Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-906-4 | CAS number: 3277-26-7
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.4 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 150
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 217 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The DNEL for systemic effects via the inhaled route is determined on the basis of route-to route extrapolation from the oral combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction / developmental toxicity screening test, conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 422 and in compliance with GLP, with dimethylsilanediol (DMSD).
The following correction was made to the NOAEL (oral): Correction respiratory volume rat (24 hour) 1/1.15 m3/kg bw/day. Therefore the corrected NOAEC for repeated-dose systemic effects via the inhalation route is: 250 mg/kg/day*(1/1.15) = 217 mg/m3.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Default (subacute to chronic)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (oral rat to inhaled human)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default (general population)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (guideline study)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (no remaining uncertainties)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.4 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 600
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The DNEL for systemic effects via the oral route is determined on the basis of the oral combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction / developmental toxicity screening test, conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 422 and in compliance with GLP, with dimethylsilanediol (DMSD).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 6
- Justification:
- Default (subacute to chronic)
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default (oral rat to oral human)
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (guideline study)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default (no remaining uncertainties)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
