Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Endpoint summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE CATEGORY APPROACH (ENDPOINT LEVEL)
By using different grouping methods to group chemicals into chemical categories according to different measures of similarity so that within a category a QSAR model can be established. We select profiles related to generic toxicity, including “in vitro mutagenicity (Ames test) alerts by ISS”, “in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS”, “Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR”, “in vitro mutagenicity (Ames test) alerts by ISS with Rat liver S9 metabolism simulator” and “in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS with Rat liver S9 metabolism simulator”. Besides, generic toxicity depends on the solubility, shape and reactivity of the chemicals. Therefore, we select "logkow" to describe solubility, “US-EPA New Chemical Categories”, “Chemical elements” and “Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol)” to describe the shape of molecule, empiric profiles “DNA binding by OECD” and “Protein binding by OECD” to describe the reactivity.

2. CATEGORY APPROACH JUSTIFICATION (ENDPOINT LEVEL
Reliable predicted value obtained by the OECD QSAR Toolbox 4.5 SP1 using Read-across within category members.The prediction fulfilling the OECD criteria for the validation of QSAR models with respect to • a defined endpoint • unambiguous algorithm • a defined domain of applicability • appropriate measure of goodness-of-fit, robustness and predictivity • a mechanistic interpretation.

OECD Principle 1 - Defined endpoint: Human Health Hazards -> Genetic Toxicity -> in Vitro -> Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Assay -> in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells.

OECD principle 2 - Unambiguous algorithm: takes the mode value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Active descriptor: log Kow (calculated)
Data usage: All values*
*When multiple values are available for the same chemical, all of them are taken individually in prediction calculations

OECD principle 3 - Applicability domain
Database(s) used:
- ECHA REACH
Category boundaries (applicability domain):
- Active descriptor(s) range:
- log Kow: from from 8.12 to 18.5 target chemical is in domain
- Response range:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells: negative (x6)
Profilers:
- No alert found (in vitro mutagenicity (Ames test) alerts by ISS) (primary grouping) target chemical is in domain
- in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- DNA binding by OECD (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- US-EPA New Chemical Categories (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- Protein binding by OECD (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- Chemical elements (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- in vitro mutagenicity (Ames test) alerts by ISS with Rat liver S9 metabolism simulator (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS with Rat liver S9 metabolism simulator (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain
- Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) (subcategorization) target chemical is in domain

OECD principle 4 - Uncertainty of the prediction:
The prediction is based on 6 values, 6 of them (100%) equal to predicted value
Prediction confidence is measured by the p-value: 8.5E-06

OECD principle 5 - Chemical and biological mechanisms
No alert found (in vitro mutagenicity (Ames test) alerts by ISS) (primary grouping): No alert found
in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS (subcategorization): No alert found
DNA binding by OECD (subcategorization): No alert found
Aquatic toxicity classification by ECOSAR (subcategorization): Esters; Melamines
US-EPA New Chemical Categories (subcategorization): Not categorized
Protein binding by OECD (subcategorization): No alert found
Chemical elements (subcategorization): Group 14 - Carbon C; Group 15 - Nitrogen N; Group 16 - Oxygen O
in vitro mutagenicity (Ames test) alerts by ISS with Rat liver S9 metabolism simulator (subcategorization): No alert found; Simple aldehyde
in vivo mutagenicity (Micronucleus) alerts by ISS with Rat liver S9 metabolism simulator (subcategorization): No alert found; Simple aldehyde
Organic functional groups, Norbert Haider (checkmol) (subcategorization): Amine; Aromatic compound; Carboxylic acid derivative; Carboxylic acid ester; Heterocyclic compound; Secondary amine; Secondary aromatic amine
Key result
Species / strain:
mammalian cell line, other: mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells, Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO), Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
not specified
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Conclusions:
The predicted value of in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells is "negative".
Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosomal Aberration Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Version / remarks:
92/69/EWG, B.10 (Säuger zytogenetischer in vitro-Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
other: in vitro mammalian cytogenicity (B10)
Species / strain / cell type:
mammalian cell line, other: Chin. Hamster, V79-Zellen
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-Mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation): 10 - 100 μg/mL
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation): 10 - 100 μg/mL
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Exposure period (with metabolic activation): 4 hours
Exposure period (without metabolic activation): 18 hours
Expression time: 18 and 28 hours
Species / strain:
mammalian cell line, other: Chin. Hamster, V79-Zellen
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Additional information on results:
No findings
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: see remark
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method : Dean, S. W. ; Lane, M. ; Dunmore, R. H. ; Ruddock, S.P. ; Martin, C. N. ; Kirkland, D. J. ;
Loprieno, N. : Development of assays for the detection of photomutagenicity of chemicals during exposure to UV light - I. Assay development. Carcinogenesis 6, 335 - 341 (1991).
Dean, S.W. ; Dunmore, R.H. ; Ruddock, S.P. ; Dean, J.C. ; Martin, C. N. ; Kirkland, D. J. : Development of assays for the detection of photomutagenicity of chemicals during exposure to UV light - II. Results of testing three sunscreen ingredients. Mutagenesis 7, 179 - 182 (1992).
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
bacteria, other: esc WP2
Metabolic activation:
without
Metabolic activation system:
none
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation) : 1.6 - 1000ug/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
Solvent : DMSO
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
Concentration of the test substance resulting in precipitation : 1000ug/plate
Species / strain:
bacteria, other: esc WP2
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Additional information on results:
Observations : No findings.
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative without metabolic activation
Executive summary:

Not classified as mutagenic.

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Concentration range in the main test (with metabolic activation) : 20 - 5000ug/plate
Concentration range in the main test (without metabolic activation) : 20 - 5000ug/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
Solvent : DMSO
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with metabolic activation
negative without metabolic activation
Executive summary:

not classified as mutagenic

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

No indications of a clastogenic or aneugenic effect. Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
Version / remarks:
1986
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
other: micronucleus assay chromosome aberration
Species:
mouse
Strain:
NMRI
Sex:
male/female
Route of administration:
oral: unspecified
Vehicle:
olive oil
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Male : 525 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 16 hours
Male : 525 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 24 hours
Male : 525 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 48 hours
Male : 1050 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 16 hours
Male : 1050 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 24 hours
Male : 1050 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 48 hours
Male : 2100 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 16 hours
Male : 2100 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 24 hours
Male: 2100 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 48 hours
Female : 525 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 16 hours
Female : 525 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 24 hours
Female : 525 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 48 hours
Female : 1050 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 16 hours
Female : 1050 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 24 hours
Female : 1050 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 48 hours
Female : 2100 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 16 hours
Female : 2100 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 24 hours
Female : 2100 mg/kg; number of animals : 5; sacrifice time : 48 hours
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: not further specified
Additional information on results:
Observations:
Controls, 24h: 0.16% micronuclei containing PCE
Test substance: 0.11% - 0.17% micronuclei containing PCE
no change in the ratio of PCE/NCE
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Not classified as mutagenic
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification