Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to OECD 473 guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This study was conducted according to the IPCS guidelines [Albertini et al., 2000].
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amoxicillin
EC Number:
248-003-8
EC Name:
Amoxicillin
Cas Number:
26787-78-0
Molecular formula:
C16H19N3O5S
IUPAC Name:
6-{[amino(4-hydroxyphenyl)acetyl]amino}-3,3-dimethyl-7-oxo-4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylic acid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Amoxicillin (AMO)

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
primary culture, other: human peripheral blood lymphocytes (Whole blood from two healthy donors: one male and one female, nonsmokers, age: 24).
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: 2.5 mL chromosome medium B (Biochrom AG, F 5023) supplemented with 10 µg/mL of bromodeoxyuridine (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, B5002).
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
400, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/mL
The test concentrations were chosen based on the top concentration that resulted a 50% (LD50) reduction in mitotic index (MI) (1000 µg/mL).
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
(DMSO)
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
(0.25 µg/mL)
Positive control substance:
mitomycin C
Remarks:
Without metabolic activation (-S9-mix)
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
(DMSO)
Positive controls:
yes
Remarks:
(28 µg/mL)
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
Remarks:
With metabolic activation (+S9-mix)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION:
In Vitro Assay (Without S-9 Mix):
The cells were treated with 400, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/ml concentrations of AMO that dissolved in DMSO, for 24 hr (AMO was added 48 hr after initiating the culture) and 48 hr (AMO was added 24 hr after initiating the culture), respectively.
A negative control, a DMSO control (DMSO, 9 µl/ml), and a positive control (Mitomycin-C, 0.25 µg/ml) were also used.
The cells were exposed to colchicines (0.06 µg/ml) 2 hr before harvesting. The cells were treated with 0.4% KCl (37ºC) as the hypotonic solution and methanol: glacial acetic acid (3:1) as the fixative (at room temperature 22ºC ± 1ºC, fixative treatments were repeated three times). The staining of the air-dried slides was performed following the standard methods using 5% Giemsa stain for CA. The slides were irradiated with 30 W, 254 nm UV lamp at 15 cm distance in Sorensen buffer for 30 min, then incubated with 1 x SSC (standard saline citrate) at 60ºC for 50 min and stained with 5% Giemsa prepared with Sorensen buffer.

In Vitro Assay (With S9 Mix):
Cells were cotreated with 400, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/ml concentrations of AMO and 0.5 ml S9 mix for 3 hr (AMO and S9 mix was added 48 hr after initiating the culture).
A negative control, a DMSO control (DMSO, 9 µl/ml), and a positive control (cyclophosphamide monohydrate, 28 µg/ml) were also used.
The test chemical and S9 mix were removed from the culture by centrifugation 4 min at 2500 rpm. The pellet of the lymphocytes was washed twice with 2.5 ml RPMI 1640 medium and resuspended in complete medium (chromosome medium B), and the cultures were incubated for a total of 72 hr at 37ºC.

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 72 hours at 37ºC.
- Exposure duration: 24 and 48 hours (without S-9 mix) and 3 hours (with S-9 mix).

SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): The cells were exposed to colchicine (0.06 µg/mL) 2 hr before harvesting.
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 5% Giemsa stain

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Chromosomal aberrations were evaluated in 100-well spread metaphases per donor (totally 200 metaphases per concentration).

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index (MI) and proliferation index (PI).

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes.
Evaluation criteria:
The number of CAs was obtained by calculating the percentage of the metaphases from each concentration and treatment period that showed structural and/or numerical alterations. The CA was classified according to the ISCN (International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature) [Paz-y-Miño et al., 2002]. Gaps were not evaluated as CA according to Mace et al. [1978]. CAs were classified as the structural and the numerical aberrations. Structural CAs were consisted of the chromatid type (breaks and exchanges) and the chromosome type (breaks, fragments, sister unions, dicentrics, translocations) abnormalities, whereas the numerical CAs were consisted of poliploid cells. Only the structural CAs were taken into consideration to determine the genotoxicity.
Statistics:
One-Way ANOVA (LSD test) was used for the statistical significance of all parameters. Concentration-response relationships were determined from the correlation and regression coefficients for the percentage of cells with Chromosomal aberration.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
primary culture, other: human peripheral blood lymphocytes
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
(AMO concentration-dependently decreased the proliferation index (PI) in the absence of the metabolic activation for 24-hr treatment period).
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
AMO did not significantly decrease the PI when compared with both the negative and the solvent control for 24- and 48-hr treatment periods; however, AMO induced a concentration-dependent decrease in PI when it is present for the last 24 hr (24-hr treatment) of the culture period (r = 20,980, P < 0.05). The decrease occured in the PI in 24-hr treatment period was not significant as the decrease caused by the positive control, MMC.
On the other hand, 48-hr treatment with AMO did not lead to a marked decrease in the PI when compared with both the negative and the solvent controls; however, the positive control significantly reduced the PI. In 24-hr treated cultures, MI was generally found to be reduced when compared with the negative control. Forty-eight hour treatment with AMO induced significant decreases in the MI at certain concentrations when compared to the negative control. Similarly, in the presence of an S9 mix, the PI and MI did not significantly decrease in comparison with the negative and the solvent control.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Effect of Amoxicillin (AMO) on Chromosomal Aberration (CA) in Human Peripheral Lymphocytes for 24- and 48-hr Treatment Periods.

 

Test substance

Treatment

Structural CA

Polyploid cells

Percentage of cells with aberrations ± SE

Time (hr)

Conc. (µg/mL)

Chromatid type

Chromosome type

N. control

--

--

6

--

1

3.00 ± 2.00 c3, c3*

DMSO

24

9µL

3

2

1

2.50 ± 0.50 c3

MMC

24

0.25

44

47

1

36.50 ± 0.50

AMO

24

400

2

3

 

2.50 ± 0.50 c3

AMO

24

600

4

2

1

3.00 ± 0.00 c3

AMO

24

800

9

2

 

5.00 ± 2.00 c3

AMO

24

1000

9

1

 

4.50 ± 2.50 c3

DMSO

48

9 µL

8

--

 

4.00 ± 2.00 c3

MMC

48

0.25

173

86

1

64.50 ± 0.50

AMO

48

400

2

2

 

2.00 ± 1.00 c3

AMO

48

600

1

3

 

1.00 ± 0.00 c3

AMO

48

800

4

2

 

3.00 ± 2.00 c3

AMO

48

1000

8

2

1

5.00 ± 1.00 c3

 

Data are expressed as the mean values (±S.E) obtained from two donors; n = 2.

a: significant from negative control; b: significant from solvent control; c: significant from positive control.

c*: Positive control significant from negative control for 48-hr.

a1b1c1: P < 0.05; a2b2c2: P < 0.01; a3b3c3: P < 0.001.

 

 

 

Table 2. Effect of Amoxicillin (AMO) on Chromosomal Aberration (CA) in Human Peripheral Lymphocytes in the Presence of S9 Mix

 

Test substance

Treatment

Structural CA

Polyploid cells

Percentage of cells with aberrations ± SE

Time (hr)

Conc. (µg/mL)

Chromatid type

Chromosome type

N. control

--

--

4

1

 

2.50 ± 1.50 c1

DMSO

3

9µL

4

--

 

2.00 ± 1.00 c1

CYP

3

28

15

5

1

10.00 ± 5.00

AMO

3

400

4

2

 

2.50 ± 0.50 c1

AMO

3

600

4

3

 

3.50 ± 0.50

AMO

3

800

8

3

1

5.50 ± 0.50

AMO

3

1000

6

3

 

4.50 ± 0.50

 

Data are expressed as the mean values (±S.E) obtained from two donors; n = 2.

a: significant from negative control; b: significant from solvent control; c: significant from positive control.

a1b1c1: P < 0.05; a2b2c2: P < 0.01; a3b3c3: P < 0.001.

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative (with and without metabolic activation)

Amoxicillin did not induce chromosomal aberrations at 24- and 48- hr treatment periods in the absence and presence of the S9 mix when compared to the negative and the solvent control.
Executive summary:

Evaluation of the ability of amoxicillin (AMO) to induce chromosome aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes was determinated according to equivalent or similar OECD 473 Guideline. The cells were treated with 400, 600, 800, and 1000 µg/mL AMO in the presence and absence of a metabolic activator (S9 mix). AMO concentration-dependently decreased the proliferation index (PI) in the absence of the metabolic activation for 24-hr treatment period. Mitotic index (MI) was generally found to have been reduced when compared with the negative control but not with the solvent control in cultures treated with AMO for 24 hr. AMO did not decrease the PI and MI in the presence of the metabolic activator. The test substance did not induce chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes both in the presence and absence of the metabolic activator.