Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 808-234-2 | CAS number: 1211443-61-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 21 Feb - 21 Feb 2014
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Remarks:
- no dose-response relationship; EC10/NOEC could not be determined
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
- Version / remarks:
- 2010
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-chloro-7-cyclopentyl-N,N-dimethyl-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxamide
- Cas Number:
- 1211443-61-6
- Molecular formula:
- C14 H17 Cl N4 O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-chloro-7-cyclopentyl-N,N-dimethyl-7H-pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxamide
Constituent 1
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
Test solutions
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: The test substance was not completely soluble in test medium at the loading rates initially prepared. Therefore, 1-Litre test bottles were filled with 200 ml of test substance mixtures in Milli-RO water (tap-water purified by reverse osmosis; Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass., USA) with initial loading rates of 2.5 times the final loading rate. These mixtures were stirred in closed dark brown bottles for approximately 24 hours. Subsequently, 16 ml synthetic medium (= sewage feed), 250 ml sludge and Milli-RO water up to 500 ml were added resulting in the required loading rates. Optimal contact between the test substance and test organisms was ensured applying continuous aeration and stirring.
- Eluate: no
- Differential loading: yes
- Controls: blank control, reference control, nitrification control, abiotic control prepared with synthetic medium (sewage feed) according to OECD guideline 209
- Evidence of undissolved material: not reported
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- - Name and location of sewage treatment plant where inoculum was collected:
Municipal sewage treatment plant: 'Waterschap Aa en Maas', 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, receiving predominantly domestic sewage.
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: The sludge was coarsely sieved (1 mm), washed and diluted with ISO-medium. A small amount of the sludge was weighed and dried overnight at ca. 105°C to determine the amount of suspended solids (3.0 g/L of sludge, as used for the test). The pH was 7.7 on the day of testing. The batch of sludge was used one day after collection; therefore 50 mL of synthetic medium (= sewage feed) was added per litre of activated sludge at the end of the collection day. The sludge was kept aerated at test temperature until use.
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 20.9 - 22.7
- pH:
- 7.4 - 8.1
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal loading rates: Control, 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: All glass 1 L open bottles/vessels with 500 mL fill volume
- Aeration: Clean, oil-free air. The aeration was adjusted in such a way that the dissolved oxygen concentration at the start was above 60-70% saturation (60% of air saturation is > 5 mg/l at 20°C) and to maintain the sludge flocs in suspension.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 1 each for 10 and 100 mg/L loading rates; 3 for 1000 mg/L loading rate
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per abiotic control (replicates): 1
- No. of vessels per nitrification control (replicates): 2
- Sludge concentration (weight of dry solids per volume): 1.5 g/L
- Nitrification inhibitor used: A 2.32 g/l solution of N-allylthiourea (ATU, Merck Schuchardt OHG, Hohenbrunn, Germany) was prepared. 2.5 ml of this solution was added to 500 ml final test medium (final ATU concentration: 11.6 mg/l).
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: Synthetic medium (sewage feed) according to OECD guideline 209
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Details on termination of incubation: After the 3-hour contact time, the oxygen consumption was recorded for a period of 10 to 15 minutes. During measurement, the sample was not aerated but continuously stirred on a magnetic stirrer. The pH and temperature were determined in the remaining part of the reaction mixture. This procedure was repeated for all test/reference substance concentrations/loading rates and controls.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: Determination of oxygen was performed with oxygen probes connected to a BlueBox (GO-Systemelektronik GmbH, Germany), a multichannel measuring and controlling system.
- Other: The medium temperature was recorded continuously in temperature control vessels. The temperature control vessels were identically prepared compared to the control vessels. A temperature control vessel with a REES (temperature) sensor was placed in each fume cupboard of the climate room.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Range finding study : Loading rates of 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L. Controls: blank control, nitrification control, abiotic control, nitrification inhibitor (only at the highest loading rate). Responses were compared to the blank and nitrification controls.
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Definitive test was designed based on the results of the range finding study. However no evaluation of the results of the range finding study is reported. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 3,5-Dichlorophenol
Results and discussion
Effect concentrations
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Details on results:
- The respiration rates of 10 and 100 mg/L were considered less reliable because the oxygen decrease was not consistent. No explanation could be given for this finding. The inhibition observed at 1000 mg/l was statistically significant (average value 43%). There was no oxygen uptake from abiotic processes and the result at 1000 mg/L with a nitrification inhibitor showed that the heterotrophic inhibition of the respiration rate was comparable to the total inhibition. Based on the results of the total and heterotrophic respiration, nitrification inhibition was calculated to be 44%. A NOEC value could not be determined.
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? yes
- Relevant effect levels: EC50 (3 h) = 5.6 mg/L - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Calculation of EC50 values was based on probit analysis using linear max. likelihood regression with the percentages of respiration inhibition versus the logarithms of the corresponding concentrations of the test substance.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Study results
Flask |
Concentration/Loading rate (mg/L) |
pH before addition of sludge |
pH after 3 h contact time |
Respiration rate (mg O2/L per h |
Respiration rate (mg O2/g per h (1), (A) |
% Inhibition respiration relative to the blank control (mean value) |
C1 |
0 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
63 |
42 |
|
C2 |
0 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
55 |
37 |
|
C3 |
0 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
58 |
39 |
|
C4 |
0 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
65 |
43 |
|
C5 |
0 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
60 |
40 |
|
C6 |
0 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
58 |
39 |
|
C Mean |
|
|
|
60 (=RTB) |
40 |
|
SD |
|
|
|
4 |
2 |
|
CV (%) |
|
|
|
6 |
6 |
|
|
||||||
CN1 |
0 |
7.5 |
8.0 |
35 |
23 |
42 |
CN2 |
0 |
7.5 |
8.1 |
28 |
19 |
53 |
CN Mean |
|
|
|
32 (=RHB) |
21 |
|
|
||||||
R1 |
2.0 |
7.5 |
7.9 |
44 |
29 |
26 |
R2 |
5 |
7.5 |
7.9 |
34 |
23 |
43 |
R3 |
12 |
7.5 |
8.1 |
17 |
11 |
72 |
|
||||||
T1 |
10 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
107 |
71 |
-79# |
T2 |
100 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
65 |
43 |
-9# |
T3a |
1000 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
40 |
27 |
33* |
T3b |
1000 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
34 |
23 |
43* |
T3c |
1000 |
7.4 |
7.7 |
29 |
19 |
52 |
T3 Mean |
|
|
|
34 (=RT) |
23 |
43 (=IT) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1000 |
7.5 |
8.0 |
21 |
14 |
33 |
|
1000 |
7.5 |
8.1 |
17 |
11 |
46 |
|
1000 |
7.5 |
8.1 |
17 |
11 |
46 |
TN Mean |
|
|
|
18 (=RH) |
12 |
42 (=IH)(2) |
|
||||||
TA |
1000 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
0 |
0 |
100 |
C: Blank control
CN: Nitrification control
R: Reference substance, 3,5-dichlorophenol
SD: Standard deviation
CV: Coefficient of variation
(A) The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/l.
T: Test substance
TA: Abiotic control of test substance.
TN: Test substance with N-allylthiourea.
(1) The amount of suspended solids in the final test mixture was 1.5 g/l.
(2) Relative to CN
* Statistically significant different compared to C (Student-t test for Homogeneous Variances: α=0.05)
# Unreliable value: The respiration rates of 10 and 100 mg/l were considered less reliable because the oxygen decrease was not consistent. No explanation could be given for this finding.
Table 2: Validity criteria
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The blank controls (without the test substance or reference substance) oxygen uptake rate should not be less than 20 mg oxygen per one gram of activated sludge (dry weight of suspended solids) in an hour. |
40 mg O2 per g of activated sludge in 1 h |
yes |
The coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake rate in control replicates should not be more than 30% at the end of definitive test. |
< 30% |
yes |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.
- Conclusions:
- The EC50 (3 h) of the substance is > 1000 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.