Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation/corrosion: non-irritant
Eye irritation/damage: non-irritant
respiratory irritation: no data available

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented, according to accepted guidelines
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
-reliability scoring based on 2002 guideline
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
-purity of the test article and sex of the animals were not reported
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
-purity of the test article and sex of the animals were not reported
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harald Schriever, Kaninchenfarm, D-2740 Bremervorde, Neuendamm 88
- Age at study initiation: not reported
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 to 2.8 kg
- Housing: Individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): pellets (Ssniff MU Z, Ssniff Spezialdiaten GmbH); ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 ± 2
- Humidity (%): 50 to 85
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12


Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
- pH was 6.5


Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
30 to 60 minutes, 24, 48, and 72 hours
Number of animals:
3 animals
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: ca. 6 cm squared on the back of each animals
- Type of wrap if used: semi-occlusive dressing, which was held in place by non-irritating tape


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): After the exposure period, the dressing was removed and any residual sample was carefully washed away with water or an appropriate solvent.
- Time after start of exposure: 4h

SCORING SYSTEM: Same scale as the one provided in the OECD guideline


Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 30 to 60 min
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 hr
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 hr
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 30 to 60 min
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 48 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 72 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
In this skin irritation/corrosion test sec-butylchloride was shown to be non irritant as defined by CLP (Regualtion (EC) 1272/2008).
Executive summary:

In this skin irritation/corrosion test according to OECD 404 sec-butylchloride was shown to be non irritant as defined by CLP (Regualtion (EC) 1272/2008). Only after 24 and 48 hours very slight erythema (barely perceptible) were noted and these were fully reversible, not observed at 72 hr. following application.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented, according to accepted guidelines
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Version / remarks:
reliability scoring based on 2002 guideline
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Six rabbits were tested in total and three of the test eyes were washed following administration
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harald Schriever, Kaninchenfarm, D-2740 Bremervorde, Neuendamm 88
- Weight at study initiation: 2.4 - 2.8 kg
- Housing: Individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, Ssniff Mu Z (pellets), Ssniff Spezialdiaten GmbH
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, drinking water
- Acclimation period: At least 7 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 +/- 2°C
- Humidity (%): 50 to 85%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): Undiluted
- Ph was 6.5

Duration of treatment / exposure:
0.1 mL of the test material was placed into the conjunctival sac of the left eye while the right eye served as control.
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48, and 72 hour after treatment
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 animals in total
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM:
Cornea opacity- degree of density (area most dense taken for reading): Grade

No ulceration or opacity: 0
Scattered or diffused areas of opacity (other than slight dulling of normal lustre); details of iris clearly visible: 1
Easily discernible translucent areas, details of iris slightly obscured: 2
Nacreous areas, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible: 3
Opaque cornea, iris not discernible through the opacity: 4

Iris: Grade

Normal: 0
Markedly deepened rugae, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal hyperaemia, or injection, any of these or combination of any thereof, iris still reacting to light: 1
No reaction to light, haemorrhage, gross destruction (any or all of these): 2

Conjunctivae Redness (refers to the most severe reading of palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae, cornea, and iris): Grade

Blood vessels normal: 0
Some blood vessel definitely hyperaemic (injected): 1
Diffuse, crimson colour, individual vessels not easily discernible: 2
Diffuse beefy red appearance: 3

Chemosis (lids and/or nictating membranes): Grade

No swelling: 0
Any swelling above normal: 1
Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids: 2
Swelling with lids about half-closed: 3
Swelling with lids more than half-closed: 4


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Readings of ocular reactions were made 1, 24, 48, 72 hours after treatment using an ophthalmoscope.
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: 1 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: 1 hr
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: 1 hr
Score:
2.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 71 hours
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
redness
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
1
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: 1 hr
Score:
2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 47 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
3 animals
Time point:
other: mean of 24, 48, 72 hrs
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 24 hours
Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under conditions of this test to investigate eye irritation/corrosion to rabbits 2-chlorobutane was found not to be classfied as irritant to eyes when applying the criteria for classification as described in CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008), respectively DSD (Directive 67/548/EEC).
Executive summary:

The substance showed a marked conjunctivae redness and chemosis directly after exposure to eyes of rabbits (1 hr following exposure), which quickly reversed after 48 hours. Thus, wehn applying the criteria as described in GHS respectively CLP (Regualtion (EC) No 1272/2008) the substance is not to be classified as having irreversible effects to eyes respectively being irritant to eyes.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin corrosion/irritation:

In a well documented OECD404 guideline GLP-study the skin corrosion/irritation potential of 2-chlorobutane has been investigated and the substance was found to be non-irritant to skin. Only very slight erythema effects were seen 24 and 48 hrs following exposure which fully reversed at 72 hrs after exposure. This observation is supported by Smyth et al. that ranked the skin irritation potential with grade 1 out of 10 (a non-Draize scoring system was applied at that time).

Eye damage/irritation:

In a well documented OECD405 guideline GLP-study the eye damage/irritation potential of 2-chlorobutane has been investigated and the substance was found to be non-irritant to eyes. Conjunctiva redness and chemosis was marked directly following exposure but quickly reversed, disappearing entirely 72 hours following exposure. The mean scores were 1.0 for conjunctivae redness (mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours following exposure as required by CLP for assessment) and 0.33 for chemosis (mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours following exposure as required by CLP for assessment) and thus the substance is not subject to classification as irritant according to CLP. This observation is supported by Smyth et al. that ranked the eye irritation potential with grade 2 out of 10 (a non-Draize scoring system was applied at that time).


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Well documented OECD404 GLP-study

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Well documented OECD405 GLP-study

Effects on eye irritation: slightly irritating

Justification for classification or non-classification

2 -Chlorobutane has been investigated for skin irriation / corrosion and eye irritation /damage in 2 studies each. All results were found to be outside the boundaries for classifciation and labelling according to CLP (Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008) and DSD (Directive 67/548/EEC) and thus the substance is not classifiable for skin irritation/corrosion or eye irritation/damage.

As no data is available to assess respiratory irritation, the substance is not classifiable for this endpoint.