Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-504-3 | CAS number: 8060-28-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Principal key study on "Evaluation of the Mutagenic Activity of Hop Extract in the Salmonella typhimurium Reverse Mutation Assay and the Escherichia coli Reverse Mutation Assay (Plate Incorporation and Pre-Incubation Methods)" peformed in 2017 according to GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Key study: The objective of this study was to determine the potential of Hop Extract and/or its metabolites to induce reverse mutations at the histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium; TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537), and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain WP2uvrA in the presence or absence of an exogenous mammalian metabolic activation system (S9).
The design of this study is based on the following study guidelines:
• OECD Guideline 471. Genetic Toxicology: Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. (Adopted July 21, 1997).
• EC Guideline No. 440/2008. Part B: Methods for the Determination of Toxicity and other health effects, Guideline B.13/14: "Mutagenicity: Reverse Mutation Test using Bacteria”. Official Journal of the European Union No. L142, 31 May 2008. - GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Key study: Hop extract. Batch no. 16/4021. Dark green/brown resin; UVCB.
- Target gene:
- Key study: The objective of this study was to determine the potential of Hop Extract and/or its metabolites to induce reverse mutations at the histidine locus in several strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium; TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537), and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli (E. coli) strain WP2uvrA in the presence or absence of an exogenous mammalian metabolic activation system (S9).
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Key study: 1600 ug per plate. Initial range finding showed that 5000 ug per plate caused precipitation of hop extract.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Key study: Hop Extract is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium reverse mutation assay and in the Escherichia coli reverse mutation assay.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Well-documented study from 1995, performed to GLP. This supporting study was performed on a major derivative of hop iso-alpha acids.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test article, RHO isoalpha acids; 89.4% concentration, was tested in the CHO/HGPRT Mutation Assay in two phases.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Lot no. 1463-F; purity 89.4%; described as thick golden brown, very viscous liquid
- Target gene:
- HGPRT
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.5 - 5000 ug per ml.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Test report shows that all criteria for a valid study were met. The results indicated that the substance did not cause a positive response in the non-activated and activated systems, and was concluded to be negative.
Study performed on major derivative of hop iso-alpha acids. - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Well-documented study from 1991, performed to GLP. This supporting study was performed on hop iso-alpha acids.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test article, 40% isohumulones (i.e. hop iso-alpha-acids);40% concentration, was tested in the Salmonella Mutagenicity Assay using tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver microsomal enzymes. Three phases, using the plate incorporation method: 1st: a dose range-finding study; 2nd and 3rd: mutagenicity and confirmatory assays.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine mutations hisG46, hisC3076 and hisD3052, and additional mutations: rfa, uvrB
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The maximum dose tested in the dose range-finding study was 100 ug per plate. No precipitate and no appreciable toxicity were observed. The maximum dose in the mutagenicity assay was increased to 1000 ug per plate. No appreciable toxicity was observed at 1000 ug per plate, so the dose was increased to 10,000 ug per plate in the confirmatory assay.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, ICR-191
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- No apreciable toxicity observed at 1000 ug per plate. Increased to 10,000 ug per plate in confirmtaory assay to demonstrate reduction in bacterial lawn.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Test report shows that all criteria for a valid study were met. The results indicated that the substance did not cause a positive response in any of the tester strains in the presence and absence of microsomal enzymes prepared from Aroclor-induced liver.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Well-documented study from 1991, performed to GLP. This supporting study was performed on hop beta acids.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test article, 40% lupulones (i.e. hop beta-acids);40% concentration, was tested in the Salmonella Mutagenicity Assay using tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537 and TA1538 in the presence and absence of Aroclor-induced rat liver microsomal enzymes. Three phases, using the plate incorporation method: 1st: a dose range-finding study; 2nd and 3rd: mutagenicity and confirmatory assays.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine mutations hisG46, hisC3076 and hisD3052, and additional mutations: rfa, uvrB
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The top dose in range-finding study (100 ug per plate) showed that toxicity was only present in the absence of microsomal enzymes, and no precipitate was observed. In consultation with original sponsor of the work, the maximum dose was 1000 ug per plate in the presence of microsomal enzymes, and up to 333 ug per plate in the absence of microsomal enzymes.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: 2-aminoanthracene, ICR-191
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- in the absence of microsomal enzymes at the highest dose in the dose range-finding study
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Test report shows that all criteria for a valid study were met. The results indicated that the substance did not cause a positive response in any of the tester strains in the presence and absence of microsomal enzymes prepared from Aroclor-induced liver.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Justification for type of information:
- This study is taken from a recently-published scientific article by S. Suzuki et al. on "Genetic, acute and subchronic toxicity studies of matured hop extract produced by extraction from heat-treated hops", published in the Journal of Toxicological Sciences (2018) vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 473-484, available freely as full text in the public domain. Matured hop extract contains oxidised alpha and beta acids. This substance is therefore of direct relevance to hop extract, and to alpha acids, iso-alpha acids, and beta acids, as the oxidised alpha and beta acids are common degradation products of hop alpha and beta acids. This article is useful in that it reports a number of toxicological studies, and the in vivo tests on chromosome aberration are reported in this end-point to add as weight of evidence for the lack of genotoxicity expected for hop extract and its constituents.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: In accordance with a previous protocol, viz. Hayashi, M., Sofuni, T. and Ishidate, M. Jr. (1983): An application of Acridine Orange fluorescent staining to the micronucleus test. Mutat. Res., 120, 241-247.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian germ cell cytogenetic assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- An aqueous extract of a heat-treated hop extract, designed for production and extraction of oxidised alpha and beta acids.
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Eight-week-old male rats. Body weight was between 289 - 310 g.
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- Sterlized water
- Details on exposure:
- High dose group: 2,000 mg/kg bw/day; middle dose group: 1,000 mg/kg bw/day; low dose group: 500 mg/kg bw/day. Once daily for 2 days.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 2 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- Once daily
- Post exposure period:
- 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- High dose group
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Middle dose group
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Remarks:
- Low dose group
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- MMC. This was dissolved in sterilized water and it was injected intraperitoneally at 2 mg/kg bw. One dose only.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow cell smears for erythrocytes.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Notes from journal: "Bone marrow cell smears were prepared and stained with acridine orange. Numbers of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) per 200 erythrocytes, and micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) per 2,000 PCEs were counted."
- Evaluation criteria:
- Notes from journal: "Numbers of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) per 200 erythrocytes, and micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) per 2,000 PCEs were counted."
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- These results are part of a larger study reported in the article. Results in brief:
• Ames test – negative, up to 5,000 ug per plate, with and without metabolic activation
• In vitro chromosomal aberration test – positive at 3,330 and 5,000 ug per plate without metabolic activation (i.e. elevated structural aberration above negative control) but no increase in polyploid cells
• In vivo micronucleus test in rat bone marrow – no clastogenic potential at max dose of 2,000 mg/kg bw/day, i.e. negative
• Acute toxicity – No noticeable toxic signs at 2,000 mg/kg bw
• 90 days study – NOAEL considered to be over 3,484 mg/kg bw/day for male and 4,022 mg/kg bw/day for female rats.
Authors’ conclusion is that although the structural chromosomal aberration was positive in high dose group for the in vitro test, Ames test and in vivo micronucleus test suggests that the matured hop extract has no potential for mutagenicity and genotoxicity under in vivo conditions.
Further consideration of results noted that cytotoxicity was observed in the in vitro test.If the toxicity mechanism was to slow cell division or similar, it could look like a chromosome aberration. The in vivo test indicates lack of genotoxicity at appropriate doses. The authors' comment was as follows: "From the results mentioned above, it is judged that MHE does not have clastogenic potential in rats at the maximum dose, which is recommended by OECD guidelines (OECD, 1997)." - Conclusions:
- The studies reported in this journal article add weight of evidence to the lack of toxicity of hop extract, in particular for substances derived from hop alpha and beta acids.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.