Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method)
Version / remarks:
KeratinoSens method
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
activation of keratinocytes
Justification for non-LLNA method:
In-vitro test

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
2-Propenenitrile, polymer with 1,2-ethanediamine
EC Number:
608-174-5
Cas Number:
28183-82-6
IUPAC Name:
2-Propenenitrile, polymer with 1,2-ethanediamine
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
Named in some reports as 2-propenenitrile, polymer with 1,2-ethanediamine
Dried material, described as viscous liquid, is used for some tests.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Dried matrial with > 90% actives described as viscous liquid

In vitro test system

Details on the study design:
Concentrations tested : 400, 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.125, 1.563, 0.781, 0.391, 0.195 mg/l expressed as water-free material using DMSO as a vehicle
Negative control : DMSO
Positive control : Cinnamic aldehyde
Three repetitions (runs) were performed. Each repetition consisted of 3 x 96-well plates for luminescence

Results and discussion

In vitro / in chemico

Resultsopen allclose all
Run / experiment:
other: 1
Parameter:
other: Viability %
Value:
71
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Run / experiment:
other: 2
Parameter:
other: Viability %
Value:
63
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Run / experiment:
other: 3
Parameter:
other: Viability %
Value:
74
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
Cell viability was not reduced below 50%

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Classified as Negative using the KeratinoSens prediction model.