Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 642-902-2 | CAS number: 163802-53-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-01-19 to 2012-02-16
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 B (Ready Biodegradability: CO2 Evolution Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic, non-adapted
- Details on inoculum:
- The activated sludge was obtained from the Wareham Wastewater Treatment Plant, Wareham, Massachussets, which receives primarily domestic waste. Approximately 8 L of activated sludge was collected on 18 January 2012, and transported to the laboratory. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the sludge was passed through a 2 mm sieve, recombined and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was discarded, the sludge was washed with mineral media (1000 mL) and the contents were centrifuged at least once again and the supernatant discarded. The moisture content of the activated sludge was determined, using an automated moisture analyser (Sartorius MA-150) to be 94.90% and the percent solid determined to be 5.1%. A 15 mg solids/mL inoculum solution was prepared (1.5 g dry weight sludge brought to 100 mL with mineral media) and aerated until used. The test substance flasks, the blank flasks, the procedural control flask and the toxicity control flask all received 6 mL of the inoculum to produce an activated sludge concentration of 30 mg/L.
In addition, a 50 g aliquot of fresh soil, a 25 g aliquot of Weweantic River sediment and a 25 g aliquot of Taunton River sediment were collected near the laboratory. The soil and sediment were suspended in 1.0 L of Weweantic River water. The suspension was filtered through glass wool prior to use. A 3.0 mL aliquot of the soil/sediment filtrate was added to each test vessel containing 2991 mL of mineral medium and 6.0 mL of activated sludge as shown in Table 2. - Duration of test (contact time):
- 28 d
- Initial conc.:
- 10 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- CO2 evolution
- Details on study design:
- Test design:
Each test unit consisted of a 4 L glass bottle with a rubber stopper into which one stainless steel needle with a Luer-Lok connection and two pieces of glass tubing were inserted. Prior to test initiation, the test vessels were acid washed and rinsed repeatedly with reagent grade water. The stainless steel needle was extended through the stopper into the test solution serving as a sampling port for solution samples. A rubber cap was used to cover the top of the sample port. The glass tubing provided the inlet and outlet ports for air exchange. CO2-free air was pumped under positive pressure through a hydration flask before entering the test system. The outlet port of each system was connected to two CO2 effluent gas traps, the first consisting of 200 mL of 0.2 N potassium hydroxide (KOH) and the second trap containing 100 mL of 0.2 N KOH. The test vessels were identified with project number, replicate number and treatment type. Each test vessel was placed on a magnetic stir plate located in a dark environmental chamber set to maintain a temperature of 22±2°C.
Test initiation:
Six test vessels were established: two for the test substance, two inoculum blanks, one sodium benzoate procedural control and one toxicity control (see Table 2).
On day 1, each 4 L vessel was established by adding 2991 mL of mineral medium (see Table 1). A 6 mL aliquot of the activated sludge inoculum and 3 mL of soil inoculum were added to each vessel for a total volume of 3 L per vessel. All test vessels were attached to a CO2-free compressed air tank and aerated under positive pressure. The vessels were mixed and purged with CO2-free air until day 0 to reduce carbon in the test system from the inoculum prior to test initiation.
On day 0, the test substance replicate vessels (A and B) were dosed with 0.0552 g aliquots of the test substance, which were first each added to 100 mg portions of silica gel, then transferred to 4 L flasks. The total nominal fortification was 10 mg C/L in the test substance vessels. The inoculum blank control vessels only received 100 mg portions of untreated silica gel.
The toxicity control vessel, which was fortified with 0.0552 g of the test substance, also received 3.0 mL of the 10.0 mg C/mL sodium benzoate stock solution. The total fortification was 20 mg C/L (test and reference substance) in the toxicity control vessel.
The sodium benzoate procedural control was fortified with 3.0 mL of the sodium benzoate stock solution for a final concentration of 10 mg C/L.
A summary of the dosing procedure is given in Table 2. DOC samples were not taken at test initiation because of the insoluble nature of the test substance.
Test maintenance and sampling:
All test systems were aerated continuously for 28 days under positive pressure using CO2-free air in order to provide oxygen for the microbes and to capture evolved carbon dioxide. The temperature of the environmental chamber was recorded daily throughout the exposure period using a digital minimum-maximum thermometer (VWR).
On test days 1, 4, 7,10, 13, 18, 22 and 25, a 7 mL sample was removed from the first KOH CO2 trap on each test system and analysed for CO2 evolution. on Day 28, 1 mL of concentrated HCl was added to each test vessel following pH measurements to terminate biological activity. Aeration was continued overnight to drive any residual inorganic carbon from the test vessels. After overnight aeration, 7 mL samples for analysis of CO2 evolution were removed from the first and second traps. The amount of evolved CO2 in each trap was determined using a Shimadzu TOC V-CPH Carbon Analyser. - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (CO2 evolution)
- Value:
- 42.6
- St. dev.:
- 0.83
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Details on results:
- The mean cumulative net percent CO2 evolved (percent biodegradation) from the aqueous test medium fortified with the test substance at 10 mg C/L was 42.63% on day 28.
The toxicity control on day 13 was 51.60%, which indicates that the test substance was not toxic to the inoculum in the test medium. - Results with reference substance:
- The cumulative net percent C02 evolved from the sodium benzoate procedural control was 73.14% of theoretical by day 10, thus exceeding the "pass" criteria of the test (reaching 60% or greater CO2 evolution within a 10-day window of reaching 10% biodegradation). This rapid biodegradation of sodium benzoate confirmed the presence of an active microbial population and system integrity.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- A ready biodegradation value of 42.6% in 28 days was obtained for the substance in accordance with a relevant test method and in compliance with GLP. The result is considered to be reliable.
- Executive summary:
This study was performed to determine the potential for ultimate biodegradation of the test substance in water by the carbon dioxide evolution method following OECD Test Guideline 301B. The amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) released upon biodegradation of the test substance and a reference substance, sodium benzoate, was measured to assess the potential for ultimate biodegradation. Two blank controls (containing inoculum), a procedural control (containing inoculum and reference substance) and a toxicity control (containing inoculum, reference and test substances) were established to account for background CO2 production, inoculum viability and toxicity ofthe test substance, respectively. Test flasks were incubated aerobically in the dark for a period of 28 days.
The mean cumulative net percent CO2 evolved (percent biodegradation) from the aqueous test medium fortified with the test substance at 10 mg C/L was 42.63% on day 28. The toxicity control on day 13 was 51.60%, which indicates that the test substance was not toxic to the inoculum in the test medium. The cumulative net percent CO2 evolved from the sodium benzoate procedural control was 73.14% of theoretical by day 10, thus exceeding the "pass" criteria of the test (reaching 60% or greater CO2 evolution within a 10-day window of reaching 10% biodegradation). This rapid biodegradation of sodium benzoate confirmed the presence of an active microbial population and system integrity.
Reference
Test conditions:
During the 24 hour incubation period designed to purge CO2 from the test vessels, the temperature ranged from 21.3 -21.8°C. The temperature in the environmental chamber was recorded daily during the study and ranged from 20.7 -22.5°C. The pH measurements are presented in Table 3. The pH of the test medium was measured to be 7.42 on day 1 and ranged from 7.19 to 7.32 on day 28.
Table 3: pH measurements taken at termination (day 28) of the 28-day biodegradation study
Test vessel |
Replicate |
pH* on day 28 |
Test substance |
A B |
7.25 7.25 |
Inoculum |
A B |
7.19 7.23 |
Procedural control |
A |
7.32 |
Toxicity control |
A |
7.30 |
*The pH was measured using a Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) pH 100 meter pH meter. The pH of the medium on day 1 was 7.42. The pH measurements on day 28 were taken prior to acidification.
CO2 evolution:
The total inorganic carbon measured in the KOH traps (Table 4) was used to calculate the cumulative CO2 evolved from the test vessels (Table 5). The mean cumulative CO2 from the test substance, procedural control, toxicity control and blank control test vessels was 41.71, 51.44, 69.19 and 26.08 mg/L respectively at day 28. The cumulative net percent CO2 production (blank control values substracted), or percent ultimate biodegradation for the test substance, procedural control, and toxicity control was calculated to be 42.63, 69.16 and 58.78% respectively. The data is summarised in Table 6. The test cumulative net CO2 evolved from the toxicity control was 51.60% on day 13 and therefore the test substance was not considered toxic to the inoculum based on the OECD 301B Guideline (i.e.>25% CO2 evolution by day 14 is not considered toxic). The cumulative net CO2 evolved from the sodium benzoate procedural control was 73.14% theoretical by day 10, thus exceeding the 'pass' criteria of the test (reaching 60% or greater CO2 evolution within a 10 -day window of reaching 10% biodegradation). This rapid biodegradation of of sodium benzoate confirmed the presence of an active microbial population and system integrity.
Table 4: Total inorganic carbon (mg C/L) measured in KOH traps during the 28 day biodegradation study
Vessel No |
Test vessel |
Day 1 |
Day 4 |
Day 7 |
Day 10 |
Day 13 |
Day 18 |
Day 22 |
Day 25 |
Day 28 |
Day 28 |
Trap 1 |
Trap 2 |
||||||||||
1 |
Test substance |
19.78 |
68.14 |
98.85 |
125.00 |
155.50 |
176.50 |
190.00 |
203.30 |
219.00 |
24.12 |
2 |
Test substance |
19.58 |
65.36 |
92.73 |
119.60 |
147.30 |
168.70 |
181.60 |
196.10 |
213.60 |
35.43 |
3 |
Blank |
14.28 |
37.39 |
58.60 |
73.02 |
85.49 |
102.40 |
109.40 |
117.50 |
124.60 |
26.52 |
4 |
Blank |
15.91 |
42.40 |
62.41 |
78.43 |
89.51 |
109.80 |
119.70 |
130.80 |
138.50 |
21.35 |
5 |
Procedural control |
23.50 |
129.90 |
176.70 |
198.30 |
223.50 |
245.20 |
257.60 |
269.10 |
278.30 |
20.10 |
6 |
Toxicity control |
55.47 |
165.90 |
211.80 |
248.20 |
267.50 |
303.10 |
323.50 |
341.10 |
358.70 |
49.52 |
Table 5: Cumulative CO2(mg/L) evolved from the test substance test vessels during the 28 day biodegradation study*
Vessel No |
Test vessel |
Day 1 |
Day 4 |
Day 7 |
Day 10 |
Day 13 |
Day 18 |
Day 22 |
Day 25 |
Day 28 |
1 |
Test substance |
4.84 |
16.07 |
22.47 |
27.35 |
32.69 |
35.60 |
36.69 |
37.52 |
41.50 |
2 |
Test substance |
4.79 |
15.42 |
21.08 |
26.17 |
30.97 |
34.02 |
35.07 |
36.19 |
41.93 |
|
Mean Std dev |
4.81 0.03 |
15.75 0.46 |
21.78 0.98 |
26.76 0.84 |
31.83 1.22 |
34.81 1.11 |
35.88 1.15 |
36.86 0.94 |
41.71 0.31 |
5 |
Procedural control |
5.74 |
30.64 |
40.17 |
43.39 |
46.99 |
49.45 |
49.75 |
49.67 |
51.44 |
3 |
Blank |
3.49 |
8.82 |
13.32 |
15.98 |
17.97 |
20.65 |
21.13 |
21.69 |
25.17 |
4 |
Blank |
3.89 |
10.00 |
14.19 |
17.16 |
18.82 |
22.15 |
23.12 |
24.14 |
26.99 |
|
Mean Std dev |
3.69 0.28 |
9.41 0.84 |
13.76 0.61 |
16.57 0.84 |
18.40 0.60 |
21.40 1.06 |
22.12 1.41 |
22.91 1.74 |
26.08 1.28 |
6 |
Toxicity control |
13.56 |
39.14 |
48.15 |
54.31 |
56.24 |
61.13 |
62.48 |
62.96 |
69.19 |
*Corrected for removal of 7 mL KOH sample from each trap at each sampling interval
The rounded values presented in the table were calculated based on unrounded experimental results
Table 6: Cumulative net percent CO2 evolved (ultimate biodegradation) during the 28 day biodegradation study
Vessel No |
Test vessel |
Day 0 |
Day 1 |
Day 4 |
Day 7 |
Day 10 |
Day 13 |
Day 18 |
Day 22 |
Day 25 |
Day 28 |
1 |
Test substance |
0 |
3.12 |
18.17 |
23.77 |
29.40 |
38.99 |
38.72 |
39.74 |
39.84 |
42.04 |
2 |
Test substance |
0 |
2.99 |
16.38 |
19.98 |
26.18 |
34.29 |
34.43 |
35.31 |
36.21 |
43.22 |
|
Mean Std dev |
0 - |
3.06 0.09 |
17.28 1.26 |
21.88 2.68 |
27.79 2.28 |
36.64 3.32 |
36.58 3.03 |
37.53 3.13 |
38.03 2.56 |
42.63 0.83 |
5 |
Procedural control |
0 |
5.60 |
57.90 |
72.04 |
73.14 |
77.97 |
76.51 |
75.34 |
72.96 |
69.16 |
6 |
Toxicity control |
0 |
13.46 |
40.53 |
46.90 |
51.46 |
51.60 |
54.18 |
55.02 |
54.60 |
58.78 |
The rounded values presented in the table were calculated based on unrounded experimental values. All values were corrected for mean blank CO2production.
Description of key information
Biodegradation in water: screening tests: 42.6% biodegradation in 28 days.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- under test conditions no biodegradation observed
Additional information
The key study is the only biodegradation study available for the substance. In a test conducted in accordance with OECD 301B (CO2 Evolution Method) and in compliance with GLP, the test substance attained 42.6% degradation in 28 days.
3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl-(2E,4E)-hexa-2,4-dienoate hydrolyses within the timescale of the ready biodegradation study (4.7 hours at 25°C) to 3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl-(2E,4E)-2,4-hexadienoate and methanol. The biodegradation observed in the study is mainly attributable to the biodegradation of the methanol hydrolysis product.
Methanol is readily biodegradable (OECD, 2004).
No significant biodegradation is expected for the silanol hydrolysis product.
Reference:
OECD (2004): SIDS Initial Assessment Report for SIAM 19, Berlin, Germany, 18-20 October 2004, Methanol, CAS 67-56-1.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.