Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to microorganisms

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
05 - 13 Oct 1998
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Remarks:
GLP study similar to guideline study with acceptable restrictions: The test substance is tested using only one replicate for each test concentration. No analytics of the test substance is performed.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1998

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Amtsblatt der EG L 133, Teil C: Biologische Abbaubarkeit: Prüfung der Atmungshemmung
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
The incubation period was 3 h instead of 30 minutes under continuous aeration (this was recommended by the German federal Environmental Agency
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Dibutyl adipate
EC Number:
203-350-4
EC Name:
Dibutyl adipate
Cas Number:
105-99-7
Molecular formula:
C14H26O4
IUPAC Name:
1,6-dibutyl hexanedioate
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Adipinsäure-di-n-butylester
- Analytical purity: 99.6%
- Lot/batch No.: 2380422B

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
no

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: The test substance was directly added to the test vessel and stirred overnight.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
Details on inoculum:
- Laboratory culture: Activated sludge collected from water treatment plant predominantly processing municipal waste water; Wupperverband, Germany; date of collection: 12 Oct 1998
- Pretreatment: none
- Initial biomass concentration: 480 mg/L

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
3 h

Test conditions

Test temperature:
20 ± 2 °C
pH:
7.4 - 8.2
Dissolved oxygen:
5.8 - 8.6 mg/L at test start
2.5 - 8.0 mg/L at test end
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal: 1000, 1800, 3200, 5600 and 10000 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Aeration: continuously
- No. of vessels per concentration: 1
- No. of vessels per control: 2

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: deionized water
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Oyxygen concentration was measured at the beginning and at the end of the test. Temperature and pH was measured once per test concentration after 6-8 minutes.

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Inhibition of respiration was recorded after 3 h test duration.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
3,5-Dichlorphenol

Results and discussion

Effect concentrations
Duration:
3 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
> 10 000 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
inhibition of total respiration
Remarks:
respiration rate
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? yes
- Relevant effect levels: EC50 = 12 mg/L; EC10 = 2.9 mg/L

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Test results

Nominal concentration [mg/L]

Respiration rate [mg/L*h]

Abiotic loss of oxygen [mg/L*h]

Inhibition [%]

1000

27.8

0.0*

0.0

1800

27.4

0.0*

0.0

3200

25.5

0.0*

6.3

5600

29.1

0.0*

0.0

10000

28.0

0.0

0.0

Control 1

27.0

 

Control 2

27.4

 

*: The abiotic oxygen loss was measured in the 10000 mg/L treatment. As no loss of oxygen was observed, it was assessed that also no loss occurred at the lower test concentrations.

Applicant's summary and conclusion