Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 227-873-2 | CAS number: 6018-92-4
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
There are no mutagenicity studies available for Trinickel dicitrate. However, extensive data exist on the read-across substance nickel chloride.
Parts of the data are taken from the EU-RAR for nickel chloride, dated 2008.
In vitro
Nickel chloride has been extensively studied in bacteria.
De Flora et al. (1984) performed a pre-incubation bacterial reverse mutation assay in S. typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 97, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538. This study yielded a negative result like most of the studies performed. However, two studies which were both fluctuation tests reported positive results. One, in S. typhimurium, was reported only as an abstract (La Velle and Witmer 1981). In the other, in Corynebacterium, no positive controls were employed (Pikalet and Necasek 1983).
In mammalian cells, all in vitro mutation and chromosomal aberrations test gave positive results (For details refer to EU-RAR.).
In vivo
A high number of animal studies indicate that nickel chloride induces DNA damage and chromosome aberrations in somatic cells in vivo. Data from in vivo micronucleus studies are conflicting (see EU-RAR).
Dhir et al. (1991) studied the effects of nickel chloride on chromosome aberrations (CA) and micronuclei (MN) in Swiss albino mice after intraperitoneal administration of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg bw. For the CA study, there were 3 exposure levels with a single dose and three bone marrow samples were taken 6, 12 and 24 h after a single dose. 50 metaphases/animal were scored. For the MN study, there were again three exposure levels with 2 doses separated by 24 h. Bone marrow samples were taken 24 and 48 h after the second dose and 500 cells/animal were counted. There was a significant and dose-related increase in the chromosomal aberration rate. In the MN study, there was also a significant and dose related increase in incidence of micronuclei. There are no major differences in the NCE/PCE ratio at the different dose levels.
References:
La Velle JM, Witmer CM (1981). Mutagenicity of NiCl2 and the analysis of mutagenicity of metal ions in a bacterial fluctuation test. Environ Mutag 3: 320-321.
Pikalet P, Necasek J (1983): The mutagenic activity of nickel in Corynebacterium sp. Folia Microbiol 28: 17-21.
Short description of key information:
In vitro:
Negative Ames test with TA 97, TA 98, TA 100, TA 1535, TA 1537 and TA 1538.
Positive results in mutation tests and chromosomal aberration assays in mammalian cells
In vivo:
Positive chromosome aberration and micronucleus tests.
Endpoint Conclusion:
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available information from the read-across substance nickel chloride Trinickel dicitrate needs to be classified:
EU: Muta Category 3, R68
CLP: Category 2 germ cell mutagenicity
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
