Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 261-858-1 | CAS number: 59690-88-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin Irritation
The primary irritation index on rabbit for (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is estimated to be 1.91. Based on this value, it can be estimated that(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride exhibits slight irritation potential to rabbit skin. However, the PDII score is not considered high enough for classification of the chemical as a skin irritant. Thus, the chemical (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is not considered to be a skin irritant.
Eye Irritation
(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is irritating to rabbit eye at 100 mg/24H concentration.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- (Q)SAR
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 404 (Acute dermal irritation / corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Prediction is done using QSAR Toolbox version 3.1
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- other: occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Irritation parameter:
- other: Primary irritation index(PII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Score:
- 1.91
- Reversibility:
- no data
- Remarks on result:
- other: The PDII score indicates the chemical to be a slight skin irritant
- Interpretation of results:
- not classified
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The primary irritation index on rabbit for (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is estimated to be 1.91. Based on this value, it can be estimated that(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride exhibits slight irritation potential to rabbit skin. However, the PDII score is not considered high enough for classification of the chemical as a skin irritant. Thus, the chemical (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is not considered to be a skin irritant.
- Executive summary:
The primary irritation index on rabbit for (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is estimated to be 1.91. Based on this value, it can be estimated that(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride exhibits slight irritation potential to rabbit skin. However, the PDII score is not considered high enough for classification of the chemical as a skin irritant. Thus, the chemical (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is not considered to be a skin irritant.
Reference
The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: "Primary Irritation Index"
Estimation method: Takes average value from the 6 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain
(("a" and "b" ) and ("c" and "d" ) )
Domain logical expression index: "a"
Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Aromatic amines by Skin irritation/corrosion Inclusion rules by BfR
Domain logical expression index: "b"
Similarity boundary:Target: c1(N)cc(N{+}(.Cl{-})=C(N)O)ccc1
Threshold=30%,
Dice(Atom centered fragments)
Domain logical expression index: "c"
Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of logP Multicase which is >= -2.69
Domain logical expression index: "d"
Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of logP Multicase which is <= 2.53
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The Draize Test is an acute toxicity test devised in 1944 by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) toxicologists John H. Draize and Jacob M. Spines. Initially used for testing cosmetics, the procedure involves applying 0.5mL or 0.5g of a test substance to the eye or skin of a restrained, conscious animal, and then leaving it for set amount of time before rinsing it out and recording its effects. The animals are observed for up to 14 days for signs of erythema and edema in the skin test, and redness, swelling, discharge, ulceration, hemorrhaging, cloudiness, or blindness in the tested eye. The test subject is commonly an albino rabbit, though other species are used too, including dogs. The animals are euthanized after testing if the test renders irreversible damage to the eye or skin. Animals may be re-used for testing purposes if the product tested causes no permanent damage. Animals are typically reused after a "wash out" period during which all traces of the tested product are allowed to disperse from the test site.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 100 mg
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24H
- Details on study design:
- Standard Draize test
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks on result:
- other: Dose : 100 mg/24H; Irritating to eyes
- Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is irritating to rabbit eye at 100 mg/24H concentration.
- Executive summary:
(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is irritating to rabbit eye at 100 mg/24H concentration.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Additional information
Skin Irritation
The primary irritation index on rabbit for (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is estimated to be 1.91. Based on this value, it can be estimated that(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride exhibits slight irritation potential to rabbit skin. However, the PDII score is not considered high enough for classification of the chemical as a skin irritant. Thus, the chemical (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is not considered to be a skin irritant.
Eye Irritation
(3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is irritating to rabbit eye at 100 mg/24H concentration.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Model considered reliable by OECD
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Model considered reliable by OECD
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: slightly irritating
Effects on eye irritation: irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based upon the available data, (3-aminophenyl)uronium chloride is classified as a eye irritant and not a skin irritant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.