Adenosine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate), disodium salt

Eye irritation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Study period:

29-30 March 2017

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2017

Report date:

2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)

Version / remarks:

2013

Deviations:

no

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Adenosine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate), disodium salt

EC Number:

213-579-1

EC Name:

Adenosine 5'-(tetrahydrogen triphosphate), disodium salt

Cas Number:

987-65-5

Molecular formula:

C10H14N5O13P3.2Na

IUPAC Name:

disodium hydrogen [({[5-(6-amino-9H-purin-9-yl)-3,4-dihydroxyoxolan-2-yl]methoxy}(hydroxy)phosphoryl phosphonato)oxy]phosphonate

impurity 1

Reference substance name:

Water

EC Number:

231-791-2

EC Name:

Water

Cas Number:

7732-18-5

Molecular formula:

H2O

IUPAC Name:

Oxidane

impurity 2

Reference substance name:

Unknown impurities.

Molecular formula:

Not available as unknown impurities.

IUPAC Name:

Unknown impurities.

Test material form:

solid: crystalline

Details on test material:

Storage conditions: 2-8°C
Batch No: 11678500

Test animals / tissue source

Species:

cattle

Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:

SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: ABP, Perth, PH1 3XB
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue (e.g. transport time, transport media and temperature, and other conditions): Cow eyes were collected from freshly slaughtered cattle, and placed into containers containing Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS). Transport to test facility was on the same day as slaughter. Cold packs were used to keep the contents cool.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: Corneas were prepared and used for testing on the day of collection
- indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: Upon receipt, eyes were rinsed with HBSS and examined for defects (scratches, opacity or neovascularisation) prior to use.Any eyes showing defects were rejected from further use.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: Not specified

Test system

Vehicle:

physiological saline

Controls:

yes, concurrent positive control

yes, concurrent negative control

Amount / concentration applied:

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 750 µL
- Concentration Test Item: 20.06%, w/v in physiological saline
NEGATIVE CONTROL: Physiological saline
- Amount(s) applied: 750 µL
- Concentration: Sodium Chloride 0.9%, w/v
- Batch no.: 16B29T2C
POSITIVE CONTROL : Imidazole
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µl
- Concentration (if solution): 20.03%, w/v in physiological saline
- Batch no.: SLBP2962V

Duration of treatment / exposure:

4 h ± 10 min

Number of animals or in vitro replicates:

Three Corneas per test item and control

Details on study design:

SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS:
Upon receipt, eyes were rinsed with HBSS and examined for defects (scratches, opacity or neovascularisation) prior to use. Any eyes showing defects were rejected from further use. Corneas from undamaged eyes were dissected, leaving a sclera margin of ca 3 mm. Collected corneas were placed epithelial side down in HBSS at ambient temperature until use. Prior to mounting corneas the width of the cornea was measured using a ruler.

QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
Corneas were then mounted, epithelial side forward, into pre-warmed corneal holders. Once mounted, both chambers of the cornea holders were filled with pre-warmed EMEM (Eagles Minimum Essential Medium) without phenol red. The posterior chamber was filled first to encourage the cornea to return to its original curvature, and care was taken to avoid the introduction of bubbles into the medium. Holders were then allowed to equilibrate for >1 h in an incubator.
Unless otherwise stated, all incubations of corneas were conducted in an incubator set to maintain 32°C (actual temperatures have been recorded in the raw data). At the end of the equilibration period, the medium in both chambers was replaced with fresh, EMEM without phenol red. Baseline opacity readings were then taken using an Opacitometer (Duratec Analysentechnik GmbH) comprising a Testo 545 luminometer with a photo diode and xenon halogen light source in a custom enclosure. Damaged corneas (opacity >7 opacity units) were rejected from further use.

TREATMENT METHOD: closed chamber. Prior to dosing, cornea holders were tipped forward to avoid contact between the dosing solution and the corneal epithelium. ATP, Di-Na (20.06%, w/v in physiological saline; 750 µL) was applied to the surface of three corneas using syringe. The negative control, physiological saline (750 µL) and the positive control, imidazole (20.03%, w/v in physiological saline; 750 µL), were also applied to the surface of three corneas each, using a syringe. The anterior chambers were then sealed with tape. To begin exposure, the corneal holders were tilted to a horizontal position, taking care to ensure that the entire epithelial surface was covered with the dosing solution. The dosed units were then returned to the incubator for 4 h ± 10 min.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
EMEM with and without phenol red were pre-warmed prior to use. Following the exposure incubation, the test items and control solutions were removed from the anterior chambers through the holes using a vacuum pump. Corneas were then rinsed three times with EMEM with phenol red (ca 5 mL per rinse), removing the EMEM each time, then rinsed once with EMEM without phenol red (ca 5 mL), which was also removed. Finally, both chambers were refilled with EMEM without phenol red, and any bubbles introduced into the medium were removed.

POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: no

METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: opacity readings were then taken using an Opacitometer (Duratec Analysentechnik GmbH) comprising a Testo 545 luminometer with a photo diode and xenon halogen light source in a custom enclosure. Gross damage or other changes were observed by visual assessment.
- Corneal permeability: Following the measurement of opacity, the EMEM in both chambers of the cornea holder wasremoved. Posterior chambers were refilled with EMEM without phenol red and sealed. Sodium fluorescein solution (5 mg/mL in EMEM without phenol red; ca 1 mL) was added to the anterior chambers. Cornea holders were rotated to the horizontal position, and incubated for 90 min ± 5 min in an incubator set to maintain a temperature of 32°C. At the end of the permeability test, EMEM from the posterior chambers was collected. These samples were stored overnight in a refrigerator set to maintain a temperature of 4°C.
Following overnight storage, triplicate aliquots from each sample (380 µL) were transferred into a 96 well plate, and analysed with a Multiskan Spectrum plate reader at 490 nm. Three blank wells containing EMEM without phenol red (380 µL) were analysed on the same plate, along with two aliquots of a quality control solution (sodium fluorescein, 10 µg/mL).

SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
IVIS = Opacity change + (15 x A490 Value)

DECISION CRITERIA:
In accordance with OECD Test Guideline No. 437, irritancy was assigned on the basis of in vitro irritancy scores (IVIS), calculated from the opacity and permeability value for each cornea, as follows:

IVIS<=3: not classified according to GHS/CLP
3IVIS>55: Classified as Eye Damaging Category 1 according to GHS/CLP

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results

Irritation parameter:

in vitro irritation score

Run / experiment:

Single experiment

Value:

18.5

Vehicle controls validity:

valid

Remarks:

IVIS: 0.0

Positive controls validity:

valid

Remarks:

IVIS: 106.60

Remarks on result:

not determinable

Remarks:

No Prediction can be made

Other effects / acceptance of results:

OTHER EFFECTS:
- Test item treatement: Prior to baseline opacity checks cornea diameter was measured and the mean diameter for the 3 test item treated corneas was 2.23 cm.
The BCOP results were similar for all corneas and are presented in full in Table 1 (see Any other information on results incl. tables section).
- Visible damage on test system: not reported

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Negative and Positive Control Treatments: Prior to baseline opacity checks cornea diameter was measured. Negative and positive control corneas had a mean diameter of 2.33 cm and 2.23 cm, respectively. The negative control treatment gave opacity readings <5 and low permeability values. The classification achieved was “No Category”. The mean change in opacity after treatment was 1.53. The mean permeability (corrected for blank only) was 0.072. The positive control treatments gave mean IVIS scores of 106.60. The classification achieved was “Category 1”.
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, mean post treatment opacity of 1.53 (historical values range 3.83 +/- 1.82) / mean permeability corrected for blank of 0.072 (historical values range 0.045 +/- 0.043)
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes, mean IVIS 106.60 (historical range: Mean +/- 2SD =66.29 to 169.36)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1                         BCOP Results for Controls and ATP, Di-Na (n=3)

Treatment	Opacity Post Dose (Opacity Units, Uncorrected)	Corrected* Opacity Change (Opacity Units)	Permeability (A490), Corrected for Blank Only	Permeability (A490), Corrected*	IVIS	IVIS (Mean)	UN GHS Category**
Physiological Saline (Negative Control)	1.26	-1.96	0.020	-0.053	-2.75	0.00	No Category
	4.72	2.00	0.162	0.090	3.35
	3.98	-0.05	0.036	-0.037	-0.60
Imidazole (PositiveControl)	93.23	90.17	1.672	1.600	114.16	106.60	Category 1
	87.47	84.61	1.499	1.427	106.01
	80.93	78.42	1.486	1.414	99.63
ATP, Di-Na	17.52	15.02	0.010	-0.063	14.08	18.50	No Prediction can be made
	22.18	19.04	0.008	-0.065	18.07
	27.67	24.31	0.007	-0.066	23.33

* Corrected for Negative Control

**Classifications from OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 437 (2013)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

other: no prediction could be made

Conclusions:

In conclusion, no prediction could be made for ATP, Di-Na (CAS 987-65-5) using the BCOP assay according to the UN GHS classifications and the CLP classification system.

Executive summary:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the ocular irritation potential of ATP, Di-Na (CAS 987-65-5) using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay (OECD guideline 437).

Corneas were dissected from freshly obtained cow eyes, the cornea diameter was measured and they were mounted into corneal holders. Following a pre-dose equilibration period, and measurement of baseline opacity (using an opacitometer), the epithelial sides of the corneas were treated as follows:

ATP, Di-Na (20%, w/v; 750 µL), physiological saline or imidazole (20%, w/v) as negative and positive controls, respectively, were applied to three corneas each. Following exposure for 4 h ± 10 min, the test or control items were rinsed off.

The opacity of each cornea was then determined, followed by measurement of permeability by assessment of the passage of sodium fluorescein through the cornea. Irritancy was assigned on the basis of in vitro irritancy scores (IVIS). The results are summarised as follows:

The mean IVIS Score for ATP, Di-Na was 18.50

In conclusion, no prediction could be made for ATP, Di-Na (CAS 987-65-5) using the BCOP assay according to the UN GHS classifications and the CLP classification system.