Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-368-9 | CAS number: 328-90-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Hydrolysis
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- hydrolysis
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From March 27th, 2019 to May 29th, 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
- Version / remarks:
- 2004
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 835.2130 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH and Temperature)
- Version / remarks:
- 1998
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Radiolabelling:
- no
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Sampling intervals for the parent/transformation products: at the start and at the end of the study (days 0 and 5).
- Sampling method: a duplicate sample of each pH was taken immediately after the addition of the test item on Day 0 and after day 5 of incubation.
- Sampling intervals/times for pH measurements: at the start and at the end of the study (days 0 and 5).
- Sampling intervals/times for sterility check: at the start and at the end of the study (days 0 and 5).
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: none, samples were analysed immediately after sampling.
- Other observation, if any (e.g.: precipitation, color change etc.): no. - Buffers:
- - pH: 4.0, 7.0, 9.0.
- Preparation of buffer solutions: Buffer Solution of pH 4.0: An aliquot of 410 mL of 0.2 M acetic acid solution and 90 mL of 0.2 M anhydrous sodium acetate solution were transferred into a 2000 mL volumetric flask and the volume was made up to the mark using Milli-Q water. The pH of the resulting buffer solution measured was found to be 4.1. The pH was adjusted to 4.00 by using 1.0 mL of 0.1% acetic acid solution. The final pH of the resulting buffer solution measured was found to be 4.00. Buffer Solution of pH 7.0: An aliquot of 195 mL of 0.2 M monobasic sodium phosphate solution and 305 mL of 0.2 M dibasic sodium phosphate solution was transferred into a 2000 mL volumetric flask and the volume was made up to the mark using Milli-Q water. The pH of the resulting buffer solution measured was found to be 6.9. The pH was adjusted to 7.00 by using 0.6 mL of 0.1 N sodium hydroxide solution. The final pH of the resulting buffer solution measured was found to be 7.00. Buffer Solution of pH 9.0: An aliquot of 1000 mL of 0.1 M boric acid solution was transferred into a 2000 mL volumetric flask and the volume was made up to the mark using Milli-Q water. The pH of the resulting solution measured was found to be 8.8. The pH was adjusted to 9.00 by using 1.0 mL of 50% w/v NaOH solution. The final pH of the resulting buffer solution measured was found to be 9.00. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Type, material and volume of test flasks, other equipment used: 200 mL volumetric flask glassware.
- Sterilisation method: filtration
- Lighting: no
- Measures taken to avoid photolytic effects: the test was carried out in darkness
- Measures to exclude oxygen: samples were sonicated for about 5 min
- Is there any indication of the test material adsorbing to the walls of the test apparatus? no
TEST MEDIUM
- Kind and purity of water: Milli-Q water
- Preparation of test medium: The prepared buffer solutions were sterilized by passing through a 0.2 µm sterilized filter and oxygen in the solutions was removed by sonication for about 5 minutes.
- Identity and concentration of co-solvent: acetonitrile, less than 1% of the final volume - Duration:
- 5 d
- pH:
- 4
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Initial conc. measured:
- 17.31 mg/L
- Duration:
- 5 d
- pH:
- 7
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Initial conc. measured:
- 17.47 mg/L
- Duration:
- 5 d
- pH:
- 9
- Temp.:
- 50 °C
- Initial conc. measured:
- 17.47 mg/L
- Number of replicates:
- 2
- Positive controls:
- no
- Negative controls:
- yes
- Preliminary study:
- The preliminary tests were performed in a dark incubator at 50 ± 0.5°C at three pH values: 4.0; 7.0 and 9.0, during 5 days. The analysis of pH 4.0 buffer solution on Day 5 showed 4.51% hydrolysis, The analysis of pH 7.0 buffer solution on Day 5 showed 1.66% hydrolysis, and the analysis of pH 9.0 buffer solution on Day 5 showed 4.92% hydrolysis. The results obtained clearly indicated that the test item is hydrolytically stable at pH 4.0, pH 7.0 and pH 9.0 buffer solutions under test conditions.
- Transformation products:
- not measured
- Remarks on result:
- hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
- Key result
- Remarks on result:
- hydrolytically stable based on preliminary test
- Details on results:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- pH, sterility, temperature, and other experimental conditions maintained throughout the study: Yes - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- As less than 10 per cent of hydrolysis is observed after 5 days (t½ > 1 year), the test substance was considered hydrolytically stable.
- Executive summary:
An hydrolysis study was conducted on the test item, according to OECD TG 111 and EPA OPPTS 835.2130 (Hydrolysis as a function of pH), under GLP conditions. Since the hydrolytic behaviour of the test substance was unknown, a preliminary (Tier 1) test was conducted. Test item sample solutions at pH 4.0, 7.0 and 9.0 were prepared in duplicate in PBS buffer, sterilized by filtering with a 0.2 µm filter and sonicated to remove oxygen. These were kept for 5 days at 50 ± 0.5ºC, protected from light. pH values and sterility were measured at the start and at the end of the test, as well as the test item concentration, which was determined by means of a HPLC-UV method validated according to SANCO/3029/99 rev.4. All validity criteria were met. The analytical measurements at the end of the test showed 4.51, 1.66 and 4.92% hydrolisis under test conditions at pH 4.0, 7.0 and 9.0, respectively. As less than 10 per cent of hydrolysis is observed after 5 days (t½ > 1 year), the test substance was considered hydrolytically stable (no further testing is required).
Reference
Table 2. Summary of test results.
Sample Code |
Mean Initial Day Test item Content (mg/L) |
Mean Day 5 Test item Content (mg/L) |
Degradation (%) |
Sample pH 4 |
17.31 |
16.53 |
4.51 |
Sample pH 7 |
17.47 |
17.18 |
1.66 |
Sample pH 9 |
17.47 |
16.61 |
4.92 |
Table 3. Test item concentrations at the start of the test (day 0).
Sample Code |
Sample Peak Area (Volts) |
Standard Peak Area |
Mean Standard Peak Area |
Standard Conc. (mg/L) |
Dilution Factor |
TFMSA Content (mg/L) |
Mean TFMSA Content Obtained |
Control pH 4 |
BLOQ |
1885003 |
1872638 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Sample pH 4 R1 Rep 1 |
1610406 |
1892496 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.24 |
17.31 |
|
Sample pH 4 R1 Rep 2 |
1621242 |
1870062 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.36 |
||
Sample pH 4 R2 Rep 1 |
1615618 |
1862949 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.30 |
||
Sample pH 4 R2 Rep 2 |
1619189 |
1852678 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.34 |
||
Control pH 7 |
BLOQ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Sample pH 7 R1 Rep 1 |
1610173 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.24 |
17.47 |
||
Sample pH 7 R1 Rep 2 |
1610090 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.24 |
|||
Sample pH 7 R2 Rep 1 |
1667587 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.85 |
|||
Sample pH 7 R2 Rep 2 |
1638879 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.55 |
|||
Control pH 9 |
BLOQ |
- |
- |
- |
|||
Sample pH 9 R1 Rep 1 |
1647640 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.64 |
17.47 |
||
Sample pH 9 R1 Rep 2 |
1644194 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.60 |
|||
Sample pH 9 R2 Rep 1 |
1615753 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.30 |
|||
Sample pH 9 R2 Rep 2 |
1620021 |
4.01 |
5.0 |
17.35 |
Table 4. Test item concentrations at the end of the test.
Sample Code |
Sample Peak Area (Volts) |
Standard Peak Area |
Mean Standard Peak Area |
Standard Conc. (mg/L) |
Dilution Factor |
TFMSA Content (mg/L) |
Mean TFMSA Content Obtained |
Control pH 4 |
BLOQ |
834899 |
838346 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Sample pH 4 R1 Rep 1 |
1594450 |
842545 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.93 |
16.53 |
|
Sample pH 4 R1 Rep 2 |
1591443 |
836197 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.89 |
||
Sample pH 4 R2 Rep 1 |
1522596 |
838152 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.16 |
||
Sample pH 4 R2 Rep 2 |
1520222 |
839939 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.14 |
||
Control pH 7 |
BLOQ |
- |
- |
- |
- |
||
Sample pH 7 R1 Rep 1 |
1660610 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
17.63 |
17.18 |
||
Sample pH 7 R1 Rep 2 |
1642394 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
17.44 |
|||
Sample pH 7 R2 Rep 1 |
1595217 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.94 |
|||
Sample pH 7 R2 Rep 2 |
1573390 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.70 |
|||
Control pH 9 |
BLOQ |
- |
- |
- |
|||
Sample pH 9 R1 Rep 1 |
1556912 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.53 |
16.61 |
||
Sample pH 9 R1 Rep 2 |
1580429 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.78 |
|||
Sample pH 9 R2 Rep 1 |
1560602 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.57 |
|||
Sample pH 9 R2 Rep 2 |
1560805 |
1.78 |
5.0 |
16.57 |
Description of key information
Key study. Method according to OECD TG 111 / EPA OPPTS 835.2130, GLP study. The analytical measurements at the end of the test showed 4.51, 1.66 and 4.92% hydrolisis under test conditions at pH 4.0, 7.0 and 9.0, respectively. As less than 10 per cent of hydrolysis is observed after 5 days (t½ > 1 year), the test substance was considered hydrolytically stable.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.