Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2003
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2003

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Reference
Name:
Unnamed
Type:
Constituent

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- 3 male rabbits used – 1 treated group
- Age/Bodyweight at start: 2 to 4 month-old; 3.0 +/-0.1kg
- Temperature: 18+/-3°C; RH: 30-70%; Light/dark cycle: 12h/12h; ventilation: Approx. 12 cycles/h
- Caging: 1 rabbit/cage
- Food and water ad libitum

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
100 mg/animal
Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Application directly in the conjunctival sac of 1 eye
- No rinsing after application
- The controlateral eye served as control.
Observation period (in vivo):
eye examination at 1, 24, 48, 72 hours after the treatment
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
Control animals
not required (the contro-lateral eye served as control)

At each time of examination, individual scoring for conjunctival reactions, iritis and corneal opacification

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: chemosis
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: chemosis
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: chemosis
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 h
Score:
0.7
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: conjunctiva redness
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: conjunctiva redness
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: conjunctiva redness
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: iris
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: iris
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Remarks on result:
other: iris
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: corneal opacity
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: corneal opacity
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
1
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: corneal opacity
Other effects:
Observation: Whitish purulent discharge in 1 animal on day 2. Fully reversible.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
slightly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information fully reversible Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Classification is not required.