Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 261-245-9 | CAS number: 58430-94-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames test: negative (±S9 mix)
HPRT test: negative (±S9 mix)
MNT test: negative (± S9 mix)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix prepared from liver homogenates taken from Sprague-Dawley male rats aged 8 to 10 weeks, induced with Arochlor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Ethanol was used as solvent
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- ethanol
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: Sodium acetate, 2-nitrofluorene, 9-aminoacridine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period: not applicable
- Exposure duration: 48 to 72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Three per concentration and control
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: diminution of the background lawn was taken as an indication of bacteriotoxicity
Two independent experiments were performed. - Evaluation criteria:
- Details on evaluation criteria are not given but should be in accordance with the publication by Ames et al. (1975), Mutation Research 32, 347-364.
- Statistics:
- The statistical difference between the mean number of revertants in the negative controls and the plates at each dosage level was tested using the Chi2 test (Mohn and Ellenberger 1977).
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 µg/plate; +S9: at 5000g/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 1500 µg/plate; +S9: at 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 mg/plate; +S9: at 5000µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 µg/plate; +S9: at 5000µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- -S9: at 500 g/plate; +S9: at 1500 µg/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The substance Neononyl acetate was not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in an Ames test in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix).
- Executive summary:
The potential of the test substance Neononyl acetate to induce reverse mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 was tested in an Ames test under GLP in accordance with OECD TG 471. The test substance was dissolved in ethanol and tested in concentrations ranging from 5 to 5000 µg/plate in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation (S9-mix obtained from liver homogenates from Sprague-Dawley male rats aged 8 to 10 weeks). All strains were incubated at 37 °C for 48 to 72 hours in three replicates. In the presence of S9-mix the substance was cytotoxic to strains TA98, 100, 102 and 1535 at 500 µg/plate and to strain TA1537 at 1500 µg/plate. In the absence of S9-mix bacteriotoxicity to strain TA102 was seen at 1500 µg/plate and toxicity to strains TA98, 100, 1535 and 1537 occurred at 5000 µg/plate. Precipitation of the test compound on the plates was not observed. The test substance did not induce a significant or dose-related increase in the mutation frequency of all tested strains in the absence or presence of S9-mix. The number of spontaneous revertants observed in the controls was comparable to historical controls. The results of the positive control substances confirmed the known reversion properties and the specificity of the tested strains as well as the activity of the metabolising system.
It was concluded that the substance Neononyl acetate under the experimental conditions of an Ames test was not mutagenic to bacteria (Salmonella typhimurium) strains TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535 and TA1537 in the absence and presence of metabolising system S9-mix.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2013-01-07 to 2013-03-05
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are considered to have no impact on the purpose or integrity of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are considered to have no impact on the purpose or integrity of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deviations are considered to have no impact on the purpose or integrity of the study.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Minimal Essential Medium (MEM) supplemented with 10 % foetal bovine serum
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 4-hour exposure group (-S9 mix): 3.75, 7.5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120 µg/mL
4-hour exposure group (+S9 mix, 2 %): 7.5, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 µg/mL
24-hour exposure group (-S9 mix) and 4-hour exposure group (+S9 mix, 1 %): 1.88, 3.75, 7.5, 15, 30, 60, 90 µg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h (±S9 mix), 24 h (-S9 mix)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 6 or 7 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-Thioguanine
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2x10^5
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible dose-related increase in the mutation frequency where at least a threefold increase in the mutant frequency over the vehicle control value is observed. Such evaluation may be considered also in the case that a threefold increase of the mutant frequency is not observed.
A test item producing neither a dose-related increase of the mutant frequency nor a reproducible positive response at any of the test points is considered to be non-mutagenic in this system.
A single dose level that meets the minimum criterion for a positive response within a range of assayed concentrations is not sufficient to evaluate the test item as a mutagen. - Statistics:
- If a test item gives a marked and dose-related increase in the mutant frequency over the vehicle controls it will be designated as mutagenic and statistical analysis will not be required. However, if weaker responses are observed then statistical analysis will be performed using the SPSS program or a suitable alternative.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at and above 90 µg/mL and precipitate at and above 60 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 180 µg/mL and precipitate at and above 120 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 90 µg/mL
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Precipitation: at and above 60 µg/mL (4-hour exposure, -S9 mix), at and above 120 µg/mL (4-hour exposure, +S9 mix 2 %)
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes - Remarks on result:
- other: 4-hour exposure (Experiment 1)
- Conclusions:
- The test item was shown to be non-mutagenic to V79 cells at the HPRT locus under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
The purpose of this study is to assess the potential mutagenicity of a test item on the hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus of the V79 cell line. The test methods described are designed to be compatible with the procedures indicated by the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 476 "In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests", Method B17 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and US EPA OPPTS 870.5300 Guideline.
Chinese hamster (V79) cells were treated with the test item at up to seven dose levels, in duplicate, together with vehicle (solvent) and positive controls in the presence and absence of an S9 metabolic activation system. Four treatment conditions were used for the test, i.e. In Experiment 1, a 4-hour exposure in the presence of an induced rat liver homogenate metabolizing system (S9), at a 2 % final concentration and a 4-hour exposure in the absence of metabolic activation (S9). In Experiment 2, the 4-hour exposure with addition of S9 was repeated (using a 1 % final S9 concentration); whilst in the absence of metabolic activation the exposure time was increased to 24 hours.
The dose range of the test item was selected based on the results of a preliminary cytotoxicity test and were as follows:
Exposure Group
Final concentration of test item (µg/mL)
4-hour
(-S9mix)
3.75
7.5
15
30
45
60
90
120
4-hour
(+S9mix, 2 %)
7.5
15
30
45
60
90
120
180
24-hour
(-S9mix)
1.88
3.75
7.5
15
30
60
90
-
4-hour
(+S9mix, 1%)
1.88
3.75
7.5
15
30
60
90
-
The vehicle (solvent) controls gave mutant frequencies within the range expected of V79 cells at the HPRT locus. The positive control treatments, both in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, gave significant increases in the mutant frequency indicating the satisfactory performance of the test and of the metabolizing system. The test item demonstrated no significant increases in mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, in either the first or second experiment. The test item was shown to be non-mutagenic to V79 cells at the HPRT locus under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- from 2012-06-06 to 2013-02-08
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD 487 "In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test"
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The expression phase and harvest time were slightly modified compared to the OECD TG 487
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- lymphocytes: human
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: DMEM:F12 (Dulbecco's modified eagle medium/Ham's F12 medium, mixture 1:1) supplemented with 200 mM GlutaMax
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Mammalian Microsomal Fraction S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
40 h / 4 h: 6.9-1863.0 µg/mL (-S9 mix)
40 h / 4 h: 6.9-1863.0 µg/mL (+S9 mix)
Experiment IIA:
40 h / 20 h: 12.1-1863.0 µg/mL (-S9 mix)
40 h / 4 h: 37.1-1863.0 µg/mL (+S9 mix)
Experiment IIB:
40 h / 4 h: 50.0-1200.0 µg/mL (+S9 mix) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: ethanol; final concentration of ethanol in the culture medium was 0.5 % v/v
- Justification for choice of solvent: the solvent was chosen due to its solubility properties and its relative non-toxicity to the cell cultures. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- other: Demecolcin
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 h
- Exposure duration: 4 h with and without S9 mix (experiment I), 4 h with S9 mix and 20 h without S9 mix (experiment IIA) and 4 h with S9 mix (experiment IIB)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): cells exposed for 4 h have 16 h recovery period before fixation, no recovery period for 20 h exposure cells
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 20 h with Cytochalasin B (4 µg/mL)
- Cells were prepared 40 hrs after start of the exposure
SPINDLE INHIBITOR: Cytochalasin B (4 µg/mL)
STAIN: Giemsa
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
cytotoxic effect the CBPI: ca 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is expressed as % cytostasis
micronuclei effects: at least 1000 binucleate cells per culture. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- percentages of reduction in the CBPI (cytokinesis-block proliferating index) in comparison with the controls (% cytostasis) by counting 500 cells per culture in duplicate
- Exposure time 4 hrs (with and without S9 mix), cells were prepared 40 hrs after start of the exposure - Evaluation criteria:
- cytotoxic effect: percentages of reduction in the CBPI (cytokinesis-block proliferating index) in comparison with the controls (% cytostasis)
micronuclei effects: 1000 binucleate cells per culture. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells
criteria for the evaluation of micronuclei:
The micronuclei were counted in cells showing a clearly visible cytoplasm area. The micronuclei have to be stained in the same way as the main nucleus. The area of the micronucleus should not extend the third part of the area of the main nucleus. At least 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. The frequency of micronucleated cells was reported as % micronucleated cells. To describe a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is expressed as % cytostasis. A CBPI of 1 (all cells are mononucleate) is equivalent to 100 % cytostasis.
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated dose groups is in the range of the laboratory historical control data and/or
- no statistically significant or concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
A test item can be classified as mutagenic if:
- the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical laboratory control data and
- either a concentration-related increase of micronucleated cells in three test groups or a statistically significant increase of the number of micronucleated cells is observed. - Statistics:
- Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Chi square test.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Evaporation from medium: no
- Water solubility: Phase separation was observed in Experiment I at 347.6 Og/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and at 198.6 Og/mL in the presence of S9 mix. In Experiment IIA phase separation was observed at 608.3 Og/mL in the absence of S9 mix and at 347.6 Og/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. In Experiment IIB no phase separation was observed.
- Precipitation: no
- Other confounding effects: no
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: yes
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes - Conclusions:
- Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Neo Nonyl Acetate did not induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro, when tested up to cytotoxic, the highest required or evaluable concentration.
- Executive summary:
The test item Neo Nonyl Acetate, dissolved in ethanol, was assessed for its potential to induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro in the absence and presence of metabolic activation by S9 mix. Three independent experiments were performed. In Experiment I, the exposure period was 4 hours with and without S9 mix. In Experiment IIA, the exposure periods were 4 hours with S9 mix and 20 hours without S9 mix. In Experiment IIB, the exposure period was 4 hours with S9 mix. The cells were prepared 40 hours after start of treatment with the test item. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were analysed. 1000 binucleate cells per culture were scored for cytogenetic damage on coded slides. To determine a cytotoxic effect the CBPI was determined in approximately 500 cells per culture and cytotoxicity is described as % cytostasis. The highest treatment concentration in this study, 1863.0 µg/mL (approx. 10 mM) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight of the test item and with respect to the OECD Guideline 487 for the in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test. No precipitation of the test item in the culture medium was observed. No relevant influence on osmolarity or pH value was observed. Phase separation was observed in Experiment I at 347.6 µg/mL and above in the absence of S9 mix and at 198.6 µg/mL in the presence of S9 mix. In Experiment IIA phase separation was observed at 608.3 µg/mL in the absence of S9 mix and at 347.6 µg/mL and above in the presence of S9 mix. In Experiment IIB no phase separation was observed. In Experiment I in the absence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. In Experiment IIA in the absence of S9 mix cytotoxicity (48.1 %) was observed at the highest evaluated concentration. In Experiment I and IIA in the presence of S9 mix concentrations showing clear cytotoxic effects were not evaluable for cytogenetic damage. In Experiment IIB in the presence of S9 mix cytotoxicity (48.4 %) was observed at the highest evaluated concentration. In the absence and presence of S9 mix, no biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying micronuclei was observed. The micronucleus rates of the cells after treatment with the test item (0.00 - 0.95 % micronucleated cells) did not exceed the range of the solvent control values (0.05 - 1.00 % micronucleated cells) and were within the range of the laboratory historical control data. However, in Experiment IIA in the presence of S9 mix one single statistically significant increase in micronucleated cells (0.40 %) was observed after treatment with 347.6 µg/mL. The value is clearly within the range of the historical control data (0.20 – 1.70 % micronucleated cells) and therefore biologically irrelevant. Either Demecolcin (75.0 ng/mL), MMC (2.0 µg/mL) or CPA (15.0 or 20.0 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed distinct increases in cells with micronuclei.
Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item Neo Nonyl Acetate did not induce micronuclei in human lymphocytes in vitro, when tested up to cytotoxic, the highest required or evaluable concentration.
Referenceopen allclose all
see attached document
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Three testsin vitro(Ames, HPRT and MNT) according to data requirements are negative.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification,
Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The
available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for
classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on
available data on genetic toxicity, the
test item is not classified according
to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the eighth time in
Regulation (EU) No 2016/918.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.