Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 947-752-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- peer-reviewed OECD SIDS report
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Remarks:
- link to target
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Remarks:
- peer-reviewed OECD SIDS report, read-across
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The ideal structure of the registered substance is a complex which consists of iron2+ as central ions and a hemiprophyrazine ring as ligand. Therefore, the endpoint in question may be both covered with data on Fe2+ salts as well as hemiprophyrazines and structurally related substances. So the read-across can be performed on both common functional groups and common breakdown products, as the read-across substances are considered breakdown products of the target substance.
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Source Chemicals, for individual read-across from an analogue in the required endpoints:
- Iron dichloride, CAS 7758-94-3
- Copper, (29H,31H-phthalocyaninato(2-)-kappaN29,kappaN30,kappaN31,kappaN32)-, ((3-(dimethylamino)propyl)amino)sulfonyl derivs., CAS 68411-04-1
- Copper phthalocyanine, CAS 147-14-8
Target Chemical:
(8,20-Dihydro-8,20-diphenyl-5,24:12,17-diimino-7,10:22,19-dinitrilodibenz(f,p)(1,2,4,9,11,12,14,19)
octaazacycloicosinato(2-)-N25,N26,N27,N28)iron, CAS 50293-39-5
All substances do not contain impurities to an extent which is expected to alter the outcome of the experimental results or read-across approach.
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
There are no data on the respective endpoints for all read-across substances available, but if data is available on all endpoints, a clear trend is available. So in general, read-across is justified. In detail, for the single possible structural analogues, the following is concluded:
CAS 7758-94-3: Both substances contain a Fe2+ ion, and with respect to acute oral toxicity, the substance provides the worst case scenario. So an underestimation of the actual risk here is unlikely. With regard to skin sensitization, iron does not need to be regarded, as it is an endogenous substance and no cases of sensitization were ever reported. Regarding gene mutation in bacteria, it was consistently with all the other possible analogues negative, so read-across is justified. For the irritation endpoints, it is not suitable, as based on the counterion, there are acidic iron salts available, clearly overestimating the possible hazard.
CAS 68411-04-1 / CAS 147-14-8: both source and target chemical contain structurally highly related chelating rings, i.e. a hemiprophyrazine ring or a phthalocyanine ring, they predominantly only differ in the central ion. The organic ring bearing all the chelating nitrogen atoms are identical, the only differ in the way the benzyl rings are attached, which are nevertheless identical chemical groups. With regard to acute oral toxicity, their acute oral LD50 values are way above the limit of classification, the precautionary classification of the target chemical as Acute tox. Cat. 4 does certainly not underestimate the actual risk. Regarding gene mutation in bacteria, all possible analogues are consistently negative ±S9. With regard to irritation and sensitisation, the organic functional groups are more relevant than the central ions, so read-across is also here justified.
4. DATA MATRIX
There is currently no data on the target chemical available, so an estimation using a worst case approach based on the properties of the available surrogates will be used:
Property CAS 50293-39-5 (target) CAS 7758-94-3 (source 1) CAS 68411-04-1 (source 2) CAS 147-14-8 (source 3)
LD50 (oral) Acute tox. Cat. 4 >300, <2000 mg/kg (rats) > 5000 mg/kg (rats) > 10000 mg/kg (rats)
>16000 mg/kg (rabbits)
Skin irritation Not irritating No data No data Not irritating
Eye irritation Not irritating No data No data Not irritating
Skin sensitization Not sensitizing No data No data Not sensitizing
Gene mutation in bacteria Negative ± S9 Negative ± S9 (OECD 471) Negative ± S9 (OECD 471) Negative ± S9 (various assays) - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his- / trp-
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Remarks:
- Escherichia coil (strain WP2 uvrA)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 5% S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 33.3, 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 μg/plate, based on pre-test, as stipulated by the guideline
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: not stated
- Remarks:
- not stated
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Preliminary experiments to find the dose range were carried out using the pre-incubation method with 5 % S9 mix as a metabolic activation system. Employed doses were 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1,000 and 5,000 μg/plate, both in the absence and in the presence of a metabolic activation system. 5,000 μg/plate was chosen as the maximum test concentration.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Information was gathered from a peer-reviewed report / collection of data, hence, the information can be considered as sufficiently reliable to assess the mutagenic potential of the test item. There was no statistically significant difference in any tester strain up to the maximum test concentration of 5,000 µg/plate (p > 0.01). Precipitation was noted at doses greater than 300 μg/plate. It was concluded that iron dichloride did not exhibit mutagenic activity to any test strains under the test conditions.
- Executive summary:
A bacterial reverse mutation test, according to OECD test guideline 471, was performed in compliance with GLP. In the main study, iron dichloride did not increase reverse mutations of Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537) and Escherichia coli (strain WP2 uvrA) with and without a metabolic activation system at 33.3, 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 μg/plate. There was no statistically significant difference up to the maximum test concentration of 5,000 μg/plate (p > 0.01). Precipitation was noted at doses greater than 300 μg/plate. It was concluded that iron dichloride did not exhibit mutagenic activity to any test strains under the test conditions.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- review article or handbook
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Iron dichloride
- EC Number:
- 231-843-4
- EC Name:
- Iron dichloride
- Cas Number:
- 7758-94-3
- IUPAC Name:
- iron(2+) dichloride
- Test material form:
- solid
- Remarks:
- commercial product: liquid
- Details on test material:
- Water solubility : 650 g/L at 25 °C
Molecular Weight: 126.75
Synonyms:
Iron chloride (FeCl2)
Ferrous chloride
Ferrous chloride (FeCl2)
Ferrous dichloride
Iron protochloride
Iron(2+) chloride
Iron(II) chloride
Iron(II) chloride (FeCl2)
Iron(II) chloride (1:2)
Iron dichloride is in the form of white rhombohedral crystals and sometimes it has a green tint and the substance is very hygroscopic. Iron dichloride dihydrate (FeCl2•2H2O) is in the form of white monoclinic crystals with a pale green tint and loses 1 H2O at 120 °C. Also the substance is reported to lose 1 H2O at 150 – 160 °C. Iron dichloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2•4H2O) is in the form of pale green to blue-green monoclinic crystals or cryst powder and loses 2 H2O at 105 – 115 °C
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- his- / trp-
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
- Remarks:
- Escherichia coil (strain WP2 uvrA)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 5% S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 33.3, 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 μg/plate, based on pre-test, as stipulated by the guideline
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: not stated
Controls
- Remarks:
- not stated
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Preliminary experiments to find the dose range were carried out using the pre-incubation method with 5 % S9 mix as a metabolic activation system. Employed doses were 1.6, 8, 40, 200, 1,000 and 5,000 μg/plate, both in the absence and in the presence of a metabolic activation system. 5,000 μg/plate was chosen as the maximum test concentration.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Information was gathered from a peer-reviewed report / collection of data, hence, the information can be considered as sufficiently reliable to assess the mutagenic potential of the test item. There was no statistically significant difference in any tester strain up to the maximum test concentration of 5,000 µg/plate (p > 0.01). Precipitation was noted at doses greater than 300 μg/plate. It was concluded that iron dichloride did not exhibit mutagenic activity to any test strains under the test conditions.
- Executive summary:
A bacterial reverse mutation test, according to OECD test guideline 471, was performed in compliance with GLP. In the main study, iron dichloride did not increase reverse mutations of Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535 and TA 1537) and Escherichia coli (strain WP2 uvrA) with and without a metabolic activation system at 33.3, 100, 300, 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 μg/plate. There was no statistically significant difference up to the maximum test concentration of 5,000 μg/plate (p > 0.01). Precipitation was noted at doses greater than 300 μg/plate. It was concluded that iron dichloride did not exhibit mutagenic activity to any test strains under the test conditions.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.