2-Propenoic acid, homopolymer

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Administrative data

Endpoint:

in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells

Remarks:

Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

17 Feb 1987 - 30 Aug 1988

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Comparable to guideline study conducted in compliance with GLP regulations

Data source

Reference

Reference 1

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

1988

Report date:

1988

Reference 2

Reference Type:

publication

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

1992

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Qualifier:

equivalent or similar to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)

Principles of method if other than guideline:

The HGPRT assay was performed based on the procedure described by O'Neill et al. (1977) and Gupta and Sing (1982).

O'Neill et al. (1977). Mutat Res 45: 91-101
Gupta and Sing (1982). Mutat Res 94: 449-466

GLP compliance:

yes

Type of assay:

mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

Acrylic acid

EC Number:

201-177-9

EC Name:

Acrylic acid

Cas Number:

79-10-7

Molecular formula:

C3H4O2

IUPAC Name:

acrylic acid

Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Acrylic acid
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.92 %

Method

Target gene:

HGPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase) gene

Species / strain

Species / strain / cell type:

Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)

Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):

Strain: CHO-K1-BH4 cells

Metabolic activation:

with and without

Metabolic activation system:

Rat liver homogenate (S9 mix) prepared from male Fischer rats that were induced by ip injection of Aroclor-1254 at 500 mg/kg bw

Test concentrations with justification for top dose:

Without metabolic activation: 0.3, 0.6, 1.0, 1.5, 1.9 µL/mL
With metabolic activation: 1.0, 1.5, 1.9, 2.4, 2.8 µL/mL

Vehicle / solvent:

- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: phosphate buffer

Controls

Untreated negative controls:

yes

Negative solvent / vehicle controls:

yes

True negative controls:

no

Positive controls:

yes

Positive control substance:

other: Without activation: Ethyl methanesulfonate; with activation: Benzo(a)pyrene

Details on test system and experimental conditions:

METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium


DURATION
- Exposure duration: 5 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7-9 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7-10 days


SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Hypoxanthine (Hx)


NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
Triplicate cultures were used for each treatment condition. Replicate plates were subcultured in F12FBS5 or F12FBS5-Hx throughout the experiment.
The mutation assay was repeated at the Sponsor's request with a confirmatory assay.


DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency

Evaluation criteria:

In the testing laboratory, the confidence interval for the CHO/HGPRT assay was set at 8.7/1 000 000 clonable cells. Therefore, the mutagenic response after treatment was considered significant only when the treatment mutant frequency was increased above that of the solvent control and the untreated control by at least 8.7 mutants/1 000 000 clonable cells and also was at least twice that of the solvent control and the untreated control.
Criteria for evaluation of a valid test:
The cloning efficiency of the solvent and untreated controls must be no less than 50 %. The spontaneous mutant frequency in the solvent and untreated controls must fall within the range of 0-20 mutants per 1 000 000 clonable cells. The positive control must induce a mutant frequency at least three times that of the solvent control.

Results and discussion

Test results

Species / strain:

Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)

Metabolic activation:

with and without

Genotoxicity:

negative

Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:

cytotoxicity

Vehicle controls validity:

valid

Untreated negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Additional information on results:

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:

- 1st trial:
Survival was 72, 95, 82, 85, and 86 % at 1.9, 1.5, 1.0, 0.6, and 0.3 µL/mL, respectively without, and 89, 71, 80, 86, and 91 % at 2.8, 2.4, 1.9, 1.5, and 1.0 µL/mL, respectively, with metabolic acitvation.

- 2nd trial (confirmatory):
Survival was 31, 38, and 37 % at 1.9 µL/mL, and 60, 52, and 65 % at 1.5 µL/mL, and 90, 72, and 82 % at 1.0 µL/mL, and 67, 80, and 78 % at 0.6 µL/mL, and 88, 91, and 102 % at 0.3 µL/mL, respectively, without metabolic activation.

Survival was 1, 2, and 3 % at 2.8 µL/mL, and 22, 26, and 23 % at 2.4 µL/mL, and 39, 31, and 36 % at 1.9 µL/mL, and 62, 63, and 51 % at 1.5 µL/mL, and 9, 89, and 103 % at 1.0 µL/mL, respectively with metabolic activation.

Remarks on result:

other: all strains/cell types tested

Remarks:

Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

In the first trial, the mutant frequencies of two and one of the test article tested groups without and with metabolic activation respectively were increased significantly above the controls. But increases were barely in excess of two-fold the highest concurrent background (untreated or solvent control) levels. In addition, no dose-response was apparent, and the nonactivated assay had not achieved sufficient toxicity. Consequently, an additional mutation assay was performed. Triplicate cultures were independently subcultured throughout the repeat assay to provide confirmation of any significant, dose-dependent increases in mutant frequency.

Non-activated assay (confirmatory assay):

 

Treatment	Cloning efficiency*	Mutants/E+06 clonable cells*
Untreated	1.12	11.5
Solvent	1.03	1.6
1.9 µL/mL	1.03	5.0
1.5 µL/mL	1.08	5.8
1.0 µL/mL	1.02	16.7
0.6 µL/mL	0.82	1.2
0.3 µL/mL	0.88	11.7
EMS	1.10	126.6

* means of triplicate cultures

 

 

 

Activated assay (confirmatory assay):

 

Treatment	Cloning efficiency*	Mutants/E+06 clonable cells*
Untreated	1.24	13.3
Solvent	1.28	8.2
2.4 µL/mL	0.96	4.2
1.9 µL/mL	1.15	2.2
1.5 µL/mL	0.97	1.3
1.0 µL/mL	1.16	7.9
BaP	0.98	243.5

* means of triplicate cultures

 

In the confirmatory assay with and without metabolic activation the mutant frequencies of the test article treated groups were not increased significantly above the controls. The negative and positive controls fulfilled the requirements for a valid test. Under the conditions of the assay, acrylic acid should be considered negative in the CHO/HGPRT mutation assay.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:

Acrylic acid did not show mutagenic effects in this in vitro HGPRT assay in CHO cells with and without metabolic activation.