Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-368-9 | CAS number: 328-90-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin irritation / corrosion
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- December 12, 2017 - December 16, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid
- EC Number:
- 700-368-9
- Cas Number:
- 328-90-5
- Molecular formula:
- C8H5F3O3
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzoic acid
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- Beige to brownish solid
Constituent 1
In vitro test system
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Remarks:
- SkinEthicTM RHE
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- foreskin from multiple donors
- Justification for test system used:
- The human skin model, epidermis has been validated for corrosion testing and it can be use for skin corrosion test accordiing the OECD guideline 431.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: SkinEthicTM RHE model
- Tissue batch number(s): 17-RHE-127
- Delivery date: 12/12/2017
- Date of initiation of testing: 12/12/2017
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37±1 °C for 60 minute exposure and room temperature for 3 minute exposure.
REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
-Volume and number of washing steps: 20 times in constant soft stream of 1 mL DPBS
- Observable damage in the tissue due to washing: No
MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 300 uL of 1.00 mg/mL
- Incubation time: 180 min.
- Spectrophotometer: absorbance microplate reader
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: no
FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: Specification O.D. >0.7, Results: O.D.=1.1
- Barrier function: Using TRITON X-100 1%. Specification: 4.0 h<=ET50>=10.0 h. Results:4.5 h
- Morphology: Specification: number of cell layers >=4. Results: 6 cell layers (absence of significant histological abnormalities)
- Contamination: No
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3
CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE:
- Freeze killed tissues (for positive control)-Non-specific MTT reduction calculation (NSMTT)
- Procedure used to prepare the killed tissues (if applicable): Killed tissues were prepared by incubating the viable tissues at -20 ± 5°C for 48 hours.
- N. of replicates: 2
- Method of calculation used: The true tissue viability is calculated as the percent tissue viability obtained with living tissues exposed to the positive minus the percent non-specific MTT reduction obtained with the killed tissues exposed to the same, calculated relative to the negative control run concurrently (%NSMTT). NSMTT was < 0% relative to the negative control, hence true MTT metabolic conversion of treated tissue was not determined.
- Live tissues (negative control and test item): Non-specific Color (NSC)
- N. of replicates : 2
- Method of calculation used: The true tissue viability is calculated as the percent tissue viability obtained with living tissues exposed to the interfering test chemical and incubated with MTT solutions minus the percent non specific color obtained with living tissues exposed to the interfering test chemical and incubated with medium without MTT.For positive control test item, %NSC was between 0 to 0.1 % relative to the negative control, hence TOD and relative viability calculation was not determined.
NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: 1
PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA
If the viability after 3 minutes exposure is strictly less than 50% or greater or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 hour exposure is strictly less than 15 %, test item has to be classified as CORROSIVE.
If the viability after 3 minutes exposure is greater than or equal to 50% and the viability after 1 hour exposure is greater than or equal to 15 %, test item has to be classified as NON-CORROSIVE. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 20 mg ± 3 mg of test item/0.5 cm2
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 40 µL/0.5 cm2 of sterile distilled water
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 40 µL/0.5 cm2 of 8N KOH - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 exposure periods: 30 and 60 minutes
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 3 hours (incubation in MTT solution)
- Number of replicates:
- 3
Results and discussion
In vitro
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 3 minute exposure
- Value:
- ca. 99.3
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 60 minute exposure
- Value:
- ca. 80.7
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- - OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: No
- Direct-MTT reduction: For adapted positive control treated tissues, NSMTT was < 0% relative to the negative control, therefore true MTT metabolic conversion of treated tissue is not determined.
- Colour interference with MTT: For adapted controls to correct colour interference due to test item, treated tissues were exposed for period of 3 minute at room temperature and 60 minutes at 37±1 °C and 5±1% CO2 in a 95% humidified incubator. %NSC was between 0 to 0.1% relative to the negative control, hence TOD and relative viability calculation were not determined.
DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: Yes. It was performed.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Criteria: 0.8>=OD<=3.0. Results:2.271-2.404. Criteria met.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Cell viability should be less than 15% according the guideline. The results: Cell viability =5.31%. Criteria met.
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: The viability should not exceed 30% between tissue replicates. Viability was less than 1.46%.Criteria met.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Pre-Tests
Color Interference Test
Treatment |
Optical Density (nm) |
Interaction |
Negative Control (Isopropanol) |
0.043 |
No |
0.049 |
||
4-Trifluoromethylsalicylic Acid (ATFMS) |
0.257 |
Yes |
0.261 |
Direct MTT Reduction Test
Treatment |
Interaction |
Negative Control (Maintenance medium) |
No |
4-Trifluoromethylsalicylic Acid (ATFMS) |
No |
Mean percent viability of the 4-trifluoromethylsalicylic acid (ATFMS)
Treatment |
Viability |
|
3 Minutes Exposure |
60 Minutes Exposure |
|
Negative control (Sterile distilled water) |
100% |
100% |
4-Trifluoromethylsalicylic Acid (ATFMS) |
99.3% |
80.7% |
Positive control (8N KOH) |
- |
5.31% |
Individual results (positive and negative control)
Treatment |
Exposure Time |
Tissue Replicate |
O.D. |
Corrected O.D. |
Mean of Corrected O.D. |
Mean O.D. of Replicate tissues |
% Viability/ Tissue |
Mean % Viability |
S.D. of % Viability |
% C.V. of % Viability |
Corrosivity Class |
Negative Control (Sterile Distilled water) |
3 Minutes |
1 |
2.352 |
2.309 |
2.294 |
2.328 |
100 |
100 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
2.331 |
2.288 |
||||||||||
2.328 |
2.285 |
||||||||||
2 |
2.411 |
2.368 |
2.353 |
||||||||
2.434 |
2.391 |
||||||||||
2.343 |
2.3 |
||||||||||
3 |
2.329 |
2.286 |
2.336 |
||||||||
2.433 |
2.39 |
||||||||||
2.374 |
2.331 |
||||||||||
60 Minutes |
1 |
2.408 |
2.365 |
2.306 |
2.324 |
100 |
100 |
NA |
NA |
||
2.324 |
2.281 |
||||||||||
2.314 |
2.271 |
||||||||||
2 |
2.335 |
2.292 |
2.299 |
||||||||
2.332 |
2.289 |
||||||||||
2.360 |
2.317 |
||||||||||
3 |
2.447 |
2.404 |
2.368 |
||||||||
2.342 |
2.299 |
||||||||||
2.444 |
2.401 |
||||||||||
Positive Control (8N KOH) |
60 Minutes |
1 |
0.172 |
0.129 |
0.125 |
0.123 |
5.38 |
5.31 |
0.07 |
1.32 |
Corrosive |
0.165 |
0.122 |
||||||||||
0.166 |
0.123 |
||||||||||
2 |
0.172 |
0.129 |
0.123 |
5.29 |
|||||||
0.167 |
0.124 |
||||||||||
0.160 |
0.117 |
||||||||||
3 |
0.150 |
0.107 |
0.122 |
5.25 |
|||||||
0.179 |
0.136 |
||||||||||
0.167 |
0.124 |
Individual results (test item)
Treatment |
Exposure Time |
Tissue Replicate |
O.D. |
Corrected O.D. |
Mean of Corrected O.D. |
Mean O.D. of Replicate tissues |
% Viability/ Tissue |
Mean % Viability |
S.D. of % Viability |
% C.V. of % Viability |
Corrosivity Class |
4-Trifluoromethylsalicylic acid (ATFMS) |
3 Minutes |
1 |
2.453 |
2.411 |
2.343 |
2.312 |
100.6 |
99.3 |
1.15 |
1.16 |
Non-corrosive |
2.356 |
2.314 |
||||||||||
2.347 |
2.305 |
||||||||||
2 |
2.332 |
2.29 |
2.290 |
98.4 |
|||||||
2.345 |
2.303 |
||||||||||
2.318 |
2.276 |
||||||||||
3 |
2.324 |
2.282 |
2.303 |
98.9 |
|||||||
2.351 |
2.309 |
||||||||||
2.36 |
2.318 |
||||||||||
60 Minutes |
1 |
1.923 |
1.881 |
1.908 |
1.877 |
82.1 |
80.7 |
1.18 |
1.46 |
||
1.98 |
1.938 |
||||||||||
1.948 |
1.906 |
||||||||||
2 |
1.899 |
1.857 |
1.862 |
80.1 |
|||||||
1.895 |
1.853 |
||||||||||
1.918 |
1.876 |
||||||||||
3 |
1.882 |
1.84 |
1.86 |
80 |
|||||||
1.901 |
1.859 |
||||||||||
1.922 |
1.88 |
Adapted Control forNon-Specific MTT Reduction (NSMTT)
Treatment |
Exposure Time |
Tissue Replicate |
O.D. |
Corrected O.D. |
Mean of Corrected O.D. |
Mean OD of Replicate tissues |
% NSMTT |
Mean % NSMTT |
TODTT |
% Relative Viability |
Negative Control (Untreated killed tissues) |
60 minutes |
1 |
0.17 |
0.128 |
0.127 |
0.129 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.17 |
0.128 |
|||||||||
0.168 |
0.126 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.175 |
0.133 |
0.13 |
|||||||
0.168 |
0.126 |
|||||||||
0.172 |
0.13 |
|||||||||
Positive Control (Positive control treated killed tissues) |
60 minutes |
1 |
0.046 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
-5.3 |
-5.4 |
NA |
NA |
0.047 |
0.005 |
|||||||||
0.047 |
0.005 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.046 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
-5.4 |
||||||
0.045 |
0.003 |
|||||||||
0.046 |
0.004 |
Adapted Control for Non-Specific Color (NSC)
Treatment |
Exposure Time |
Tissue Replicate |
O.D. |
Corrected O.D. |
Mean of Corrected O.D. |
Mean OD of Replicate tissues |
% NSC |
Mean % NSC |
TODCT |
% Relative Viability |
Negative Control
|
3 minutes |
1 |
0.043 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.044 |
0.002 |
|||||||||
0.042 |
0 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.043 |
0.001 |
0.000 |
|||||||
0.041 |
-0.001 |
|||||||||
0.042 |
0 |
|||||||||
Negative Control
|
60 minutes |
1 |
0.042 |
0 |
0.000 |
0.001 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.043 |
0.001 |
|||||||||
0.041 |
-0.001 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.043 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
|||||||
0.042 |
0 |
|||||||||
0.043 |
0.001 |
|||||||||
4-Trifluoromethylsalicylic acid (ATFMS) |
3 minutes |
1 |
0.046 |
0.004 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
NA |
NA |
0.045 |
0.003 |
|||||||||
0.045 |
0.003 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.045 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
0.0 |
||||||
0.044 |
0.002 |
|||||||||
0.044 |
0.002 |
|||||||||
4-Trifluoromethylsalicylic acid (ATFMS) |
60 minutes |
1 |
0.045 |
0.003 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
NA |
NA |
0.043 |
0.001 |
|||||||||
0.043 |
0.001 |
|||||||||
2 |
0.043 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.0 |
||||||
0.044 |
0.002 |
|||||||||
0.043 |
0.001 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under experimental conditions, the test item was concluded to be non-corrosive in IN VITRO skin corrosion test using reconstructed human epidermins (RHE) tissues.
- Executive summary:
An in vitro skin corrosion test for the test item was performed in a reconstructed human epidermis SkinEthic RHE model, according to OECD TG 431 (GLP study). The tissues were exposed to test item and sterile distilled water (negative control) for 3 minutes at room temperature and 60 minutes at 37±1 °C and 5±1% CO2. Since potassium hydroxide is direct MTT reducer, adapted control with two freeze killed tissues were used and treated with 8N KOH for exposure of 60 minutes. To evaluate the non-specific OD due to the residual test item staining, adapted control with two live tissues were used for test item and negative control for exposure of 3 minutes and 60 minutes. Percent relative viability in the tissues treated with the test item was 99.3% at 3 minute exposure period and 80.7% at 60 minute exposure period. Significant reduction in percent cell viability was not observed at the either 3 minute or 60 minute exposure period in the treated tissues when compared with the concurrent negative control. Differences between the viability of treated tissues was ≤ 1.46% i.e. %CV. OD values for negative control replicates were between 2.271 -2.404 and positive control showed 5.31 % cell viability. All criteria were valid. From the results of this study, the test item is concluded as non-corrosive using reconstructed human epidermins (RHE) tissues.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.