Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
From 26 October to 12 November, 2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2022

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
trimethylsulfanium bromide
EC Number:
678-448-7
Cas Number:
3084-53-5
Molecular formula:
C3H9BrS
IUPAC Name:
trimethylsulfanium bromide
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Lot No.: 21MR1-2
Purity: 99%

In vitro test system

Details of test system:
Keratinoses transgenic cell line [442D]
Details on the study design:
PREPARATION OF TEST SOLUTIONS
- Preparation of the test chemical stock solution:
All test item solutions were freshly prepared immediately prior to use.
The test item was dissolved in dist. water. A stock solution of 200 mM was prepared by pre-weighing the test material into a suitable tube. A 0.2 µm sterile filter was used to sterilise the test sample solution. Vortex mixing and sonication were used to aid solubilisation.
Based on the stock solution a set of twelve master solutions in 100% solvent was prepared. The stock solution of the test item was diluted eleven times using a constant dilution factor of 1:2. Then the 100x concentrated master solutions were further diluted 1:25 in cell culture medium resulting in a 4% share of the solvent. Since the test item was dissolved in water, DMSO was added at a final concentration of 4% (v/v).
These 4x concentrated test item solutions were finally diluted 1:4 when incubated with the cells. Based on this procedure the final concentration of the solvent was 1% (v/v) in all test item concentrations and controls.

- Preparation of the positive controls:
Cinnamic aldehyde was used as positive control. CA was dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 6.4 mM and was further diluted four times with a constant dilution factor of 1:2 resulting in a concentration range of 0.4 mM – 6.4 mM. The following preparation of the positive control was carried out analogous to the preparation of the test item, resulting in a final concentration range of 4 µM – 64 µM. The final concentration of the solvent DMSO was 1% (v/v) for all wells.

- Preparation of the solvent, vehicle and negative controls:
DMSO at a final concentration of 1% (v/v) in test item exposure medium was used as negative control. Six wells were included in every testing plate. The preparation of the negative control was carried out analogous to the test item.
A blank well with no seeded cells was included in every plate to determine the background. The well was incubated with the negative control.


DOSE RANGE FINDING ASSAY:
- Highest concentration used: 2000 uM
- Cytotoxicity assessment performed: yes
- Final concentration range selected on basis of: Based on the stock solution a set of twelve master solutions in 100% solvent was prepared by serial dilution using a constant dilution factor of 1:2. These master solutions were diluted 1:100 in cell culture medium.


APPLICATION OF THE TEST CHEMICAL AND CONTROL SUBSTANCES
- Number of replicates: 3
- Number of repetitions: 2
- Test chemical concentrations: 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.63, 7.81, 3.91, 1.95, 0.98 µM
- Application procedure
- Exposure time: 48 hours
- Study evaluation and decision criteria used:
A KeratinoSens™ prediction is considered positive if the following conditions will be met in at least two independently prepared test repetitions:
- Imax is >1.5 fold increased and statistically significant (p <0.05) compared to the negative control
- cell viability is >70% at the lowest concentration with an induction of luciferase activity >1.5
- EC1.5 value is < 1000 µM
- an apparent overall dose-response for luciferase induction

If in a given repetition, all of the three first conditions are met but a clear dose-response for the luciferase induction cannot be observed, the result of that repetition is considered as inconclusive and further testing may be required. In addition, a negative result obtained with test items at a maximal test concentration < 1000 µM and which do not reach cytotoxicity (< 70% viability) at the maximal tested concentration is considered as inconclusive.

LUCIFERASE ACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS
After 48 h ± 1 h of exposure, the supernatant was aspirated from the white assay plates and discarded. Cells were washed once with DPBS. Subsequently 20 µL of passive lysis buffer were added into each well and the plate was incubated for 20 min at room temperature in the absence of light.
Plates with the cell lysate were placed in the plate reader for luminescence measurement. Per well 50 µL of the luciferase substrate were injected by the injector of the plate reader. The plate reader waited for 1 sec. before assessing the luciferase activity for 2 sec. This procedure was repeated for each individual well.

DATA EVALUATION
- Cytotoxicity assessment:
For the cell viability plate the medium was replaced with 200 µL test item exposure medium. 27 µL MTT solution were added directly to each individual well. The plate was covered with a sealing tape and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C ± 1 °C and 5% CO2. Afterwards the medium was removed and replaced by 200 µL 10% SDS solution per well. The plate was covered with sealing tape and incubated in the incubator at 37 °C ± 1 °C and 5% CO2 overnight. After the incubation period the plate was shaken for 10 min and the OD was measured at λ = 600 nm.
Vehicle / solvent control:
water
Negative control:
other: DMSO
Positive control:
cinnamic aldehyde [442D]

Results and discussion

In vitro / in chemico

Results
Key result
Group:
test chemical
Run / experiment:
mean
Parameter:
EC 1.5 [442D]
Cell viability:
No cytotoxic effects were observed in the tested concentration range.
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
not determinable
Remarks:
no EC1.5 value could be calculated.
Outcome of the prediction model:
negative [in vitro/in chemico]
Other effects / acceptance of results:
In the first experiment, no significant luciferase induction > 1.5 was found in the tested concentration range. Therefore, no EC1.5 value could be calculated. No cytotoxic effects were observed in the tested concentration range.
In the second experiment, no significant luciferase induction > 1.5 was found in the tested concentration range. Therefore, no EC1.5 value could be calculated. No cytotoxic effects were observed in the tested concentration range.
No dose response for luciferase activity induction was observed for each individual run as well as for an overall luciferase activity induction.
Under the condition of this study the test item is therefore considered as non-sensitiser.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the condition of this study the test item is therefore considered as non-sensitiser.
Executive summary:

The in vitro KeratinoSens™ assay was performed according to OECD Guideline 442D under GLP.


In this study under the given conditions the test item did not induce the luciferase activity in the transgenic KeratinoSens™ cell line in two independent experiment runs. Therefore, the test item can be considered as non-sensitiser.