Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted to OECD and EC guidelines and in compliance with GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Unjecol 85AN
IUPAC Name:
Unjecol 85AN
Test material form:
other: Liquid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Unjecol 84AN
- Physical state: Liquid
- Analytical purity: 98%
- Lot/batch No.: 5253
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 30 October 2015
- Storage condition of test material: Room Temperature

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
other: Bovine eyes
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- No animals required for In-Vitro test
-Bovine eyes supplied and excised by abottoir, collected soon after slaughter.
-Eyes obtained from cattle approximately less than 30 months.
_Excised eyes maintained and transported to laboratory, at ambient temperarture, sufficient HBSS containing 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin solution to cover eyes.
-Used witnin 4 hours of slaughter.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
-Undiluted substance used.
-750 µl applied
Duration of treatment / exposure:
10 minutes ± 30 seconds at 32 ºC ± 1ºC , post incubation 2 hrs with cMEM at 32ºC ± 1ºC
Observation period (in vivo):
- 1 mL sodium fluorescein solution added and incubated for 90 ± 5 minutes in a waterbath at 32ºC ± 1ºC.
- Aliquote of medium removed and transfered to cuvette for spectrophotometric read at 490 nm.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Corneas were treated in triplicate with either the test substance, positive control (ethanol) or negative control (0.9% saline).
Details on study design:
- No animals required for In-Vitro test
The test substance and the positive control were tested undiluted.
-All eyes examined macroscopically, for defects.
-Surrounding tissue around the eyeball pulled away from the cornea, leaving 2-3mm of sclera present around the cornea.
-Stored in HBSS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution until all the corneas had been dissected. Once all the corneas had been dissected, they were rinsed in fresh HBSS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution prior to mounting.
-Mounted in the cornea holders with the endothelial side against the O-ring of the posterior half of the holder, cornea flattened, holders screwed into position.
-Compartments filled with HBSS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin, incubated overnight, in upright position at room temperature.
- HBSS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin removed and replaced with cMEM, incubated for 60mins in upright position at 32 ºC ± 1°C in waterbath, medium removed, compartments refilled with cMEM.
-Posterior compartment plugged and basal opacity measurements performed.
-Opacitometer used to measure light transmission through centre of each mounted cornea.
-pH of test substance diluents recorded.
- Corneas treated in triplicates with either the test substance, positive control (ethanol) or negative control (0.9% saline).

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Value:
-1
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
other: No prediction can be made
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

In vivo

Irritant / corrosive response data:
Throughout the assay the corneas were examined for opaque spots or other irregularities. Following treatment with test substance, Unjecol 85AN, the corneas were noted as clear. The corneas treated with the positive control, ethanol, were opaque and the corneas treated with the negative control, 0.9% saline, were clear.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Sample

Opacity
± SD

Permeability
± SD

In vitro irritancy Score
± SD

In vitro
classification

Unjecol 85AN

-1.000 ± 0.577

-0.003 ±0.004

-1.0 ±0.6

No category

Ethanol         

19.667 ±1.732

2.225 ±2.438

53.0 ±35.7

No prediction can be made

0.9% Saline

2.333 ±1.155

0.025 ± 0.018

Not applicable

Not applicable

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
study cannot be used for classification
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
The test substance, Unjecol 85AN, elicited an In Vitro Irritancy Score of -1.0 ± 0.6 and was predicted to have a classification of No Category according to the UN GHS.