Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-014-3 | CAS number: 627-83-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 Jun 2010 - 17 Aug 2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see "Remarks"
- Remarks:
- GLP-Guideline study, tested with the source substance 91031-31-1. According to the ECHA guidance document “Practical guide 6: How to report read-across and categories (March 2010)”, the reliability was changed from RL1 to RL2 to reflect the fact that this study was conducted on a read-across substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Fatty acids, C16-18, esters with ethylene glycol
- EC Number:
- 292-932-1
- EC Name:
- Fatty acids, C16-18, esters with ethylene glycol
- Cas Number:
- 91031-31-1
- Molecular formula:
- C18H36O3, C20H40O3, C34H66O2, C36H70O4, C38H74O2
- IUPAC Name:
- Fatty acids, C16-18, esters with ethylene glycol
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- TK locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 Hepes buffered medium (Dutch modification) containing penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate and L-glutamin amd 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum (24 h exposure); for 3 h exposure only 5% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum were included. Selective medium consisted of the basic medium and 20% (v/v) heat-inactivated horse serum and 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine (TFT).
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/β-naphtoflavone-induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1:
With and without S9-mix: 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 33.0, 100.0 and 333.0 µg/mL (3 h)
Experiment 2:
In the absence of S9-mix: 3.0, 10.0, 33.0, 100.0, 125.0, 140.0 and 175.0 µg/mL for 24h
In the presence of 12% (v/v) S9-mix: 0, 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0, 33.0, 100.0 and 333.0 µg/mL for 3h - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: cyclophosphamide, 7.5 µg/mL, with S9; methylmethanesulfonate, 15 µg/mL and 5 µg/mL without S9, for 3 h and 24 h treatment, respectively
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 3 and 24 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 5 µg/mL trifluorothymidine
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 11-12 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2 replications each in 5 independent experiments
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency, relative total growth, relative survival, suspension growth, relative suspension growth, growth rate - Evaluation criteria:
- A mutation assay was considered acceptable if it met the following criteria:
a) The absolute cloning efficiency of the solvent controls is between 65 and 120%. An acceptable number of surviving cells (10E6) could be analysed for expression of the TK mutation.
b) The spontaneous mutation frequency in the solvent control is ≥ 50E-06 and ≤ 170E-06.
c) The growth rate (R) over the 2-day expression period for the negative controls should be between 8 and 32 (3 h treatment) and between 32 and 180 (24 h treatment).
d) The mutation frequency of MMS should not be below 500E-06, and fro CP not below 700E-06.
The global evaluation factor (GEF) has been identified by the IWTG as the mean of the negative/solvent mutation frequeny (MF) distribution plus one standard deviation. For the micro well version of the assay the GEF is 126.
A test substance is considered positive (mutagenic) in the mutation assay if it induces a MF of more than the MF of the controls + 126 in a dose-dependent manner. An observed increase should be biologically relevant and will be compared with the historical control data range.
A test substance is considered equivocal (questionable) in the mutation assay if no clear conclusion for positive or negative result can be made after an additional confirmation study.
A test substance is considered negative (not mutagenic) in the mutation assay if: a) None of the tested concentrations reaches a mutation frequency of the MF of the controls + 126. b) The results are confirmed in an independently repeated test.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility and precipitation: The test substance precipitated in the exposure medium at concentrations of 100 µg/mL and above. The test substance was tested beyond the limit of the solubility to obtain adequate cytotoxicity data, the concentration used as the highest test substance concentration for the dose range ending test was 333 µg/mL.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
In the absence of S9-mix, the relative suspension growth was 66% at the test substance concentration of 333 µg/mL compared to the relative suspension growth of the solvent control. In the presence of S9-mix, no toxicity in the relative suspension growth was observed up to and including the highest test substance concentration of 333 µg/mL compared to the suspension growth of the solvent control.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: The spontaneous mutation frequencies in the solvent treated control cultures were within the ranges of the historical controls.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Cytotoxic and mutagenic responses
Treatment |
Concentration [µg/mL] |
Cloning efficiency [%] |
Relative total growth [%] |
Mutation frequency x 10-6
|
||
total |
small colonies |
large colonies |
||||
3 h treatment without S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
86 |
100 |
61 |
42 |
19 |
Test substance |
0.1 |
101 |
114 |
56 |
29 |
25 |
0.3 |
101 |
108 |
52 |
28 |
23 |
|
1.0 |
118 |
140 |
66 |
48 |
16 |
|
3.0 |
91 |
109 |
63 |
46 |
15 |
|
10.0 |
95 |
108 |
66 |
32 |
33 |
|
33.0 |
97 |
104 |
76 |
46 |
28 |
|
100.0* |
91 |
97 |
81 |
32 |
46 |
|
333.0* |
102 |
77 |
64 |
48 |
14 |
|
MMS |
15 |
60 |
45 |
685 |
521 |
118 |
3 h treatment with 8% (v/v) S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
91 |
100 |
67 |
36 |
29 |
Test substance |
0.1 |
108 |
111 |
74 |
47 |
25 |
0.3 |
89 |
94 |
71 |
45 |
24 |
|
1.0 |
108 |
113 |
64 |
42 |
20 |
|
3.0 |
98 |
107 |
78 |
53 |
23 |
|
10.0 |
95 |
100 |
87 |
54 |
29 |
|
33.0 |
108 |
96 |
55 |
32 |
22 |
|
100.0* |
98 |
89 |
83 |
60 |
21 |
|
333.0* |
94 |
92 |
63 |
23 |
39 |
|
CP |
7.5 |
60 |
32 |
1074 |
829 |
144 |
24 h treatment without S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
115 |
100 |
51 |
26 |
23 |
Test substance |
3 |
135 |
92 |
58 |
42 |
14 |
10 |
137 |
109 |
51 |
39 |
11 |
|
33 |
133 |
85 |
71 |
32 |
35 |
|
100* |
110 |
30 |
100 |
35 |
60 |
|
125* |
118 |
31 |
70 |
31 |
36 |
|
140* |
118 |
20 |
103 |
51 |
47 |
|
175* |
102 |
9 |
134 |
53 |
72 |
|
MMS |
5 |
101 |
73 |
865 |
463 |
233 |
3 h treatment with 12% (v/v) S9-mix |
||||||
Solvent control (mean) |
-- |
109 |
100 |
72 |
47 |
23 |
Test substance |
0.1 |
110 |
100 |
73 |
49 |
21 |
0.3 |
123 |
117 |
72 |
47 |
23 |
|
1.0 |
104 |
105 |
82 |
52 |
27 |
|
3.0 |
97 |
104 |
94 |
62 |
29 |
|
10.0 |
115 |
126 |
87 |
57 |
26 |
|
33.0 |
107 |
108 |
85 |
59 |
23 |
|
100.0* |
131 |
123 |
80 |
51 |
26 |
|
333.0* |
97 |
83 |
92 |
64 |
24 |
|
CP |
7.5 |
70 |
59 |
979 |
621 |
221 |
*precipitation of test substance in the exposure medium
MMS = methylmethanesulfonate
CP = cyclophosphamide
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.