |
20 22 19 |
(20) 1.5 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
5000 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
7 S 7 S 14 S |
(9) 4.0 |
33 32 40 |
(35) 4.4 |
10 S 13 S 14 S |
(12) 2.1 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1855 1919 2034 |
(1936) 90.7 |
333 319 289 |
(314) 22.5 |
229 231 232 |
(231) 1.5 |
105 126 146 |
(126) 20.5 |
346 364 367 |
(359) 11.4 |
† Experimental procedure repeated at a later date due to toxicity in the original test
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
N/T Not tested at this dose level
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Table 2 : Test Results: Experiment 2 with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
102 114 115 |
(110) 7.2# |
9 9 13 |
(10) 2.3 |
34 20 21 |
(25) 7.8 |
21 17 16 |
(18) 2.6 |
10 6 7 |
(8) 2.1 |
|
0.015 µg |
107 115 126 |
(116) 9.5 |
8 9 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
N/T |
15 25 18 |
(19) 5.1 |
9 6 7 |
(7) 1.5 |
||
0.05 µg |
108 126 116 |
(117) 9.0 |
7 10 11 |
(9) 2.1 |
N/T |
21 20 15 |
(19) 3.2 |
9 5 5 |
(6) 2.3 |
||
0.15 µg |
117 133 118 |
(123) 9.0 |
14 10 6 |
(10) 4.0 |
N/T |
20 13 26 |
(20) 6.5 |
11 12 8 |
(10) 2.1 |
||
0.5 µg |
87 111 116 |
(105) 15.5 |
10 6 9 |
(8) 2.1 |
N/T |
14 18 12 |
(15) 3.1 |
9 7 3 |
(6) 3.1 |
||
1.5 µg |
123 123 128 |
(125) 2.9 |
7 8 13 |
(9) 3.2 |
N/T |
15 19 15 |
(16) 2.3 |
6 5 3 |
(5) 1.5 |
||
5 µg |
90 100 95 |
(95) 5.0 |
11 8 9 |
(9) 1.5 |
N/T |
11 21 21 |
(18) 5.8 |
12 10 5 |
(9) 3.6 |
||
15 µg |
82 S 87 S 83 S |
(84) 2.6 |
12 S 15 S 7 S |
(11) 4.0 |
28 29 23 |
(27) 3.2 |
22 S 18 S 18 S |
(19) 2.3 |
6 S 5 S 5 S |
(5) 0.6 |
|
50 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
6 S 8 S 12 S |
(9) 3.1 |
37 29 22 |
(29) 7.5 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
150 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
31 25 21 |
(26) 5.0 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
26 28 29 |
(28) 1.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
1500 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
26 33 30 |
(30) 3.5 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
5000 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
21 30 29 |
(27) 4.9 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
405 464 409 |
(426) 33.0 |
1268 1403 1552 |
(1408) 142.1 |
428 444 367 |
(413) 40.6 |
351 343 348 |
(347) 4.0 |
117 123 104 |
(115) 9.7 |
||
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
109 130 119 |
(119) 10.5# |
11 13 19 |
(14) 4.2 |
41 32 35 |
(36) 4.6 |
29 23 31 |
(28) 4.2 |
10 10 15 |
(12) 2.9 |
|
0.15 µg |
119 130 127 |
(125) 5.7 |
N/T |
N/T |
N/T |
7 11 9 |
(9) 2.0 |
||||
0.5 µg |
112 110 113 |
(112) 1.5 |
8 10 12 |
(10) 2.0 |
N/T |
N/T |
12 7 8 |
(9) 2.6 |
|||
1.5 µg |
107 145 124 |
(125) 19.0 |
13 6 17 |
(12) 5.6 |
N/T |
N/T |
13 6 10 |
(10) 3.5 |
|||
5 µg |
120 129 131 |
(127) 5.9 |
14 10 7 |
(10) 3.5 |
N/T |
27 21 24 |
(24) 3.0 |
4 13 5 |
(7) 4.9 |
||
15 µg |
114 128 114 |
(119) 8.1 |
8 11 4 |
(8) 3.5 |
38 37 27 |
(34) 6.1 |
26 27 28 |
(27) 1.0 |
16 17 12 |
(15) 2.6 |
|
50 µg |
104 124 106 |
(111) 11.0 |
12 12 10 |
(11) 1.2 |
41 38 33 |
(37) 4.0 |
27 19 23 |
(23) 4.0 |
12 8 11 |
(10) 2.1 |
|
150 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 15 7 |
(10) 4.4 |
43 36 29 |
(36) 7.0 |
18 18 14 |
(17) 2.3 |
8 S 10 S 8 S |
(9) 1.2 |
|
500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 S 7 S 9 S |
(8) 1.0 |
39 29 31 |
(33) 5.3 |
13 18 27 |
(19) 7.1 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
1500 µg |
N/T |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
30 31 41 |
(34) 6.1 |
20 10 11 |
(14) 5.5 |
N/T |
|||
5000 µg |
N/T |
N/T |
39 26 51 |
(39) 12.5 |
10 S 17 S 27 S |
(18) 8.5 |
N/T |
||||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1863 1914 1789 |
(1855) 62.9 |
312 341 327 |
(327) 14.5 |
162 177 235 |
(191) 38.6 |
104 106 132 |
(114) 15.6 |
275 233 250 |
(253) 21.1 |
Table 1 : Test Results: Experiment 1 with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
116 114 106 |
(112) 5.3# |
11 14 10 |
(12) 2.1 |
27 21 26 |
(25) 3.2 |
26 32 21 |
(26) 5.5 |
7 10 11 |
(9) 2.1 |
|
1.5 µg |
127 137 108 |
(124) 14.7 |
22 9 9 |
(13) 7.5 |
15 25 22 |
(21) 5.1 |
32 24 30 |
(29) 4.2 |
6 8 13 |
(9) 3.6 |
|
5 µg |
118 126 112 |
(119) 7.0 |
11 12 12 |
(12) 0.6 |
25 32 15 |
(24) 8.5 |
20 34 20 |
(25) 8.1 |
12 5 4 |
(7) 4.4 |
|
15 µg |
134 130 117 |
(127) 8.9 |
11 11 11 |
(11) 0.0 |
23 24 24 |
(24) 0.6 |
21 27 22 |
(23) 3.2 |
9 11 10 |
(10) 1.0 |
|
50 µg |
112 122 107 |
(114) 7.6 |
11 15 15 |
(14) 2.3 |
22 18 14 |
(18) 4.0 |
27 29 30 |
(29) 1.5 |
6 3 8 |
(6) 2.5 |
|
150 µg |
72 S 79 S 78 S |
(76) 3.8 |
12 10 12 |
(11) 1.2 |
24 18 23 |
(22) 3.2 |
25 15 27 |
(22) 6.4 |
7 7 1 |
(5) 3.5 |
|
500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
10 S 13 S 12 S |
(12) 1.5 |
18 S 23 S 18 S |
(20) 2.9 |
22 21 15 |
(19) 3.8 |
4 S 7 S 3 S |
(5) 2.1 |
|
1500 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
11 S 11 S 13 S |
(12) 1.2 |
18 S 20 S 22 S |
(20) 2.0 |
25 S 22 S 17 S |
(21) 4.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
5000 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
6 S 12 S 6 S |
(8) 3.5 |
18 S 18 S 19 S |
(18) 0.6 |
15 S 29 S 25 S |
(23) 7.2 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
|||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
|||||||
1905 1806 1729 |
(1813) 88.2 |
1373 1378 1231 |
(1327) 83.5 |
154 142 168 |
(155) 13.0 |
109 103 102 |
(105) 3.8 |
174 161 188 |
(174) 13.5 |
||
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
94 122 87 |
(101) 18.5# |
8 16 15 |
(13) 4.4 |
16 13 13 |
(14) 1.7 |
40 24 12 |
(25) 14.0 |
10 8 11 |
(10) 1.5 |
|
0.015 µg |
110 123 105 |
(113) 9.3 |
15 10 11 |
(12) 2.6 |
17 13 11 |
(14) 3.1 |
16 19 20 |
(18) 2.1 |
6 9 10 |
(8) 2.1 |
|
0.05 µg |
139 107 90 |
(112) 24.9 |
11 10 9 |
(10) 1.0 |
10 20 14 |
(15) 5.0 |
13 13 12 |
(13) 0.6 |
2 5 10 |
(6) 4.0 |
|
0.15 µg |
91 85 96 |
(91) 5.5 |
12 8 9 |
(10) 2.1 |
16 17 11 |
(15) 3.2 |
30 11 16 |
(19) 9.8 |
7 5 4 |
(5) 1.5 |
|
0.50 µg |
128 108 98 |
(111) 15.3 |
10 11 15 |
(12) 2.6 |
18 22 9 |
(16) 6.7 |
8 14 14 |
(12) 3.5 |
9 12 10 |
(10) 1.5 |
|
1.5 µg |
90 116 106 |
(104) 13.1 |
17 9 10 |
(12) 4.4 |
8 11 14 |
(11) 3.0 |
20 11 32 |
(21) 10.5 |
9 7 9 |
(8) 1.2 |
|
5 µg |
80 S 95 S 68 S |
(81) 13.5 |
5 14 13 |
(11) 4.9 |
10 6 15 |
(10) 4.5 |
33 10 16 |
(20) 11.9 |
2 13 8 |
(8) 5.5 |
|
15 µg |
104 S 43 S 54 S |
(67) 32.5 |
9 S 9 S 6 S |
(8) 1.7 |
18 S 15 S 12 S |
(15) 3.0 |
15 S 29 S 14 S |
(19) 8.4 |
13 S 0 S 2 S |
(5) 7.0 |
|
50 µg |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
8 S 11 S 5 S |
(8) 3.0 |
8 S 21 S 6 S |
(12) 8.1 |
23 S 14 S 12 S |
(16) 5.9 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
|||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
|||||||
495 492 472 |
(486) 12.5 |
1658 1783 1813 |
(1751) 82.2 |
257 245 244 |
(249) 7.2 |
143 157 152 |
(151) 7.1 |
71 103 94 |
(89) 16.5 |
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
N/T Not tested at this dose level
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard deviation
Table 2 : Test Results: Experiment 2 with and without metabolic activation and results of concurrent positive controls
S9-Mix (+) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
105 104 87 |
(99) 10.1# |
14 9 13 |
(12) 2.6 |
23 26 31 |
(27) 4.0 |
19 20 25 |
(21) 3.2 |
12 18 3 |
(11) 7.5 |
||
0.15 µg |
105 113 108 |
(109) 4.0 |
N/T |
|
N/T |
|
N/T |
|
N/T |
|
||
0.5 µg |
118 115 106 |
(113) 6.2 |
7 8 8 |
(8) 0.6 |
24 26 23 |
(24) 1.5 |
22 19 20 |
(20) 1.5 |
11 12 9 |
(11) 1.5 |
||
1.5 µg |
124 120 110 |
(118) 7.2 |
7 7 12 |
(9) 2.9 |
26 28 25 |
(26) 1.5 |
21 19 24 |
(21) 2.5 |
10 15 13 |
(13) 2.5 |
||
5 µg |
108 105 118 |
(110) 6.8 |
12 7 9 |
(9) 2.5 |
18 21 31 |
(23) 6.8 |
21 18 17 |
(19) 2.1 |
12 10 11 |
(11) 1.0 |
||
15 µg |
110 115 119 |
(115) 4.5 |
9 8 6 |
(8) 1.5 |
39 22 21 |
(27) 10.1 |
24 22 20 |
(22) 2.0 |
12 13 16 |
(14) 2.1 |
||
50 µg |
114 105 115 |
(111) 5.5 |
11 10 8 |
(10) 1.5 |
28 18 28 |
(25) 5.8 |
19 17 15 |
(17) 2.0 |
11 14 13 |
(13) 1.5 |
||
150 µg |
113 S 83 S 82 S |
(93) 17.6 |
11 11 13 |
(12) 1.2 |
16 25 14 |
(18) 5.9 |
22 14 19 |
(18) 4.0 |
11 10 12 |
(11) 1.0 |
||
500 µg |
87 S 70 S 56 S |
(71) 15.5 |
13 13 5 |
(10) 4.6 |
10 S 13 S 10 S |
(11) 1.7 |
24 11 14 |
(16) 6.8 |
6 S 2 S 4 S |
(4) 2.0 |
||
1500 µg |
N/T |
|
12 S 14 S 11 S |
(12) 1.5 |
25 S 9 S 11 S |
(15) 8.7 |
15 S 14 S 19 S |
(16) 2.6 |
6 S 2 S 3 S |
(4) 2.1 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix (+) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
1 µg |
2 µg |
10 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
||||||||
1893 1948 2082 |
(1974) 97.2 |
264 323 322 |
(303) 33.8 |
181 199 151 |
(177) 24.2 |
129 132 132 |
(131) 1.7 |
298 303 297 |
(299) 3.2 |
|||
S9-Mix (-) |
Dose Level Per Plate |
Number of revertants (mean) +/- SD |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution strains |
Frameshift strains |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
Solvent Control (DMSO) |
109 109 124 |
(114) 8.7# |
15 17 9 |
(14) 4.2 |
21 18 22 |
(20) 2.1 |
18 17 12 |
(16) 3.2 |
13 4 17 |
(11) 6.7 |
||
0.015 µg |
103 89 92 |
(95) 7.4 |
5 14 9 |
(9) 4.5 |
20 16 20 |
(19) 2.3 |
14 12 20 |
(15) 4.2 |
10 8 7 |
(8) 1.5 |
||
0.05 µg |
119 115 99 |
(111) 10.6 |
10 15 14 |
(13) 2.6 |
24 25 24 |
(24) 0.6 |
18 11 18 |
(16) 4.0 |
7 9 5 |
(7) 2.0 |
||
0.15 µg |
134 111 92 |
(112) 21.0 |
11 15 17 |
(14) 3.1 |
10 21 19 |
(17) 5.9 |
22 21 16 |
(20) 3.2 |
10 6 11 |
(9) 2.6 |
||
0.5 µg |
105 98 101 |
(101) 3.5 |
19 12 11 |
(14) 4.4 |
18 20 24 |
(21) 3.1 |
13 12 18 |
(14) 3.2 |
6 9 14 |
(10) 4.0 |
||
1.5 µg |
125 96 100 |
(107) 15.7 |
14 16 8 |
(13) 4.2 |
22 24 20 |
(22) 2.0 |
16 17 12 |
(15) 2.6 |
9 8 10 |
(9) 1.0 |
||
5 µg |
94 105 71 |
(90) 17.3 |
12 15 14 |
(14) 1.5 |
14 20 21 |
(18) 3.8 |
7 12 18 |
(12) 5.5 |
5 13 4 |
(7) 4.9 |
||
15 µg |
79 S 70 S 67 S |
(72) 6.2 |
17 S 17 S 8 S |
(14) 5.2 |
8 S 13 S 15 S |
(12) 3.6 |
14 S 11 S 6 S |
(10) 4.0 |
5 S 2 S 0 S |
(2) 2.5 |
||
50 µg |
81 S 82 S 106 S |
(90) 14.2 |
8 S 30 S 7 S |
(15) 13.0 |
9 S 11 S 7 S |
(9) 2.0 |
15 S 14 S 8 S |
(12) 3.8 |
10 S 4 S 3 S |
(6) 3.8 |
||
Positive controls S9-Mix (-) |
Name Dose Level No. of Revertants |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
||||||
3 µg |
5 µg |
2 µg |
0.2 µg |
80 µg |
||||||||
1241 1013 935 |
(1063) 159.0 |
2216 2462 1821 |
(2166) 323.4 |
1001 991 809 |
(934) 108.1 |
183 165 216 |
(188) 25.9 |
438 487 476 |
(467) 25.7 |
|||
1. Chromosome Aberration Test – Main Test
The dose levels of the controls and the test item are given below:
4(20)-hour without S9: 0*, 10, 15*, 30*, 60*, 80, 120, 240 μg/mL and MMC 0.4* μg/mL
4(20)-hour with S9: 0*, 10, 15, 30*, 60*, 80*, 120, 240, μg/mL and CP 4* μg/mL
24-hour without S9: 0*, 10, 20, 30, 40*, 50*, 60*, 120 μg/mL and MMC 0.1* μg/mL
where: * = dose levels selected for metaphase analysis ; MMC= Mitomycin C and CP = Cyclophosphamide
The qualitative assessment of the slides determined that the toxicity was similar to that observed in the Cell Growth Inhibition Test and that there were metaphases suitable for scoring present at up 60 and 80 μg/mL of test item in the 4(20)-hour exposure groups and up to 60 µg/mL in the 24-hour continuous exposure group. Precipitate observations were made at the end of exposure in blood-free cultures and was noted at 240 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group dosed in the absence of S9 and at and above 120 μg/mL in the presence of S9 and 24-hour exposure group. Additionally, hemolysis was observed following exposure to the test item at and above 60.6 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of metabolic activation (S9), at and above 30.3 μg/mL in the 4(20)-hour in the presence of S9 and at and above 121.3 μg/mL in the 24-hour continuous exposure group. A reduced cell pellet was observed at and above 80 μg/mL in the short exposure groups 4(20)-hours, only.
The qualitative observations indicated a dose-related inhibition of mitotic index was observed in all exposure groups.In the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of S9, 70% mitotic inhibition was achieved at 60 μg/mL. Below this dose level no inhibition was observed; above it there were no metaphases present. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 60 μg/mL, even though it exceeded the maximum range for optimum toxicity.In the presence of S9, 32%, 23% and 55% mitotic inhibition was achieved at 30, 60 and 80 μg/mL, respectively. Above this dose level, there were no scorable metaphases present. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 80 μg/mL because this dose level achieved optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 test guideline (55±5%). In the 24-hour continuous exposure group, an inhibition of mitotic index of 40% and 58% was noted at 50 and 60 μg/mL, respectively. The maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was, therefore, 60 μg/mL because this dose level achieved optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 test guideline (55±5%).
- All of the vehicle control cultures had frequencies of cells with chromosome aberrations within the expected range.
- The positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
- The test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations either in the absence or presence of metabolic activation.
- The test item did not induce a statistically significant increase in the numbers of polyploid cells at any dose level in any of the exposure groups. There were several indications of endoreduplication noted, each isolated within each exposure group. The applicant confirms: endoreduplicated cell incidences were not replicated in the duplicate cultures at any dose-level.
2. Discussion:
- In the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the absence of S9, 70% mitotic inhibition was achieved at 60 μg/mL. Below this dose level no inhibition was observed; above it there were no metaphases present. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 60 μg/mL, even though it exceeded the maximum range for optimum toxicity.Below this dose level (30%) no inhibition was observed but above it (80 μg/mL) there were no metaphases present. Despite this, the test item did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, even though the dose level selected could be considered excessively toxic. The hemolysis and reduced pellet observations for this exposure group support that the lymphocytes were at or near to maximum exposure of the test item.
- In the 4(20)-hour exposure group in the presence of S9, 32%, 23% and 55% mitotic inhibition was achieved at 30, 60 and 80 μg/mL, respectively. Above this dose level, there were no scorable metaphases present. Therefore, the maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was 80 μg/mL because this dose level achieved optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 test guideline (55±5%). The hemolysis and reduced pellet observations for this exposure group support that the lymphocytes were at or near to maximum exposure of the test item.
- In the 24-hour exposure group an inhibition of mitotic index of 40% and 58% was noted at 50 and 60 μg/mL, respectively. The maximum dose level selected for metaphase analysis was, therefore, 60 μg/mL because this dose level achieved optimum toxicity as defined by the OECD 473 test guideline (55±5%).
- Optimum toxicity or greater than optimum toxicity was achieved in the cultures in the absence of S9 and presence of S9. Under the conditions of the study, the test item was considered to have been adequately tested as the test item was tested up to cytotoxic conditions and scored at dose levels within or above, excessive cytotoxicity. No significant increases in chromosome aberrations was observed at any dose level or exposure group tested.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Key study : OECD TG 471, 2018 : The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item using the Ames pre incubation method at up to eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate. Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (all TA-strains) dosed in the absence of S9-mix employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Eight test item dose levels were again selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve a minimum of four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and ranged between 0.015 and 5000 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or the toxic limit of the test item depending on the strain type and presence of S9-mix.The test item caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the Salmonella strains dosed in the absence of S9-mix from 15 μg/plate. In the presence S9-mix, weakened bacterial background lawns were noted for all of the Salmonella strains initially from 150 μg/plate. No toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA at any test item dose level in either the absence or presence S9-mix. In Experiment 2, both the maximum dose level (5000 μg/plate) or the toxic limit was employed as the maximum concentration in the second mutation test, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The test item induced an identical toxic response to the first experiment with weakened bacterial background lawns noted from 15 μg/plate to all Salmonella strains dosed in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Again, no toxicity was noted to Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA at any test item dose level. No precipitates were observed at any dose level in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. There were no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9‑mix). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Key study : OECD TG 471, 2020 : The study was performed to the requirements of OECD Guideline 471, EU Method B13/14, US EPA OCSPP 870.5100 and Japanese guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing under GLP, to evaluate the potential mutagenicity of the test item in a bacterial reverse mutation assay using S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in both the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The test strains were treated with the test item using the Ames pre incubation method at eight dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for Experiment 1 was predetermined and was 1.5 to 5000 µg/plate. Part of the first mutation test was repeated due to excessive toxicity (all TA-strains) dosed in the absence of S9-mix employing an amended test item dose range of 0.015 to 50 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test item formulations. Eight test item dose levels were again selected in Experiment 2 in order to achieve a minimum of four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test item. The dose range was amended following the results of Experiment 1 and ranged between 0.015 and 1500 µg/plate, depending on bacterial strain type and presence or absence of S9-mix. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The maximum dose level of the test item in the first experiment was selected as the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 μg/plate or the toxic limit of the test item depending on the strain type and presence of S9-mix. In the first mutation test, the test item induced a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn of all of the tester strains, initially from 5 and 150 µg/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 mix), respectively. Based on the results of Experiment 1, the toxic limit of the test item was selected as the maximum dose concentration in the second mutation test (pre-incubation method). The test item once again induced a toxic response with a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns noted to all of the tester strains, initially from 15 and 150 µg/plate in the absence and presence of metabolic activation (S9 mix), respectively. There were no biologically relevant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 1. One statistically significant value was noted (TA100 at 15 µg/plate in the presence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), however as the maximum fold increase was only 1.1 times the concurrent vehicle control and the mean colony count was within the in-house historical vehicle/untreated control range for the strain the response was considered of no biological relevance. Similarly, no significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation (S9-mix) in Experiment 2 (pre incubation method). It was concluded that, under the conditions of this assay, the test item gave a negative, i.e. non-mutagenic response in S.typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- in the presence and absence of S-9 mix.
Key study : OECD TG 473, 2018 : The study was performed to the requirements of OECD TG 473 and Japan METI guidelines under GLP conditions to assess the potential chromosomal mutagenicity of the test item, on the metaphase chromosomes of normal human lymphocyte cultured mammalian cells. Duplicate cultures of human lymphocytes, treated with the test item, were evaluated for chromosome aberrations at three dose levels, together with vehicle and positive controls. In this study, three exposure conditions were investigated; a 4-hour exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2% final concentration with cell harvest after a 20-hour expression period, 4-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9) with a 20-hour expression period and a 24-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation. The dose levels used in the Main Experiment were selected using data from the Preliminary Toxicity Test (Cell Growth Inhibition Test) between 7.6 to 1940 μg/mL where the results indicated that the maximum concentration should be limited on precipitation and toxicity for all exposure groups for dose selection. Precipitation and toxicity closely coincided. The dose levels selected for the Main Test were as follows: 4(20)-hour with and without S9-Mix (2%) : 0, 10, 15, 30, 60, 80, 120, 240 μg/mL and 24-hour continuous exposure without S9: 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 120 μg/mL. All vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) controls had frequencies of cells with aberrations within the range expected for normal human lymphocytes. All the positive control items induced statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations indicating that the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9 mix were validated. The test item was toxic to human lymphocytes and but did not induce any statistically significant increases in the frequency of cells with aberrations, using a dose range that included a dose level that either induced or exceeded 55±5% mitotic inhibition. Under the conditions of this study, the test item was considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The substance does not meet classification criteria under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 for mutagenicity
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
