Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1983-10-05 to 1983-11-30
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP Guideline study
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1983
Report date:
1983

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-4 (Acute Eye Irritation)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Ace Animals, Inc., Boyertown, PA, USA
- Age at study initiation: not stated
1 rabbit per cage, stainless steel with elevated wire mesh flooring.
temperature - 60 - 75 degrees F, 40 - 45% humidity, 12 hr ligh/dark photoperiod. Ad libitum Wayne 15% rabbit ration & tap water.
Rabbits acclimated prior to dosing

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated eye acted as control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 g ground material
Duration of treatment / exposure:
7 day exposure and observation period.
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not performed

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: none specified

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0.78
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
other: reversible in 5/6 rabbits.
Remarks on result:
other: Score of 1 for redness in one animal for all observations. Redness reversible in 5/6 rabbits by 72 hours or 4 days. 2/5 rabbits which showed reversible effects had score of 1 at 7 day observation. The material was not washed from the eye.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0.78
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 4 days
Remarks on result:
other: 3/6 rabbits which showed reversible effects at the Day 4 observation had a score of 1 at the 7 day observation. The test material was not washed from the eye.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No other observations were recorded
Other effects:
No other observations were recorded

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test material is not an irritant to the eyes of rabbits. The test material is not classified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
Executive summary:

Test Guidance

In a study similar to US EPA OPP 81-4, ground test chemical (0.1 g) was placed into the conjunctival sac of one eye of each of 6 New Zealand White rabbits. The untreated eye acted as a control. The eyes were not washed after instillation. Treated eyes were examined at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days after treatment.

Results

Slight conjunctival effects (redness and chemosis) were noted in all 6 animals. Effects were reversible by the 4 -day observation except for redness in one animal which persisted to the 7-day observation. Effects which had reversed at the 4 -day observation reoccurred at the 7 -day observation (2/5 animals (redness) and 3/5 animals (chemosis). This was considered to be due to the presence of the test material throughout the full 7 -day period in comparison to the current OECD guideline which requires washing of the eye at the 1 hour exposure observation if the material has not been removed by physiological mechanisms.

Conclusion

The test material is not an irritant to the eye of rabbits. The test material is not classified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008